https://medium.com/egaas/report-of-the-egaas-team-c118452831a6#.wc7nvd7ta hi guys
We have new report for you all
We have new report for you all
That's nice report but what we need wait all ICO end to listed on exchange?
Topic: [ANN] eGaaS: Electronic Government as a Service - page 32. (Read 115086 times)
That's nice report but what we need wait all ICO end to listed on exchange?
https://medium.com/egaas/report-of-the-egaas-team-c118452831a6#.wc7nvd7ta hi guys
We have new report for you all
We have new report for you all
What do you mean prepared, whether, the launch of which will be provided by the developer ?? 
It simply just means that they will not be holding it starting from today as was planned but that they are making preparations (whatever that includes) to hold it on a later date. You can not just launch an ICO out of the blue, they prepared for phase 1, launched it, closed it and now they are preparing for phase 2. We'll probably have more info once they decide on a date (if they ever do ...).
Let them come out for another ICO, I can quarantee them noone will invest into it, the developer disappear after the first one, another thing that I've learnt from Synereo and Antshare second ICO is that one will surely get burnt
I agree that second ICOers will probably be dumped on by first ICOers when EGS hits exchanges, unless second ICO price is more attractive ... Anyway, the strategy here doesn't seem clear. For starters, they made it sound like EGS might get listed on exchanges before the second ICO, which doesn't make sense. Then, there are many ICO phases planned, and it still doesn't make sense to list EGS on an exchange as long as ICO phases are planned. Moreover, if the price in the subsequent phases is higher than in the first, then new investors will be dumped on as soon as this is exchangeable. I really don't see the motives behind this, and it's too bad that no one steps forward to explain what is really the goal here ...
2nd ICO dont make any sense at all. They could have done better earlier by at least communicating continously even with simple updates. Now I am thinking they arent willing to pay Bittrex to enlist because it might hamper a second ICO. Sorry but I think this project is already a failure.
What do you mean prepared, whether, the launch of which will be provided by the developer ??
It simply just means that they will not be holding it starting from today as was planned but that they are making preparations (whatever that includes) to hold it on a later date. You can not just launch an ICO out of the blue, they prepared for phase 1, launched it, closed it and now they are preparing for phase 2. We'll probably have more info once they decide on a date (if they ever do ...).
Let them come out for another ICO, I can quarantee them noone will invest into it, the developer disappear after the first one, another thing that I've learnt from Synereo and Antshare second ICO is that one will surely get burnt
I agree that second ICOers will probably be dumped on by first ICOers when EGS hits exchanges, unless second ICO price is more attractive ... Anyway, the strategy here doesn't seem clear. For starters, they made it sound like EGS might get listed on exchanges before the second ICO, which doesn't make sense. Then, there are many ICO phases planned, and it still doesn't make sense to list EGS on an exchange as long as ICO phases are planned. Moreover, if the price in the subsequent phases is higher than in the first, then new investors will be dumped on as soon as this is exchangeable. I really don't see the motives behind this, and it's too bad that no one steps forward to explain what is really the goal here ...
Haven't you figured it out yet? they are a band of scammers with at least 50 accounts for shilling, they start a new ICO every 2 weeks or so and take gullible unsuspected and uninformed people thinking if they ride the wave no harm will come to them blinded by greed.
Just tell me what is government as a service? a bunch of filthy pants thieves can provide E-Gov as a service by registering a few domains?
Now their newest project is TAAS, this time they'll give you token as a service, what's that? let me know when you figured it out.
When you see a bunch of high ranking members of forum are showing interest and posting positive feed backs in an ICO thread and their dev team saying we collected more than 1000btc or 10000btc and showed you some transactions, don't fall for it thinking there are much higher and bigger amounts at stake many investors are risking their money so my few bucks or few bitcoins wouldn't be the target for them to scam and there it is where you are destructively naive and wrong. they are looking for these small sums accumulated just to fill their pockets and even throwing a bone to a patsy just to come here and keep you occupied until you are in up to your waist with no going back.
So please when you see a topic announcing any ICO what so ever the healthy choice would be to avoid even clicking on it.
I think you're right about It I just also notice those two ICO also have the same manager with fixed token price. For now all we have to do is monitored any ICO before join and invest our money. Just tell me what is government as a service? a bunch of filthy pants thieves can provide E-Gov as a service by registering a few domains?
Now their newest project is TAAS, this time they'll give you token as a service, what's that? let me know when you figured it out.
When you see a bunch of high ranking members of forum are showing interest and posting positive feed backs in an ICO thread and their dev team saying we collected more than 1000btc or 10000btc and showed you some transactions, don't fall for it thinking there are much higher and bigger amounts at stake many investors are risking their money so my few bucks or few bitcoins wouldn't be the target for them to scam and there it is where you are destructively naive and wrong. they are looking for these small sums accumulated just to fill their pockets and even throwing a bone to a patsy just to come here and keep you occupied until you are in up to your waist with no going back.
So please when you see a topic announcing any ICO what so ever the healthy choice would be to avoid even clicking on it.
..."God save the queen.."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqrAPOZxgzU
Mercatox progress zero!...Exchange progress zero ! DEV When will the miracle happen?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqrAPOZxgzU
Mercatox progress zero!...Exchange progress zero ! DEV When will the miracle happen?
Development Update:
https://medium.com/egaas/report-of-the-egaas-team-c118452831a6#.bouprkb6o
This is the second update in the last month.
i know the developers are shitty in marketing, but it seems there is still work getting done.
But an constant update on what's next in this Projects roadmap would be nice
https://medium.com/egaas/report-of-the-egaas-team-c118452831a6#.bouprkb6o
This is the second update in the last month.
i know the developers are shitty in marketing, but it seems there is still work getting done.
But an constant update on what's next in this Projects roadmap would be nice
They are still work
but the first ico is already over and not listed on exchange yet.
they are have a plan to open the second ICO, it is bad a idea
Development Update:
https://medium.com/egaas/report-of-the-egaas-team-c118452831a6#.bouprkb6o
This is the second update in the last month.
i know the developers are shitty in marketing, but it seems there is still work getting done.
But an constant update on what's next in this Projects roadmap would be nice
https://medium.com/egaas/report-of-the-egaas-team-c118452831a6#.bouprkb6o
This is the second update in the last month.
i know the developers are shitty in marketing, but it seems there is still work getting done.
But an constant update on what's next in this Projects roadmap would be nice
Haven't you figured it out yet? they are a band of scammers with at least 50 accounts for shilling, they start a new ICO every 2 weeks or so and take gullible unsuspected and uninformed people thinking if they ride the wave no harm will come to them blinded by greed.
Just tell me what is government as a service? a bunch of filthy pants thieves can provide E-Gov as a service by registering a few domains?
Now their newest project is TAAS, this time they'll give you token as a service, what's that? let me know when you figured it out.
When you see a bunch of high ranking members of forum are showing interest and posting positive feed backs in an ICO thread and their dev team saying we collected more than 1000btc or 10000btc and showed you some transactions, don't fall for it thinking there are much higher and bigger amounts at stake many investors are risking their money so my few bucks or few bitcoins wouldn't be the target for them to scam and there it is where you are destructively naive and wrong. they are looking for these small sums accumulated just to fill their pockets and even throwing a bone to a patsy just to come here and keep you occupied until you are in up to your waist with no going back.
So please when you see a topic announcing any ICO what so ever the healthy choice would be to avoid even clicking on it.
Just tell me what is government as a service? a bunch of filthy pants thieves can provide E-Gov as a service by registering a few domains?
Now their newest project is TAAS, this time they'll give you token as a service, what's that? let me know when you figured it out.
When you see a bunch of high ranking members of forum are showing interest and posting positive feed backs in an ICO thread and their dev team saying we collected more than 1000btc or 10000btc and showed you some transactions, don't fall for it thinking there are much higher and bigger amounts at stake many investors are risking their money so my few bucks or few bitcoins wouldn't be the target for them to scam and there it is where you are destructively naive and wrong. they are looking for these small sums accumulated just to fill their pockets and even throwing a bone to a patsy just to come here and keep you occupied until you are in up to your waist with no going back.
So please when you see a topic announcing any ICO what so ever the healthy choice would be to avoid even clicking on it.
wow still not exchange?
yes, We dont know when will be listed at exchange
maybe after the second ICO.
In this case, you think they will raise money from second ICO? This is scam and dev team has shown their inability to communicate with public affairs. No exchange forever, because the token is worthless.
still not exchange?Nahhh
What do you mean prepared, whether, the launch of which will be provided by the developer ??
It simply just means that they will not be holding it starting from today as was planned but that they are making preparations (whatever that includes) to hold it on a later date. You can not just launch an ICO out of the blue, they prepared for phase 1, launched it, closed it and now they are preparing for phase 2. We'll probably have more info once they decide on a date (if they ever do ...).
Let them come out for another ICO, I can quarantee them noone will invest into it, the developer disappear after the first one, another thing that I've learnt from Synereo and Antshare second ICO is that one will surely get burnt
U sounded like one of obnoxious bitches who sued egaas crew for being untrustworthy in public. After u got refunded u kept stalking those guys with constant demands but much to ur surprise they refused to send u money for the second time, kicked u out of their thread and reported u to mods.
wow still not exchange?
yes, We dont know when will be listed at exchange
maybe after the second ICO.
wow still not exchange?
What do you mean prepared, whether, the launch of which will be provided by the developer ??
It simply just means that they will not be holding it starting from today as was planned but that they are making preparations (whatever that includes) to hold it on a later date. You can not just launch an ICO out of the blue, they prepared for phase 1, launched it, closed it and now they are preparing for phase 2. We'll probably have more info once they decide on a date (if they ever do ...).
Let them come out for another ICO, I can quarantee them noone will invest into it, the developer disappear after the first one, another thing that I've learnt from Synereo and Antshare second ICO is that one will surely get burnt
I agree that second ICOers will probably be dumped on by first ICOers when EGS hits exchanges, unless second ICO price is more attractive ... Anyway, the strategy here doesn't seem clear. For starters, they made it sound like EGS might get listed on exchanges before the second ICO, which doesn't make sense. Then, there are many ICO phases planned, and it still doesn't make sense to list EGS on an exchange as long as ICO phases are planned. Moreover, if the price in the subsequent phases is higher than in the first, then new investors will be dumped on as soon as this is exchangeable. I really don't see the motives behind this, and it's too bad that no one steps forward to explain what is really the goal here ...
agree with you topesis dev not care enough with investors from ICO first round
dev should add egaas at any exchanges then held ICO second round
will the investor will invest again at egaas project? let's see it soon at ICO second round
dev should add egaas at any exchanges then held ICO second round
will the investor will invest again at egaas project? let's see it soon at ICO second round
What do you mean prepared, whether, the launch of which will be provided by the developer ??
It simply just means that they will not be holding it starting from today as was planned but that they are making preparations (whatever that includes) to hold it on a later date. You can not just launch an ICO out of the blue, they prepared for phase 1, launched it, closed it and now they are preparing for phase 2. We'll probably have more info once they decide on a date (if they ever do ...).
Let them come out for another ICO, I can quarantee them noone will invest into it, the developer disappear after the first one, another thing that I've learnt from Synereo and Antshare second ICO is that one will surely get burnt
What do you mean prepared, whether, the launch of which will be provided by the developer ??
It simply just means that they will not be holding it starting from today as was planned but that they are making preparations (whatever that includes) to hold it on a later date. You can not just launch an ICO out of the blue, they prepared for phase 1, launched it, closed it and now they are preparing for phase 2. We'll probably have more info once they decide on a date (if they ever do ...).
So what do you know about this project, when the exact date to begin the second phase they are doing for the launch of this ??
I know nothing
. I'm just trying to say that asking such questions does not serve any purpose, the team members post when they want, if they have news for us, they probably will post them, if they don't post, then there's no news for investors/community. For the time being, they only told us that a second ICO is in preparation, if they wanted to give us a date or more info they would have ... What do you mean prepared, whether, the launch of which will be provided by the developer ??
It simply just means that they will not be holding it starting from today as was planned but that they are making preparations (whatever that includes) to hold it on a later date. You can not just launch an ICO out of the blue, they prepared for phase 1, launched it, closed it and now they are preparing for phase 2. We'll probably have more info once they decide on a date (if they ever do ...).
well, and when the scheduled second round of sales, and whether the advertising campaign with signatures and Facebook?
does it make sense to take into account Egaas, despite innovative initiatives like an investment portfolio
does it make sense to take into account Egaas, despite innovative initiatives like an investment portfolio
Jump to: