Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] 💠 FSBT TECH 💠 – Open API For Fintech Developers - page 52. (Read 58117 times)

member
Activity: 420
Merit: 11
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

Yeah I experienced such with KuCoin I later found out it wasn't an error but a safety measure to prevent someone else from accessing your account its quite annoying but necessary at the same time.

 In my own opinion I feel listing in big exchanges is better off say there is a drastic drop in price only an exchange with high volume of people can help up the price along with a good update,  whereas in a small exchange such wouldn't be the case.

Is there already announcement from FSBT team regarding exchange name and listing. Which exchange it will be listed first? Since lots of time left for ICO end date I think FSBT should try for big exchange.
I guess before sometime exchange details was on their home page. But now they from there. But while reading white paper I found this "The bank is going to develop
its own exchange in addition to partnering exchanges that could be connected to by using Forty Seven Bank platform via API
."


I was not sure if I had already read from the 47BK Exchange. But now that you quote from the whitepaper, I remember it.
Together with the APIs for other exchanges that will surely be a great exchange. Unfortunately, it will take a few years until all products are finished, I am getting more and more impatient :-)


I checked FSBT website again and also visited the telegram group. There is no talk/info about exchange listing or name as of now. So we have to wait more Sad

You are right, but I remember that they had the names of some exchanges on their website. I don't know it exactly, but I mean HitBTC and Kucoin.
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 110
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

The problem is, technology will always have issues, you know, this is like a digital financial thing, a lot of issues are bound to come up, no matter the exchange, is now left for the exchange sites to employ capable hands that can trash issues when they arise, my point is, no exchange site is 100% safe or good

Not if the technology is not implemented properly but i am not saying there is no problem with technology surely there is but not always... I think the site needs to be well maintained to prevent that lagging issue and proper security needs to be placed to prevent hacking.

Yea but we should understand that an exchange been safe doesn't mean is actually safe, it simply means that a loophole is yet to be found and when hackers do, they sure will try and cause havoc but if a competent team is on board, they may salvage the situation

FSBT team has taken lot of afforts till now for this project and taken good decision from investors point of view as well. And I am sure they will select good exchange.
I agree with this i think they also extended it so that after it goes on exchanges it will go on a good one which one do you guys think it will go?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

Yeah I experienced such with KuCoin I later found out it wasn't an error but a safety measure to prevent someone else from accessing your account its quite annoying but necessary at the same time.

 In my own opinion I feel listing in big exchanges is better off say there is a drastic drop in price only an exchange with high volume of people can help up the price along with a good update,  whereas in a small exchange such wouldn't be the case.

Is there already announcement from FSBT team regarding exchange name and listing. Which exchange it will be listed first? Since lots of time left for ICO end date I think FSBT should try for big exchange.
I guess before sometime exchange details was on their home page. But now they from there. But while reading white paper I found this "The bank is going to develop
its own exchange in addition to partnering exchanges that could be connected to by using Forty Seven Bank platform via API
."


I was not sure if I had already read from the 47BK Exchange. But now that you quote from the whitepaper, I remember it.
Together with the APIs for other exchanges that will surely be a great exchange. Unfortunately, it will take a few years until all products are finished, I am getting more and more impatient :-)


I checked FSBT website again and also visited the telegram group. There is no talk/info about exchange listing or name as of now. So we have to wait more Sad
full member
Activity: 994
Merit: 140
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

Yeah I experienced such with KuCoin I later found out it wasn't an error but a safety measure to prevent someone else from accessing your account its quite annoying but necessary at the same time.

 In my own opinion I feel listing in big exchanges is better off say there is a drastic drop in price only an exchange with high volume of people can help up the price along with a good update,  whereas in a small exchange such wouldn't be the case.

Is there already announcement from FSBT team regarding exchange name and listing. Which exchange it will be listed first? Since lots of time left for ICO end date I think FSBT should try for big exchange.
I guess before sometime exchange details was on their home page. But now they from there. But while reading white paper I found this "The bank is going to develop
its own exchange in addition to partnering exchanges that could be connected to by using Forty Seven Bank platform via API
."


I was not sure if I had already read from the 47BK Exchange. But now that you quote from the whitepaper, I remember it.
Together with the APIs for other exchanges that will surely be a great exchange. Unfortunately, it will take a few years until all products are finished, I am getting more and more impatient :-)
member
Activity: 728
Merit: 11
DocTailor IEO on Zloadr
FYI the reason for the one month extension of ICO wasn't solely for forty seven bank to reach hard cap but also a medium to wait out the bad market price. Forty seven bank hopes before ICO ends the market must have recovered to a certain extent so early investors wouldn't suffer loss.

Inasmuch i respect the decision of the FSBT team, i am still wondering, what's the expected price of eth they hope for before they continue with the project developement? What if eth took a lot of time to get to that value? because currently as i type eth is still at $420 still not balance
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

Yeah I experienced such with KuCoin I later found out it wasn't an error but a safety measure to prevent someone else from accessing your account its quite annoying but necessary at the same time.

 In my own opinion I feel listing in big exchanges is better off say there is a drastic drop in price only an exchange with high volume of people can help up the price along with a good update,  whereas in a small exchange such wouldn't be the case.

Is there already announcement from FSBT team regarding exchange name and listing. Which exchange it will be listed first? Since lots of time left for ICO end date I think FSBT should try for big exchange.
I guess before sometime exchange details was on their home page. But now they from there. But while reading white paper I found this "The bank is going to develop
its own exchange in addition to partnering exchanges that could be connected to by using Forty Seven Bank platform via API
."


Developing own exchange will take some time. For now they need to list at some exchange once ICO is finished. We have to wait till FSBT team officially announce the exchange name.
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 11
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

Yeah I experienced such with KuCoin I later found out it wasn't an error but a safety measure to prevent someone else from accessing your account its quite annoying but necessary at the same time.

 In my own opinion I feel listing in big exchanges is better off say there is a drastic drop in price only an exchange with high volume of people can help up the price along with a good update,  whereas in a small exchange such wouldn't be the case.

Is there already announcement from FSBT team regarding exchange name and listing. Which exchange it will be listed first? Since lots of time left for ICO end date I think FSBT should try for big exchange.
I guess before sometime exchange details was on their home page. But now they from there. But while reading white paper I found this "The bank is going to develop
its own exchange in addition to partnering exchanges that could be connected to by using Forty Seven Bank platform via API
."
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 11
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

The problem is, technology will always have issues, you know, this is like a digital financial thing, a lot of issues are bound to come up, no matter the exchange, is now left for the exchange sites to employ capable hands that can trash issues when they arise, my point is, no exchange site is 100% safe or good

Not if the technology is not implemented properly but i am not saying there is no problem with technology surely there is but not always... I think the site needs to be well maintained to prevent that lagging issue and proper security needs to be placed to prevent hacking.

Yea but we should understand that an exchange been safe doesn't mean is actually safe, it simply means that a loophole is yet to be found and when hackers do, they sure will try and cause havoc but if a competent team is on board, they may salvage the situation

FSBT team has taken lot of afforts till now for this project and taken good decision from investors point of view as well. And I am sure they will select good exchange.

Thats right, every decision of the 47B Team is comprehensible. They always act with appreciation of the investors and respect their needs.s.
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 106
Bountyhive.io
Individual clients will have opportunities to create and manage their investment portfolio by using investment and brokerage services provided by Forty Seven Bank.

Didn't realize they were offering that it makes sense though as its a typical banking service, though this might be the first one that includes crypto in it's managed services. Does this mean they will be able to do stock/bond+crypto based managed funds?
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
Individual clients will have opportunities to create and manage their investment portfolio by using investment and brokerage services provided by Forty Seven Bank.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

The problem is, technology will always have issues, you know, this is like a digital financial thing, a lot of issues are bound to come up, no matter the exchange, is now left for the exchange sites to employ capable hands that can trash issues when they arise, my point is, no exchange site is 100% safe or good

Not if the technology is not implemented properly but i am not saying there is no problem with technology surely there is but not always... I think the site needs to be well maintained to prevent that lagging issue and proper security needs to be placed to prevent hacking.

Yea but we should understand that an exchange been safe doesn't mean is actually safe, it simply means that a loophole is yet to be found and when hackers do, they sure will try and cause havoc but if a competent team is on board, they may salvage the situation

FSBT team has taken lot of afforts till now for this project and taken good decision from investors point of view as well. And I am sure they will select good exchange.
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

Yeah I experienced such with KuCoin I later found out it wasn't an error but a safety measure to prevent someone else from accessing your account its quite annoying but necessary at the same time.

 In my own opinion I feel listing in big exchanges is better off say there is a drastic drop in price only an exchange with high volume of people can help up the price along with a good update,  whereas in a small exchange such wouldn't be the case.

Is there already announcement from FSBT team regarding exchange name and listing. Which exchange it will be listed first? Since lots of time left for ICO end date I think FSBT should try for big exchange.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 11
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

The problem is, technology will always have issues, you know, this is like a digital financial thing, a lot of issues are bound to come up, no matter the exchange, is now left for the exchange sites to employ capable hands that can trash issues when they arise, my point is, no exchange site is 100% safe or good

Not if the technology is not implemented properly but i am not saying there is no problem with technology surely there is but not always... I think the site needs to be well maintained to prevent that lagging issue and proper security needs to be placed to prevent hacking.

Yea but we should understand that an exchange been safe doesn't mean is actually safe, it simply means that a loophole is yet to be found and when hackers do, they sure will try and cause havoc but if a competent team is on board, they may salvage the situation
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
47bank continues its rapid development. The team is working to attract influential investors. Innovative idea combined with a purposeful team guarantee the success of the project.

Talking about innovative, the team has been very innovative from the beginning, from their whitepaper presentation, security implementation and the innovative idea of implementing a platform for developers and recently the idea of a hardware wallet, well, i'm sure that pretty much sums up everything, amazing if you ask me  

because you just mentioned it, the whitepaper and the other documents are really exemplary. I have not seen so detailed documents in any ico.
Since they also want to offer the organization of ICOs, as a future customer you can already see what your own ICO might look like

Guys do you think FSBT should start accepting FIAT currencies/cards and may be possibly other top 5 crypto currencies. This should increase token sale speed.

I think this would be a fantastic proposal and I would be interested to hear what the official team have to say about this.

It will certainly open up more doors and more options for the potential investors, it will certainly help hit the hard cap!

Would be good to see what the team think about this

Yea but as easy at it sounds, it may involve some technicalities, remember this has to do with like online transactions and all that, it may require them going back to tweak one or two things in order to make such feasible, is not that easy but if they can fix such easily, then why not

Agree FIAT option may be required lot of changes and approvals. But it will be worth I guess if it will surely help to reach hardcap or at least go as much close as possible.
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

Yeah I experienced such with KuCoin I later found out it wasn't an error but a safety measure to prevent someone else from accessing your account its quite annoying but necessary at the same time.

 In my own opinion I feel listing in big exchanges is better off say there is a drastic drop in price only an exchange with high volume of people can help up the price along with a good update,  whereas in a small exchange such wouldn't be the case.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 16
47B offers its customers from the EU multi account with a multi currency card, allowing you to manage the accounts of any European banks through a convenient online banking interface or mobile application.

Does it mean each user will have more than one account? or one account that support multiple currencies? That is something if is applied. I guess we just have to wait and see the fee structure on this one.

You will have one account with access to all your other accounts (from other banks also), wallets or exchanges.
for this they program their own APIs
That will be a great thing


A great selling point, no more having to create multiple accounts on several different exchanges, you can just have it on one exchange and one username and password.

Great selling point
member
Activity: 728
Merit: 10
Guys forty seven bank plans to get listed on smaller exchanges before getting listed on big exchanges. Do you think it's wise to list on smaller exchange before a big exchange.

It's certainly almost the way all other great project has gone, list on small exchange, gain both momentum and volume then list on bigger exchange, this time they have already established themselves and its quite easier

Theirs a reason other ICO's do it like that its what works, i dont see why they would suddenly shift from what works for all the rest, i'd imagine we will see it on smaller exchanges like hitbtc before we see it any time soon on the likes of binance. It's cheaper for them that way and also it prevents the unlikely event of them getting delisted which would suck due to lack of volume, its best to build up volume ons maller exchanges

Right on point plus Hitbtc is not some small exchange you know they just needed to get their acts right and up their game, I have heard alot of hype with kkcoin exchange tried them out yesterday and they have interface like that of Binance but the site kept logging me off every other time

The problem is, technology will always have issues, you know, this is like a digital financial thing, a lot of issues are bound to come up, no matter the exchange, is now left for the exchange sites to employ capable hands that can trash issues when they arise, my point is, no exchange site is 100% safe or good

Not if the technology is not implemented properly but i am not saying there is no problem with technology surely there is but not always... I think the site needs to be well maintained to prevent that lagging issue and proper security needs to be placed to prevent hacking.
full member
Activity: 994
Merit: 140
47B offers its customers from the EU multi account with a multi currency card, allowing you to manage the accounts of any European banks through a convenient online banking interface or mobile application.

Does it mean each user will have more than one account? or one account that support multiple currencies? That is something if is applied. I guess we just have to wait and see the fee structure on this one.

You will have one account with access to all your other accounts (from other banks also), wallets or exchanges.
for this they program their own APIs
That will be a great thing
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
47B offers its customers from the EU multi account with a multi currency card, allowing you to manage the accounts of any European banks through a convenient online banking interface or mobile application.

Does it mean each user will have more than one account? or one account that support multiple currencies? That is something if is applied. I guess we just have to wait and see the fee structure on this one.
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 11
47B offers its customers from the EU multi account with a multi currency card, allowing you to manage the accounts of any European banks through a convenient online banking interface or mobile application.
Pages:
Jump to: