Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Decentralized Machine Learning - page 14. (Read 6188 times)

member
Activity: 546
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:46:13 AM
It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.
Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.
It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.
Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling
And this project involves an endless supply of computing power ?
In theory, yes. Developers bet on devices of people, laptops, tablets, phones, computers. The number of these devices is huge and every year the number of devices will grow. Therefore, we can conclude that the growth potential for project infinite, well, or at least definitely much more than centralized systems
It is necessary to understand that all devices will not be involved in the work of the platform is certainly and first of all you need to start from how many people will provide their unused capacity
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:39:06 AM
It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.
Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.
It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.
Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling
And this project involves an endless supply of computing power ?
In theory, yes. Developers bet on devices of people, laptops, tablets, phones, computers. The number of these devices is huge and every year the number of devices will grow. Therefore, we can conclude that the growth potential for project infinite, well, or at least definitely much more than centralized systems
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:32:58 AM
It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.
Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.
It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.
Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling
And this project involves an endless supply of computing power ?
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:27:55 AM
It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.
Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.
It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.
Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:26:02 AM
This is a topic and field that will play an important part in the future. Everybody is talking about machine learning nowadays. It is easier said than done though. I will watch the project closely.
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:22:48 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.
I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.
By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice!
Yes, I totally agree, it remains only to find out exactly what amounts of promotion can be discussed  Cheesy
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:20:26 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.
I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.
By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice!
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:19:00 AM
It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.
Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.
It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:16:25 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.
I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:14:27 AM
It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.
Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:08:29 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 08:07:43 AM
It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 07:56:02 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 07:39:43 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 07:11:57 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 07:07:42 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 07:04:49 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 07:01:56 AM
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
April 09, 2018, 06:55:04 AM
Will u provide the buyback program? it is one of the things that could guarantee the steady price growth
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
April 09, 2018, 06:58:45 AM
I see they have a prototype or prototype of the future system for the github. Someone already watched it? Someone already tried to figure this out somehow?
Yes it really is, they have a ready-made prototype. And for what you ask?
I'm just trying to figure out at which stage this project is currently located. Also it would be desirable to know what exactly this model represents, which is in public access.
Well, if you look at the road map, at the moment the project is at the stage Token Generation Event and Launch of DML Protocol Gen 0 (DML Algo Marketplace) Beta. so what exactly are you asking about the prototype?
I'm just wondering, maybe there are people understanding in programming and who look at this prototype and analyzed it. I'm interested in knowing the opinions of people who understand something about this area.
Yes, I did not mean a deep analysis of the implementation of the algorithms of this. Just at least understand how well it can function and how professional the skills of those programmers who were writing this product.
Well, I do not think that there are any problems with this. Because the developers and the team are tuned with this project seriously. No one would take up an area in which you do not understand much. so I'm sure that product development is in the right direction and you should not worry about it.   Wink
Well, I hope that you're right and it really is.
I believe in this project and in this idea, I really wonder how this will be realized and how it will work in the end. I hope we see the working progrumny product as soon as possible.
Well, if you are so interested in the finished product, then you can get acquainted with the road map on the website, there is a detailed schedule for the release of various versions of this product.  Wink
Pages:
Jump to: