SSL WRITE TIMEOUT.
Miner randomly stops with error.
Miner hashrate drops really low and sometimes freezes up completely.
Is DSTM supposed to reload miner automatically in a bad state?
I HOPE I CAN GET SOME SUPPORT MY LAST QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN IGNORED! @DSTM
Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 60. (Read 224961 times)
January 15, 2018, 12:16:43 AM
January 14, 2018, 09:51:31 PM
I created a Dockerfile for dstm 0.5.8.
I've found that using docker simplifies the management of my Ubuntu mining rig.
No more 'screen' or writing systemd/init scripts!
Requires https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker
https://github.com/skinlayers/docker-dstm-zcash-cuda-miner
If you find this useful, feel free to toss some coin my way.
ETH: 0x75F4363b09166FDf8702F41502E90D21A3F2Afb9
ZEN: znY2eiUwdx9Pj4EzRkktZqRWHfEfX7o9gkW
FTC: 6nDBmQE65gy7BbcUYbYPttc9EYA7eNKN3g
ZCL: t1cSvJsEBWCipA4CY9K7oi9sKRQgb3EG76T
VIVO: VVmjio2zqGgfnvmkEU9bZcxXmFpNswusig
TZC: Tn6K9mw6bKc8R447CrpeEMazFcve8vEg1a
LBC: bXp34GVRLnQgTTid9x6nMorHYjq1GzFwz7
GBX: GTeMA2kehXf2E7DqPGEGVSsb1gQWxpg5Lx
BTC: 196h6xSrcjEPMf7jRQZbNBQcAB3twDMHE6
I've found that using docker simplifies the management of my Ubuntu mining rig.
No more 'screen' or writing systemd/init scripts!
Requires https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker
https://github.com/skinlayers/docker-dstm-zcash-cuda-miner
If you find this useful, feel free to toss some coin my way.
ETH: 0x75F4363b09166FDf8702F41502E90D21A3F2Afb9
ZEN: znY2eiUwdx9Pj4EzRkktZqRWHfEfX7o9gkW
FTC: 6nDBmQE65gy7BbcUYbYPttc9EYA7eNKN3g
ZCL: t1cSvJsEBWCipA4CY9K7oi9sKRQgb3EG76T
VIVO: VVmjio2zqGgfnvmkEU9bZcxXmFpNswusig
TZC: Tn6K9mw6bKc8R447CrpeEMazFcve8vEg1a
LBC: bXp34GVRLnQgTTid9x6nMorHYjq1GzFwz7
GBX: GTeMA2kehXf2E7DqPGEGVSsb1gQWxpg5Lx
BTC: 196h6xSrcjEPMf7jRQZbNBQcAB3twDMHE6
January 14, 2018, 08:21:15 PM
Try this:
zm --server ssl://eu.zec.slushpool.com --port 4443 --user userName.workerName --pass workerpass
# zm 0.5.8
# GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 1:0
# telemetry server started
# encryption enabled
# connected to: eu.zec.slushpool.com:4443
# server set difficulty to: 001dca01dca01dca01dca01d...
it works for me
zm --server ssl://eu.zec.slushpool.com --port 4443 --user userName.workerName --pass workerpass
# zm 0.5.8
# GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 1:0
# telemetry server started
# encryption enabled
# connected to: eu.zec.slushpool.com:4443
# server set difficulty to: 001dca01dca01dca01dca01d...
it works for me
I wish i could connect to the ssl port or any ssl port with dstm's miner , an did how you posted it , Claymore does connect with my AMD cards. while dstm's miner won't with my 2 NV rigs .
January 14, 2018, 08:08:00 PM
anyone else have issue with dstm's Miner on a ssl port/pool .I have no issue connecting clay more to any pool/port that supports ssl, I have yet to get dstm's to connect to any ssl port/pool on my NV cards.
I end up using the normal port.
I'm using the right GPU with the right software miner before anyone goes there.
I end up using the normal port.
I'm using the right GPU with the right software miner before anyone goes there.
January 14, 2018, 05:26:52 PM
i was dragging the scroll bar on the right side of the cmd dtsm window to see if i was getting any error messages (been experiencing invalid shares lately) then let it resume to the current hashrate and it would drop the hashrate massively, sometimes down to single digits on all cards.
i was able to reproduce this a few times, sometimes it will be half the hashrate, sometimes it will go all the way down to single digits. it does eventually start to correct itself, but very odd.
let me know if anyone else can reproduce this.
version 5.8 of zm, windows 10 64bit, 6x 1070ti's, 4gb ram
i was able to reproduce this a few times, sometimes it will be half the hashrate, sometimes it will go all the way down to single digits. it does eventually start to correct itself, but very odd.
let me know if anyone else can reproduce this.
version 5.8 of zm, windows 10 64bit, 6x 1070ti's, 4gb ram
January 14, 2018, 04:33:01 PM
thanks for the miner ! tell me the maps 1080ti, you have in the first post next to the lines, a lot of pluses ++++++++, and I have one, two or three, is that right?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bfals-vuLqozIeg8ukZyjU7vsnG3hsi6/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZSM-qickPd1M0Lle-0yZPbc_5ysQK14d/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bfals-vuLqozIeg8ukZyjU7vsnG3hsi6/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZSM-qickPd1M0Lle-0yZPbc_5ysQK14d/view?usp=sharing
January 14, 2018, 08:52:08 AM
Try this:
zm --server ssl://eu.zec.slushpool.com --port 4443 --user userName.workerName --pass workerpass
# zm 0.5.8
# GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 1:0
# telemetry server started
# encryption enabled
# connected to: eu.zec.slushpool.com:4443
# server set difficulty to: 001dca01dca01dca01dca01d...
it works for me
zm --server ssl://eu.zec.slushpool.com --port 4443 --user userName.workerName --pass workerpass
# zm 0.5.8
# GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 1:0
# telemetry server started
# encryption enabled
# connected to: eu.zec.slushpool.com:4443
# server set difficulty to: 001dca01dca01dca01dca01d...
it works for me
January 14, 2018, 08:08:20 AM
Hey folks.
im trying to switch from nanopool to slushpool.
Nothing is working with slushpool.
error im getting:
connected to zec.slushpool.com:4444 failed
I am thinking it is slushpool issue, but want to touch a feather here in case i missed something.
I have tried the following:
miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server us.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server eu.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server us1.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server eu1.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
this is the only help they offer:
https://slushpool.com/help/get-started/getting_started_zcash
im trying to switch from nanopool to slushpool.
Nothing is working with slushpool.
error im getting:
connected to zec.slushpool.com:4444 failed
I am thinking it is slushpool issue, but want to touch a feather here in case i missed something.
I have tried the following:
miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server us.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server eu.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server us1.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server eu1.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
this is the only help they offer:
https://slushpool.com/help/get-started/getting_started_zcash
try might work
Code:
miner --server us-east.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
I Mine on slushpool. with dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.8 an no issue ....
Quote
Getting Started - Zcash
1. Create an account with Slush Pool
Sign-up and wait for a confirmation email.
Login to your account.
2. Configure Your Device
The login credentials for your miner look like this:
URL: stratum+tcp://zec.slushpool.com:4444
userID: userName.workerName
Please note that we do not support Zcash addresses directly in the command. Use your Slush Pool userName instead.
workerName is optional, if you do not provide any it's fine. Our system will automatically create auto worker for you.
The servers can be chosen from the following list based on your geographical location:
Servers Location Address
USA, east coast stratum+tcp://us-east.zec.slushpool.com:4444
Europe stratum+tcp://eu.zec.slushpool.com:4444
1. Create an account with Slush Pool
Sign-up and wait for a confirmation email.
Login to your account.
2. Configure Your Device
The login credentials for your miner look like this:
URL: stratum+tcp://zec.slushpool.com:4444
userID: userName.workerName
Please note that we do not support Zcash addresses directly in the command. Use your Slush Pool userName instead.
workerName is optional, if you do not provide any it's fine. Our system will automatically create auto worker for you.
The servers can be chosen from the following list based on your geographical location:
Servers Location Address
USA, east coast stratum+tcp://us-east.zec.slushpool.com:4444
Europe stratum+tcp://eu.zec.slushpool.com:4444
and set up workser first then try they should hash with dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.8 miner
I know it says: Our system will automatically create auto worker for you.
I make my own any way .
January 14, 2018, 04:02:47 AM
Hey folks.
im trying to switch from nanopool to slushpool.
Nothing is working with slushpool.
error im getting:
connected to zec.slushpool.com:4444 failed
I am thinking it is slushpool issue, but want to touch a feather here in case i missed something.
I have tried the following:
miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server us.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server eu.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server us1.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server eu1.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
this is the only help they offer:
https://slushpool.com/help/get-started/getting_started_zcash
im trying to switch from nanopool to slushpool.
Nothing is working with slushpool.
error im getting:
connected to zec.slushpool.com:4444 failed
I am thinking it is slushpool issue, but want to touch a feather here in case i missed something.
I have tried the following:
miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server us.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server eu.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server us1.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
miner --server eu1.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444
this is the only help they offer:
https://slushpool.com/help/get-started/getting_started_zcash
January 13, 2018, 11:22:13 PM
dstm starts with,.. "server sets difficulty to"/... which seems to cause problems. Seems to base it only upon 'initial' launch,. and not AB settings.. testing...
January 13, 2018, 09:40:25 PM
I just switched to the dstm client and having zero issues with my 1080ti. Actually Its OCed more and clocked higher than I have ever been before!
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core. No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher. Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec! If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings. I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more. So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core. No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher. Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec! If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings. I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more. So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.
Could you share a screengrab of dstm window running?.. I'm trying to compare my settings... Might be because I'm using 1070's and you are on 1080ti.
thx
1060 6GB Settings/Results https://ibb.co/eJp5HR
1080TI Settings/Results https://ibb.co/ca0ZBm
hmm... that speed crashes mine for some reason. I have to keep my core clock around 140 to keep it stable. win10 with 4 asus and 2 evga 1070's
Now if I go to +250 on the 1080TI, it will crash (takes about 1 hour). I have not hit the limit on the 1060s in this rig yet, the other one hits +230 on the core.
Might just be the stable limit for it. Have you tried to reduce your TDP (Power Limit) at all? I'm able to push higher clocks by dropping the power limit.
Yep, did that.
I can usually set pwr to 90/ temp 74/ core clock 140/ and mem clock 450 to 550 max ... but lower it to core clock 135 when away so it's stable.
Thanks again, just making sure I (lol.. edit.. ) don't f up my settings!
January 13, 2018, 08:47:39 PM
Will there be something done also about the non correctly working flags?
I did try setting --farm-recheck 200 - this decreases the pool hash dramatically. A little decrease in hash when I use only --cl-global-work 16384 was also observed.
I did try setting --farm-recheck 200 - this decreases the pool hash dramatically. A little decrease in hash when I use only --cl-global-work 16384 was also observed.
January 13, 2018, 08:07:00 PM
with reference to 12 GPU rigs:
i have noticed using DSTM on my 12 gpu rigs that GPU number 7 and 11 are on noticeably wamer than the others by 5-10degrees.
I FIND THIS REALLY STRANGE.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance
January 13, 2018, 05:46:55 PM
I just switched to the dstm client and having zero issues with my 1080ti. Actually Its OCed more and clocked higher than I have ever been before!
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core. No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher. Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec! If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings. I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more. So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core. No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher. Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec! If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings. I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more. So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.
Could you share a screengrab of dstm window running?.. I'm trying to compare my settings... Might be because I'm using 1070's and you are on 1080ti.
thx
1060 6GB Settings/Results https://ibb.co/eJp5HR
1080TI Settings/Results https://ibb.co/ca0ZBm
hmm... that speed crashes mine for some reason. I have to keep my core clock around 140 to keep it stable. win10 with 4 asus and 2 evga 1070's
Now if I go to +250 on the 1080TI, it will crash (takes about 1 hour). I have not hit the limit on the 1060s in this rig yet, the other one hits +230 on the core.
Might just be the stable limit for it. Have you tried to reduce your TDP (Power Limit) at all? I'm able to push higher clocks by dropping the power limit.
January 13, 2018, 05:16:53 PM
I just switched to the dstm client and having zero issues with my 1080ti. Actually Its OCed more and clocked higher than I have ever been before!
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core. No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher. Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec! If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings. I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more. So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core. No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher. Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec! If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings. I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more. So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.
Could you share a screengrab of dstm window running?.. I'm trying to compare my settings... Might be because I'm using 1070's and you are on 1080ti.
thx
1060 6GB Settings/Results https://ibb.co/eJp5HR
1080TI Settings/Results https://ibb.co/ca0ZBm
hmm... that speed crashes mine for some reason. I have to keep my core clock around 140 to keep it stable. win10 with 4 asus and 2 evga 1070's
January 13, 2018, 04:11:41 PM
I just switched to the dstm client and having zero issues with my 1080ti. Actually Its OCed more and clocked higher than I have ever been before!
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core. No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher. Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec! If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings. I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more. So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core. No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher. Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec! If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings. I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more. So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.
Could you share a screengrab of dstm window running?.. I'm trying to compare my settings... Might be because I'm using 1070's and you are on 1080ti.
thx
1060 6GB Settings/Results https://ibb.co/eJp5HR
1080TI Settings/Results https://ibb.co/ca0ZBm
January 13, 2018, 04:03:15 PM
as any one compare that to ewbf?
Yeah just the last 111 pages of this thread... a little bit of reading wouldn't hurt isn't it ?
111 pages is not a little bit of reading
so have u compared it ?
Go back and even read the last 5 pages, or 10 pages. Yes its been compared.
January 13, 2018, 12:43:47 PM
as any one compare that to ewbf?
Yeah just the last 111 pages of this thread... a little bit of reading wouldn't hurt isn't it ?
111 pages is not a little bit of reading
so have u compared it ?
January 13, 2018, 12:40:04 PM
as any one compare that to ewbf?
have no crashes on ewb. but on this miner likes to crash for no reason January 13, 2018, 12:39:41 PM
as any one compare that to ewbf?
Yeah just the last 111 pages of this thread... a little bit of reading wouldn't hurt isn't it ?
Jump to: