Topic: [ANN] Exclusive Coin - Cryptsy/Bittrex, CAT bot, Loads of News! - page 26. (Read 248520 times)
April 17, 2015, 06:54:04 AM
This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on April 24th unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC.
April 17, 2015, 04:49:38 AM
lets go full PoS so we can kill the dumpers?!
Works for PayCon, it even has pretty high inflation and also increasing in price.
What about just doing a swap to a new Coin?
Also, I was wondering if EXCL has a set of forums? Do you guys want a set of forums?
April 17, 2015, 12:04:59 AM
lets go full PoS so we can kill the dumpers?!
April 16, 2015, 09:57:16 AM
I have already previously commented on what I think would be best to implement in the fork earlier in this thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10634697
In summary, obviously first of all the blocktime needs to now be increased. Furthermore and also I think that this is very important, the staking frequency must be reduced, not the staking amount which should still remain the same at two percent. This should fix problems with the wallet.dat file bloating and causing lag in the qt wallet. I think we should also reduce the block reward, to be more specific I suggest we reduce the reward by 1 coin per block per year. This way it does not compromise the security of the blockchain. If anyone has any more ideas about what should be implemented in this fork please speak up, now is our chance to make any changes that we might want.
What do you mean about the staking frequency? If you increase the block times, you reduce the staking frequency. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10634697
In summary, obviously first of all the blocktime needs to now be increased. Furthermore and also I think that this is very important, the staking frequency must be reduced, not the staking amount which should still remain the same at two percent. This should fix problems with the wallet.dat file bloating and causing lag in the qt wallet. I think we should also reduce the block reward, to be more specific I suggest we reduce the reward by 1 coin per block per year. This way it does not compromise the security of the blockchain. If anyone has any more ideas about what should be implemented in this fork please speak up, now is our chance to make any changes that we might want.
April 16, 2015, 06:34:52 AM
I have already previously commented on what I think would be best to implement in the fork earlier in this thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10634697
In summary, obviously first of all the blocktime needs to now be increased. Furthermore and also I think that this is very important, the staking frequency must be reduced, not the staking amount which should still remain the same at two percent. This should fix problems with the wallet.dat file bloating and causing lag in the qt wallet. I think we should also reduce the block reward, to be more specific I suggest we reduce the reward by 1 coin per block per year. This way it does not compromise the security of the blockchain. If anyone has any more ideas about what should be implemented in this fork please speak up, now is our chance to make any changes that we might want.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10634697
In summary, obviously first of all the blocktime needs to now be increased. Furthermore and also I think that this is very important, the staking frequency must be reduced, not the staking amount which should still remain the same at two percent. This should fix problems with the wallet.dat file bloating and causing lag in the qt wallet. I think we should also reduce the block reward, to be more specific I suggest we reduce the reward by 1 coin per block per year. This way it does not compromise the security of the blockchain. If anyone has any more ideas about what should be implemented in this fork please speak up, now is our chance to make any changes that we might want.
What do you mean about the staking frequency? If you increase the block times, you reduce the staking frequency.
April 15, 2015, 08:31:52 PM
I have already previously commented on what I think would be best to implement in the fork earlier in this thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10634697
In summary, obviously first of all the blocktime needs to now be increased. Furthermore and also I think that this is very important, the staking frequency must be reduced, not the staking amount which should still remain the same at two percent. This should fix problems with the wallet.dat file bloating and causing lag in the qt wallet. I think we should also reduce the block reward, to be more specific I suggest we reduce the reward by 1 coin per block per year. This way it does not compromise the security of the blockchain. If anyone has any more ideas about what should be implemented in this fork please speak up, now is our chance to make any changes that we might want.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10634697
In summary, obviously first of all the blocktime needs to now be increased. Furthermore and also I think that this is very important, the staking frequency must be reduced, not the staking amount which should still remain the same at two percent. This should fix problems with the wallet.dat file bloating and causing lag in the qt wallet. I think we should also reduce the block reward, to be more specific I suggest we reduce the reward by 1 coin per block per year. This way it does not compromise the security of the blockchain. If anyone has any more ideas about what should be implemented in this fork please speak up, now is our chance to make any changes that we might want.
April 15, 2015, 07:23:39 PM
yeah the fork is being discussed right now.
bring on the ideas, and lets make the fork to make EXCL value higher
bring on the ideas, and lets make the fork to make EXCL value higher
April 15, 2015, 06:27:13 PM
giving me fatal error when trying to download windows qt wallet
EDIT..believe its a runtime error
When trying to download the windows qt wallet? All of the links in the OP are working fine for me at the moment. EDIT..believe its a runtime error
April 15, 2015, 06:06:10 PM
giving me fatal error when trying to download windows qt wallet
EDIT..believe its a runtime error
EDIT..believe its a runtime error
April 14, 2015, 10:41:52 PM
blocks are fast, this is one of fastest [if not the fastest] coins running
According to everything I've read the target block time is supposed to be 40 seconds, according to the pool stats that I've checked the average block time is more like 13.5 seconds...
What is the actual target time?
April 14, 2015, 05:33:55 PM
blocks are fast, this is one of fastest [if not the fastest] coins running
According to everything I've read the target block time is supposed to be 40 seconds, according to the pool stats that I've checked the average block time is more like 13.5 seconds...What is the actual target time?
April 14, 2015, 01:39:58 PM
You got a link to the latest windows wallet please??
Windows QT mirror 3:
http://fuk.io/ExclusiveCoin-qt.exe
April 13, 2015, 11:06:46 PM
You got a link to the latest windows wallet please??
April 13, 2015, 10:27:09 PM
blocks are fast, this is one of fastest [if not the fastest] coins running
April 12, 2015, 06:28:51 PM
Trying to solo mine is quite hard. I keep getting ''not providing work fast enough''.
I think the blocks are that fast it is struggling.
Anyone have any tips ?.
I think the blocks are that fast it is struggling.
Anyone have any tips ?.
Slow down the Block times?
April 12, 2015, 11:44:34 AM
Trying to solo mine is quite hard. I keep getting ''not providing work fast enough''.
I think the blocks are that fast it is struggling.
Anyone have any tips ?.
I think the blocks are that fast it is struggling.
Anyone have any tips ?.
April 12, 2015, 12:08:18 AM
I have been thinking about EXCL's mining, wouldn't it be better to go full Proof of Stake?
I have been working with Static POS rewards and I think they tend to work much better than measuring as a % on Coins per year. Maybe you should eliminate the POW reward and make the same amount as the POS reward, then it's the holders who are mining all those Coins and not POW miner's selling into the market to pay for mining costs.
I have been working with Static POS rewards and I think they tend to work much better than measuring as a % on Coins per year. Maybe you should eliminate the POW reward and make the same amount as the POS reward, then it's the holders who are mining all those Coins and not POW miner's selling into the market to pay for mining costs.
theres many ideas but mostly.. we wait for Byron{ to finosh EXCL/BTC/LTC "ebay" than the coin will get rolling
April 05, 2015, 01:33:06 PM
I have been thinking about EXCL's mining, wouldn't it be better to go full Proof of Stake?
I have been working with Static POS rewards and I think they tend to work much better than measuring as a % on Coins per year. Maybe you should eliminate the POW reward and make the same amount as the POS reward, then it's the holders who are mining all those Coins and not POW miner's selling into the market to pay for mining costs.
I have been working with Static POS rewards and I think they tend to work much better than measuring as a % on Coins per year. Maybe you should eliminate the POW reward and make the same amount as the POS reward, then it's the holders who are mining all those Coins and not POW miner's selling into the market to pay for mining costs.
April 05, 2015, 08:53:45 AM
currently excusive coin is pretty profitable for the miner not bag holders,,bagholders just buy more your turn will come around cheers mining @ suprnova
April 04, 2015, 05:50:33 PM
Guys spread hash on our pool. we wait all on our pool. thanks
Jump to: