Topic: [ANN] ⚡ HEALTH MONITOR⚡ | Soft cap reached - ICO ending today | 1200 tokens left - page 26. (Read 39372 times)
December 16, 2017, 11:42:39 AM
Dev, I want to know, is it just your manager who works as a doctor? Are there no other members in the team who work as doctors as well? I see all the members in the team on this project are very good at health.
December 16, 2017, 11:41:36 AM
Maybe this question was answered already, but still. Why do we need blockchain for health monitor? Does it really suits crypto space?
Main reason i see is that is for transparency on raising funds and spreading for easy spreading of dividends. Other models of funding aren't this transparent and require lot's of more work and fees.
December 16, 2017, 11:40:44 AM
I think people will be scared to do this tests. Imagine you see that you have a serious illness. Dont most people postpone their visits to the doctor anyway?
I have mixed feelings about this product. On the one side it's great on the other side, do you really wanna know that you're ill? Difficult question.
It seems to me that this device for people who are afraid of doctors, afraid of queues. I agree that people are afraid to learn about a serious illness, but I think that it is better to learn about this disease when you can cure it, and not when it will be too late late. Therefore, I believe that the Health Monitor will be very useful to people!I have mixed feelings about this product. On the one side it's great on the other side, do you really wanna know that you're ill? Difficult question.
But in general when you are sick it's always a case of 'the sooner the better you know it'.
December 16, 2017, 11:36:41 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
I believe it's still too early to go out to the governmental level. The system needs to be proven working before they make any moves that direction. Public sector doesn't welcome any innovations that easily.
That is true, but if the system deliver as advertised can be that at a certain point the public sector could get on board as well. Just speculating off course.
by that time the product will have to have great success. the public sector moves at a snails pace, compare to private.
Private sector has always to be faster because innovation is a key to success and I think there is an oportunity here.
I just thought the pharmaceutical industry won't be too enthusiastic when Health Monitor gets widely used and becomes a successful device of early detection of diseases. Especially in the case of an early stage of diabetes often a change of lifestyle is enough and you wouldn't need any medicines.
I think the opposite about how the farmaceutical industry will react: people will find out earlier they have a disease and will start using medicin
December 16, 2017, 11:25:17 AM
Maybe this question was answered already, but still. Why do we need blockchain for health monitor? Does it really suits crypto space?
December 16, 2017, 11:24:02 AM
Yes HEALTH MONITOR can change the way people take care of them, if there is a lot of deceives everywhere, people will be able to check their health care all the time. I think the project has a huge potential in long term.
December 16, 2017, 11:06:00 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
I believe it's still too early to go out to the governmental level. The system needs to be proven working before they make any moves that direction. Public sector doesn't welcome any innovations that easily.
That is true, but if the system deliver as advertised can be that at a certain point the public sector could get on board as well. Just speculating off course.
by that time the product will have to have great success. the public sector moves at a snails pace, compare to private.
Private sector has always to be faster because innovation is a key to success and I think there is an oportunity here.
I just thought the pharmaceutical industry won't be too enthusiastic when Health Monitor gets widely used and becomes a successful device of early detection of diseases. Especially in the case of an early stage of diabetes often a change of lifestyle is enough and you wouldn't need any medicines.
I think the opposite about how the farmaceutical industry will react: people will find out earlier they have a disease and will start using medicin
December 16, 2017, 11:02:03 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
I believe it's still too early to go out to the governmental level. The system needs to be proven working before they make any moves that direction. Public sector doesn't welcome any innovations that easily.
That is true, but if the system deliver as advertised can be that at a certain point the public sector could get on board as well. Just speculating off course.
by that time the product will have to have great success. the public sector moves at a snails pace, compare to private.
Private sector has always to be faster because innovation is a key to success and I think there is an oportunity here.
I just thought the pharmaceutical industry won't be too enthusiastic when Health Monitor gets widely used and becomes a successful device of early detection of diseases. Especially in the case of an early stage of diabetes often a change of lifestyle is enough and you wouldn't need any medicines.
December 16, 2017, 10:53:34 AM
I Think in the beginning there will be a great interest in people for the novelty, and then you need to improve the monitor.
so is it, its just the beginning and all the interest things will start next year with HEALTH MONITOR
Are you kidding people are in to health a lot in my country, this thing will sell out in no time. Everyone is very concerned about their health. It is a good business
December 16, 2017, 10:07:11 AM
Is this health scanner or environment scanner
Please check out their website. Its a health scanner on a per person basis. An individual breathes into it and it can give health data based on it.
December 16, 2017, 09:33:27 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
I believe it's still too early to go out to the governmental level. The system needs to be proven working before they make any moves that direction. Public sector doesn't welcome any innovations that easily.
That is true, but if the system deliver as advertised can be that at a certain point the public sector could get on board as well. Just speculating off course.
by that time the product will have to have great success. the public sector moves at a snails pace, compare to private.
Private sector has always to be faster because innovation is a key to success and I think there is an oportunity here.
December 16, 2017, 09:18:27 AM
The project seems to go well beyond routine monitoring, despite its strategic location at large flow points, apparently there is something greater in this concept, early detection of diseases is essential for early treatment and to prevent their progress. When it comes to health and prevention, of course, everyone remembers cancer and its diagnosis, but I'm still waiting on a Team statement about it, it would be really fantastic
December 16, 2017, 08:56:17 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
Well there is one for glucose level, but nothing official released as far as I can see. Also there is nothing about the cancer test. :/
Actually, i think the most important one is with cancer.
I think they didn't say cancer accuracy. Telling someone false diabetes not that important but telling someone false cancer could cause a lot.
Yes, that's the thing. Would be nice to see how accurate it is and that there is official research with real findings.
December 16, 2017, 08:52:38 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
Well there is one for glucose level, but nothing official released as far as I can see. Also there is nothing about the cancer test. :/
Actually, i think the most important one is with cancer.
I think they didn't say cancer accuracy. Telling someone false diabetes not that important but telling someone false cancer could cause a lot.
I can't imagine that the monitor tells you 'you have lung cancer'. I think it will point out that some biomarker or values aren't in the normal range and you should consult a doctor for further examination.
This is just to help us to respond quickly to our health condition.
And also they can choose which test they want to use, not all at once.
December 16, 2017, 08:29:24 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
I believe it's still too early to go out to the governmental level. The system needs to be proven working before they make any moves that direction. Public sector doesn't welcome any innovations that easily.
That is true, but if the system deliver as advertised can be that at a certain point the public sector could get on board as well. Just speculating off course.
by that time the product will have to have great success. the public sector moves at a snails pace, compare to private.
Private sector has always to be faster because innovation is a key to success and I think there is an oportunity here.
December 16, 2017, 08:26:20 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
Well there is one for glucose level, but nothing official released as far as I can see. Also there is nothing about the cancer test. :/
Actually, i think the most important one is with cancer.
I think they didn't say cancer accuracy. Telling someone false diabetes not that important but telling someone false cancer could cause a lot.
I can't imagine that the monitor tells you 'you have lung cancer'. I think it will point out that some biomarker or values aren't in the normal range and you should consult a doctor for further examination.
This is just to help us to respond quickly to our health condition.
December 16, 2017, 08:24:11 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
I believe it's still too early to go out to the governmental level. The system needs to be proven working before they make any moves that direction. Public sector doesn't welcome any innovations that easily.
That is true, but if the system deliver as advertised can be that at a certain point the public sector could get on board as well. Just speculating off course.
by that time the product will have to have great success. the public sector moves at a snails pace, compare to private.
December 16, 2017, 08:18:47 AM
is there any medical research around this for diagnostics available? wondering accuracy of product. Like concept but wondering about theory behind. Health monitor team is looking good.
December 16, 2017, 08:04:06 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
I believe it's still too early to go out to the governmental level. The system needs to be proven working before they make any moves that direction. Public sector doesn't welcome any innovations that easily.
That is true, but if the system deliver as advertised can be that at a certain point the public sector could get on board as well. Just speculating off course.
December 16, 2017, 07:45:39 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
There's so much red tape and hoops to jump through when dealing with governments. Stick to places where you can get it implemented with as little friction as possible. Put it in drug stores, convenience stores, etc.
Jump to: