Topic: [ANN] [DRZ] [DROIDZ] [ANTI-INSTAMINE] - A FRESH NEW START - WALLET UPDATES!!! - page 30. (Read 48442 times)

After swap , wallet will be fully functional with all promised features?
Masternodes/Darksend, 1:1 ration...

this has actually changed from the original compilation - as it only required that for the daemon compile ...

now the code is a little different - as it uses its own implementation of secp256k1 ecc - and as far as i know - ubuntu ( debian based os ) does actually have a solid implementation of the elliptical curve cryptography within openssl ... fedora ( and most redhat based system ) do not ... with fedora 22 / 23 being the exceptions - being the first to have a 'limited' implementation of this ecc ...

so for those that are redhat people ( like me ) - we need to figure out what it is that will allow this to compile properly with the current status quo of the os ...

in the case of centos 7 x64 ( which almost all my vps's are based ) - these required the building of ALL the components as static builds ( from openssl to bdb ) - and then implementing those static results into a static build of the daemon ...

this no longer works with the current code - unfortunately ... let alone the qt5 build ( which is a dynamic build ) under fedora 23 x64 ... also a redhat based system ...

but - we are well underway to getting things sorted - it will just take time ...

im working closely with the devs on the linux compiles anway - to ensure that the majority of linux and windows systems are covered ... so that as a community - you can rest assured that it WILL work with the os of your choosing ...

when the daemons are running and functional - we will make sure the permanent seednodes are as well ... and if all is well - will have them hardcoded also ... that is determined by the core dev of course ...

tanx for you help in any case ... i really appreciate it ...

#crysx

Thanks 

i didnt have any problems with compiling the daemon on ubuntu .. from memory it was as easy as
make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-


i keep meaning to try compiling the qt .. one day :p


--

thanks to GREEDYJOHN for all the pm's about changes to Droidz.
very handy to keep up to date with swaps without having to check the actual thread

that wont be an issue ...

ill get to that later today - as i need a few personal things sorted by the mid afternoon ...

the swap should be fine - as long as all are compliant ...

bittrex have never been easy with such things ... from their history - they would usually prefer to have the old coin delisted with the new coin relisted ( IF they relist ) ...

this swap should NOT rely just on one exchange if it is to go ahead - but i have to admit - bittrex is a very big player in this crypto world - so their cooperation would really need to be sought ...

i hope we get a positive response from them ...

in further news - im having issue with the linux compilations for both the qt wallet and the daemon ... so those out there that have linux as their main system ( like i do ) - whether it be debian based ( ubuntu etc ) or redhat based ( fedora - like mine ) - or have nodes setup on vps systems already - we just ask that you have a little more patience ...

will work with the windows wallet if necessary ( on the workstation host systems ) - and test if it works with wine under linux as a workaround for the time being ... but a native linux wallet will be what we will be looking at trying to succeed in compiling ...

working long and hard in the background to get this all to run smooth ... gotta give it to the devs behinds the scenes here - they are doing an awesome job ... just a few things to iron out and we will have one hell of system ...

when the linux daemon is successful - the permanent seednodes will be upgraded on the servers so that syncing will never be an issue also ...

tanx a great deal guys ...

#crysx

Lets wait and see what Bittrex says. We have a lot of things in our favour, we hope that BITTREX will also be favourable

Hard to tell how many people are there. But of course making swap in the exchanges is preferable. The off-exchange swap could be started later as a rescue for those few who did not manage to swap coins on exchanges.

Looks like you are ready to sacrifice Bittrex listing for the swap? I mean if they refuse to do swap and tell they have to de-list the coin, then do we proceed?

I believe we should not start swap process without getting answer from Bittrex.

mmmh how many people held DRZ? an escrow should manage a lot of txi maybe. I was in BTX when they made a swap on CCEX and everything went good. So CCEX did it in the past, if they're ok who is holding can send DRZ to ccex and wait for the swap there.

Good to see some progress. I am already getting tired from work 

Yes, we need to know what their answer is. If no response before we initiate the swap we will TELL ALL TO WITHDRAW FROM BITTREX to your local wallet ready to either send to the escrow, c-cex or yobit

are you waiting for bittrex to start the swap? I've some DRZ there not on ccex or yobit

Superb,  looking forward to seeing future updates with this new coin.  Hopefully all goes well with the swap.  Your work is appreciated.

Will be Finalizing the Swap dates soon too. Get this ball rolling 

As Long as it is either Yobit / Ccex then yes as we are still awaiting Bittrex's Answer.

So if you leave your coins on the exchange then yes they will get swapped for you by the exchange and hopefully with 0 issue's

So can i just confirm that if i have coins on any of the exchanges listed then they will just automatically change to the new coins?

That would be brilliant mate if you could do that. I will also contact them too if you wish.

Thanks Crysx  Appreciate it

one escrow that ive found to be completely reliable AND honest is sebastianju ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sebastianju-18640 ) ...

his feedback is impeccable and has the trust of the majority of community members here on bct ...

'free' escrow and works off donations - so i would suggest we organize something for him also if we are going to use him ...

ill contact him and see what he says - unless you want to contact him direct frazazel ...

let me know mate ...

#crysx

Well, in this case it could make sense to request the new DRZ address inside the message instead of forum username. Could save some correspondence
Though this is up to you of course, both methods could work.

Looks like in this case that person will lose his funds completely, as the transaction will not contain any message... To avoid this, the best would be to announce the off-exchange swap address after the swap is finished on all exchanges.