Hey idiot, his name is Stan Golden, not Steve, shows how well you can read.
You're the lair who challenged me to call Coicrest and I did. As soon as I did as you challenged me to do then you change your tune. As Mr. Golden said in his post and I challenge you to as well to do what I did and get the phone numbers off their website and call and ask to speak to Mr. Golden. In fact any of you who believe this idiot's lies are welcome to call Coincrest yourself. As this lying FUD master has already shown, he fears facts, always has some sort of excuse when he is proved a lair. Funny that Mr. Golden points out that the employee who FUD master claims he spoke to was not there to be spoken to.
The bottom line is that this lying FUD master has been proven to be just that, a lying FUD master. Each and everyone here is free to believe what they want. If you believe his lies, then that is your right, no matter how wrong you are. Remember the "proof" that he has provided is non proof, conjecture and opinion and has been discredited over and over again.
He accuses me of creating an ID for Stan Golden (Who he calls Steve) when that is not true, he has no proof other than his twisted mind, when I believe that he uses multiple IDs so he can agree with himself. No, I don't have proof, but I believe that based on the level of duplicity this idiot practices. Again, he and any of you are free to call Coincrest and see if Mr. Golden is available to talk to you like he was when I called. Remember ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the ONLY reason I called Coincrest is because the lying FUD master challenged me to do so, then when his lies were discovered he started to sing a new tune. As soon as a lie is exposed he comes up with another "logic" to try and support his lies.
It's up to all of you to decide what to believe. All I ask is you do as I did and make the calls to hear for yourselves, then you will know what a lying FUD master ICO-Buster is. His name says it all.
Sure is. He made the claim to be "Steve Golden" with no proof. It's on him to prove it and until that's done I'm not obligated to provide any identifying information since he is more likely Cryptoguy posing rather than actual Steve Golden. But such complicated concept as burden of proof is not something a Pajeet would understand, clearly...
Like all liars you never answer the points raised you simply dissemble some more.
Exactly. Still waiting for the proof you're in fact "Steve Golden". Don't want to waste my time proving anything to CryptoGuy who's delusional enough to think it isn't obvious it's him posting under an alt account.
LOL. Nice logic. The stupid way is for the person who makes the claim to come up with PROOF. But, like I said, that is stupid way. As what you said is the MOST LOGICAL WAY! So much to cheer about this PERFECT GUY!