Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 9. (Read 224621 times)

This is a bug introduced in 0.6.1.
ZM doesn't output stats properly if you use the '--dev' option.
It's fixed already in the current development branch.

Thx for reporting.
On what version does this happen? If it's on 0.6.1 could you pls check if it also happens on 0.6?

The output format has changed in 0.6.1.
This might be the reason why it's not able to parse the reported solution rate.

Ragefarm has proposed something similar.
I don't like the idea of software controlled fans. If the software crashes in a state where it previously set the fan to a low speed your GPU could be damaged.
Setting your fan speed to a constant value seems to be a better solution for a 24/7 running system.

I have no issues with it either running on windows 10. It has never crashed so I agree with you and chaostic on that bit.

I want to change to Linux as seems to be more stable and better performance from the miner. What hashrate do you get with your GTX 1070 Ti?

I have posted this before but I'm having ZERO issues on Linux (Ubuntu Server) with 0.6.1 on a eight GTX1070TI rig.  I don't understand why others are having issues.  I'm seeing the slight speed increase dstm said we would and have never had one single crash since I started using his miner back in December.

So I don't know what is up with other problems reported.  I agree with chaostic in that most of the issues are user error and not setting up the Linux environment correctly.  I've been using Linux since 1997 so perhaps that is why I don't have issues.

Read carefully your first 6 words... the payout is NOT the same...so read what you post before you post it.

And if you read in mi post I said my payout time is the same. I copy paste it for you:

If you mine in flypool that is what happened. My console reports the same low share, you can see my post on page 163 I believe but my payout time is exactly the same. It hasn’t changed.

I don’t know everything that’s why I post and ask and I did on page 163, so do not come here to teach me lessons. Pay a bit more attention and read carefully.

Learn something guy, I never said the payouts changed on Flypool, I did say however that it "will" take longer to get a payout, and that is a fact bud...It isnt my fault ya think ya know everything and were clueless on the biggest thing the zec name atm, the miner works great but on nix youll have lil issues due to things not being setup correctly (user error 90% of the time) If you cant be helpful then simply keep you're comments to yourself as every comment i've made was 100% factual and helpful.

I have the exact same issue going on. just updated Awesome Miner. Looks like part of that update was to update to the new DSTM 0.6.1 Now the only thing updating in my miner is the server difficulty changes. Only running 3 1050TI's on it at the moment.

So for your 14 post I nearly forget you were the real expert in this subject... my payout is exactly the same it hasn’t gone down and I have no need to lie about it. No need to be harsh though calling people noobs or fools when you are no better than anyone here or elsewhere.

So go an learn some manners then come back and try to post something helpful.

The Payout is "NOT" the same and anyone saying so is a damn fool, and that's wrong to do as noobs will no doubt think things are the same, it's taking me much longer for payouts after going from difficulty of 1.95 to 11.7 and now that asics are on zec we'll no doubt encounter much more problems until we find another coin to goto that doesnt screw over GPU miners, the miner itself has no issues atm unless you have driver problems which *nix is going to be full of, no the miner hasnt upped anyones difficulty flypool has and it'll get much worse, would be nice to have a coin that is anti asic that doesnt screw us lil gpu miner guys over, but i guess that's a pipe dream at this rate, the fact is yes it will take longer to get a payout now as its added 20 hours on my payouts.

Yes, I mine in flypool, OK I will check for two days from now, Thanks for help!

If you mine in flypool that is what happened. My console reports the same low share, you can see my post on page 163 I believe but my payout time is exactly the same. It hasn’t changed.

If you mine in nanopool might be a different issue but the miner itself is the same and hasn’t changed

My minimum payout time increased from 30-31 hours to 41 hours, so its not exactly "completely normal"

Was thinking the same here... Yeah, it looks like I'm getting same balance daily.
..
I think this is the site?
https://zcashnetwork.info/blocks

It is completely normal as flypool increased the difficulty for everyone in order to reduce the number of connections to their servers but the payout is not affected.

You can look at that on flypool website, click on payout and read the twits over there. It is explained

Yeah, I noticed that as well.  I mine at flypool and the shares there track with what I've been used to, but the output shows only single '+' very sporadically.  Not too worried since the shares seem to track on flypool.

I have checked and confirmed - nvidia-settings show GPU as defined by Identifier "DeviceN" (where N in 0,1,2 and so on) in section "Device".

For example:
show GPU order 750 - 950 - 1050

show GPU order 750 - 1050 - 950

Hi all,

Need help, last days my output seems very strange, the "+" that indicates one submitted share almost gone
please see my output, only two submitted shares from about 30 lines
Some suggestions?

> GPU0  63C  75% |  543.1 Sol/s   541.3 Avg   289.3 I/s | 3.37 S/W  161 W |  0.33  100  132
   GPU0  63C  75% |  541.9 Sol/s   541.4 Avg   289.2 I/s | 3.36 S/W  162 W |  0.30  100  132
   GPU0  63C  75% |  539.7 Sol/s   541.2 Avg   289.3 I/s | 3.36 S/W  159 W |  0.27  100  132
   GPU0  63C  75% |  538.9 Sol/s   541.0 Avg   289.2 I/s | 3.36 S/W  160 W |  0.50  100  124 +
   GPU0  63C  75% |  542.5 Sol/s   541.2 Avg   289.1 I/s | 3.36 S/W  163 W |  0.46  100  124
> GPU0  63C  75% |  543.0 Sol/s   541.3 Avg   289.2 I/s | 3.36 S/W  160 W |  0.43  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  540.9 Sol/s   541.3 Avg   289.3 I/s | 3.36 S/W  158 W |  0.40  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  538.4 Sol/s   541.1 Avg   289.0 I/s | 3.36 S/W  162 W |  0.37  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  536.7 Sol/s   540.8 Avg   289.0 I/s | 3.36 S/W  158 W |  0.35  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  539.1 Sol/s   540.7 Avg   289.1 I/s | 3.35 S/W  164 W |  0.33  100  124
> GPU0  63C  75% |  539.7 Sol/s   540.7 Avg   289.2 I/s | 3.35 S/W  162 W |  0.31  100  124
> GPU0  63C  75% |  542.7 Sol/s   540.8 Avg   289.4 I/s | 3.35 S/W  165 W |  0.30  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  535.9 Sol/s   540.5 Avg   289.1 I/s | 3.35 S/W  160 W |  0.28  100  124
> GPU0  63C  75% |  550.8 Sol/s   541.0 Avg   289.2 I/s | 3.36 S/W  161 W |  0.27  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  533.7 Sol/s   540.7 Avg   289.3 I/s | 3.35 S/W  164 W |  0.26  100  124
> GPU0  63C  75% |  537.0 Sol/s   540.5 Avg   289.3 I/s | 3.35 S/W  163 W |  0.25  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  535.7 Sol/s   540.3 Avg   289.1 I/s | 3.35 S/W  164 W |  0.24  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  544.8 Sol/s   540.5 Avg   289.3 I/s | 3.35 S/W  162 W |  0.23  100  124
   GPU0  63C  75% |  540.6 Sol/s   540.5 Avg   289.3 I/s | 3.35 S/W  161 W |  0.33  100  220 +
> GPU0  63C  75% |  541.1 Sol/s   540.5 Avg   289.2 I/s | 3.35 S/W  162 W |  0.32  100  220
   GPU0  63C  75% |  541.6 Sol/s   540.6 Avg   289.2 I/s | 3.35 S/W  160 W |  0.31  100  220
   GPU0  64C  75% |  540.1 Sol/s   540.6 Avg   289.0 I/s | 3.35 S/W  163 W |  0.30  100  220
   GPU0  64C  75% |  542.6 Sol/s   540.6 Avg   289.0 I/s | 3.35 S/W  154 W |  0.29  100  220 

Finally we have the power consumption report in new update ver.6.1. I still keep some of my rigs moving on mining ZEc, and let see what happen in the end of June as asics miners Z9 release out. By the way, ver.6.1 constantly crashes on my 1070 rigs even I set them at stock setting, low power limit, but it works fine for 1060 and P106 rigs.