if i understand correctly, The amount after each round will no longer be fixed and will depend on the rank of community
It will be same and some people who included in the support group will get bonus payments.
Nice Idea ... But how is this gonna work ? Like the factors on which support ranking will be decided ? Also who will vouch for people supporting Deeponion ? Like for example I vote twice on nova & will shortly be casting my 3rd one. Debated with Fuders in support for Onion... Who all will be vouching for me?
we made a list of people and we will expand this in time
The list of people is good, but there must be some criteria for determining the degree of assistance, someone writes that the onion is good, and someone silently does the work. Or perhaps after each of its actions write in the branch that I did for the onion? As they say, he does not praise himself, no one will praise him. Just a list of names for the award without explaining the reasons will cause discontent, those who think they are doing their best in their power to advance the bow but do not receive additional awards.
We have distributed 3 rounds so far.
We have had some wonderful supporters, we also have seen some fudders and haters.
To make our community better, and to encourage helps from community, we decided to make the following changes in the distribution formula.
Airdrop Amount = (Total coins to be distributed) * factor / sum(factor number_of_member_type)
factor = ranking_factor * community_factor
community_factor default is 1, and dev team may assign higher (2 for double) the factor to certain members, who significantly helped this community.
All the members are encouraged to suggest to dev team (PM please) if you see people significantly helped the community.
Your feedback always welcomed and valued
You said, nobody get lesser coins as before.
But if you have a fix amount of onions and you are using a factor of 2, then some people get more and therefore some peole get lesser coins as before.
I never saw so many changes in an airdrop/ICO whatever. Changes in signatures, Avatar necessary and then not necessary, char limit 50 -> 100 ->50 again, now changes in the formula ...
I would recommend to make not so many changes, because a rule gets it's power out of reliability.
You also could give some onion as reward for active people like you did it before.
You are the dev, you can make what you want, but I would appreciate not to have to many changes in rules.
Here I also agree, the constant change in the rules is not very good on discipline, I saw coins that started well but due to constant changes in conditions specifically related to distribution, they lost their participants, there is a good Russian proverb -
"The horses do not change at the ferry"
P.s. With regard to the contribution to development, I'm probably the only one who leads all tweets and retweets of the onion from the very beginning on their own twitter, and I want to be seen by the developer, and not write every time and not ask for a few coins.
I agree too. Some who deserves will miss it and as bigger the community will grow as harder it will be for the devs to see who supports DO.
Devs will know whats best for DO and i am sure the next rounts of distrinution will also go smooth.