Author

Topic: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65% - page 595. (Read 1260677 times)

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1004
buy silver!
CEO Aleksander Ray (popshot)

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/aleksander-ray/a8/368/b03

CVO Helmut Siedl (cryptonit)

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/helmut-siedl/92/460/586

alex: [email protected]
me: [email protected]

questions are always welcome
it show us what we didnt explain well enough already

our CTO and main developer is one of my 1800 linkedin connections
but his coming out he have to do himself
he run a own company (not crypto related)
and might have the wish to not mix up both in one linkedin

beside this 3 main people we have a handfull more in our core community = foundation
and a lot in extendet community

both use as main communication platform skype chat rooms

everyone who is interested can join us just send me your skype name and i can add u to community chatroom
This info can be found if u actually read the thread, it's there and has been posted before.  I suppoert the dev team even though I sometimes disagree with them.  Our main code dev whos remains behind the scenes is also a dedicated team member whom I trust to do the right thing.  As has been stated many times before the dev team are volunteer and not paid and make their own investments too. 
im not wasting my time reading 257 pages, when it should be in the first post or on diamond website.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1004
buy silver!
From an investors point of view, dmd market graph was interesting to me and seemed maybe volume was rising.  Looked good till this reactor bs.  Ill wait 6 more months before I look at this again, but maybe never.  The bs about owning this coin should stop or there will be little investment in it.  It also shouldnt be so hard to find out who behind this coin.  Your bitcointalk profile doesnt even have email addresses.

How can you not know or find it.  Helmut has a full linkedin profile.




look again, i said i found one and he was the one...linkedin profiles doesnt mean much to me, I dont see any email addresses.  Whos popshot?  

Damn dude, how can you be a hero member and still write this kind of junk. E-mail address? How th fck is that going to help you or anyone else in the case of any problems.
Helmut and the rest of DMD devs are the most transparent coin dev team I have seen so far and I ve been into crypto for a long, long time.

He s just posted you can meet him in Graz on one of Austrian crypto events. You can see his linkedin profile, lots of friends, real people. He has posted some personal photos in this thread, including photos of him and his children. WHAT else do you need?

I was surprised when I first purchased DMD cloud mining that I received a contract stating my rights and responsibilites from Helmut. I know this is not UN law strong but it still shows the direction these people go.

In other words, if you have some actual comment, pls do share it, I will read it with respect. Just writing trash and FUD brings no good to anyone and it certainly does not support your "hero" member reputation.


what trash did i write, i asked questions, so fuk off.  If your not adding to the conversation, stfu!
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
what does popshot do for the foundation?

more than me.....

there is a reason why he is the CEO

but work for DMD Diamond is not the same as being active on BTT

BTT is far less important than most of u belive

any real successstory will be outside of the limited crypto crowd u can reach inside BTT

DMD Diamond have very interesting times ahead
the next few months (6-12) will determine the future and show the real strengh


hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
CEO Aleksander Ray (popshot)

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/aleksander-ray/a8/368/b03

CVO Helmut Siedl (cryptonit)

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/helmut-siedl/92/460/586

alex: [email protected]
me: [email protected]

questions are always welcome
it show us what we didnt explain well enough already

our CTO and main developer is one of my 1800 linkedin connections
but his coming out he have to do himself
he run a own company (not crypto related)
and might have the wish to not mix up both in one linkedin

beside this 3 main people we have a handfull more in our core community = foundation
and a lot in extendet community

both use as main communication platform skype chat rooms

everyone who is interested can join us just send me your skype name and i can add u to community chatroom
This info can be found if u actually read the thread, it's there and has been posted before.  I suppoert the dev team even though I sometimes disagree with them.  Our main code dev whos remains behind the scenes is also a dedicated team member whom I trust to do the right thing.  As has been stated many times before the dev team are volunteer and not paid and make their own investments too. 
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
CEO Aleksander Ray (popshot)

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/aleksander-ray/a8/368/b03

CVO Helmut Siedl (cryptonit)

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/helmut-siedl/92/460/586

alex: [email protected]
me: [email protected]

questions are always welcome
it show us what we didnt explain well enough already

our CTO and main developer is one of my 1800 linkedin connections
but his coming out he have to do himself
he run a own company (not crypto related)
and might have the wish to not mix up both in one linkedin

beside this 3 main people we have a handfull more in our core community = foundation
and a lot in extendet community

both use as main communication platform skype chat rooms

everyone who is interested can join us just send me your skype name and i can add u to community chatroom
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
In actuality most hero members here BOUGHT that status ... months ago there was a fund drive to keep bitcointalk alive and one of the bonuses was "Hero" member status, not earned status like a normal poster ... so watch this post get deleted shortly by a hero member ...
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!
From an investors point of view, dmd market graph was interesting to me and seemed maybe volume was rising.  Looked good till this reactor bs.  Ill wait 6 more months before I look at this again, but maybe never.  The bs about owning this coin should stop or there will be little investment in it.  It also shouldnt be so hard to find out who behind this coin.  Your bitcointalk profile doesnt even have email addresses.

How can you not know or find it.  Helmut has a full linkedin profile.




look again, i said i found one and he was the one...linkedin profiles doesnt mean much to me, I dont see any email addresses.  Whos popshot? 

Damn dude, how can you be a hero member and still write this kind of junk. E-mail address? How th fck is that going to help you or anyone else in the case of any problems.
Helmut and the rest of DMD devs are the most transparent coin dev team I have seen so far and I ve been into crypto for a long, long time.

He s just posted you can meet him in Graz on one of Austrian crypto events. You can see his linkedin profile, lots of friends, real people. He has posted some personal photos in this thread, including photos of him and his children. WHAT else do you need?

I was surprised when I first purchased DMD cloud mining that I received a contract stating my rights and responsibilites from Helmut. I know this is not UN law strong but it still shows the direction these people go.

In other words, if you have some actual comment, pls do share it, I will read it with respect. Just writing trash and FUD brings no good to anyone and it certainly does not support your "hero" member reputation.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1004
buy silver!
From an investors point of view, dmd market graph was interesting to me and seemed maybe volume was rising.  Looked good till this reactor bs.  Ill wait 6 more months before I look at this again, but maybe never.  The bs about owning this coin should stop or there will be little investment in it.  It also shouldnt be so hard to find out who behind this coin.  Your bitcointalk profile doesnt even have email addresses.

How can you not know or find it.  Helmut has a full linkedin profile.




look again, i said i found one and he was the one...linkedin profiles doesnt mean much to me, I dont see any email addresses.  Whos popshot? 
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
From an investors point of view, dmd market graph was interesting to me and seemed maybe volume was rising.  Looked good till this reactor bs.  Ill wait 6 more months before I look at this again, but maybe never.  The bs about owning this coin should stop or there will be little investment in it.  It also shouldnt be so hard to find out who behind this coin.  Your bitcointalk profile doesnt even have email addresses.

How can you not know or find it.  Helmut has a full linkedin profile.


hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1004
buy silver!
From an investors point of view, dmd market graph was interesting to me and seemed maybe volume was rising.  Looked good till this reactor bs.  Ill wait 6 more months before I look at this again, but maybe never.  The bs about owning this coin should stop or there will be little investment in it.  It also shouldnt be so hard to find out who behind this coin.  Your bitcointalk profile doesnt even have email addresses.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1004
buy silver!
These points do not address the issue.  Yes, anyone can set up a cloud mining project, but not anyone can set up a cloud mining project and also be responsible for the currency.  Again, you are ignoring the clear conflict of interest.

Then you again argue that giving this 200% to cloud mining investors is not an issue because we can all invest in cloud mining, so again I reiterate, you are saying we can all invest in the operations that the guys who run the coin and the cloud mining have set up therefore its fair.  What you are arguing is that the 200% is an incentive to invest in cloud mining - to enrich the guys who run the coin and the cloud mining.  The reason they should take coins from their own pockets to reward investors is because that somewhat eliminates the conflict of interest.

It seems like you have no concept of conflict of interest.  Maybe you should look it up and school yourself on what it is and why its bad
.

Correct me if I am wrong here but the foundation members are responsible to develop, innovate and build the technology that is DMD crypto currency.  As with any currency, value is derived from the market.  The foundation members,  mine the coin the exact same as you or I do.  Helmut the CVO created the cloudmining service that mines btc to put buy side pressure on the coin to help discover value as a stabilizing mechanism.   Which is part of the focus of the coin as a stable investment product.  Am I correct on this premise?  

Based upon a simple google search as you instructed me to do, so eloquently (in truth you were being a cheeky ass*hole but I digress) - A conflict of interest is a situation in which a person or organization is involved in multiple interests (financial, emotional, or otherwise), one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation of the individual or organization.

So based upon that definition where are the multiple interests?  Coin to gain value and coin to be stable.  My interest as an investor and holder of DMD is aligned with the service and foundation.  All DMD holders gain value on investment into cloudmining.  Not just the "owners" of the coin as you ignorantly pointed out. All holders are "owners" the foundation members are the developers.   If you are concerned that the foundation is in some way trying to create an incentive to buy into the stabilization part of DMD, well you at the very least made a correct assumption on that point.  People should be motivated to invest into the coin.  There should also be a pay off.  Is helmut and the rest of the DMD foundation out to steal your nest egg.  I don't think so, but could be wrong.  If the latter is the case helmut has made himself very public.

In order to make things crystal clear.  I believe that maybe DMD foundation members should have there positions in DMD disclosed and available to view.  A lot of btc foundation folks have done this.   This way it would clear up a lot of the hesitation and reluctance of trust by some community members.  

In general, with the stock market, board members of companies disclose when they buy or sell stock.  Maybe the foundation could do the same with DMD.

It's just a suggestion maybe it will alleviate some of this distrust.  




...maybe the foundation members should be disclosing who they are, real names.  Im looking, but I cant discover any??

edit* found one
what does popshot do for the foundation?
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
These points do not address the issue.  Yes, anyone can set up a cloud mining project, but not anyone can set up a cloud mining project and also be responsible for the currency.  Again, you are ignoring the clear conflict of interest.

Then you again argue that giving this 200% to cloud mining investors is not an issue because we can all invest in cloud mining, so again I reiterate, you are saying we can all invest in the operations that the guys who run the coin and the cloud mining have set up therefore its fair.  What you are arguing is that the 200% is an incentive to invest in cloud mining - to enrich the guys who run the coin and the cloud mining.  The reason they should take coins from their own pockets to reward investors is because that somewhat eliminates the conflict of interest.

It seems like you have no concept of conflict of interest.  Maybe you should look it up and school yourself on what it is and why its bad
.

Correct me if I am wrong here but the foundation members are responsible to develop, innovate and build the technology that is DMD crypto currency.  As with any currency, value is derived from the market.  The foundation members,  mine the coin the exact same as you or I do.  Helmut the CVO created the cloudmining service that mines btc to put buy side pressure on the coin to help discover value as a stabilizing mechanism.   Which is part of the focus of the coin as a stable investment product.  Am I correct on this premise? 

Based upon a simple google search as you instructed me to do, so eloquently (in truth you were being a cheeky ass*hole but I digress) - A conflict of interest is a situation in which a person or organization is involved in multiple interests (financial, emotional, or otherwise), one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation of the individual or organization.

So based upon that definition where are the multiple interests?  Coin to gain value and coin to be stable.  My interest as an investor and holder of DMD is aligned with the service and foundation.  All DMD holders gain value on investment into cloudmining.  Not just the "owners" of the coin as you ignorantly pointed out. All holders are "owners" the foundation members are the developers.   If you are concerned that the foundation is in some way trying to create an incentive to buy into the stabilization part of DMD, well you at the very least made a correct assumption on that point.  People should be motivated to invest into the coin.  There should also be a pay off.  Is helmut and the rest of the DMD foundation out to steal your nest egg.  I don't think so, but could be wrong.  If the latter is the case helmut has made himself very public.

In order to make things crystal clear.  I believe that maybe DMD foundation members should have there positions in DMD disclosed and available to view.  A lot of btc foundation folks have done this.   This way it would clear up a lot of the hesitation and reluctance of trust by some community members. 

In general, with the stock market, board members of companies disclose when they buy or sell stock.  Maybe the foundation could do the same with DMD.

It's just a suggestion maybe it will alleviate some of this distrust. 

sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 270
So you think its okay for the people who run this coin to set up a cloudmining service which they also run and profit from, then change the currency mechanics to offer a higher reward for the people who invest in their service?  Your argument is we can all invest in this scheme to enrich the people who run the cloudmining service and the currency at the same time?  You see no conlfict of interest in this?

Anyone could have set up the cloudmining project,  anyone can take BTC and convert them to DMD.   Helmut/Cryptonit set the service up to control a portion of the buy pressure.  Providing continued, controlled, and stable buying, remember that word used STABLIZATION.  I am fairly certain any profit that is generated is put into more buy pressure and put into the currency stabilization mechanics.  The service and buy pressure on DMD are clearly shown, no one argues that point at all.  I view the service as a needed resource until the time of more adoption occurs with the coin.  Remember the Dev Teams coin ROLL OUT PLAN.   It is planly clear your view of the project is from a pure skeptic who wants nothing to do with the project and your risk tolerance is minimal at best assumption.   No one should invest $$$ they 100% cannot lose or view as a no return loss.   SO you shouldn’t be rewarded and stick with the vanilla plan and continue mining the coin.  
Where is the conflict of interest? My interest lays that same as the DEV team.  Helmut, and the entire DEV team want the coin to become a success as do ALL OF US WHO MINE, HORDE it and would like to acquire more.   Not simply dump it.   I am sure Helmut is not going to put himself out on LinkedIn as he has to "sucker people"....  I think his intentions are bigger and he appears to want more from the coin.
  
Like I said earlier, if the cloudmining operators want to give a higher reward for Cloudmining investors they should take it out of their own pockets.  Changing the rules of the currency to attract investors because they can is just plain unethical.  

Define for me how the rules are changing?  POS in a one off special wallet that runs at 200% that is open to everyone and provides incentive to apply buying pressure to the coin.  Remember they stated the first round would go to cloudmining investors.  WHAT IS THE HARM HERE?   Why should the DEV team come out of pocket for this?  Who in the community is the reactor hurting?  The investors are given a bigger proportion of reward to risk the ones providing the buying pressure.   POS coin plan also meets the dev teams time table.

And for the record, I can afford to invest in cloudmining but I choose not to.  Its equally interesting to see the ones who support this scheme the most are the ones who invested in Cloudmining and benefit the most.

Key wording in this is YOU CHOOSE NOT TO. But you stomp your feet and cry foul if people who did invest are given priority in a line.  Life in general is a collection of choices,  If the coin turns out to be a very successful project and everyone here is rewarded by there efforts you will be one of the first people to think back and wish you had done more to generate a better return.   GREED IS GOOD.

At the time being though how is the DEV team and all the work they are doing rewarded?  
Helmut has been nothing but open and honest about the cloudmining Service.  I see DMD hit my wallet on a daily basis from cloudminig.  But I also am not as guarded and risk intolerant.  Again CHOICE.
  

 


These points do not address the issue.  Yes, anyone can set up a cloud mining project, but not anyone can set up a cloud mining project and also be responsible for the currency.  Again, you are ignoring the clear conflict of interest.

Then you again argue that giving this 200% to cloud mining investors is not an issue because we can all invest in cloud mining, so again I reiterate, you are saying we can all invest in the operations that the guys who run the coin and the cloud mining have set up therefore its fair.  What you are arguing is that the 200% is an incentive to invest in cloud mining - to enrich the guys who run the coin and the cloud mining.  The reason they should take coins from their own pockets to reward investors is because that somewhat eliminates the conflict of interest.

It seems like you have no concept of conflict of interest.  Maybe you should look it up and school yourself on what it is and why its bad.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
I can take DMD on storage for POS. will give all sum and percent on call.

i feel some language barrier and if i say that that mean something  Grin

2 posting over this one reactor light ruleset written down

please which option and how much u are interested?
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
I can take DMD on storage for POS. will give all sum and percent on call.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
DMD Reactor "light"

This need no wallet code change it give the reactor no advantage over normal wallets
it support network with a very big 24/7 staking wallet and it support dmd cloudmining with 70% of its POS earnings
(30% of its pos earnings stay in reactor to slowly increase its size same as all DMD cloudmining investments follow this 70/30 rule)

there are two ways how people can take part at Reactor
both ways and the whole project have to be seens as longterm support of the main stabilisation mechanism
for already big cloudmining shareholders who hold a lot DMD option 1 is ideal

for new (or people without dmd cloudmining shares) investors a 33/33/33 split between
buy DMD for ur wallet
buy dmd for reactor option1
buy DMD for reactor option2 might be interesting

option 1. contribute

lend dmd for 12 months to reactor and get nothing in return
beside the additional DMD from reactor staking that ur existing dmd cloudmining shares qualify u
(but people who dont lend and have cloudmining shares would profite too from reactor)
at end of 12 months foundation will offer u a bounty to leave them in reactor for other 12 months
or u decide against it and get ur coins back

option 2. invest

ur dmd actual $ value value will be converted into dmd cloud shares 1:1
this dmd u will never get back they stay in reactor forever
but the cloudmining shares u keep and so the dmd cloudmining earnings


both options are not great investment opportunity but supportive act for dmd cloudmining

------------------------------------

for now we have "lend" coins option 1

30k helmut/cryptonit
10k alex/popshot
2.5k anonymousG
1.5k chilo


and invested coins option 2

2.5k anonymousG
1.5k anonymousJ
1.5k big_coins


--------------------
total 49.5k


(we only accept coins send to us once its clear we launch it
the trigger value that we make it will be somewhere around 50k but goal still come as close as possible to 100k)

-------------------

thx to all who contribute!

legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
I will be upset when PoW reduction occurs drasiticly, have a look at stretchcoin gradual PoW reduction

then u can start now already to be upset
pow reward reduction is known since ages
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
for now we have "lend" coins

30k ۞ helmut/cryptonit
10k ۞ alex/popshot
1.5k ۞ chilo

and invested coins

1.5k ۞ big_coins


(we only accept coins send to us once its clear we launch it
the trigger value that we make it will be somewhere around 50k but goal still come as close as possible to 100k)
hero member
Activity: 774
Merit: 554
CEO Diamond Foundation

lend dmd for 12 months to reactor and get nothing in return


Good deal!  Sign me in! with +10k▼s Wink
Jump to: