OK. Ryan from Bittrex found the application, but, it was in the name of FIMK, not HEAT. He says there is no reference to a HEAT token, in that application.
Thanks for the effort. I also found the emails - yes indeed I asked for listing of FIMK and inquired about helping HEAT (whose name remained secret in mid June, so it was not identified) in the ICO as escrow, for later listing on Bittrex. In a followup to their canned reply I offered the 3 BTC quoted somewhere on their site, with communication stopping there on their side.
I remember getting somewhat harsher treatment from Polo. This combined with all the vague requests of showing love with a project that still would be months in making - and of course no chance of listing before a token is out, yeah it was reasonable to put that off until later time.
Like described earlier in this thread, we'll look more closer at the 3rd party exchangers again when the token is out. The initiatives with Bittrex are appreciated and I'll be sure to reach out on the slack soon.
Our bet - on how FIMK will survive? Twisting and turning the past is the trend of the day... If we translate that post there properly, you wrote
you'd like to bet that 6 months from that date
FIMK's rate is below the ICO level of 160 sat. Quite a difference there in content? Can't remember what the exchange rate was, but the FIMK network has been doing pretty well recently:
https://lompsa.com/#/activity/fim/forgers/latesthttps://github.com/fimkrypto/mofowalletInteresting how the fellow countrymen keep on supporting each other...
Here's a fun bonus for until checking back the next time: Random draft from September with some wallet ideas that became now again relevant with the initial AE User Interface design we're working on with Dennis. Nothing specific, but some competitors may get an idea or two
(that happened multiple times earlier with the FIMK client).