This is same rig with same OC / power settings. 6.1 is not working 6.0 is working. We found this issue in multiple rigs with 6 or more GPU:s trying to upgrade to 6.1
Boot Time: 2018-05-21 14:35:48
System Up Time: up 25 minutes
Miner Up Time: 18:30
Distro: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS 4.4.0-97-generic
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4400 @ 3.30GHz
Disk / Free Disk: 29G / 19G
Memory / Free Memory: 3897 / 803
Load Average: 2.16 1.71 1.54
Nvidia Driver Version: 390.48
https://imgur.com/a/sLqDGD7
Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 11. (Read 224621 times)
May 21, 2018, 08:02:08 AM
May 19, 2018, 07:07:15 AM
^^^^
Some additional Info.
The 1070 Rig has a i7-3770K CPU and the 1070 Ti Rig a Pentium G4400 CPU.
Maybe the 1070 Ti Rig can't handle the CPU Load, thats why the hash rate drops.
Some additional Info.
The 1070 Rig has a i7-3770K CPU and the 1070 Ti Rig a Pentium G4400 CPU.
Maybe the 1070 Ti Rig can't handle the CPU Load, thats why the hash rate drops.
May 19, 2018, 05:22:08 AM
I have 2 rigs, one is 6x GTX 1070 and the other one 9x GTX 1070 Ti
With 0.6.1 update:
On the 1070 rig the hash rate went up, but NOT on the 1070 Ti rig.
Both rigs are running nvOC (Ubuntu) with 387 driver.
You can see on the 1070 Ti at the start the hash rate is normal, but after 15 min. it drops.
https://imgur.com/KywkWgB
https://imgur.com/CGzArLW
With 0.6.1 update:
On the 1070 rig the hash rate went up, but NOT on the 1070 Ti rig.
Both rigs are running nvOC (Ubuntu) with 387 driver.
You can see on the 1070 Ti at the start the hash rate is normal, but after 15 min. it drops.
https://imgur.com/KywkWgB
https://imgur.com/CGzArLW
May 19, 2018, 12:10:12 AM
Thank you guys!
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
to get 4 souls/watt on a 1070 ti, means you have the TPD about 58-60% lol you should post you're config cause I just dont see that type of hash rate with that low of TPD.
That is actually not true. I have 6 GTX 1070 Ti and get 4.12 sols/W average between the 6 cards and all of them are running at 70% TDP. The best one it is doing 4.23 sols/W. Have a look
No need to go that low but still I am surprise about the performance difference on the hashrate. I average 3107 maximun 3111 and he is doing 200 more sols average. Are you using Windows or Linux? and what driver version?
Interesting AB settings. I thought most were closer to this..
power limit 86
temp 72
core clock 133
mem clock 585
.. I tried your settings and output is basically the same... but..
67c 537 sol/s 295 i/s 3.43 s/w (on my end.. 1080's)
May 18, 2018, 12:53:59 AM
how can i get manual difficulty/static difficulty to pass through?
when I do --pass d=1 it wont take it, even if i do --pass x,d=1
it acts like its not even passing that through and just gives me Varr diff only.
On supernova pools.
when I do --pass d=1 it wont take it, even if i do --pass x,d=1
it acts like its not even passing that through and just gives me Varr diff only.
On supernova pools.
May 17, 2018, 04:07:35 AM
very buggy release. i am using hiveos. dstm 0.6.1.
1. gtx1080ti has hashrate around 200 sols
2. ping problem (already reported here before)
1. gtx1080ti has hashrate around 200 sols
2. ping problem (already reported here before)
Same problem here... With gtx 1060, dstm 0.6.0 i get ~300 sol/s. Now with dstm 0.6.1 i get around 200 sol/s .
Whats wrong?
https://i.imgur.com/UKFqQvW.png
yes i can confirm that.
are those AMD machines ? i have the same effect on 2 other of these cheap AMD machines, but on the modern intel machine with gigabyte D3A H110 it has no issues and the 0.6.1 performs slightly better.
this is with 0.6 (and its even warm).
Code:
GPU1 56C Sol/s: 491.0 Sol/W: 4.33 Avg: 487.8 I/s: 261.2 Sh: 0.39 0.99 116
GPU0 60C Sol/s: 710.1 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 715.4 I/s: 383.2 Sh: 0.58 1.00 112
GPU3 60C Sol/s: 489.1 Sol/W: 4.33 Avg: 487.8 I/s: 261.2 Sh: 0.40 1.00 113
GPU2 52C Sol/s: 493.4 Sol/W: 4.36 Avg: 490.8 I/s: 262.8 Sh: 0.43 0.99 112
GPU4 61C Sol/s: 740.6 Sol/W: 3.68 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.4 Sh: 0.63 0.99 112
========== Sol/s: 2924.2 Sol/W: 4.06 Avg: 2914.7 I/s: 1560.8 Sh: 2.41 0.99 113
GPU0 60C Sol/s: 710.1 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 715.4 I/s: 383.2 Sh: 0.58 1.00 112
GPU3 60C Sol/s: 489.1 Sol/W: 4.33 Avg: 487.8 I/s: 261.2 Sh: 0.40 1.00 113
GPU2 52C Sol/s: 493.4 Sol/W: 4.36 Avg: 490.8 I/s: 262.8 Sh: 0.43 0.99 112
GPU4 61C Sol/s: 740.6 Sol/W: 3.68 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.4 Sh: 0.63 0.99 112
========== Sol/s: 2924.2 Sol/W: 4.06 Avg: 2914.7 I/s: 1560.8 Sh: 2.41 0.99 113
this is with 0.6.1 just started (so would get lower in a bit)
Code:
_ GPU0 58C 80% | 678.2 Sol/s 678.2 Avg 364.9 I/s | 3.44 S/W 202 W | 0.00 . .
_ GPU1 55C 80% | 474.4 Sol/s 474.4 Avg 254.7 I/s | 4.22 S/W 117 W | 0.00 . .
_ GPU2 50C 80% | 476.2 Sol/s 476.2 Avg 253.9 I/s | 4.31 S/W 104 W | 0.00 . .
_ GPU3 58C 80% | 462.7 Sol/s 462.7 Avg 249.3 I/s | 4.15 S/W 110 W | 0.00 . .
_ GPU4 58C 80% | 747.1 Sol/s 747.1 Avg 402.5 I/s | 3.78 S/W 179 W | 2.99 100 113
============== | 2838.7 Sol/s 2838.7 Avg 1525.3 I/s | 3.98 S/W 713 W | 2.99 100 113
_ GPU1 55C 80% | 474.4 Sol/s 474.4 Avg 254.7 I/s | 4.22 S/W 117 W | 0.00 . .
_ GPU2 50C 80% | 476.2 Sol/s 476.2 Avg 253.9 I/s | 4.31 S/W 104 W | 0.00 . .
_ GPU3 58C 80% | 462.7 Sol/s 462.7 Avg 249.3 I/s | 4.15 S/W 110 W | 0.00 . .
_ GPU4 58C 80% | 747.1 Sol/s 747.1 Avg 402.5 I/s | 3.78 S/W 179 W | 2.99 100 113
============== | 2838.7 Sol/s 2838.7 Avg 1525.3 I/s | 3.98 S/W 713 W | 2.99 100 113
hwinfo: (its obviously one of my low ROI machines where i use an older downclocked energy save cpu, mb + mem in combination with a 1to4 pci extender. works flawlessly though. its 2x 1080ti 3x1070ti config. OS is SmOS.
Code:
Linux simpleminer 4.11.12-041112-generic #201707210350 SMP Fri Jul 21 07:53:15 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Code:
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 4
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 2
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD
CPU family: 21
Model: 48
Model name: AMD A8-7600 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Stepping: 1
CPU MHz: 1400.000
CPU max MHz: 2800.0000
CPU min MHz: 1400.0000
BogoMIPS: 4990.45
Virtualization: AMD-V
L1d cache: 16K
L1i cache: 96K
L2 cache: 2048K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-3
cheers
as inquired the cpu usage of 0.6 and 0.6.1 related to above findings.
0.6.1 has higher peaks ie i see it peak to up to 50% cpu usage at least using "top".
0.6
Code:
Tasks: 162 total, 2 running, 160 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 8.4 us, 10.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 81.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 3963096 total, 2444388 free, 1108500 used, 410208 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 2497384 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4087 miner 20 0 64.963g 588996 434516 S 40.2 14.9 1155:28 zm
%Cpu(s): 8.4 us, 10.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 81.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 3963096 total, 2444388 free, 1108500 used, 410208 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 2497384 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4087 miner 20 0 64.963g 588996 434516 S 40.2 14.9 1155:28 zm
0.6.1
Code:
Tasks: 169 total, 2 running, 167 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 9.8 us, 22.1 sy, 0.0 ni, 68.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 3963096 total, 2464964 free, 1085700 used, 412432 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 2519828 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
14325 miner 20 0 67.005g 567988 434928 S 40.5 14.3 0:31.95 zm
%Cpu(s): 9.8 us, 22.1 sy, 0.0 ni, 68.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 3963096 total, 2464964 free, 1085700 used, 412432 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 2519828 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
14325 miner 20 0 67.005g 567988 434928 S 40.5 14.3 0:31.95 zm
May 16, 2018, 09:41:27 PM
very buggy release. i am using hiveos. dstm 0.6.1.
1. gtx1080ti has hashrate around 200 sols
2. ping problem (already reported here before)
I would have to agree. Both of my rugs dropped 500 sols after jumping onto DSTM 0.6.1. I rolled back to 0.6 and my hash rates jumped up where they should be. I only have one rig near me but it’s not by a tv so I’m not sure how I can get the logs if you need them. 1. gtx1080ti has hashrate around 200 sols
2. ping problem (already reported here before)
May 16, 2018, 08:04:59 PM
New Version 0.6.1
- support configuration of 'temp-target', 'intensity', 'pool' via cmd-line parameters
- support configuration of 'temp-target', 'intensity', 'pool' via cmd-line parameters
DSTM, thanks for the new version. I haven't had any issues with latency on MiningPoolHub, ZPool or NiceHash using Windows 10. However, I do have a quick question regarding latency. Is 1.0 the default value? Based on my limited testing, I am assuming it is as any lower value reduces the hash rate, but I would like a quick confirmation of that. Thanks.
I guess you're talking about intensity not latency like you wrote.
Intensity is only used to reduce the GPU load - if you don't set the '--intensity' option the intensity code path isn't used and zm will run as fast as possible.
Sorry about my typo. Yes, I meant intensity and not latency in the second sentence. That’s what I get for not proof-reading. Thanks for clarifying how your miner uses intensity. Other miners, such as CCMiner, use a default intensity that is often less than the maximum and I wanted to make sure that was not the case with DSTM. Keep up the good work.
May 16, 2018, 07:35:58 PM
EDIT: fixed
So far new version everything is running smooth/solid.
Def like the difficulty addition to show whole numbers instead of random string of characters.
So far new version everything is running smooth/solid.
Def like the difficulty addition to show whole numbers instead of random string of characters.
May 16, 2018, 06:43:59 PM
Thank you guys!
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
nice results... how did you do that? care to share your config? Thanks.
I am sorry but 4 post and results nobody is near them with the same cards on different systems. I think you should upload a pic otherwise I just think you are pretty much bluffing...
I have not seen anyone getting that high hashrate and sols/W with GTX 1070 Ti. That combination does not sound right to me
May 16, 2018, 06:37:38 PM
Thank you guys!
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
to get 4 souls/watt on a 1070 ti, means you have the TPD about 58-60% lol you should post you're config cause I just dont see that type of hash rate with that low of TPD.
That is actually not true. I have 6 GTX 1070 Ti and get 4.12 sols/W average between the 6 cards and all of them are running at 70% TDP. The best one it is doing 4.23 sols/W. Have a look
No need to go that low but still I am surprise about the performance difference on the hashrate. I average 3107 maximun 3111 and he is doing 200 more sols average. Are you using Windows or Linux? and what driver version?
May 16, 2018, 04:01:04 PM
For people having performance issues on 0.6.1/linux.
Is there a significant CPU-load difference between 0.6 / 0.6.1 on your systems?
Is there a significant CPU-load difference between 0.6 / 0.6.1 on your systems?
Hi DSTM,
I noticed quite a difference in CPU usage between 0.6.0 and 0.6.1 running on vanilla Debian 9.4 (Stretch).
Here it goes: https://imgur.com/a/lNtcqlC
I measured the CPU usages with top over a period of time (around 1 minute or so) and took the average.
The behaviour of 0.6.1 running on my miner is that the last GPU (GPU4) is running at 75% of its capacity.
This rig has 4 GTX 1070 and 1 GTX 1080. One of the 1070s is GPU4.
That's quite odd (considering the high CPU usage of kworker and some IRQs as well with 0.6.1).
GPU Overclock, memory clock, power limit have been kept identical in the two runs (0.6.0 vs 0.6.1).
The only actual difference is zm executable version.
Hope it helps. Meanwhile, I reverted to 0.6.0 that uses less CPU and provides a higher combined hashrate on my rig.
Thanks for your good work! Cheers!
Thx, that's very helpful.
For people who have performance issues and also have some time to test - pls pm me.
May 16, 2018, 04:00:34 PM
New Version 0.6.1
- support configuration of 'temp-target', 'intensity', 'pool' via cmd-line parameters
- support configuration of 'temp-target', 'intensity', 'pool' via cmd-line parameters
DSTM, thanks for the new version. I haven't had any issues with latency on MiningPoolHub, ZPool or NiceHash using Windows 10. However, I do have a quick question regarding latency. Is 1.0 the default value? Based on my limited testing, I am assuming it is as any lower value reduces the hash rate, but I would like a quick confirmation of that. Thanks.
I guess you're talking about intensity not latency like you wrote.
Intensity is only used to reduce the GPU load - if you don't set the '--intensity' option the intensity code path isn't used and zm will run as fast as possible.
May 16, 2018, 03:31:15 PM
For people having performance issues on 0.6.1/linux.
Is there a significant CPU-load difference between 0.6 / 0.6.1 on your systems?
Is there a significant CPU-load difference between 0.6 / 0.6.1 on your systems?
Hi DSTM,
I noticed quite a difference in CPU usage between 0.6.0 and 0.6.1 running on vanilla Debian 9.4 (Stretch).
Here it goes: https://imgur.com/a/lNtcqlC
I measured the CPU usages with top over a period of time (around 1 minute or so) and took the average.
The behaviour of 0.6.1 running on my miner is that the last GPU (GPU4) is running at 75% of its capacity.
This rig has 4 GTX 1070 and 1 GTX 1080. One of the 1070s is GPU4.
That's quite odd (considering the high CPU usage of kworker and some IRQs as well with 0.6.1).
GPU Overclock, memory clock, power limit have been kept identical in the two runs (0.6.0 vs 0.6.1).
The only actual difference is zm executable version.
Hope it helps. Meanwhile, I reverted to 0.6.0 that uses less CPU and provides a higher combined hashrate on my rig.
Thanks for your good work! Cheers!
May 16, 2018, 03:03:05 PM
New Version 0.6.1
- support configuration of 'temp-target', 'intensity', 'pool' via cmd-line parameters
- support configuration of 'temp-target', 'intensity', 'pool' via cmd-line parameters
DSTM, thanks for the new version. I haven't had any issues with latency on MiningPoolHub, ZPool or NiceHash using Windows 10. However, I do have a quick question regarding latency. Is 1.0 the default value? Based on my limited testing, I am assuming it is as any lower value reduces the hash rate, but I would like a quick confirmation of that. Thanks.
May 16, 2018, 02:38:18 PM
Thank you guys!
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
to get 4 souls/watt on a 1070 ti, means you have the TPD about 58-60% lol you should post you're config cause I just dont see that type of hash rate with that low of TPD.
May 16, 2018, 09:07:25 AM
For people having performance issues on 0.6.1/linux.
Is there a significant CPU-load difference between 0.6 / 0.6.1 on your systems?
Is there a significant CPU-load difference between 0.6 / 0.6.1 on your systems?
May 16, 2018, 09:06:37 AM
So i get a strange thing happening in 6.1. I have two 1080ti's on my comp and when i run my second card by itself the output shows only the first line of hash info and then stops displaying any info except for difficulty changes. The card is hashing and is reporting on the pool but the output display just shows the difficulty changes. If i run my first card by itself and if i run the two cards together they output fine just how they are suppose to.. Must be a little glitch with running dev 1 only i guess. Anyone else running into this? Great miner by the way.. https://imgur.com/a/BP5ulKB
Thx, fixed.
May 16, 2018, 08:56:43 AM
Thank you guys!
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
Very good result for my rig 6x 1070ti
Equihash algoritm:
Average rate - 3.38 KSol/s
Energy per card - Sol/w 4.20
nice results... how did you do that? care to share your config? Thanks.
May 16, 2018, 04:43:15 AM
I have performance issue on 0.6.1 as well :
0.6.0 :
0.6.1 :
the config is 7 * msi gaming 1070 on ubuntu 18.04, nvidia drive 390.48
0.6.0 :
Code:
2018-05-16 08:29:40| GPU2 55C Sol/s: 433.5 Sol/W: 3.65 Avg: 437.7 I/s: 236.2 Sh: 0.90 1.00 71
2018-05-16 08:29:40| GPU0 52C Sol/s: 453.7 Sol/W: 3.77 Avg: 449.3 I/s: 237.7 Sh: 1.50 1.00 71 +
2018-05-16 08:29:41| GPU1 49C Sol/s: 445.0 Sol/W: 3.69 Avg: 441.4 I/s: 237.4 Sh: 2.39 1.00 71 ++
2018-05-16 08:29:42| GPU3 45C Sol/s: 452.8 Sol/W: 3.71 Avg: 445.3 I/s: 238.6 Sh: 1.19 1.00 71
2018-05-16 08:29:43| GPU4 50C Sol/s: 471.4 Sol/W: 3.87 Avg: 462.9 I/s: 248.3 Sh: 3.28 1.00 72
2018-05-16 08:29:45| GPU5 51C Sol/s: 466.2 Sol/W: 3.89 Avg: 464.1 I/s: 247.8 Sh: 2.39 1.00 71 +
2018-05-16 08:29:47| GPU6 48C Sol/s: 461.2 Sol/W: 3.87 Avg: 461.4 I/s: 245.9 Sh: 2.09 1.00 71 +
2018-05-16 08:29:47| ========== Sol/s: 3183.7 Sol/W: 3.78 Avg: 3162.2 I/s: 1691.9 Sh: 13.74 1.00 71
0.6.1 :
Code:
2018-05-16 08:32:46| GPU0 50C 50% | 206.1 Sol/s 211.9 Avg 110.3 I/s | 2.01 S/W 107 W | 0.00 . .
2018-05-16 08:32:46| GPU1 48C 50% | 417.7 Sol/s 422.9 Avg 226.7 I/s | 3.51 S/W 121 W | 1.71 100 71
2018-05-16 08:32:46| GPU2 47C 50% | 162.1 Sol/s 171.1 Avg 89.3 I/s | 1.73 S/W 93 W | 1.29 100 72
2018-05-16 08:32:46| GPU3 44C 50% | 431.6 Sol/s 429.5 Avg 227.9 I/s | 3.56 S/W 122 W | 3.41 100 278 ++
2018-05-16 08:32:46| GPU4 44C 50% | 158.6 Sol/s 159.4 Avg 82.8 I/s | 1.80 S/W 83 W | 0.48 100 71
2018-05-16 08:32:46| GPU5 50C 50% | 437.5 Sol/s 440.9 Avg 234.4 I/s | 3.66 S/W 120 W | 2.34 100 71 +
2018-05-16 08:32:47| GPU6 44C 50% | 198.9 Sol/s 204.0 Avg 107.9 I/s | 1.93 S/W 111 W | 1.70 100 70
2018-05-16 08:32:47| ============== | 2012.5 Sol/s 2039.8 Avg 1079.3 I/s | 2.60 S/W 760 W | 10.93 100 105
the config is 7 * msi gaming 1070 on ubuntu 18.04, nvidia drive 390.48
I have the same in few rigs, 8x1070 EVGA
Jump to: