Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 7. (Read 224961 times)

@DSTM
I use your miner since the begining.

For information : with the last version, the 6.1, I have some disconnections by my pool (4 or 5 since the release of this version, the pool is SuprNova) that I haven't with previous versions. I am back to the 6.0 : not matter.

My Request : I am a BTCz supporter and I mine only this EquiHash coin, not others. This coin will fork on sunday because the ASICs. The fork is a variant of EquiHash : ZHash. It would be nice if your miner would be ZHash compatible. If not, I will mine BTCz with an other miner, but I would be sad to leave you ;-).

further pushes out the roi on my 3 GTX 1080's

Yep.. both my miners are almost 1000 sol/s lower.. but the graph on flypool looks higher.  Not sure what is up.

I bet Nviidia is in on this too.  Why would they not be.   They want us to buy newer cards to drive up their stocks, especially since it's a slow time on their graphs on the 'in between' of new cards coming out. 

anyone else noticed the price drop in zec. how low will it go with asic mining taking over?

0.6.0 works great with simplemining on various pools. when i try to use 0.6.1 it does not seem to work very well. most of the cards are under performing by quite a bit. any ideas what is going on ?  all the same 1070 8gb cards and overclock settings

0.6.0


_ GPU3 53C Sol/s: 442.9 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 448.3 I/s: 240.2 Sh: 47.18 1.00 21
_ GPU0 54C Sol/s: 443.3 Sol/W: 4.25 Avg: 445.0 I/s: 238.6 Sh: 57.57 1.00 31
_ GPU4 54C Sol/s: 436.4 Sol/W: 4.23 Avg: 433.9 I/s: 233.2 Sh: 57.55 1.00 29
_ GPU8 59C Sol/s: 432.2 Sol/W: 4.22 Avg: 433.8 I/s: 233.6 Sh: 63.42 1.00 21
_ GPU9 46C Sol/s: 451.3 Sol/W: 4.26 Avg: 448.4 I/s: 240.9 Sh: 41.52 1.00 22
_ GPU2 53C Sol/s: 439.0 Sol/W: 4.21 Avg: 442.0 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 51.86 1.00 28
_ GPU5 51C Sol/s: 446.9 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 447.9 I/s: 239.6 Sh: 33.41 1.00 27
_ GPU7 55C Sol/s: 443.6 Sol/W: 4.24 Avg: 444.8 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 49.51 1.00 28
_ GPU6 51C Sol/s: 450.1 Sol/W: 4.29 Avg: 448.9 I/s: 239.1 Sh: 37.95 1.00 21
_ GPU1 52C Sol/s: 444.8 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 447.7 I/s: 238.8 Sh: 39.03 1.00 21
_ GPU10 54C Sol/s: 448.8 Sol/W: 4.21 Avg: 445.0 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 55.26 1.00 39
_ GPU11 47C Sol/s: 442.8 Sol/W: 4.33 Avg: 450.3 I/s: 241.1 Sh: 43.83 1.00 29
========== Sol/s: 5322.0 Sol/W: 4.26 Avg: 5336.0 I/s: 2855.5 Sh: 578.09 1.00 26


0.6.1

_ GPU6 52C 70% | 391.1 Sol/s 391.1 Avg 208.5 I/s | 3.73 S/W 108 W | 59.79 100 27
_ GPU3 53C 70% | 455.7 Sol/s 455.7 Avg 245.5 I/s | 4.36 S/W 102 W | 50.63 100 28
_ GPU1 52C 70% | 454.2 Sol/s 454.2 Avg 243.7 I/s | 4.36 S/W 104 W | 76.15 100 29
_ GPU4 54C 70% | 454.8 Sol/s 454.8 Avg 238.6 I/s | 4.34 S/W 104 W | 78.39 100 26
_ GPU7 55C 70% | 150.2 Sol/s 150.2 Avg 82.0 I/s | 1.61 S/W 95 W | 25.24 100 32
_ GPU8 59C 70% | 373.5 Sol/s 373.5 Avg 199.9 I/s | 3.42 S/W 97 W | 39.10 100 31
_ GPU2 53C 70% | 449.7 Sol/s 449.7 Avg 241.4 I/s | 4.36 S/W 103 W | 39.05 100 24
_ GPU0 54C 70% | 458.9 Sol/s 458.9 Avg 243.5 I/s | 4.36 S/W 104 W | 73.80 100 26
_ GPU5 51C 70% | 164.1 Sol/s 164.1 Avg 85.8 I/s | 1.90 S/W 90 W | 25.29 100 28
_ GPU9 46C 70% | 145.3 Sol/s 145.3 Avg 77.3 I/s | 1.61 S/W 95 W | 18.40 100 24
_ GPU10 54C 70% | 372.3 Sol/s 372.3 Avg 200.5 I/s | 3.44 S/W 112 W | 53.06 100 28
_ GPU11 45C 70% | 128.4 Sol/s 128.4 Avg 69.6 I/s | 1.52 S/W 78 W | 16.02 100 24
============== | 3998.3 Sol/s 3998.3 Avg 2136.2 I/s | 3.25 S/W 1200 W | 554.91 100 27

It will be great if you adapt the miner to ZHash.

Yup.  Trying to keep the Efficiency high.  Doesn't make sense to burn more power these days for a few additional Sols.

Fan Speed

plz tell me what is 75% in this output?

I join the question of ZHash support (Equihash 144,5)
 We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team ...

Hi DSTM.

Is it possible to use same GPU numbering as system (Linux for me?). Its too hard to identify GPUs if a GPU throws an error.
Also, is it possible to keep the old format for --temp-limit NN to apply it to ALL GPUs?

Thanks!

You must be aiming for conserving power because my 1070 ti gets 560ish souls 194/900 89% TPD 4 souls/watt is nice tho i guess

I share the same here.

msi gtx Duke 1080 OC +150 core +600 mem @ 70% Power

GPU0  52C  Sol/s: 580.0  Sol/W: 4.05  Avg: 580.0

ZHash is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).
It would be possible to make ZM compatible.

Hi DSTM! can I find out if Zhash(144.5) support will be and how soon?

I just tried it with this line in the zm.cfg file: intensity=0:0.5

Its still around 25% loaded with about a quarter of the Sol/s.

Hello DSTM, what's new to expect from v7.0 ? You saw a tablet for GDDR 5X? It is impossible to use it for Equihash in dstm ?

Try run with config file, without additional command line params.

For example (from my config file):

and run

Yeah, you gotta go through the power cable swap,.. riser swap steps.  I ended up getting a different power supply and it fixed all my woes here.  (thermaltake much better than evga here)
And make sure you give enough time for the card to be recongnized.. almost 5  to 10 minutes sometimes.