Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65% - page 89. (Read 1260677 times)

legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!
1 spot is still open for DMD Diamond signature campaign!


Hey guys,
 
DMD Diamond s about to start a small signature campaign and we would like to select and reward 4 members of our great community to be part of this project.
This campaign will last for 6 months with possibility or permanent extension, depending on the feedback we get from it.






Please do not apply for this campaign unless you usually spend time on Bitcointalk on a daily basis and post a lot since I would really hate to exclude participants for not following the rules.

Here are the rules:

1)      DMD Signature campaign will be open for Senior,  Hero and Legendary Bitcointalk ranks only.
 
2)      Bitcointalk account with negative reputation are not allowed to apply.
 
3)      Participants need to wear DMD signature all the time, no other link is allowed to be in their signature.
 
 
4)      Participants are required to post minimum 3 posts per day (90 posts per month minimum), exclusively on Bitcointalk forum, out of which minimum 1 post per day needs to be related to DMD (mention DMD Diamond in some way) and this DMD related post must not be posted on the official DMD Bitcointalk thread. - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-dmd-diamond-30-scarce-valuable-secure-pos-30-masternodes-65-580725
In case you are not able to post your posts on any given day, you can do it the next day or any other day as long as your monthly sum is no less than 90 posts out of which 30 must be DMD related.
 
5)      Post in “Other” subsection (Meta, Politics and Society, Beginners&Help, Off-topic, Archival threads) do not count towards daily 3 posts requirement.
Please make sure to post on threads which are relevant to DMD, for example, “where to invest”, “cloudmining”, “PoS and masternode related threads”. This is not a strict rule as you can posts and get paid for posting on whatever topic you find interesting, excluding “Other” subsection, but threads related to DMD bring more people to the community and we all benefit from this.  
 
6)      All posts need to be of high quality, they need to be informational and related to the thread topic. No posts containing single word (example: Yes, No, Great! Etc), no posts containing just 1 sentence. (example:+1 What a great post!). Please do not try to cheat the system, I will be watching.
 
7)      Participants will be paid $150 per month in DMD, at the end of the month. Selected participants need to submit 1 DMD address for payments which is not allowed to be changed as long as members participate into this project.
 
7.1)      In case a participant decided to leave DMD signature campaign, they can do that only at the end of the month after they get paid. If a participant decides to quit any time during the month, they will not be paid for that month.
 
If you satisfy required criteria and listed requirements seem acceptable for you, please PM me. DMD Diamond team will select 4 people based on their post quality, account reputation and time of application. Once again, evaluate your free time and posting habits. I DO NOT WANT TO BE FORCED TO EXCLUDE PEOPLE FOR NOT FOLLOWING THESE RULES. Please do not make me so.

Cheers!
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1013
DMD info: https://diamond-info.github.io/
All masternodecoins are standing good and growing very fast. Especially if this is proof os stake coin. How is with anonymity in Diamond? Mixing, dark sending or there is nothing added?

If you have seen the DMD wallet you should know that all functions is present
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1708
First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold
All masternodecoins are standing good and growing very fast. Especially if this is proof os stake coin. How is with anonymity in Diamond? Mixing, dark sending or there is nothing added?
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
was there any update on the silver coins? obviously quite a few people kicked in 200 DMD and the price has risen a fair bit since they were given, are those coins being staked, and are the remaining slots being sold?

All information is available here
There is still availability for registration.


dont register i will prepare with goal up to end of february the offer for the 5th anniversary coin
all who did send 200 DMD will be able to have that convertedtowards the new coin then

the new anniversary coin will be much greater package

not just a limited coin
not just a branded noble woodbox
not just a limited by author handsigned book about DMD
not just a cool DMD branded led light
and and and



we switched the producer of silvercoins
to reach the desired quality
once we have proper prototypes to show
we will start sell unclaimed coins again
once a proper ammount is sold
we start to produce the silvercoins and do the lottery for the 10000 DMD

im sorry for the delay but at the moment my whole energy is focused on DMDv3 release
im sure we can manage finalize the DMD Diamond 4th anniversary silvercoin project pre xmas

i just wonder what increadible value the lottery price of 10000 DMD will then represent!

Any news on the silvercoins? Or are plans shifted toward more expensive matters Wink


it will become a 5th anniversary coin
i did absolute underestimate the time all this things need
good part we will add a lot of goodies like a DMD book and some more DMD promo gimmicks
in the end it will be a limited edition wonder box with many nice things

new release goal is pre june 2018
we might replace the masternode lottery with a much more luxury material selection for the coin
this way everyone is a winner


legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1013
DMD info: https://diamond-info.github.io/
was there any update on the silver coins? obviously quite a few people kicked in 200 DMD and the price has risen a fair bit since they were given, are those coins being staked, and are the remaining slots being sold?

All information is available here
There is still availability for registration.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1002
Supporting DMD, ERC & PIO
was there any update on the silver coins? obviously quite a few people kicked in 200 DMD and the price has risen a fair bit since they were given, are those coins being staked, and are the remaining slots being sold?
No one expected BTC to rise so much so quickly.
I am sure the DMD team will take care of their loyal
followers.
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
was there any update on the silver coins? obviously quite a few people kicked in 200 DMD and the price has risen a fair bit since they were given, are those coins being staked, and are the remaining slots being sold?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
...and just another 15 shares left for the shared masternode.......a good chance to boost your passive income  Smiley
https://dmdmn.miningfield.com/bshare.php
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 101
The hen or the egg
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
if u remove below 100 BTC marketcap coins
we are one of the 20 best performing coins last 12 months with over 4000% $ value gain
if u add on top the ~25% more coins u generated that year too we are close to top 10 coin
so we perform excelent
and are still way undervalued
we have lot more room to grow

the future is bright!

source: http://alt19.com/



legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
DMD Diamond reach new $ per coin and $ total marketcap all time high!

a great year ends with another sprint back up to where we belong into the top 50 blockchains
where we where for a long time already in the early days of crypto

still way to go and early anough to join us on this voyage!

legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
What does actually mean Multisend: not active? Do I need this oneß

u dont need multisend
its only a special usecase when u want POS/Masternode income be forwarded to another address
this is called multisend

its not required to be configured
and not many usecases with it make sense
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 101
Hello,
staking is not active since yesterday. What can i do ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25712214
Quote
Hello,
my wallet 3.0.0.13b is running since yesterday and staking is still not active.

I have unlocked my wallet since yesterday as well.

Why ?

EDIT: i have to say that my connection is having issues lately, it's extremely slow. Could it be that ?

restart wallet
wait until all sync bars disappear
wait 1 min longer
then unlock wallet in "only for..." mode
then after like 1-2 minutes ur diamond icon bottom right should get blue
if u have mature available coins older than 1 hour in wallet
if all coins minted already and none are mature again its normal the diamond get grey until u have again mature coins

most of the POS stay inactive issues are by unlock wallet to early when the MNsync is not finished
keep in mind a POS/Masternode coins need to sync not only the blockchain but also sync with the masternode network
and only if all sync are finished u should start POS (by unlock ur wallet)

I have same issue with staking. I followed your instructions above. coins are now in the wallet for 1 hour and 40 min. so should be now mature. Also waited before I unlocked the wallet. Any ideas? EDIt: It now works, just were double checking. So obviously it took more time getting the coins mature. What does actually mean Multisend: not active? Do I need this oneß
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
Hello,
staking is not active since yesterday. What can i do ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25712214
Quote
Hello,
my wallet 3.0.0.13b is running since yesterday and staking is still not active.

I have unlocked my wallet since yesterday as well.

Why ?

EDIT: i have to say that my connection is having issues lately, it's extremely slow. Could it be that ?

restart wallet
wait until all sync bars disappear
wait 1 min longer
then unlock wallet in "only for..." mode
then after like 1-2 minutes ur diamond icon bottom right should get blue
if u have mature available coins older than 1 hour in wallet
if all coins minted already and none are mature again its normal the diamond get grey until u have again mature coins

most of the POS stay inactive issues are by unlock wallet to early when the MNsync is not finished
keep in mind a POS/Masternode coins need to sync not only the blockchain but also sync with the masternode network
and only if all sync are finished u should start POS (by unlock ur wallet)
sr. member
Activity: 613
Merit: 305
Hello,
staking is not active since yesterday. What can i do ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25712214
Quote
Hello,
my wallet 3.0.0.13b is running since yesterday and staking is still not active.

I have unlocked my wallet since yesterday as well.

Why ?

EDIT: i have to say that my connection is having issues lately, it's extremely slow. Could it be that ?
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
i only use ubuntu sorry
once u have a guide for suse u welcome to write a howto here

https://github.com/DMDcoin/Diamond/tree/master/doc
sr. member
Activity: 340
Merit: 251
Smell the glove.
I am trying to compile the wallet on a fresh linux install (openSUSE tumbleweed) and I am getting a configure error regarding SSL:
"configure: error: Detected LibreSSL: This is NOT supported, and may break consensus compatibility!"
I don't actually have LibreSSL installed, but rather openSSL 1.1.0-g. I have read there was a bug in bitcoin wallet that caused it to not build against openssl >1.0, but it appears that has been fixed elsewhere. Any ideas how to best work around this issue? Downgrading openssl on my system will cause a number of dependency issues.

I posted in the slack channel as well, but so far no luck.

Try the depends toolkit included in the github code.
Make sure you have the dependencies installed.
sudo apt install build-essential libtool autotools-dev autoconf pkg-config curl
You will likely have to make changes to the package names for Suse - I don't use Suse, so.....

To build the wallet -

Code:
sh autogen.sh

cd depends

#without gui
make NO_QT=1
#with gui
make

This will take awhile as the dependencies are downloaded and built, you will need a gig or 2 of disk space.

then:
Code:
cd ..
./configure --prefix=`pwd`/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
# the directory "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" may be named differently on Suse - verify the name in the depends directory.
Code:
make
strip src/qt/diamond-qt
# also verify the  src/qt/diamond-qt binary name

Good luck!

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 252
I am trying to compile the wallet on a fresh linux install (openSUSE tumbleweed) and I am getting a configure error regarding SSL:
"configure: error: Detected LibreSSL: This is NOT supported, and may break consensus compatibility!"
I don't actually have LibreSSL installed, but rather openSSL 1.1.0-g. I have read there was a bug in bitcoin wallet that caused it to not build against openssl >1.0, but it appears that has been fixed elsewhere. Any ideas how to best work around this issue? Downgrading openssl on my system will cause a number of dependency issues.

I posted in the slack channel as well, but so far no luck.

If you don't have LibreSSL installed, have you tried compiling --with-libressl? That should get it to use the openSSL that was incorrectly identified as libreSSL. At least that is what worked for me on a RasPi...

Adding the --with-libressl switch allows the configure script to complete but the build bombs out with a bunch of ssl related errors:

I'm pretty stumped on this one. I tried building an older version of openssl from source, but that has been a mess.

Hmm, as per here (https://github.com/PIVX-Project/PIVX/issues/149) you could try installing an older version of openSSL alongside the latest one with

apt-get install libssl1.0-dev


Unfortunately I am not running debian/Ubuntu. Trying to install the openssl1.0-devel package on SUSE conflicts with 1.1 It keeps proposing to uninstall openssl1.1 along with a ton of other stuff. They just moved to 1.1 a few weeks ago and I have never had issues building the wallet until now.

Then I'm out of ideas, sorry. I run all my wallets on RasPis...
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 1
I am trying to compile the wallet on a fresh linux install (openSUSE tumbleweed) and I am getting a configure error regarding SSL:
"configure: error: Detected LibreSSL: This is NOT supported, and may break consensus compatibility!"
I don't actually have LibreSSL installed, but rather openSSL 1.1.0-g. I have read there was a bug in bitcoin wallet that caused it to not build against openssl >1.0, but it appears that has been fixed elsewhere. Any ideas how to best work around this issue? Downgrading openssl on my system will cause a number of dependency issues.

I posted in the slack channel as well, but so far no luck.

If you don't have LibreSSL installed, have you tried compiling --with-libressl? That should get it to use the openSSL that was incorrectly identified as libreSSL. At least that is what worked for me on a RasPi...

Adding the --with-libressl switch allows the configure script to complete but the build bombs out with a bunch of ssl related errors:

I'm pretty stumped on this one. I tried building an older version of openssl from source, but that has been a mess.

Hmm, as per here (https://github.com/PIVX-Project/PIVX/issues/149) you could try installing an older version of openSSL alongside the latest one with

apt-get install libssl1.0-dev


Unfortunately I am not running debian/Ubuntu. Trying to install the openssl1.0-devel package on SUSE conflicts with 1.1 It keeps proposing to uninstall openssl1.1 along with a ton of other stuff. They just moved to 1.1 a few weeks ago and I have never had issues building the wallet until now.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 252
I am trying to compile the wallet on a fresh linux install (openSUSE tumbleweed) and I am getting a configure error regarding SSL:
"configure: error: Detected LibreSSL: This is NOT supported, and may break consensus compatibility!"
I don't actually have LibreSSL installed, but rather openSSL 1.1.0-g. I have read there was a bug in bitcoin wallet that caused it to not build against openssl >1.0, but it appears that has been fixed elsewhere. Any ideas how to best work around this issue? Downgrading openssl on my system will cause a number of dependency issues.

I posted in the slack channel as well, but so far no luck.

If you don't have LibreSSL installed, have you tried compiling --with-libressl? That should get it to use the openSSL that was incorrectly identified as libreSSL. At least that is what worked for me on a RasPi...

Adding the --with-libressl switch allows the configure script to complete but the build bombs out with a bunch of ssl related errors:

I'm pretty stumped on this one. I tried building an older version of openssl from source, but that has been a mess.

Hmm, as per here (https://github.com/PIVX-Project/PIVX/issues/149) you could try installing an older version of openSSL alongside the latest one with

apt-get install libssl1.0-dev
Pages:
Jump to: