https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/12/24/understanding-serenity-part-i-abstraction/"...One particular interesting consequence is that with the current plan for Serenity, Ethereum will be optionally quantum-safe; if you are scared of the NSA having access to a quantum computer, and want to protect your account more securely, you can personally switch to Lamport signatures at any time. Proof of stake further bolsters this, as even if the NSA had a quantum computer and no one else they would not be able to exploit that to implement a 51% attack. The only cryptographic security assumption that will exist at protocol level in Ethereum is collision-resistance of SHA3..."
as I understand it, after the launch of Serenity , Etherium will contain protection against quantum attacks quantum computers and eliminates the need of additional add-ons for security and a manipulation of accounts is very interesting
So let me get this straight.. Does that mean the serenity release will be more secure against quantum computer attacks and the NSA as well? If that is the case, then I think it would be the safest decentralized network (apart from bitcoin) Just my opinion. Please correct me if I am wrong.
you need to ask the developers of the Etherium, so does the threat of monitoring personal, private, confidential data and whether they offer protection in a package with other protections, as a set of measures inherent in each subject )
I don't think any threat could be anticipated and neutralized by 100%, but attempts to protect themselves certainly led to good results in the course of evolution, can occur, although, from the point of view of cost and long duration of the process , not the result of expediency and it is this protection; while this seems not probable, but a necessity to keep my personal life still overpowers the attempts of control, I think, although
