Topic: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning - page 998. (Read 2007067 times)
Can someone explain the difference between the account and the contract wallet please?
And why can´t I see the incomming transactions at the account?
Would someone point me to a good guide for mining with AMD cards? What kind of hashrate can I expect from 270x's? Thanks!
Ethereum mining hardware comparaison: http://62.212.74.86/~mining/list/amd/index.php?algo=eth 
Would someone point me to a good guide for mining with AMD cards? What kind of hashrate can I expect from 270x's? Thanks!
https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/guides/how-to-mine-ethereum/
who in the world would have guessed it to fly to above 0.03 lol?
It will fly higher ; it's just a matter of time.
These couple of weeks are really stressfull its unbelievable. Had bought couple of btc on ico. Sold almost all of it around 600-1000k ( i just had to have Factoids and bitshares). Made some btc but who in the world would have guessed it to fly to above 0.03 lol?
Goodluck all
Goodluck all
Does anyone know how to solo mine with GUI wallet and Ethereum miner? GUI wallet is much more simpler, cleaner and better in every way (Wallet 0.5.2 (Beta 10): https://github.com/ethereum/mist/releases ). The new version works pretty well for me.
ETH to BTC --> BTC
BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
That is wrong. Both should be reported as BTC volume and both should be reported as ETH volume.BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
ETH to BTC --> BTC
BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
That is wrong. Both should be reported as BTC volume and both should be reported as ETH volume. BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
Would someone point me to a good guide for mining with AMD cards? What kind of hashrate can I expect from 270x's? Thanks!
It is quite simple:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14196423
Would someone point me to a good guide for mining with AMD cards? What kind of hashrate can I expect from 270x's? Thanks!
@renegademan: but if eth volume is higher and they change the way to track it btc is higher again and vice versa
ETH to BTC --> BTC
BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
No, it's not "simple" because of the ability to also trade both into FIAT which alters how BTC is measured in comparison to how Alts are measured.
Of course, and that's why BTC's volumes are so high. most of its volume in entry is going straightly to altcoins.
@renegademan: eth can be traded for fiat or btc. btc can be traded for fiat or eth. so why is the btc/eth or eth/btc volume only in the eth volume? i dont understand. and what happens if the eth volume and marked cap is higher that the btc volume and marked cap? then the eth/btc volume is only in the btc volume? maybe im really confused and i dont understand it...
I'm guessing (and someone please correct me if this is wrong) that upon the birth of the first Alt (which was LTC) the volume being reported for LTC was purely LTC/BTC. Then when the first exchange allowed direct purchase of LTC with USD or other FIAT currencies, that volume was added on to the reported LTC volume too. But the volume for an Alt trade is only ever reported within the Alt's volume stats, otherwise every time someone buys an Alt using BTC, that volume would have to also be added on to the BTC stats and that would be unworkable and misleading (as the BTC volume would be out of all proportion to what's really going on).
Sooo....if (and it's a big IF) ETH was to overtake BTC and become the dominant crypto, CoinMarketCap may have to think about turning the tables and only reporting ETH/FIAT trades and then putting the ETH/BTC trades into BTC's volume figures.
I hope that makes sense.
BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
@renegademan: eth can be traded for fiat or btc. btc can be traded for fiat or eth. so why is the btc/eth or eth/btc volume only in the eth volume? i dont understand. and what happens if the eth volume and marked cap is higher that the btc volume and marked cap? then the eth/btc volume is only in the btc volume? maybe im really confused and i dont understand it...
I'm guessing (and someone please correct me if this is wrong) that upon the birth of the first Alt (which was LTC) the volume being reported for LTC was purely LTC/BTC. Then when the first exchange allowed direct purchase of LTC with USD or other FIAT currencies, that volume was added on to the reported LTC volume too. But the volume for an Alt trade is only ever reported within the Alt's volume stats, otherwise every time someone buys an Alt using BTC, that volume would have to also be added on to the BTC stats and that would be unworkable and misleading (as the BTC volume would be out of all proportion to what's really going on).
Sooo....if (and it's a big IF) ETH was to overtake BTC and become the dominant crypto, CoinMarketCap may have to think about turning the tables and only reporting ETH/FIAT trades and then putting the ETH/BTC trades into BTC's volume figures.
I hope that makes sense.
BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
No, it's not "simple" because of the ability to also trade both into FIAT which alters how BTC is measured in comparison to how Alts are measured.
Sooo....if (and it's a big IF) ETH was to overtake BTC and become the dominant crypto,
Crypto... what?Bitcoin is money. Ether is 'fuel'. You haven't even read the Ethereum white paper.
How can you jump to such a conclusion when you don't know anything about me, who I am or what I've done. For the purposes of helping clarify the issues around CoinMarketCap reporting volume, calling ETH a "crypto" is perfectly valid. If I wanted to get into a whole other discussion about Etherium's properties and architecture I wouldn't be going there within this interaction.
And I have read the white paper so put a sock it.
@renegademan: eth can be traded for fiat or btc. btc can be traded for fiat or eth. so why is the btc/eth or eth/btc volume only in the eth volume? i dont understand. and what happens if the eth volume and marked cap is higher that the btc volume and marked cap? then the eth/btc volume is only in the btc volume? maybe im really confused and i dont understand it...
I'm guessing (and someone please correct me if this is wrong) that upon the birth of the first Alt (which was LTC) the volume being reported for LTC was purely LTC/BTC. Then when the first exchange allowed direct purchase of LTC with USD or other FIAT currencies, that volume was added on to the reported LTC volume too. But the volume for an Alt trade is only ever reported within the Alt's volume stats, otherwise every time someone buys an Alt using BTC, that volume would have to also be added on to the BTC stats and that would be unworkable and misleading (as the BTC volume would be out of all proportion to what's really going on).
Sooo....if (and it's a big IF) ETH was to overtake BTC and become the dominant crypto, CoinMarketCap may have to think about turning the tables and only reporting ETH/FIAT trades and then putting the ETH/BTC trades into BTC's volume figures.
I hope that makes sense.
BTC to ETH --> ETH
simple.
Sooo....if (and it's a big IF) ETH was to overtake BTC and become the dominant crypto,
Crypto... what?Bitcoin is money. Ether is 'fuel'. You haven't even read the Ethereum white paper.
titanic-like
@renegademan: eth can be traded for fiat or btc. btc can be traded for fiat or eth. so why is the btc/eth or eth/btc volume only in the eth volume? i dont understand. and what happens if the eth volume and marked cap is higher that the btc volume and marked cap? then the eth/btc volume is only in the btc volume? maybe im really confused and i dont understand it...
I'm guessing (and someone please correct me if this is wrong) that upon the birth of the first Alt (which was LTC) the volume being reported for LTC was purely LTC/BTC. Then when the first exchange allowed direct purchase of LTC with USD or other FIAT currencies, that volume was added on to the reported LTC volume too. But the volume for an Alt trade is only ever reported within the Alt's volume stats, otherwise every time someone buys an Alt using BTC, that volume would have to also be added on to the BTC stats and that would be unworkable and misleading (as the BTC volume would be out of all proportion to what's really going on).
Sooo....if (and it's a big IF) ETH was to overtake BTC and become the dominant crypto, CoinMarketCap may have to think about turning the tables and only reporting ETH/FIAT trades and then putting the ETH/BTC trades into BTC's volume figures.
I hope that makes sense.
@renegademan: eth can be traded for fiat or btc. btc can be traded for fiat or eth. so why is the btc/eth or eth/btc volume only in the eth volume? i dont understand. and what happens if the eth volume and marked cap is higher that the btc volume and marked cap? then the eth/btc volume is only in the btc volume? maybe im really confused and i dont understand it...
Jump to: