Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] FairQuark | FRQ | CPU Mining | 4% Fair Pre-mine | Get in NOW! | - page 25. (Read 85954 times)

legendary
Activity: 1100
Merit: 1032
Why on pools eternally any intervals in payments?
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Frequently_Asked_Questions

Could be you didn't generate any share and pool difficulty was too high for your hashrate.

Though after 3 PM in your graph your hashrate dropped drastically, maybe some miners crashed/went buggy/disconnected?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Why on pools eternally any intervals in payments? Part of the schedule certainly it isn't visible, but there was more hash rating and there were intervals till some hours in payments.

http://i023.radikal.ru/1401/14/394ad94f7224t.jpg

(http://mine.fairquark.com:8372)

In the last 24 hours there was no payment.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
ok, the pools are connected? I was wrong then. I tought that if one pool finds a block he will just pay to all shares, but in reality p2pool is also an peer2peer protokoll and also should prevent pool stealing. This is well explained here:

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool

sorry for my falsely allegings and thanks for clarifying this
legendary
Activity: 1100
Merit: 1032
It would perhaps be useful if p2pool nodes were more explicit about how to find this kind of information, but I'm not sure how accessible such information is for nodes amonst themselves..
It's in there but the standard frontends don't provide much info about other nodes beyond how many of them there are.

Anyway, I guess the underlying issue is that if more miners don't jump in soon, the FairQuark repartition won't really look fair as someone obviously has a lot of hashing power :/

Some extra marketing efforts are going to be needed....
legendary
Activity: 1100
Merit: 1032
ok, I got that. But why is the address not showing in the pool Graphs?
It's showing there, on another node of the network
http://mine.fairquark.com:8372/static/graphs.html?Day

P2Pool are a little different, what you connect your miner to is a "node", and the nodes interconnect each other using P2P (hence the P2Pool), and they form a network that mine together (for more details see https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool).

Currently the main P2Pool "network" for FairQuark is comprised of 5 nodes, for instance if you look at http://fairpool.co.vu:9640/static/index.html you'll see 4 peers (1 in 3 out), the "pool rate" is the total rate of all 5 nodes and the "local rate" is the rate of miners connected to just that node.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
0x0a.nl operator

ok, I got that. But why is the address not showing in the pool Graphs?


http://fairquark.dyndns.org:9650/static/graphs.html?Day
http://fairquark.dyndns.org:9650/static/graphs.html?Hour

I imaging, as a pool owner, I can just write some fake shares directly to the pool DB. Or is this not possible, because its in the bitcoin (fairquark) protokoll?

P2Pool's payout tab displays the information pertaining to the entire p2pool network hashing at ~116 mH/s. At this moment, there are (at least) four p2pool nodes connected to eachother:

http://fairquark.dyndns.org:9650 ~800 kH/s
http://0x0a.nl:8372 ~ 1.5 mH/s
http://62.210.204.178:8372 ~ 4 mH/s
http://5.199.162.49:8372 ~ 100 mH/s !!

As you can see, the last p2pool node has 86% of the entire p2pool network hashing power! Looking at http://5.199.162.49:8372/static/graphs.html?Hour, miner qXZhMBQ8nxQ9pdV9iZXxiUtdmvVs9jiPNi averaged 50 mH/s over the past hour, almost half of the entire network.

It would perhaps be useful if p2pool nodes were more explicit about how to find this kind of information, but I'm not sure how accessible such information is for nodes amonst themselves..
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0

Quote
If you do some cloud mining, you'll get that automatically when cloning instances: you can have literally hundreds of CPUs mining to the same address in a few mouse clicks, the limit is ho much you're ready to pay to your cloud hoster Wink

ok, I got that. But why is the address not showing in the pool Graphs?


http://fairquark.dyndns.org:9650/static/graphs.html?Day
http://fairquark.dyndns.org:9650/static/graphs.html?Hour

I imaging, as a pool owner, I can just write some fake shares directly to the pool DB. Or is this not possible, because its in the bitcoin (fairquark) protokoll?
legendary
Activity: 1100
Merit: 1032
So this guy has cpu 37 as fast as mine?
..
Please explain?
You can have (and probably should) have multiple miners mining to the same address, that's probably what you're seeing here.

If you do some cloud mining, you'll get that automatically when cloning instances: you can have literally hundreds of CPUs mining to the same address in a few mouse clicks, the limit is ho much you're ready to pay to your cloud hoster Wink
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Is this a pool scam?

 
I'm mining on http://fairquark.dyndns.org:9650


 
For the last Block (19306) Address  qXZhMBQ8nxQ9pdV9iZXxiUtdmvVs9jiPNi gets 555.88566 FRQ.
 
Its on the same block, like my payoutaddress qPjKF7rvpYHV5GJHNzxtFjn4hx3cCTFcRU (15.16519 FRQ).
 
 
http://finder.fairquark.com/block/0000000053981a13091905d38226d63efeebc1d4899ef9b76aec139a28957610

 
So this guy has cpu 37 as fast as mine?
 
My Performance on the pool is 25.5kH/s, his should be 925kH/s, or to be said 1 MH/s.
 
But on the pool Stats, there is no such Address? And nobody with this hashingpower?
 
Is this a pool scam?
 
 
http://fairquark.dyndns.org:9650/static/graphs.html?Week
 
 
Please explain?

legendary
Activity: 1100
Merit: 1032
Is it possible to adjust the CPU usage of my miner ? If i mine and at the same time use my laptop for other stuff, the laptop crashes after a while. So I'd like to set the max CPU usage of the miner to 50% or something, but how does that work ?

If your laptop is overheating, then there are basically two options:
  • turn on power saving mode, this will reduce CPU speed, slow down everything but prevent overheating
  • only mine with 2 cores out of 4, or 1 out of 4

For the second option, add a "-t 2" on the miner command line if you want to mine with just 2 threads.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Is it possible to adjust the CPU usage of my miner ? If i mine and at the same time use my laptop for other stuff, the laptop crashes after a while. So I'd like to set the max CPU usage of the miner to 50% or something, but how does that work ?
full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
Selling 15k Fairquark pm me your offer
full member
Activity: 123
Merit: 100
Now one of the major Alt-coins that was pre-mined, was Bitcoin!!! The creator of BTC pre-mined 1/12th of the current BTC supply
I've heard about it. "Satoshi" mined bitcoin mostly solo in 2009. Bitcoin is a scam!
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 100
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Ok lets put all these rumors of Quark being "pre-mined" to rest once and for all!!! Quark was announced on BitcoinTalk.org at on July 21, 2013 (see link https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-qrk-quark-core-010-upgrade-260031 ). The first QRK block was processed on July 21, 2013 also ( see link http://quarkexplorer.com/block/1 ). So with these two facts show zero signs of "pre-mining"!!!! Now one of the major Alt-coins that was pre-mined, was Bitcoin!!! The creator of BTC pre-mined 1/12th of the current BTC supply....in other words, he pre-mined 1,000,000 BTC as proof-of-concept, but you never here the Bitcoin defenders talk or even mention BTC being pre-mined!!!!
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Vires in Numeris
Want facts? Quarkcoin developers and friends own 42% of the coins based on these numbers: http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-quarkcoin-addresses.html

I think 4% premine is pretty fair Smiley

PS. Quarkcoin developers seem to have started dumping the coins to hidden addresses because these numbers were much more radical when this link was tweeted few days ago.. I think Quarkcoin devs are afraid of FairQuark Wink

That does not mean QRK was premined and it's not. Very few people participated in mining of quark at first couple of weeks. Public spotlights were much more thin on altcoins than it is today which ultimately means that those very few people had the chance to mine a considerable amount and they did.

But this situaiton has nothing to do with "premining".


I believe it has everything to do with the narrow mindset and or greed of the creators of these coins.
There is for sure a way to distribute PoS coins more evenly. Or to do it in a way that doesnt waste resources (proof of burn).
A lot of these guys are programmers and not marketing people, but it really only takes some common sense and some compassion to find solutions to these problems. No one seems interested in changing things for the better, everyone just wants more of the same.
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
Want facts? Quarkcoin developers and friends own 42% of the coins based on these numbers: http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-quarkcoin-addresses.html

I think 4% premine is pretty fair Smiley

PS. Quarkcoin developers seem to have started dumping the coins to hidden addresses because these numbers were much more radical when this link was tweeted few days ago.. I think Quarkcoin devs are afraid of FairQuark Wink

That does not mean QRK was premined and it's not. Very few people participated in mining of quark at first couple of weeks. Public spotlights were much more thin on altcoins than it is today which ultimately means that those very few people had the chance to mine a considerable amount and they did.

But this situaiton has nothing to do with "premining".

full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
So i've been mining this whole night, checked my wallet this morning but no FRQ was added to it. I'm fairly new to mining so I'm wondering if I did something wrong. These are the steps i did:

-I installed the FRQ wallet from this topic
-I installed the miner from the link in this topic
-I made a .bat in the map of the miner with the following text: minerd -a quark -o http://mine.fairquark.com:8372 -u qadsoHqgdpMBND7CUGQrd7przzjd3sWUkd -p x
-I ran the .bat and an MS-DOS showed up and seemed to be active all night (i remember reading it was doing about 80 kH/s)

That's basically all i did.


Is there something I forgot to do then ? The address is correct.


Many thanks in advance

95% of what any user mines at fairquark.com goes to the 'developer' wallets.  It's a scam pool.

I think these problems are related on the internal difficulty of the P2Pool because when the difficulty skyrocketed (first night) I had problems receiving payments from every pool (other than fairquark pools also). There were some big players mining on that night.

You have such a small kh/s, so you should try a GUI pool: http://cpu-pool.net/frq/

Thanks this works Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: