Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 164. (Read 224961 times)

As fast as I can

If you can't wait try one of the free linux distributions provided in this forum, like nvOC or UbuMiner.
The community did a fantastic job to make the setup as comfortable as possible.

Windows version, Windows version, Windows version     

New Version 0.3.2

mp:  improve stability
con: support more pools
con: more robust reconnection support for unreliable
  servers which often drop the connection                                                                                   
ui:  report GPU temperature

Global temp limit is fine I think

I'm preparing for the next update. I've implemented a temperature controller, it's a pid-controller and adjusts pretty well. People who asked for it, how do you use it? I don't want to add unnecessary configuration complexity so - do you want to be able to set the temperaturelimit for each GPU separately? Or do u usually set one global temperature limit that's is used for all GPUs?

Take a look at the numbers more carefully. The GPUs are not setup for max performance on this system.

200W is 80% power assuming default is 250W.

You can connect to my rig via ssh.
I think the most important thing is hashrate, if you have ideas to improve hashrate, try them at first.

Actually worst results I've ever seen.
1080 - usually gives 550-570
1080 - 730+
Even 1070 makes 460-470 Sol/s

Thx for the help, however all I need is an ssh terminal. I don't think it's worth the time to setup a new dev-environment. I want to finish some small things on the cpu-side this week, like temperature reporting, a temperature-controller, logfiles, some tesing with different pools.

https://www.teleconsole.com/
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/06/wormhole-fast-secure-way-send-files-users-cli

i can give you the ip address and password of my rig to test if you need, 3 1080ti and 1 1080.

You can't conclude that from these numbers. The solution rate is subjected to probability, it's inherent to equihash. You have to compare a lot more number and average them to have a more robust statement, this is why I'm computing an average in my output, so you can make better judgements how e.g. over/underclocking on your system affects the performance.

I know the technical term is solutions but the difference does not matter for all intents and purposes to the miner and hashrate has become a generalized term for measurement regardless of algorithmic differences.

That is just 1% difference. So it is comparable.

Looks promising, waiting for windows version, gj dude!

How about improving the performance? I have some new ideas, however I don't have access to testing hardware this week, so I'll see how they perform next week.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                               
I was thinking about reducing the dev fee for people that are helping development, providing feedback etc. - still not sure about it.

almost the same hashrate, if you can decrease dev fee to 1%, I'd like to use yours

specs:
B85 mobo
G1840
4G ram
3*gtx 1080 ti cc+120 mc-1000
1*gtx 1080 cc+150 mc -1000
ubuntu 16.04 x64
cuda 8.0
driver: 384.59

EWBF 0.3.4b:

GPU0: 454 Sol/s GPU1: 672 Sol/s GPU2: 687 Sol/s GPU3: 679 Sol/s
Total speed: 2492 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    153W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    203W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    198W     |  3.47 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    201W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+

yours:

>  GPU0 Sol/s: 454.4  Avg: 454.4  I/s: 240.1  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU1 Sol/s: 684.6  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 365.5  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU2 Sol/s: 683.4  Avg: 683.4  I/s: 367.8  Shares/s: 0.200  ++
>  GPU3 Sol/s: 686.0  Avg: 686.0  I/s: 365.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   ==== Sol/s: 2508.5 Avg: 2508.5 I/s: 1338.9 Shares/s: 0.000
   GPU0 Sol/s: 433.7  Avg: 444.1  I/s: 237.4  Shares/s: 0.050  +
   GPU1 Sol/s: 668.1  Avg: 676.4  I/s: 362.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   GPU2 Sol/s: 689.6  Avg: 686.5  I/s: 364.5  Shares/s: 0.100
   GPU3 Sol/s: 677.5  Avg: 681.8  I/s: 362.2  Shares/s: 0.150  +++
   ==== Sol/s: 2468.9 Avg: 2488.7 I/s: 1326.5 Shares/s: 0.150
   GPU0 Sol/s: 445.0  Avg: 444.4  I/s: 237.3  Shares/s: 0.033
   GPU1 Sol/s: 670.9  Avg: 674.6  I/s: 361.3  Shares/s: 0.067  ++
   GPU2 Sol/s: 680.8  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 363.7  Shares/s: 0.100  +
   GPU3 Sol/s: 662.1  Avg: 675.2  I/s: 361.6  Shares/s: 0.133  +
   ==== Sol/s: 2458.8 Avg: 2478.7 I/s: 1323.8 Shares/s: 0.133

It performs slightly faster on my systmes, however there might be differences on other setups. Could you please provide some numbers how it compares on your system, it would be very helpful.