[ANN] FairQuark | FRQ | CPU Mining | 4% Fair Pre-mine | Get in NOW! | - page 33.

cryptohunter

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

Quote from: jdebunt on January 16, 2014, 10:45:51 AM

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 16, 2014, 10:41:23 AM

what is the point of your site??? it is just parrots what the fucking scam shitclone devs put

Point out the points above that i have made then i will believe you are not some scam site just begging for donations and passing on misinformation. I see you site mentioned again and i will point to this post with the same remarks. Either you are stupid or have no interest in pointing out the obvious truth.

IT RIPS THE ALGO - IT RIPS THE NAME AND TRIES TO CALL ITSELF FAIR WHEN IT IS AN OBVIOUS SCAM.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS. IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? Huh

WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? Huh

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%? Huh

?

Dude, take a chill pill before you spontaneously explodei n your chair, seriously.

You have a clear opinion about FairQuark , and that's good.

The "truth' as you call it, isn't as black and white as you portray it. All your "truth" is, is YOUR OPINION.

Sure, this coin is covered in controversy, and yes, it's a clone of Quark. That's fairly obvious to anyone.

You have a lot of issues with the coin, that you should take up with the developers, not with me or CryptoArticles.

Now turn off that caps lock and move on before you hurt yourself.

How can you run a website? Huh

??

these point are not my opinion they are FACTS

--------------------------------------

IT RIPS THE ALGO - IT RIPS THE NAME AND TRIES TO CALL ITSELF FAIR WHEN IT IS AN OBVIOUS SCAM.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS. IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS?Huh WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?HuhHuhHuhHuh

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%?HuhHuh?

and yes even 1-2 % is bad unless there is a full ledger and it is kept to

Where is this at any point up for discussion....these are the facts that you seem to have missed from your article.

Bigeyeone

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Sergios on January 16, 2014, 11:27:18 AM

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 16, 2014, 10:39:41 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 10:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bigeyeone on January 16, 2014, 09:47:26 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 09:35:07 AM

Quote from: skaffen on January 16, 2014, 07:18:23 AM

Please, don't support premined coins! 4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.

There is no fair premine here.

For a fair premine - you need a full block explorer, full ledger, Large giveaways and large bounties for things. 50-75% must be used before exchange to stop dumping. This will not happen.

THESE PEOPLE CHANGED THE OP - IT READ WE CAN'T GUARANTEE WE WILL USE THE PREMINE AS WE PROMISE....YOU WILL JUST HAVE TO HOPE WE DO !!!

wtf??? are you noobs so desperate to mine any shit that you will try anything? Huh

#

Don't you realise if you REALLY wanted a fair version of QRK you could have mined any other 50 QRK clones that have come out in the last 2 weeks???

YOU DON'T CARE IF IT IS FAIR YOU JUST WANT TO TRY AND PUMP AND DUMP THIS LATEST SHIT.

IT will never reach any Exchange with it's current name. It is a scam.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS. IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? Huh

WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? Huh

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%? Huh

?/

Someone has gotten his or her panties in a twist.
You can shout and use caps all you want it doesn't make your statements " the truth". What is does show everyone on this forum is that you have some huge anger management issues. you should have that checked out because if you rant like this in "the real world" you will be beaten up, shot at, or worse. It also shows how insecure you are and that's why you are spewing accusations, like "scam" "idiots" "parrots" to name a few. Roll Eyes

Maybe you are just mad at certain people because they had a good idea and made it work. Ok I can understand that but do not spew your hateful snot all over the forums. If you haven't anything constructive to say you shouldn't respond.
I can also respond to every message and annoy the whole community, like you obviously are doing.

So give us evidence where it is clearly stated that people you mention are "scammers". But you can't since you use words like "common sense". It's your opinion on something. That is subjective, not objective. So calling people "scammers " and other horrible words means nothing.
BTW Do you honestly think the banks, politicians, prominent people, celebrities are good, honest, hard working people ?(there are exceptions)

Strait up ad hominem defense, you dont have any facts or arguments to counter what he said about this coin, so you attack his person with some psychoanalysis psychological verbal aggression BS

Bigeyeone

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: denario on January 16, 2014, 11:01:34 AM

If you are going to clone a coin, at least try to make it better then the coin you cloned. Dont make it worse.

Great advice, what they basically did was clone an insta-mine coin and the made it a pre-mine + insta-mine coin, that actuallt made it worse.

After reading the paramaters of this coin, I would say the block rewars scale almost as bad as Quark, so it is also an insta-mine just like Quark.

So yes they definitely made Quarks problem worse. IF quarks insta-mine-scheme is unfair , then this coin is a straight up scam.

But it seems a lot of people dont care, they just want to take a gamble with any new coin and see whether they can pump or dump it, this is casino mentality we dealing with here

Sergios

member

Activity: 64

Merit: 10

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 16, 2014, 10:39:41 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 10:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bigeyeone on January 16, 2014, 09:47:26 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 09:35:07 AM

Quote from: skaffen on January 16, 2014, 07:18:23 AM

Please, don't support premined coins! 4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.

There is no fair premine here.

For a fair premine - you need a full block explorer, full ledger, Large giveaways and large bounties for things. 50-75% must be used before exchange to stop dumping. This will not happen.

THESE PEOPLE CHANGED THE OP - IT READ WE CAN'T GUARANTEE WE WILL USE THE PREMINE AS WE PROMISE....YOU WILL JUST HAVE TO HOPE WE DO !!!

wtf??? are you noobs so desperate to mine any shit that you will try anything? Huh

#

Don't you realise if you REALLY wanted a fair version of QRK you could have mined any other 50 QRK clones that have come out in the last 2 weeks???

YOU DON'T CARE IF IT IS FAIR YOU JUST WANT TO TRY AND PUMP AND DUMP THIS LATEST SHIT.

IT will never reach any Exchange with it's current name. It is a scam.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS. IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? Huh

WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? Huh

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%? Huh

?/

Someone has gotten his or her panties in a twist.
You can shout and use caps all you want it doesn't make your statements " the truth". What is does show everyone on this forum is that you have some huge anger management issues. you should have that checked out because if you rant like this in "the real world" you will be beaten up, shot at, or worse. It also shows how insecure you are and that's why you are spewing accusations, like "scam" "idiots" "parrots" to name a few. Roll Eyes

Maybe you are just mad at certain people because they had a good idea and made it work. Ok I can understand that but do not spew your hateful snot all over the forums. If you haven't anything constructive to say you shouldn't respond.
I can also respond to every message and annoy the whole community, like you obviously are doing.

So give us evidence where it is clearly stated that people you mention are "scammers". But you can't since you use words like "common sense". It's your opinion on something. That is subjective, not objective. So calling people "scammers " and other horrible words means nothing.
BTW Do you honestly think the banks, politicians, prominent people, celebrities are good, honest, hard working people ?(there are exceptions)

Snard

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Selling 94,000 FRQ for .47 BTC. Will go in smaller increments.

PM if interested.

BulletCoin

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Netnox on January 16, 2014, 11:11:05 AM

He tries to deceive people with lying, not trustable at all.

Don't spread lies if you don't trust and you are feeling frustrated

So far there are no signs of dishonesty.

Netnox

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1008

Quote from: tangle on January 16, 2014, 05:11:06 AM

Hey, fairnoobs, QRK was not 98% premined, it was instamined.
Proof: QRK announced 21 July 2013 - 12:05 PM here: https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/865-quark-qrk-information/
First block was mined 2013-07-21 12:03:50 http://quarkexplorer.com/block/00000cae787f2a1468740995fdbdadbd65e52026e485a4c3965e12f775a21f91
If your fairclone with fair 4% premine dies tomorrow, it will be fair. I hope it will.

This

The dev needs to be reported for making such a bold lie. Some butthurt guy made this coin to spread fud. He also pre mined 10 million coins (4%) and will probably give away 1 million to bounties and stuff holding millions himself. He tries to deceive people with lying, not trustable at all.

denario

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

If you are going to clone a coin, at least try to make it better then the coin you cloned. Dont make it worse.

RobRoy

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Hi all!

new p2pool: http://coinminer.net:19994/static/

please try!

Thanks

jaybeeuk

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 100

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 10:19:37 AM

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.

+1 - just need to be careful on the quantities and how the coins are used

BulletCoin

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Getting steady profit from 0btc pool.. I think the network problems (ddos?) are behind.

jdebunt

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1010

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 16, 2014, 10:41:23 AM

what is the point of your site??? it is just parrots what the fucking scam shitclone devs put

Point out the points above that i have made then i will believe you are not some scam site just begging for donations and passing on misinformation. I see you site mentioned again and i will point to this post with the same remarks. Either you are stupid or have no interest in pointing out the obvious truth.

IT RIPS THE ALGO - IT RIPS THE NAME AND TRIES TO CALL ITSELF FAIR WHEN IT IS AN OBVIOUS SCAM.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS. IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? Huh

WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? Huh

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%? Huh

?

Dude, take a chill pill before you spontaneously explodei n your chair, seriously.

You have a clear opinion about FairQuark , and that's good.

The "truth' as you call it, isn't as black and white as you portray it. All your "truth" is, is YOUR OPINION.

Sure, this coin is covered in controversy, and yes, it's a clone of Quark. That's fairly obvious to anyone.

You have a lot of issues with the coin, that you should take up with the developers, not with me or CryptoArticles.

Now turn off that caps lock and move on before you hurt yourself.

I_M

full member

Activity: 135

Merit: 100

WTS 60k FRQ for BTC

Send me an PM, small chunks at first. Thanks!

GreekBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

getmonero.org

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 16, 2014, 10:39:41 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 10:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bigeyeone on January 16, 2014, 09:47:26 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 09:35:07 AM

Quote from: skaffen on January 16, 2014, 07:18:23 AM

Please, don't support premined coins! 4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.

There is no fair premine here.

For a fair premine - you need a full block explorer, full ledger, Large giveaways and large bounties for things. 50-75% must be used before exchange to stop dumping. This will not happen.

THESE PEOPLE CHANGED THE OP - IT READ WE CAN'T GUARANTEE WE WILL USE THE PREMINE AS WE PROMISE....YOU WILL JUST HAVE TO HOPE WE DO !!!

wtf??? are you noobs so desperate to mine any shit that you will try anything? Huh

#

Don't you realise if you REALLY wanted a fair version of QRK you could have mined any other 50 QRK clones that have come out in the last 2 weeks???

YOU DON'T CARE IF IT IS FAIR YOU JUST WANT TO TRY AND PUMP AND DUMP THIS LATEST SHIT.

IT will never reach any Exchange with it's current name. It is a scam.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS. IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? Huh

WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? Huh

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%? Huh

?/

lol the usual 1-2% . So that would be good? Tongue

And being anounced ahead of time only make the big miners ready to mine. Shitcoin to the moon! Hater gonna hate!

cryptohunter

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

Quote from: jdebunt on January 16, 2014, 10:36:35 AM

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 16, 2014, 10:08:10 AM

Quote from: jdebunt on January 16, 2014, 09:40:10 AM

We at CryptoArticles did a small article on FairQuark :

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/2014/1/16/fairquark-more-fair-than-quark

Donations are welcome to the CryptoArticles FairQuark Wallet : qKCwg7zkbYJ72cB9QEuvK1eEY6RiwxQHLg

Another low baller. Remind me to tell everyone to ignore your shit site for the misinformation scam hole it is. Fancy not instantly flaming a shit clone using the coins name it cloned and even having a 4% premine with only slightly less instamine. If they didn't want any instamine then they would not have made this instamine version 2.

Your site is a disgrace.

Not sure what bit you in the rear this morning, but I don't see anything wrong with my site.

We did an article on FairQuark & we kindly ask for people's comments to be mature, you can disagree all you like with what FairQuark stands for, as WE DO NOT PICK SIDES;

We just report facts and have the client in our possession, as people should be made aware of the fact it's out there.

If you want to flame a coin, run your own site & do so, we at CryptoArticles refrain from such tactics, as it's up to the community to decide to back a coin, it' s not our job nor duty to tell anyone what to do or decide.

I do appreciate your comment and at least you checked out the site, but your opinion is your own & shouldn't be forced on other people.

what is the point of your site??? it is just parrots what the fucking scam shitclone devs put

Point out the points above that i have made then i will believe you are not some scam site just begging for donations and passing on misinformation. I see you site mentioned again and i will point to this post with the same remarks. Either you are stupid or have no interest in pointing out the obvious truth.

IT RIPS THE ALGO - IT RIPS THE NAME AND TRIES TO CALL ITSELF FAIR WHEN IT IS AN OBVIOUS SCAM.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS. IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? Huh

WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? Huh

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%? Huh

?

cryptohunter

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 10:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bigeyeone on January 16, 2014, 09:47:26 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 09:35:07 AM

Quote from: skaffen on January 16, 2014, 07:18:23 AM

Please, don't support premined coins! 4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.

There is no fair premine here.

For a fair premine - you need a full block explorer, full ledger, Large giveaways and large bounties for things. 50-75% must be used before exchange to stop dumping. This will not happen.

THESE PEOPLE CHANGED THE OP - IT READ WE CAN'T GUARANTEE WE WILL USE THE PREMINE AS WE PROMISE....YOU WILL JUST HAVE TO HOPE WE DO !!!

wtf??? are you noobs so desperate to mine any shit that you will try anything? Huh

#

Don't you realise if you REALLY wanted a fair version of QRK you could have mined any other 50 QRK clones that have come out in the last 2 weeks???

YOU DON'T CARE IF IT IS FAIR YOU JUST WANT TO TRY AND PUMP AND DUMP THIS LATEST SHIT.

IT will never reach any Exchange with it's current name. It is a scam.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS. IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? Huh

WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? Huh

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%? Huh

?/

jdebunt

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1010

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 16, 2014, 10:08:10 AM

Quote from: jdebunt on January 16, 2014, 09:40:10 AM

We at CryptoArticles did a small article on FairQuark :

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/2014/1/16/fairquark-more-fair-than-quark

Donations are welcome to the CryptoArticles FairQuark Wallet : qKCwg7zkbYJ72cB9QEuvK1eEY6RiwxQHLg

Another low baller. Remind me to tell everyone to ignore your shit site for the misinformation scam hole it is. Fancy not instantly flaming a shit clone using the coins name it cloned and even having a 4% premine with only slightly less instamine. If they didn't want any instamine then they would not have made this instamine version 2.

Your site is a disgrace.

Not sure what bit you in the rear this morning, but I don't see anything wrong with my site.

We did an article on FairQuark & we kindly ask for people's comments to be mature, you can disagree all you like with what FairQuark stands for, as WE DO NOT PICK SIDES;

We just report facts and have the client in our possession, as people should be made aware of the fact it's out there.

If you want to flame a coin, run your own site & do so, we at CryptoArticles refrain from such tactics, as it's up to the community to decide to back a coin, it' s not our job nor duty to tell anyone what to do or decide.

I do appreciate your comment and at least you checked out the site, but your opinion is your own & shouldn't be forced on other people.

Shadow_Runner

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 10:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bigeyeone on January 16, 2014, 09:47:26 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 09:35:07 AM

Quote from: skaffen on January 16, 2014, 07:18:23 AM

Please, don't support premined coins! 4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.

+100. I was no sleep sometimes and got nothing. Shit coin with "no premine" had many errors or dead pools or whatever. I think smooth launch + giveaway is better than failed lauch with linux only sources or etc. Just IMHO.

Anyway all coins need SUPPORT BY DEVELOPERS. If there is no support - coin will die. Look at dubstepcoin, gift, etc.

jaybeeuk

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 100

Still rising - get in while you can !

{
"blocks" : 9166,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 2272.21839190,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

BulletCoin

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Bigeyeone on January 16, 2014, 09:47:26 AM

Quote from: BulletCoin on January 16, 2014, 09:35:07 AM

Quote from: skaffen on January 16, 2014, 07:18:23 AM

Please, don't support premined coins! 4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.

Topic: [ANN] FairQuark | FRQ | CPU Mining | 4% Fair Pre-mine | Get in NOW! | - page 33. (Read 85954 times)