Topic: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining. - page 125. (Read 472950 times)
August 10, 2016, 07:39:43 PM
is HODL still getting delisted or has that been changed?
August 10, 2016, 06:07:13 PM
The missing _mm256_extract_epi64 I do not understand. It should be declared in "immintrin.h" which is included already:
https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#expand=2259,5074,2259&text=_mm256_extract_epi64
Other AVX intrinsics seem to be found which makes it even stranger. Which version of mingw?
https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#expand=2259,5074,2259&text=_mm256_extract_epi64
Other AVX intrinsics seem to be found which makes it even stranger. Which version of mingw?
I rewrote the code to work without _mm256_extract_epi64. It should even be faster now. Hope it compiles with mingw now, please try the latest head.
August 10, 2016, 04:17:01 PM
I faced them when compiled hodlminer 
Maybe whoever managed to build the holdminer under windows can help then?
August 10, 2016, 04:09:39 PM
the price is dirt cheap since new version wallet. 
Actually price is rising on C-CEX. Should ignore YObit as their tokens are not convertible to HODL.
I was speaking with C-CEX about the delisting -
They need to see 6 BTC here -
https://c-cex.com/?id=stat&d=30
Currrently we're at 5.07, so not far off. Another 1 BTC of trading and they should take us off delisting notice.
now it's only 0.92 BTC
Fork and rewards hodling was wrong I am afraid
August 10, 2016, 04:08:10 PM
Got the following error trying to build on win32 - any suggestions?
mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory 'c:/ewb/HODLCoin/src'
CXX libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512Compute32b_parallel(uint64_t**, uint64_t**)':
sha512.cpp:122:60: error: 'htobe64' was not declared in this scope
context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));
^
sha512.cpp:138:63: error: '_mm256_extract_epi64' was not declared in this scope
digest[0] = _mm256_extract_epi64(context[0].h, 0);
^
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512ProcessBlock(Sha512Context*)':
sha512.cpp:21:90: error: 'ulong' was not declared in this scope
#define ROR64(a, n) _mm256_or_si256(_mm256_srli_epi64(a, n), _mm256_slli_epi64(a, sizeof(ulong)*8 - n))
^
sha512.cpp:16:20: note: in expansion of macro 'ROR64'
#define SIGMA2(x) (ROR64(x, 14) ^ ROR64(x, 18) ^ ROR64(x, 41))
^
sha512.cpp:155:20: note: in expansion of macro 'SIGMA2'
T0 += (h[0]) + SIGMA2(e[0]) + Ch((e[0]), (f[0]), (g[0])) + k; \
^
sha512.cpp:166:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512'
ROUND512(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
^
sha512.cpp:174:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512_0_TO_15'
ROUND512_0_TO_15(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h); \
^
sha512.cpp:215:5: note: in expansion of macro 'R512_0'
R512_0; R512_0;
^
makefile:3508: recipe for target 'libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o' failed
Can you try adding #include
https://github.com/Optiminer/HOdlcoin/commit/1b532b7237ec2bbc5068c5269b92f6a475c9a48b or just update to head on that branch?
The missing _mm256_extract_epi64 I do not understand. It should be declared in "immintrin.h" which is included already:
https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#expand=2259,5074,2259&text=_mm256_extract_epi64
Other AVX intrinsics seem to be found which makes it even stranger. Which version of mingw?
August 10, 2016, 03:55:43 PM
the price is dirt cheap since new version wallet.
Actually price is rising on C-CEX. Should ignore YObit as their tokens are not convertible to HODL.
I was speaking with C-CEX about the delisting -
They need to see 6 BTC here -
https://c-cex.com/?id=stat&d=30
Currrently we're at 5.07, so not far off. Another 1 BTC of trading and they should take us off delisting notice.
now it's only 0.92 BTC
Fork and rewards hodling was wrong I am afraid
August 10, 2016, 12:38:31 PM
For anyone using the pool, you can control the number of CPU threads used by the miner by adding -t [number] to the end of: hodlminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://hodl.optiminer.pl:5555 -u HODLADDR -p x
as in: hodlminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://hodl.optiminer.pl:5555 -u HODLADDR -p x -t 4
this was likely obvious to everyone but me but I thought I would throw it out there.
as in: hodlminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://hodl.optiminer.pl:5555 -u HODLADDR -p x -t 4
this was likely obvious to everyone but me but I thought I would throw it out there.
August 10, 2016, 12:30:15 PM
So what's on the horizon for HOdl? We have a pool, we have a website, we're holding on by a thread on an exchange, price is effectively flat at half a penny USD, and we're all looking expectantly towards late Winter/Spring when the 12 month HOdl's start to come out of hibernution. What's the gameplan there devs?
August 10, 2016, 08:19:39 AM
Got the following error trying to build on win32 - any suggestions?
mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory 'c:/ewb/HODLCoin/src'
CXX libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512Compute32b_parallel(uint64_t**, uint64_t**)':
sha512.cpp:122:60: error: 'htobe64' was not declared in this scope
context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));
^
sha512.cpp:138:63: error: '_mm256_extract_epi64' was not declared in this scope
digest[0] = _mm256_extract_epi64(context[0].h, 0);
^
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512ProcessBlock(Sha512Context*)':
sha512.cpp:21:90: error: 'ulong' was not declared in this scope
#define ROR64(a, n) _mm256_or_si256(_mm256_srli_epi64(a, n), _mm256_slli_epi64(a, sizeof(ulong)*8 - n))
^
sha512.cpp:16:20: note: in expansion of macro 'ROR64'
#define SIGMA2(x) (ROR64(x, 14) ^ ROR64(x, 18) ^ ROR64(x, 41))
^
sha512.cpp:155:20: note: in expansion of macro 'SIGMA2'
T0 += (h[0]) + SIGMA2(e[0]) + Ch((e[0]), (f[0]), (g[0])) + k; \
^
sha512.cpp:166:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512'
ROUND512(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
^
sha512.cpp:174:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512_0_TO_15'
ROUND512_0_TO_15(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h); \
^
sha512.cpp:215:5: note: in expansion of macro 'R512_0'
R512_0; R512_0;
^
makefile:3508: recipe for target 'libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o' failed
I faced them when compiled hodlminer
for this
Code:
sha512.cpp:122:60: error: 'htobe64' was not declared in this scope
context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));
I put implementaion of the function htobe64context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));
this error
Code:
sha512.cpp:21:90: error: 'ulong' was not declared in this scope
I fixed by puttingCode:
typedef uint64_t ulong
and for this error
Code:
sha512.cpp:138:63: error: '_mm256_extract_epi64' was not declared in this scope
I guess you need to install some dependencies, I haven't faced this August 10, 2016, 07:49:18 AM
0.33% seems like extreme inflation. Why do you think this coin could hold its value?
August 10, 2016, 07:45:49 AM
Got the following error trying to build on win32 - any suggestions?
mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory 'c:/ewb/HODLCoin/src'
CXX libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512Compute32b_parallel(uint64_t**, uint64_t**)':
sha512.cpp:122:60: error: 'htobe64' was not declared in this scope
context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));
^
sha512.cpp:138:63: error: '_mm256_extract_epi64' was not declared in this scope
digest[0] = _mm256_extract_epi64(context[0].h, 0);
^
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512ProcessBlock(Sha512Context*)':
sha512.cpp:21:90: error: 'ulong' was not declared in this scope
#define ROR64(a, n) _mm256_or_si256(_mm256_srli_epi64(a, n), _mm256_slli_epi64(a, sizeof(ulong)*8 - n))
^
sha512.cpp:16:20: note: in expansion of macro 'ROR64'
#define SIGMA2(x) (ROR64(x, 14) ^ ROR64(x, 18) ^ ROR64(x, 41))
^
sha512.cpp:155:20: note: in expansion of macro 'SIGMA2'
T0 += (h[0]) + SIGMA2(e[0]) + Ch((e[0]), (f[0]), (g[0])) + k; \
^
sha512.cpp:166:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512'
ROUND512(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
^
sha512.cpp:174:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512_0_TO_15'
ROUND512_0_TO_15(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h); \
^
sha512.cpp:215:5: note: in expansion of macro 'R512_0'
R512_0; R512_0;
^
makefile:3508: recipe for target 'libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o' failed
August 09, 2016, 11:32:02 PM
"Paying YObit to list is like paying somebody to punch you in the face"
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/paying-yobit-to-list-is-like-paying-somebody-to-punch-you-in-the-face-1581013
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/paying-yobit-to-list-is-like-paying-somebody-to-punch-you-in-the-face-1581013
August 09, 2016, 11:03:02 PM
For the past month Yobit exchange have been committing a fraud. They have kept HOdl in trade while having no HOdl to exchange. If you buy HOdl from them they cannot be removed into your wallet for interest.
I have been patient with them until now, but it has become apparent that they do not intend to fix it. As a major hodler I feel it necessary to issue the following warning:
YOBIT IS A FRAUDULENT EXCHANGE. DO NOT TRADE WITH THEM UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.
See HOdl slack channel for further information and proof. Apparently I cannot upload it here.
I have been patient with them until now, but it has become apparent that they do not intend to fix it. As a major hodler I feel it necessary to issue the following warning:
YOBIT IS A FRAUDULENT EXCHANGE. DO NOT TRADE WITH THEM UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.
See HOdl slack channel for further information and proof. Apparently I cannot upload it here.
August 09, 2016, 08:16:25 PM
Any news on the new wallet build and binaries? I'm running windows x64 and Ubuntu 64bit ATM and block finding has sloooowed down a lot.
August 09, 2016, 09:21:26 AM
Ah, ok. Was still using v1.0. I've just upgradet now to v. 2.0 Please tell me how to resend the TX.
thanks!!
Just do what you did before, send a normal transaction thanks!!
August 09, 2016, 09:20:08 AM
[/quote]
What version of the wallet are you using? You might still be on the unforked chain, if so just upgrade your wallet and resend your transaction.
[/quote]
Ah, ok. Was still using v1.0. I've just upgradet now to v. 2.0 Please tell me how to resend the TX.
thanks!!
August 09, 2016, 09:14:05 AM
Hi, to help HODl about C-Cex I made a (first) transaction today from local wallet to C-Cex. Seems it didn't arrive there?!
My HODL-client shows TX f2a0bc1f7bfbde32cc3314aa6b480bec52e37d2193beb98c8d5586f0a34693ae and has more than 100 confirmations.
To my surprise, there is no such TX in block explorer.
Anybody any idea what went wrong
What version of the wallet are you using? You might still be on the unforked chain, if so just upgrade your wallet and resend your transaction. My HODL-client shows TX f2a0bc1f7bfbde32cc3314aa6b480bec52e37d2193beb98c8d5586f0a34693ae and has more than 100 confirmations.
To my surprise, there is no such TX in block explorer.
Anybody any idea what went wrong
August 09, 2016, 08:50:10 AM
Hi, to help HODl about C-Cex I made a (first) transaction today from local wallet to C-Cex. Seems it didn't arrive there?!
My HODL-client shows TX f2a0bc1f7bfbde32cc3314aa6b480bec52e37d2193beb98c8d5586f0a34693ae and has more than 100 confirmations.
To my surprise, there is no such TX in block explorer.
Anybody any idea what went wrong
My HODL-client shows TX f2a0bc1f7bfbde32cc3314aa6b480bec52e37d2193beb98c8d5586f0a34693ae and has more than 100 confirmations.
To my surprise, there is no such TX in block explorer.
Anybody any idea what went wrong
August 09, 2016, 03:43:43 AM
what up hodlas?
August 09, 2016, 12:15:21 AM
the price is dirt cheap since new version wallet.
Actually price is rising on C-CEX. Should ignore YObit as their tokens are not convertible to HODL.
I was speaking with C-CEX about the delisting -
They need to see 6 BTC here -
https://c-cex.com/?id=stat&d=30
Currrently we're at 5.07, so not far off. Another 1 BTC of trading and they should take us off delisting notice.
Jump to: