Topic: [ANN] ⚡ HEALTH MONITOR⚡ | Soft cap reached - ICO ending today | 1200 tokens left - page 27. (Read 39364 times)
December 16, 2017, 07:06:30 AM
Have you any accuracy% details? Is this device reliable. Would three different machines give three different results or would they all be identicle?
December 16, 2017, 07:01:06 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
Well there is one for glucose level, but nothing official released as far as I can see. Also there is nothing about the cancer test. :/
Actually, i think the most important one is with cancer.
I think they didn't say cancer accuracy. Telling someone false diabetes not that important but telling someone false cancer could cause a lot.
I can't imagine that the monitor tells you 'you have lung cancer'. I think it will point out that some biomarker or values aren't in the normal range and you should consult a doctor for further examination.
This is just to help us to respond quickly to our health condition.
December 16, 2017, 07:00:12 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
There's so much red tape and hoops to jump through when dealing with governments. Stick to places where you can get it implemented with as little friction as possible. Put it in drug stores, convenience stores, etc.
December 16, 2017, 06:30:00 AM
Still can't find it, which measurement errors the device will have? Does somebody know?
I understand it can be 20% error for home made glucose test, but cancer diagnostics is completely different thing...
I understand it can be 20% error for home made glucose test, but cancer diagnostics is completely different thing...
December 16, 2017, 06:23:03 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
Well there is one for glucose level, but nothing official released as far as I can see. Also there is nothing about the cancer test. :/
Actually, i think the most important one is with cancer.
I think they didn't say cancer accuracy. Telling someone false diabetes not that important but telling someone false cancer could cause a lot.
I can't imagine that the monitor tells you 'you have lung cancer'. I think it will point out that some biomarker or values aren't in the normal range and you should consult a doctor for further examination.
December 16, 2017, 05:47:34 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
Well there is one for glucose level, but nothing official released as far as I can see. Also there is nothing about the cancer test. :/
Actually, i think the most important one is with cancer.
I think they didn't say cancer accuracy. Telling someone false diabetes not that important but telling someone false cancer could cause a lot.
I can't imagine that the monitor tells you 'you have lung cancer'. I think it will point out that some biomarker or values aren't in the normal range and you should consult a doctor for further examination.
December 16, 2017, 05:45:55 AM
I think 200 devices for start is nice, if the product work nicely the expansion can be very fast and all around the world. HEALTH MONITOR is a disruptive idea, if people start using it the value can skyrocket.
You need to convey to many people the idea! Only good marketing can get people to use the machine. Many of ignorance will simply be afraid to approach him.
December 16, 2017, 05:35:53 AM
Is this health scanner or environment scanner
December 16, 2017, 05:23:35 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
Well there is one for glucose level, but nothing official released as far as I can see. Also there is nothing about the cancer test. :/
Actually, i think the most important one is with cancer.
I think they didn't say cancer accuracy. Telling someone false diabetes not that important but telling someone false cancer could cause a lot.
December 16, 2017, 05:22:43 AM
Health monitor will allow people to diagnose illnesses in the early stages. The machine will be installed in companies, medical practices and many other places. For foreign nationals, this machine will detect certain diseases in airports and will thus protect individuals and the country more generally.
Why is this machines focused only in airports ?
What do you mean? It will actually be installed in public places where there are big amount of people
airports have a large traffic of people. some of which have time on their hands while waiting for a flight. but, yeah , they can be installed anywhere.
Their vision is installing the health monitors the most people circulation happens.
Airports and shopping malls are their target and fit with their vision.
Well, i wouldnt like to test myself on an airport before going to holidays because if something would be wrong with me, my vacations would be ruined
I would rather see it in shopping malls and other public places. 
December 16, 2017, 05:15:56 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
Well there is one for glucose level, but nothing official released as far as I can see. Also there is nothing about the cancer test. :/
December 16, 2017, 04:39:28 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
I believe it's still too early to go out to the governmental level. The system needs to be proven working before they make any moves that direction. Public sector doesn't welcome any innovations that easily.
December 16, 2017, 04:31:54 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
That is a good point. Actually, Goverments are the one who are capable and should be interested in implementing this system in their respective countries.
December 16, 2017, 04:00:05 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
If people are healthy and can diagnose disease early is good also for the state/goverment because they can save money. Perhaps public health sector may be interested in financing this project
December 16, 2017, 03:48:08 AM
Health monitor will allow people to diagnose illnesses in the early stages. The machine will be installed in companies, medical practices and many other places. For foreign nationals, this machine will detect certain diseases in airports and will thus protect individuals and the country more generally.
Why is this machines focused only in airports ?
What do you mean? It will actually be installed in public places where there are big amount of people
airports have a large traffic of people. some of which have time on their hands while waiting for a flight. but, yeah , they can be installed anywhere.
Their vision is installing the health monitors the most people circulation happens.
Airports and shopping malls are their target and fit with their vision.
December 16, 2017, 03:28:50 AM
Health monitor will allow people to diagnose illnesses in the early stages. The machine will be installed in companies, medical practices and many other places. For foreign nationals, this machine will detect certain diseases in airports and will thus protect individuals and the country more generally.
Why is this machines focused only in airports ?
What do you mean? It will actually be installed in public places where there are big amount of people
airports have a large traffic of people. some of which have time on their hands while waiting for a flight. but, yeah , they can be installed anywhere.
December 16, 2017, 03:04:43 AM
Health Monitor , inovation on medical diagnostic i think it can be intersted for people
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
and for in health to must a increase for system is better ,
December 16, 2017, 02:09:43 AM
Health monitor will allow people to diagnose illnesses in the early stages. The machine will be installed in companies, medical practices and many other places. For foreign nationals, this machine will detect certain diseases in airports and will thus protect individuals and the country more generally.
Why is this machines focused only in airports ?
What do you mean? It will actually be installed in public places where there are big amount of people
December 16, 2017, 01:48:22 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
They have some patent and clinic trials on their website but I didn't check them.
Maybe your question get an answer there. Or maybe not, as I said I didn't check them.
December 16, 2017, 01:30:28 AM
Are there already any test about how sensitive the Health Monitor is? What are the percentages of false-positive and false-negative results?
Hello! Recently discussed the issue of sensitivity. The device shows a blood glucose level with an error of 5%.
The thing I would like to know about this technology is, how accurate is it and who is held liable if the machine is malfunctioning and returning false reports of health?
Hello,
we have a 5% margin error of blood glucose level. According to ISO 15197 standard for home used glucose test 20% accuracy measurements is normal.
Do you actually have some scientific papers where people can see how the device is working and that it really has just 5% of error rate?
Jump to: