https://blockchaintraining.org/
Topic: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping - page 327. (Read 2115876 times)
Brian Deery on Blockchain Training Conference 20-21, June 2016 in Toronto, Canada.
https://blockchaintraining.org/
https://blockchaintraining.org/
Factom looks weak on the market again without news i guess we see it drop some more target 150 or 120k ?
Very cool just added to github
Server Identity Management
https://github.com/FactomProject/serveridentity
We are getting close.
Server Identity Management
https://github.com/FactomProject/serveridentity
We are getting close.
Unrestand.So ,cryptos are draging itself into corruption then or it's being done mainly for sake of marketing?
Oh it's way worse than that!
https://soundcloud.com/heryptohow/yoshi-goto-of-bitmain-justus-ranvier-of-stashcrypto-and-jon-vaage/#t=42:22
Unrestand.So ,cryptos are draging itself into corruption then or it's being done mainly for sake of marketing?
Oh it's way worse than that!
https://soundcloud.com/heryptohow/yoshi-goto-of-bitmain-justus-ranvier-of-stashcrypto-and-jon-vaage/#t=42:22
Thanks for explanation.
You're welcome. Their lists are basically paid ads - it's not illegal but it's not real journalism. The ranking is meaningless.
Thanks for explanation.
You're welcome. Their lists are basically paid ads - it's not illegal but it's not real journalism. The ranking is meaningless.
Interesting, how do they calculate the ranks?
They ask people to pay them.
All I know is that they were asking people for money/BTC to get put on the list (of most prominent people). Several prominent bitcoiners asked to be removed from the list of most prominent people when they found out. If they are asking people for money it implies the companies got listed the same way.
From a technical perspective, this is the healthiest I've seen the Factom charts in a long, long time.
I suspect we're in for an uptrend.
I suspect we're in for an uptrend.
Interesting, how do they calculate the ranks?
They ask people to pay them.
It's called presstitution. The less you know the better
Interesting, how do they calculate the ranks?
They ask people to pay them.
All I know is that they were asking people for money/BTC to get put on the list (of most prominent people). Several prominent bitcoiners asked to be removed from the list of most prominent people when they found out. If they are asking people for money it implies the companies got listed the same way.
Interesting, how do they calculate the ranks?
They ask people to pay them.
It's called presstitution. The less you know the better
Interesting, how do they calculate the ranks?
They ask people to pay them.
Interesting, how do they calculate the ranks?
They ask people to pay them.
Factomproject on #24 on The 100 Most Influential [Suspicious link removed]panies ...
http://richtopia.com/companies/top-100-blockchain
Factomproject loses its position and moved with 21th place to 24th place. It is sad.
http://richtopia.com/companies/top-100-blockchain
Factomproject loses its position and moved with 21th place to 24th place. It is sad.
Interesting, how do they calculate the ranks?
Factomproject on #24 on The 100 Most Influential Blockchain Companies ...
http://richtopia.com/companies/top-100-blockchain
Factomproject loses its position and moved with 21th place to 24th place. It is sad.
http://richtopia.com/companies/top-100-blockchain
Factomproject loses its position and moved with 21th place to 24th place. It is sad.
That list doesn't say much if anything. One example: DAO. I never believed that it's a good idea, especially because it involves some conflicts of interest and while I'm kind of idealistic I don't believe such a social-experiment can be effective and successful. A lot of people didn't understand that it would be totally irrational if it trades above 1/100 of ETH and hoped for much profit. That's one of the main reasons why the ICO was so successful (another is most likely that ETH-groups bought a lot and have a lot of control now). Many are already disappointed and want out but nobody wants it. There is a huge sell-wall > 1000 BTC at 24k Sat since days. But: It was on place 19 and is on 17 now! Doesn't make much sense in my opinion.
Or Poloniex and Kraken are on 14 and 15 and on 16 follows Bittrex. In reality there are universes between Poloniex and Bittrex. Bitstamp follows on 19. And if we look were Bitfinex is: On 37. Bitfinex is the leading USD-exchange and it has even more volume than Poloniex. Or Huobi, one of the leading chinese exchanges, is on 39. That's even kind of funny.
There is much more I don't understand and there is no way to make such a list correct. That's why I see no difference if Factom is in the top 10 or top 20 or on place 40 or 60 now. And there is no way to make such a list correctly.
A more interesting list would be about connections into the real world, about contacts to businesses and politics etc. Where would Factom be? I would say Top 10, maybe above Ethereum.
P.S.: If you and I would want to lift Factom a little bit up... it wouldn't be hard. We pay some people for one month who tweet and post comments on FB etc and it already would have effect - but no meaning.
Factomproject on #24 on The 100 Most Influential Blockchain Companies ...
http://richtopia.com/companies/top-100-blockchain
Factomproject loses its position and moved with 21th place to 24th place. It is sad.
http://richtopia.com/companies/top-100-blockchain
Factomproject loses its position and moved with 21th place to 24th place. It is sad.
Low volume still waiting for ..... news
the entry code has more value than the FCT. The main goal is developpe the entry code?
The entry code is more value
Insurance is a consulting product which several intermediaries are involved. The intermediaries will never use the wallet because it is not user friendly and to much extra work. The have 2 clients (insurance brokers.) this is not an insurance company.
I was thinking that the goal of XRP is that you actually use the XRP to pay your mortgage. By using the token as payment they can save the bank charges.
Banks and insurance is two different things.
I think for long term investment is better to buy entry code than fct.
the entry code has more value than the FCT. The main goal is developpe the entry code?
The entry code is more value
Insurance is a consulting product which several intermediaries are involved. The intermediaries will never use the wallet because it is not user friendly and to much extra work. The have 2 clients (insurance brokers.) this is not an insurance company.
I was thinking that the goal of XRP is that you actually use the XRP to pay your mortgage. By using the token as payment they can save the bank charges.
Banks and insurance is two different things.
I think for long term investment is better to buy entry code than fct.
YES PLEASE, Factom can you add this feature.
Factom says no.
Jump to: