[ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning - page 882.

Benarand

full member

Activity: 773

Merit: 100

Quote from: roselee on June 29, 2016, 08:42:46 AM

Quote from: digi123 on June 29, 2016, 06:45:42 AM

A Hard Fork needs to be done or anything that stops the thief getting ether that has been stolen.
This is taking so long to fix that it is causing etherium and the developers a massive lose of faith

If the developers don't sort this out real fast all faith will be lost in etherium because such a large theft was aloud to occur when it could have been stopped.

Who wants to be a part of an ecosystem that rewards stealing and refuses to stop it when it can be stopped. Just the thought of a thief holding so much ether should send etherium to Zero. And this person should be brought to justice as soon as he can be identified for attempted theft.
Any kind of blockchain ideology will be meaningless with what is occurring.

you are mislead if you belive it can be stoped fast or with time
dont you see to stop it you need to destroy ether
and you would need the agreement of all ether holders to do it
they will never get that in a million years
the dao is done
the dao ether are gone
let go

You just need 51% of the miners to agree with certain proposal so that the proposal will be implemented. Not the Ethereum owner.

almond

sr. member

Activity: 407

Merit: 254

hard fork proposal from Gavin Wood:

https://github.com/ethcore/parity/pull/1483/commits/fd9d10a0957dd6548a62f3f8b0bb1a9a794c7187

roselee

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1000

Quote from: digi123 on June 29, 2016, 06:45:42 AM

A Hard Fork needs to be done or anything that stops the thief getting ether that has been stolen.
This is taking so long to fix that it is causing etherium and the developers a massive lose of faith

If the developers don't sort this out real fast all faith will be lost in etherium because such a large theft was aloud to occur when it could have been stopped.

Who wants to be a part of an ecosystem that rewards stealing and refuses to stop it when it can be stopped. Just the thought of a thief holding so much ether should send etherium to Zero. And this person should be brought to justice as soon as he can be identified for attempted theft.
Any kind of blockchain ideology will be meaningless with what is occurring.

you are mislead if you belive it can be stoped fast or with time
dont you see to stop it you need to destroy ether
and you would need the agreement of all ether holders to do it
they will never get that in a million years
the dao is done
the dao ether are gone
let go

TrueAnon

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

ETH is GOODNIGHT forever lol

haendehochueberfall

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: digi123 on June 29, 2016, 06:45:42 AM

A Hard Fork needs to be done or anything that stops the thief getting ether that has been stolen.
This is taking so long to fix that it is causing etherium and the developers a massive lose of faith

If the developers don't sort this out real fast all faith will be lost in etherium because such a large theft was aloud to occur when it could have been stopped.

Who wants to be a part of an ecosystem that rewards stealing and refuses to stop it when it can be stopped. Just the thought of a thief holding so much ether should send etherium to Zero. And this person should be brought to justice as soon as he can be identified for attempted theft.
Any kind of blockchain ideology will be meaningless with what is occurring.

Did you realize that faith is lost when funds are recoverd and faith is lost when funds aren't recovered?

Bottom line: faith is lost

you're behind the curve here. Also "bringing the hacker to justice" could result in a court ruling to having to pay him out. Did you know? It's no certainty the hacker would be punished or rewarded in such a case.
Personally i don't think he will be punished. Wether he would be rewarded or not would have to be seen. Would certainly be an interesting thing to watch.

YOUR main problem seems to be that you entered into a contract (dao) without reading or understanding it. Don't make others responsible for that!

First you have to blame yourself and second the shills that misled you into 'investing' into a thing which you don't understand and that was fundamentally broken.
Also experts raised red flags about the dao before the hack. They were ignored. Now don't try to shift the blame 100% away from yourself.
Blame the people that told you to invest and that 'it was a sure thing without risk' for your loss instead of the hacker who showed them to be crooked liars.

digi123

full member

Activity: 236

Merit: 100

A Hard Fork needs to be done or anything that stops the thief getting ether that has been stolen.
This is taking so long to fix that it is causing etherium and the developers a massive lose of faith

If the developers don't sort this out real fast all faith will be lost in etherium because such a large theft was aloud to occur when it could have been stopped.

Who wants to be a part of an ecosystem that rewards stealing and refuses to stop it when it can be stopped. Just the thought of a thief holding so much ether should send etherium to Zero. And this person should be brought to justice as soon as he can be identified for attempted theft.
Any kind of blockchain ideology will be meaningless with what is occurring.

haendehochueberfall

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

I think you've got a very high chance some haters and btc maximalists going to throw some decent hash on the "no" vote. "yes" could find out they are really on the weaker chain.
I don't think HF will go down without frictions. Leaving shorts open and popcorn at hand is my recommendation.

the correct way to look at it now:
https://medium.com/@WhalePanda/another-quick-dao-eth-update-2ac0e58ef1f0#.6iysrqtb1

The best you retards can do is just let it be and do nothing, like Charly Lee recommended to you progressive actionists.

AlgoSwan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

ancap

Quote from: roselee on June 29, 2016, 04:51:01 AM

Quote from: AlgoSwan on June 29, 2016, 04:28:09 AM

Quote from: roselee on June 29, 2016, 04:14:49 AM

isnt this fork talking just wishful thinking ?
if some do not fork ? is ether splited ?

In order to do a hard fork without a network split, we need to upgrade every single node in the network. If only 51% of nodes upgrade, the network splits and there is no longer an "Ethereum", but two separate networks which cannot interact, each claiming to be the true "Ethereum".

bardon for my naive question but who is "we"?

The whole Ethereum community!

roselee

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1000

Quote from: AlgoSwan on June 29, 2016, 04:28:09 AM

Quote from: roselee on June 29, 2016, 04:14:49 AM

isnt this fork talking just wishful thinking ?
if some do not fork ? is ether splited ?

In order to do a hard fork without a network split, we need to upgrade every single node in the network. If only 51% of nodes upgrade, the network splits and there is no longer an "Ethereum", but two separate networks which cannot interact, each claiming to be the true "Ethereum".

bardon for my naive question but who is "we"?
the ether holders ? with a wallet ? the miners? the exchanges ?
and how high is the chance that "we" all agree?

Quidat

hero member

Activity: 2688

Merit: 540

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

Quote from: AlgoSwan on June 29, 2016, 04:28:09 AM

Quote from: roselee on June 29, 2016, 04:14:49 AM

isnt this fork talking just wishful thinking ?
if some do not fork ? is ether splited ?

In order to do a hard fork without a network split, we need to upgrade every single node in the network. If only 51% of nodes upgrade, the network splits and there is no longer an "Ethereum", but two separate networks which cannot interact, each claiming to be the true "Ethereum".

It could happen, but the possibility is very low. At least 70% of the miners agree with the soft fork, they might agree with hard fork as well.

AlgoSwan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

ancap

Quote from: roselee on June 29, 2016, 04:14:49 AM

isnt this fork talking just wishful thinking ?
if some do not fork ? is ether splited ?

In order to do a hard fork without a network split, we need to upgrade every single node in the network. If only 51% of nodes upgrade, the network splits and there is no longer an "Ethereum", but two separate networks which cannot interact, each claiming to be the true "Ethereum".

roselee

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1000

isnt this fork talking just wishful thinking ?
if some do not fork ? is ether splited ?

estenity

hero member

Activity: 1924

Merit: 538

Quote from: AlgoSwan on June 28, 2016, 08:22:09 AM

Quote from: estenity on June 28, 2016, 07:13:02 AM

Quote from: AlgoSwan on June 28, 2016, 03:35:55 AM

Buterin: Article from 1 year ago pertinent to current Soft-Fork discussions (Basically, in future versions Of Ethereum address-blocking soft forks will be outright impossible)
https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/06/06/the-problem-of-censorship/?1

Is that means hard fork coming?

soft fork implemented and explained in a post of ethereum foundation
https://blog.ethereum.org/2016/06/24/dao-wars-youre-voice-soft-fork-dilemma/

Yes, but Buterin wrote 6 hours ago: Article from 1 year ago pertinent to current Soft-Fork discussions (Basically, in future versions Of Ethereum address-blocking soft forks will be outright impossible)
https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/06/06/the-problem-of-censorship/?1

Is that means hard fork coming?

i understand that the solution found is SF followed by HF without any rollback or transaction cancelled, allowing to reimburse everyone as described in this post :

https://blog.slock.it/what-the-fork-really-means-6fe573ac31dd#.9mqoi72q1

with only minor modifications of the clients,

but i am open to further explanations...

AlgoSwan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

ancap

Quote from: Joint Force on June 29, 2016, 02:55:19 AM

I tweeted out an interesting thought today.

If the $ETH blockchain forks, it would make $SHF the oldest running unmodified ethereum project based blockchain.
https://twitter.com/jessecouch/status/748060113391460352

Would people prefer $SHF over $ETH if $ETH hard forks or is $SHF too small and dumb to be real competition to $ETH?

The market will determine which is more valuable and therefore which gets to keep the Ethereum name.

Mrpumperitis

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1075

Quote from: Wilhelmer on June 29, 2016, 03:07:20 AM

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on June 28, 2016, 09:49:36 PM

Bittrex added ETH markets

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=ETH-DGD
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=ETH-DAO

Soon Plutus, Auger and many more will be added over the years...

ETH IS JUST GETTING STARTED

That explains why DGD went down as well. Honestly anything that has a pairing to ETH now just goes down. I rather an exchange don't do that.

that makes no sense, bittrex eth/dgd has 0 volume

Wilhelmer

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on June 28, 2016, 09:49:36 PM

Bittrex added ETH markets

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=ETH-DGD
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=ETH-DAO

Soon Plutus, Auger and many more will be added over the years...

ETH IS JUST GETTING STARTED

That explains why DGD went down as well. Honestly anything that has a pairing to ETH now just goes down. I rather an exchange don't do that.

Joint Force

hero member

Activity: 804

Merit: 500

DAO ↔ DApp

I tweeted out an interesting thought today.

If the $ETH blockchain forks, it would make $SHF the oldest running unmodified ethereum project based blockchain.
https://twitter.com/jessecouch/status/748060113391460352

Would people prefer $SHF over $ETH if $ETH hard forks or is $SHF too small and dumb to be real competition to $ETH?

roselee

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1000

tual said in this link
https://blog.slock.it/deja-vu-dao-smart-contracts-audit-results-d26bc088e32e#.hxupwh8gt

all is checked and found secure
best biz for checking did it
then why didnt they find the holes ?
are such firms responsible if they didnt find such holes ?

i sugest the ethereum stays like it is gets bugs fixed but leaves the dao desaster to the courts which will do justice if the attacker was unrightful takeing they will punish if some of the creators are responsible they will make them pay
but to involve ethereum as a whole is very wrong on the long run
some of you say if they miners do sf its legal but are you sure ? what if they get sued ? and be sure a judge will acept the case couse its a precidenc case. and such a case will take years and put a big burden on a miners pool. doesnt matter if they at the end win or not
it will cost energy and money

_Victory_

member

Activity: 90

Merit: 10

Quote from: roselee on June 29, 2016, 02:42:41 AM

Quote from: Justicemaxx on June 28, 2016, 01:24:50 PM

You now refer to the fact that the code is the law.. first of all, the code was a mistake, because the code has violated the legitimate interests of the user DAO, the second DAO is not equal to ETH. Rather ETH the body and the DAO is easy. And now the output of 3.5 mln ETH in the hands of the hacker is the decentralization and the cancer that they need to get rid of.

http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/06/28/ethereum-soft-fork-dos-vector/
seems a fork isnt that simply done
and what is the aftermath

Devs were clear from the beginniong that a hard fork was easier and soft fork required much more work.

roselee

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Justicemaxx on June 28, 2016, 01:24:50 PM

You now refer to the fact that the code is the law.. first of all, the code was a mistake, because the code has violated the legitimate interests of the user DAO, the second DAO is not equal to ETH. Rather ETH the body and the DAO is easy. And now the output of 3.5 mln ETH in the hands of the hacker is the decentralization and the cancer that they need to get rid of.

http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/06/28/ethereum-soft-fork-dos-vector/
seems a fork isnt that simply done
and what is the aftermath

Topic: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning - page 882. (Read 2006108 times)