Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 15. (Read 224961 times)

full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 126
Hello DSTM,

I don't mind paying 2% dev fee, however, I noticed the v0.6 is currently submitting more dev shares than it should. could you explain in detail how actually are you calculating it? well in a very simple calculation 2% could be 2 shares in 100 accepted shares? isn't it that simple?  Huh

Would appreciate your quick reply.

Thanks,

Yes ofc.

2% of the running time are used to calculate solutions for the dev shares.
The amount of submitted shares depends on the difficulty, which is set by the server.
So your example '2% could be 2 shares in 100 accepted shares?' is right for the case where the difficulty of 'your shares' is equal to the difficulty of the 'dev shares'.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 126
I would like to incorporate your miner into some software, but I really need to know immediately when shares are accepted. Any plans to implement a verbosity or similar?

I can add this if it's important - what's the use case for immediate notification of accepted shares?
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 126
Is there a function in dstm to restart the computer if the mining speed falls under a select value?
In claymore you can set up that the miner restarts after 5min if the hash falls below the chosen value.

How can I set up this function in dstm, in the readme file they are no comment about this..

ZM doesn't have something like this.
I don't think this is a good idea. You could end up in a reboot loop - this can damage your hardware.
I think a better solution is to implement a notification system - e.g. ZM could execute a configurable script when certain conditions arise.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 126
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Hello DSTM,

I don't mind paying 2% dev fee, however, I noticed the v0.6 is currently submitting more dev shares than it should. could you explain in detail how actually are you calculating it? well in a very simple calculation 2% could be 2 shares in 100 accepted shares? isn't it that simple?  Huh

Would appreciate your quick reply.

Thanks,

i believe the only way to do this is to dedicate 2% of time,but he probably needs lower difficulty so he gets some shares on the limited time(because only shares count on pool,so this may look like he mines more for himself),but that's just a guess
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 11
Its not really that simple, with the variable difficulty on pools, the pool that the dev mines to will have a different difficulty then the pool that you are mining too.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Hello DSTM,

I don't mind paying 2% dev fee, however, I noticed the v0.6 is currently submitting more dev shares than it should. could you explain in detail how actually are you calculating it? well in a very simple calculation 2% could be 2 shares in 100 accepted shares? isn't it that simple?  Huh

Would appreciate your quick reply.

Thanks,
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
I would like to incorporate your miner into some software, but I really need to know immediately when shares are accepted. Any plans to implement a verbosity or similar?
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 2
I can't seem to figure out how to disable a gpu in DSTM.

https://i.imgur.com/hfGlRKV.png

When I use --dev 0 2 3 in the .CFG file, the miner shows an error and wont start. I have no clue what I'm doing wrong.

I assume I'm putting in the wrong place, or there's another command I'm suppose to put in there.

EWBF I just remove the number in my cuda device, and others I can simply type in the number while the miner is running to turn them off individually.

Any help would greatly be appreciated!
Make a batch file, I use --telemetry and --dev 0 1 2 3 5, try making you're own config file a simple .bat
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
I can't seem to figure out how to disable a gpu in DSTM.

https://i.imgur.com/hfGlRKV.png

When I use --dev 0 2 3 in the .CFG file, the miner shows an error and wont start. I have no clue what I'm doing wrong.

I assume I'm putting in the wrong place, or there's another command I'm suppose to put in there.

EWBF I just remove the number in my cuda device, and others I can simply type in the number while the miner is running to turn them off individually.

Any help would greatly be appreciated!
hero member
Activity: 881
Merit: 502
I was away from mining for some time.

I know DSTM is %2 fee whereas EWBF is %1.

Can someone tell me how much DSTM is faster for

GTX 1060
1070
1080ti?

In December DSTM was faster %1.5 %2 and almost same result with EWBF because of fee difference.

You can see it here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35677463

and for 1060 6gb

2018-04-30 16:04:59|   ========== Sol/s: 1333.7 Sol/W: 3.30  Avg: 1329.9 I/s: 712.3  Sh: 4.91   0.99 184
2018-04-30 16:05:05|   GPU1  63C  Sol/s: 329.2  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 332.2  I/s: 177.9  Sh: 1.23   0.98 178
2018-04-30 16:05:06|   GPU2  64C  Sol/s: 327.1  Sol/W: 3.27  Avg: 331.4  I/s: 177.4  Sh: 1.24   0.98 178
2018-04-30 16:05:10|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 331.2  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 332.5  I/s: 178.1  Sh: 1.20   0.99 201
2018-04-30 16:05:19|>  GPU3  66C  Sol/s: 338.1  Sol/W: 3.37  Avg: 333.7  I/s: 179.2  Sh: 1.24   1.00 179
2018-04-30 16:05:19|   ========== Sol/s: 1325.5 Sol/W: 3.30  Avg: 1329.9 I/s: 712.7  Sh: 4.91   0.99 184
2018-04-30 16:05:26|>  GPU1  63C  Sol/s: 331.5  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 332.2  I/s: 177.7  Sh: 1.23   0.98 178 +
2018-04-30 16:05:26|>  GPU2  64C  Sol/s: 323.4  Sol/W: 3.27  Avg: 331.4  I/s: 177.4  Sh: 1.24   0.98 178
2018-04-30 16:05:30|>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 335.7  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 332.5  I/s: 178.2  Sh: 1.20   0.99 201
2018-04-30 16:05:39|   GPU3  66C  Sol/s: 337.0  Sol/W: 3.37  Avg: 333.7  I/s: 179.2  Sh: 1.24   1.00 179
2018-04-30 16:05:39|   ========== Sol/s: 1327.7 Sol/W: 3.30  Avg: 1329.9 I/s: 712.6  Sh: 4.91   0.99 184


Wow, thank you. For GTX 1060 and 1070 speed gap is almost %6. For GTX 1080ti around %1-2.

So I would use DSTM's miner even it has bigger fee.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
I was away from mining for some time.

I know DSTM is %2 fee whereas EWBF is %1.

Can someone tell me how much DSTM is faster for

GTX 1060
1070
1080ti?

In December DSTM was faster %1.5 %2 and almost same result with EWBF because of fee difference.

You can see it here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35677463

and for 1060 6gb

2018-04-30 16:04:59|   ========== Sol/s: 1333.7 Sol/W: 3.30  Avg: 1329.9 I/s: 712.3  Sh: 4.91   0.99 184
2018-04-30 16:05:05|   GPU1  63C  Sol/s: 329.2  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 332.2  I/s: 177.9  Sh: 1.23   0.98 178
2018-04-30 16:05:06|   GPU2  64C  Sol/s: 327.1  Sol/W: 3.27  Avg: 331.4  I/s: 177.4  Sh: 1.24   0.98 178
2018-04-30 16:05:10|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 331.2  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 332.5  I/s: 178.1  Sh: 1.20   0.99 201
2018-04-30 16:05:19|>  GPU3  66C  Sol/s: 338.1  Sol/W: 3.37  Avg: 333.7  I/s: 179.2  Sh: 1.24   1.00 179
2018-04-30 16:05:19|   ========== Sol/s: 1325.5 Sol/W: 3.30  Avg: 1329.9 I/s: 712.7  Sh: 4.91   0.99 184
2018-04-30 16:05:26|>  GPU1  63C  Sol/s: 331.5  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 332.2  I/s: 177.7  Sh: 1.23   0.98 178 +
2018-04-30 16:05:26|>  GPU2  64C  Sol/s: 323.4  Sol/W: 3.27  Avg: 331.4  I/s: 177.4  Sh: 1.24   0.98 178
2018-04-30 16:05:30|>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 335.7  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 332.5  I/s: 178.2  Sh: 1.20   0.99 201
2018-04-30 16:05:39|   GPU3  66C  Sol/s: 337.0  Sol/W: 3.37  Avg: 333.7  I/s: 179.2  Sh: 1.24   1.00 179
2018-04-30 16:05:39|   ========== Sol/s: 1327.7 Sol/W: 3.30  Avg: 1329.9 I/s: 712.6  Sh: 4.91   0.99 184
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
A virus kicked my miner off-line and I am trying to set it up again. I get to the "edit" page, put in my data, save, but it doesn't take off, which it did when I first set it up. What am I doing wrong? May I turn on the firewall to run with it? If so, what should I put in the firewall as a exclusion?
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
I was away from mining for some time.

I know DSTM is %2 fee whereas EWBF is %1.

Can someone tell me how much DSTM is faster for

GTX 1060
1070
1080ti?

In December DSTM was faster %1.5 %2 and almost same result with EWBF because of fee difference.


I dont know about others, I can only speak for myself but last year or so Ive seen better and faster results using DSTM mining Zcash on nanopool.

I see lower speeds and weird devfee with EFWB in last month or so. But then again, it does seem to run extremely well on suprnova compared to nanopool.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Im getting roughly 500sol/s NON OC with my GIGABYTE windforce 8gb 1080

How are so many people getting great (550 or more sol/s) with their 1070ti?
hero member
Activity: 881
Merit: 502
I was away from mining for some time.

I know DSTM is %2 fee whereas EWBF is %1.

Can someone tell me how much DSTM is faster for

GTX 1060
1070
1080ti?

In December DSTM was faster %1.5 %2 and almost same result with EWBF because of fee difference.
newbie
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
Is there a function in dstm to restart the computer if the mining speed falls under a select value?
In claymore you can set up that the miner restarts after 5min if the hash falls below the chosen value.

How can I set up this function in dstm, in the readme file they are no comment about this..
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Hi all! First of all, sorry for my bad English.

I have a problem. my rig on win10, msi afterburner, zm 0.6, 8 nvidia GPU, at config i set temp limit 67.
While i use remote desktop (teamviewer) all works well, temp limit reduce  intensity at 67 and increase it back well.
But if i disconnected from  remote desktop intensity not increasing after reducing by temp limit  and working at low hashrate.When i just reconnect to remote desktop intensity increasing back. Who can help me?
p.s. the same situation at my 2 rig with 5 nvidia GPU.  

Are you sure the performance drop is related to temperature controller? i.e. does it really only happen with temp-target enabled?
Pls pm me your logfile, I'll check if there is something unusual.

I have the same problem on win7, zm 0.6, temp limit 70°, 100% fan.
When GPU start temperature control AND i don't watch it via Teamviewer, GPU usage drops and don't restore until i join TV again.
Here is log of GPU usage drops on temp° controller and restores when i joined TV.
Code:
2018-04-28 18:34:04|   GPU0  66C  Sol/s: 525.0  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 534.6  I/s: 287.1  Sh: 0.94   1.00 94  
2018-04-28 18:34:05|   GPU1  60C  Sol/s: 501.7  Sol/W: 3.33  Avg: 497.0  I/s: 266.2  Sh: 1.43   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 18:34:05|   GPU2  69C  Sol/s: 526.3  Sol/W: 2.74  Avg: 536.0  I/s: 287.3  Sh: 0.98   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:34:08|   GPU3  66C  Sol/s: 538.8  Sol/W: 2.74  Avg: 536.1  I/s: 287.1  Sh: 1.56   1.00 78  +
2018-04-28 18:34:10|   GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 475.5  Sol/W: 3.68  Avg: 487.3  I/s: 260.4  Sh: 0.85   1.00 78  ++
2018-04-28 18:34:10|   GPU5  69C  Sol/s: 544.5  Sol/W: 2.67  Avg: 536.1  I/s: 287.6  Sh: 1.07   1.00 93  +
2018-04-28 18:34:11|   ========== Sol/s: 3111.9 Sol/W: 2.98  Avg: 3127.1 I/s: 1675.7 Sh: 6.83   1.00 85
2018-04-28 18:34:24|   GPU0  66C  Sol/s: 535.6  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 534.7  I/s: 287.1  Sh: 0.92   1.00 94  
2018-04-28 18:34:24|#  GPU2  reached temperature target 70C
2018-04-28 18:34:24|#  GPU2  enabling temperature controller
2018-04-28 18:34:25|   GPU1  60C  Sol/s: 501.4  Sol/W: 3.33  Avg: 497.1  I/s: 266.2  Sh: 1.41   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 18:34:25|   GPU2  64C  Sol/s: 520.4  Sol/W: 2.74  Avg: 535.8  I/s: 276.6  Sh: 0.97   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:34:28|   GPU3  67C  Sol/s: 536.9  Sol/W: 2.74  Avg: 536.1  I/s: 287.1  Sh: 1.54   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:34:30|   GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 490.3  Sol/W: 3.68  Avg: 487.4  I/s: 260.4  Sh: 0.84   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:34:31|   GPU5  69C  Sol/s: 530.4  Sol/W: 2.67  Avg: 536.0  I/s: 287.6  Sh: 1.06   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 18:34:31|   ========== Sol/s: 3114.9 Sol/W: 2.98  Avg: 3127.0 I/s: 1665.0 Sh: 6.73   1.00 85
2018-04-28 18:34:44|>  GPU0  66C  Sol/s: 533.8  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 534.6  I/s: 286.9  Sh: 0.91   1.00 94  
2018-04-28 18:34:45|>  GPU1  60C  Sol/s: 494.6  Sol/W: 3.33  Avg: 497.0  I/s: 266.4  Sh: 1.39   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 18:34:46|>  GPU2  49C  Sol/s: 120.0  Sol/W: 2.74  Avg: 529.7  I/s: 64.1   Sh: 0.95   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:34:48|>  GPU3  67C  Sol/s: 536.2  Sol/W: 2.74  Avg: 536.1  I/s: 287.1  Sh: 1.52   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:34:51|>  GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 485.2  Sol/W: 3.68  Avg: 487.3  I/s: 260.4  Sh: 0.82   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:34:51|>  GPU5  69C  Sol/s: 536.8  Sol/W: 2.67  Avg: 536.0  I/s: 287.3  Sh: 1.08   1.00 78  +
2018-04-28 18:34:51|   ========== Sol/s: 2706.5 Sol/W: 2.98  Avg: 3120.9 I/s: 1452.2 Sh: 6.68   1.00 83
2018-04-28 18:35:04|>  GPU0  66C  Sol/s: 535.0  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 534.7  I/s: 287.1  Sh: 0.94   1.00 78  +
2018-04-28 18:35:05|>  GPU1  60C  Sol/s: 498.8  Sol/W: 3.33  Avg: 497.0  I/s: 266.0  Sh: 1.37   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 18:35:06|>  GPU2  45C  Sol/s: 120.2  Sol/W: 2.73  Avg: 523.9  I/s: 64.0   Sh: 0.98   1.00 78  +
2018-04-28 18:35:08|>  GPU3  67C  Sol/s: 537.0  Sol/W: 2.74  Avg: 536.1  I/s: 287.3  Sh: 1.50   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:35:11|>  GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 495.4  Sol/W: 3.69  Avg: 487.5  I/s: 260.4  Sh: 0.81   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:35:11|>  GPU5  69C  Sol/s: 536.2  Sol/W: 2.67  Avg: 536.0  I/s: 287.6  Sh: 1.07   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 18:35:11|   ========== Sol/s: 2722.7 Sol/W: 2.98  Avg: 3115.2 I/s: 1452.4 Sh: 6.67   1.00 80

2018-04-28 21:06:36|>  GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 534.2  Sol/W: 2.72  Avg: 535.5  I/s: 287.1  Sh: 1.27   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 21:06:36|>  GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 501.7  Sol/W: 3.64  Avg: 488.6  I/s: 262.4  Sh: 1.17   1.00 78  +
2018-04-28 21:06:37|>  GPU3  63C  Sol/s: 532.1  Sol/W: 2.75  Avg: 535.9  I/s: 286.9  Sh: 1.24   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 21:06:40|   GPU2  38C  Sol/s: 118.8  Sol/W: 2.26  Avg: 174.5  I/s: 64.0   Sh: 0.36   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 21:06:40|   GPU1  59C  Sol/s: 496.1  Sol/W: 3.32  Avg: 496.9  I/s: 266.2  Sh: 1.23   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 21:06:50|   GPU5  41C  Sol/s: 119.1  Sol/W: 2.37  Avg: 254.5  I/s: 64.0   Sh: 0.54   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 21:06:50|   ========== Sol/s: 2302.0 Sol/W: 2.84  Avg: 2485.9 I/s: 1230.4 Sh: 5.81   1.00 80
2018-04-28 21:06:56|   GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 539.4  Sol/W: 2.72  Avg: 535.5  I/s: 286.9  Sh: 1.27   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 21:06:56|   GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 486.7  Sol/W: 3.64  Avg: 488.6  I/s: 262.4  Sh: 1.17   1.00 93  +
2018-04-28 21:06:57|   GPU3  64C  Sol/s: 547.5  Sol/W: 2.75  Avg: 536.0  I/s: 286.9  Sh: 1.24   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 21:07:00|   GPU2  38C  Sol/s: 122.8  Sol/W: 2.26  Avg: 174.4  I/s: 64.0   Sh: 0.37   1.00 78  ++
2018-04-28 21:07:00|   GPU1  59C  Sol/s: 494.8  Sol/W: 3.32  Avg: 496.8  I/s: 266.2  Sh: 1.24   1.00 85  ++*
2018-04-28 21:07:10|   GPU5  50C  Sol/s: 211.3  Sol/W: 2.37  Avg: 254.4  I/s: 111.8  Sh: 0.55   1.00 78  +
2018-04-28 21:07:10|   ========== Sol/s: 2402.5 Sol/W: 2.84  Avg: 2485.8 I/s: 1278.1 Sh: 5.84   1.00 84
2018-04-28 21:07:16|   GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 539.9  Sol/W: 2.72  Avg: 535.5  I/s: 285.3  Sh: 1.27   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 21:07:16|   GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 480.4  Sol/W: 3.64  Avg: 488.6  I/s: 261.9  Sh: 1.17   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 21:07:17|   GPU3  64C  Sol/s: 533.1  Sol/W: 2.75  Avg: 536.0  I/s: 285.5  Sh: 1.24   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 21:07:20|>  GPU2  57C  Sol/s: 406.8  Sol/W: 2.26  Avg: 174.8  I/s: 220.4  Sh: 0.37   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 21:07:20|>  GPU1  59C  Sol/s: 499.1  Sol/W: 3.32  Avg: 496.9  I/s: 265.6  Sh: 1.24   1.00 85  
2018-04-28 21:07:30|>  GPU5  57C  Sol/s: 532.7  Sol/W: 2.37  Avg: 255.0  I/s: 288.2  Sh: 0.55   1.00 79  +
2018-04-28 21:07:30|   ========== Sol/s: 2992.1 Sol/W: 2.84  Avg: 2486.7 I/s: 1606.9 Sh: 5.83   1.00 84
2018-04-28 21:07:36|>  GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 524.3  Sol/W: 2.72  Avg: 535.5  I/s: 284.9  Sh: 1.27   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 21:07:36|>  GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 496.0  Sol/W: 3.64  Avg: 488.6  I/s: 261.8  Sh: 1.17   1.00 93  
2018-04-28 21:07:38|>  GPU3  64C  Sol/s: 538.1  Sol/W: 2.75  Avg: 536.0  I/s: 285.6  Sh: 1.23   1.00 78  
2018-04-28 21:07:40|   GPU2  62C  Sol/s: 528.3  Sol/W: 2.27  Avg: 175.5  I/s: 286.4  Sh: 0.38   1.00 80  ++
2018-04-28 21:07:40|   GPU1  59C  Sol/s: 488.7  Sol/W: 3.32  Avg: 496.8  I/s: 262.7  Sh: 1.24   1.00 85  
2018-04-28 21:07:50|   GPU5  60C  Sol/s: 533.1  Sol/W: 2.37  Avg: 255.5  I/s: 283.5  Sh: 0.55   1.00 79  
2018-04-28 21:07:50|   ========== Sol/s: 3108.5 Sol/W: 2.84  Avg: 2487.9 I/s: 1664.9 Sh: 5.83   1.00 84

And here is typical GPU usage and temp graphic:
https://preview.ibb.co/iVix1x/screenshot_22.png

One more question, dstm. Could you add temperature limit option for GPU emergency shutdown (like in Claymore)? The reason for having such option is that your temperature controller works best with 100% fan setting, but it destroy fan very quickly. So it's sometimes good to have PID on fan and hard temp° limit to be sure GPU will turn off if exceed the limit.
newbie
Activity: 176
Merit: 0
I guess it because gpu have algorithms to reduce the performance of the temperature increase.  (indeed temp lower <70 C). I mean gpu 50 C will show more sols then with temp 60C or 70C. (on same frequency)

I also noticed the regularity that the lower the temperature, the greater the productivity. (in sols in DSTM)
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 126
Hi all! First of all, sorry for my bad English.

I have a problem. my rig on win10, msi afterburner, zm 0.6, 8 nvidia GPU, at config i set temp limit 67.
While i use remote desktop (teamviewer) all works well, temp limit reduce  intensity at 67 and increase it back well.
But if i disconnected from  remote desktop intensity not increasing after reducing by temp limit  and working at low hashrate.When i just reconnect to remote desktop intensity increasing back. Who can help me?
p.s. the same situation at my 2 rig with 5 nvidia GPU.   

Are you sure the performance drop is related to temperature controller? i.e. does it really only happen with temp-target enabled?
Pls pm me your logfile, I'll check if there is something unusual.

All night without temp limit. no low hashrate.

Thx for doing the test - I'll go trough the code of temperature-controller this weekend.
Pages:
Jump to: