Indeed, by December price will go back to the way they used to be and might exceed my expectations.
Agree with you mate. It will only be a matter of time before people realize Expanse's true potential. Being an ETH clone, it has managed to become relatively stable with no critical issues that could affect smart contract security, or even cause double spending problems like it happened on Krypton. Still, EXP has the same codebase as ETH so I wouldn't expect to hear of the same security issues sometime in the near future. In the bright side, Expanse truly believes in block chain immutability, and unstoppable applications (unlike Ethereum).
That being said, I see a very bright path for EXP for years to come. Looking forward for the official stable release of Borderless. It is going to be a real game changer, in my own opinion.
I agree regarding the fundamentals of EXP and I have no doubt that it will do great in the coming days, months and years.
It has a truly resourceful and unique team that continues to work hard.
The one thing that truly separates EXP from the crowd is they dont rely on issuing ICO's to generate money but instead rely on their own skill to increase the value of their offering. Maybe someone can correct me but i feel like projects are completely misusing this concept and can be considered borderline scams or ponzi schemes.
Take Synereo for example. I like Synereo but they have done not one but two rounds of ICO's. What does it mean to do a second round of ICO without offering any kind of tangible product? What it means is that the team behind the project is either incompetent, in that they were not able to deliver what they promised with the first round of funding or that they dont want to push themselves too hard as far as resources are concerned. I think this sets a bad precedence for the team because this eventually makes them too dependent on generating money through ICO's and will end up losing.
In my opinion you have to push yourself and your resources to truly stand out which EXP seems to be doing very well. They are answerable to no one and are still producing at tremendous speed.
I dont understand why some folks from other projects complain about the premine. I want to ask them are they better of giving the project the money to issue tokens worth the amount of money generated or are they better of with a premine decided by the dev team that they can be a part of to increase its value.