Topic: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast - page 206. (Read 542277 times)
March 13, 2014, 01:07:34 PM
#heavycoin on freenode
March 13, 2014, 12:54:21 PM
How come the net hash rate (according to nonce pool) is 2.15GH/s but the collective pools hashrate doesn't reflect this?
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
There is no rpc call so this is just an estimate using the network difficulty, not entirely accurate, but fairly close.
Who/what is gpools BTW, I'm curious
One more thing; as far as I know there isn't any IRC channel for HVC/pools yet. Wouldn't that be a good idea for people to get into contact in a quicker way?
gpools is someone with a lot of hash power
the only channel i have found is for heavycoinpool.com
This is the IRC channel: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=%23HeavycoinPool
that one is specific to heavycoinpool, not heavycoin in general
March 13, 2014, 12:51:21 PM
This is probably due to different share difficulty on different miners because of how vardiff works. You would need to use different wallet addresses/usernames on different machines to get consistent share counts.
I see! Interesting - thank you again reorder. 
March 13, 2014, 12:49:39 PM
How come the net hash rate (according to nonce pool) is 2.15GH/s but the collective pools hashrate doesn't reflect this?
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
There is no rpc call so this is just an estimate using the network difficulty, not entirely accurate, but fairly close.
Who/what is gpools BTW, I'm curious
One more thing; as far as I know there isn't any IRC channel for HVC/pools yet. Wouldn't that be a good idea for people to get into contact in a quicker way?
gpools is someone with a lot of hash power
the only channel i have found is for heavycoinpool.com
This is the IRC channel: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=%23HeavycoinPool
March 13, 2014, 12:47:35 PM
IRC Channels for the HVC pools would be great...
PS: this would be great for every pools, some have it and other dont ...
PS: this would be great for every pools, some have it and other dont ...
March 13, 2014, 12:44:05 PM
How come the net hash rate (according to nonce pool) is 2.15GH/s but the collective pools hashrate doesn't reflect this?
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
There is no rpc call so this is just an estimate using the network difficulty, not entirely accurate, but fairly close.
Who/what is gpools BTW, I'm curious
One more thing; as far as I know there isn't any IRC channel for HVC/pools yet. Wouldn't that be a good idea for people to get into contact in a quicker way?
gpools is someone with a lot of hash power
the only channel i have found is for heavycoinpool.com
March 13, 2014, 12:43:22 PM
Hi guys i asked yvg1900 team about some coins support including Heavycoin, here is the answer
March 13, 2014, 12:27:54 PM
How come the net hash rate (according to nonce pool) is 2.15GH/s but the collective pools hashrate doesn't reflect this?
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
There is no rpc call so this is just an estimate using the network difficulty, not entirely accurate, but fairly close.
Who/what is gpools BTW, I'm curious
One more thing; as far as I know there isn't any IRC channel for HVC/pools yet. Wouldn't that be a good idea for people to get into contact in a quicker way?
March 13, 2014, 12:18:12 PM
Price trending upward on Mintpal. With momentum gaining we could see decent gains today. I'm holding for .00007 
loving HVC!
loving HVC! March 13, 2014, 12:13:13 PM
Hi folks,
Im relatively new to mining, and as you can see, this is my first post.
Heavycoin made me try to involve at community.
While i dont consider self much smart about mining or tech savvy, i cant help but to choosay something about price and trading.
I see that lots of folks consider current hvc price undervalued, while dont understand that price is at your control.
Now lets say you believe in hvc. There is something you can do about price. At any market, its really about demand. Any merchant or speculant cant be indifferent to greater demand. If this community becomes more organised in terms of controled and constant demand rise, price will eventually go up and more and more will be interested in hvc.
Consider this short tem plan, and imagine what will happen if nearly anyone gets involved.
Choose an amount of money/other currency you will invest in hvc. Amount is really irellevant if many of us do this. Now split that amount in the way that EVERY DAY for next 2 or 3 weeks you buy a small amount of hvc. Bigger amounts in first week, lets say 50% of what you want to invest split into 7 days, and the rest in next 2 weeks. That way you will make hvc interesting, let other know that we have strong community and we can work together.
But this will work if we arrange to act together. It will repay and make hvc strong and respectable
Im relatively new to mining, and as you can see, this is my first post.
Heavycoin made me try to involve at community.
While i dont consider self much smart about mining or tech savvy, i cant help but to choosay something about price and trading.
I see that lots of folks consider current hvc price undervalued, while dont understand that price is at your control.
Now lets say you believe in hvc. There is something you can do about price. At any market, its really about demand. Any merchant or speculant cant be indifferent to greater demand. If this community becomes more organised in terms of controled and constant demand rise, price will eventually go up and more and more will be interested in hvc.
Consider this short tem plan, and imagine what will happen if nearly anyone gets involved.
Choose an amount of money/other currency you will invest in hvc. Amount is really irellevant if many of us do this. Now split that amount in the way that EVERY DAY for next 2 or 3 weeks you buy a small amount of hvc. Bigger amounts in first week, lets say 50% of what you want to invest split into 7 days, and the rest in next 2 weeks. That way you will make hvc interesting, let other know that we have strong community and we can work together.
But this will work if we arrange to act together. It will repay and make hvc strong and respectable
March 13, 2014, 12:09:34 PM
How come the net hash rate (according to nonce pool) is 2.15GH/s but the collective pools hashrate doesn't reflect this?
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
There is no rpc call so this is just an estimate using the network difficulty, not entirely accurate, but fairly close.
March 13, 2014, 12:07:16 PM
http://heavy.stablehash.com/ is up for beta!
http://ubuntuone.com/50wuGGpX3SgkG9Pp2hjsBw (Miner source if somebody can compile for windows! I will compile later if nobody else does.)
http://ubuntuone.com/50wuGGpX3SgkG9Pp2hjsBw (Miner source if somebody can compile for windows! I will compile later if nobody else does.)
This is a win-32 bit version of the cpuminer-heavycoin-rc2 for use with stable hash.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8vbqmf59q3occax/cpuminer-heavycoin-rc2-stablehash-w32.zip
you can join the pool at http://heavy.stablehash.com/
source provided by doge94 at bitcointalk.org
It has been tested on Win7 64.
usage
minerd.exe -a heavy -v 512 -o stratum+tcp://stablehash.com:5001 -u
Donations are appreciated
HVC: HGxqrQf5rct4LisCN6e5EgmEpz6NXB4mE6
BTC: 1J97Y7EwYinRRxJkdXvzaYoJmjZsnzR2FY
Enjoy and happy mining
Vijtech
This thread is far too long to read.
Is there a GPU client being used? I've read posts that there is.
just in a short word:
no
March 13, 2014, 11:59:59 AM
- yeah!!! still cooking it!!!fuck-wit asshole ADMINS PREVENT ME from posting honest links
March 13, 2014, 11:44:46 AM
How come the net hash rate (according to nonce pool) is 2.15GH/s but the collective pools hashrate doesn't reflect this?
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
solo? for heavycoin really consume very little memory, everyone can solo with wallet open, and play his own
March 13, 2014, 11:37:42 AM
Is anyone mining heavycoin with an FX 9590 black edition? and if so could you please post your mining speeds. Thanks
Currently I am mining with a 3570k running at 4.0ghz and an intel G1820 running at stock giving me 0.113 Total MH/s on 1Gh.com with an average of 40 coins a day.
would be nice to see what speeds other people are getting out there!
Currently I am mining with a 3570k running at 4.0ghz and an intel G1820 running at stock giving me 0.113 Total MH/s on 1Gh.com with an average of 40 coins a day.
would be nice to see what speeds other people are getting out there!
March 13, 2014, 11:19:36 AM
How come the net hash rate (according to nonce pool) is 2.15GH/s but the collective pools hashrate doesn't reflect this?
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
people with cpu farms solo mining?
March 13, 2014, 11:16:44 AM
How come the net hash rate (according to nonce pool) is 2.15GH/s but the collective pools hashrate doesn't reflect this?
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
Heavycoinpool is running at 14.18 MH/s (currently),
Nonce is running at 95.38 MH/s (currently)
stablehash is not running
zhpool is 1.2 MH/s
The other pools listed are not running
1GH (according to their hall of fame), is at 1.6 GH/s (I'm not sure how to see their live stats).
This doesn't add up to 2.15, which probably means there's a hidden pool running. Either that or nonce-pools net hash rate is incorrectly reported.
March 13, 2014, 11:16:19 AM
don#t worry about the price dropping, it's a great buying opportunity.
+100
I cannot agree with you, I prefer +1000000:)
HeavyCoin is a gpu/aisc/fpga very safe coin with brand new voting function, not like other shitting coins
price will go up, so buy a lot and bury them, take them out when you want a new porsche
and you can mine them with us at http://heavycoin.zhpool.com
March 13, 2014, 11:11:04 AM
I didn't see anyone react on AnonyMint post (see quote below, original post on page 89), I'm not tech savvy enough in crypto to have a opinion on this, @keccak512 can we have the dev team point of view? Thanks.
Someone private messaged me to check out HeavyCoin.
Sorry I realize this post will make people angry at me. I am usually the messenger who brings technical reality which is usually bad news because most coin developers are not competent.
Insufficient technical details. From what I read about their claim of SIMD as an issue. I think they fail to understand the nature of the GPU advantage.
From the Github page:
Oh great let the early investors decide to make coins even more rare. This will be a very good experiment to show why democracy is a power vacuum.
Sorry I realize this post will make people angry at me. I am usually the messenger who brings technical reality which is usually bad news because most coin developers are not competent.
Innovations and contributions
- HEFTY1 - a cryptographic hash function for CPU-only proof-of-work with a small memory footprint
Insufficient technical details. From what I read about their claim of SIMD as an issue. I think they fail to understand the nature of the GPU advantage.
- Ultra-secure hashing - a secure strategy for using multiple cryptographic hash functions
From the Github page:
- Temporal Retargeting - multipool protection that goes beyond Kimoto Gravity Well
- Decentralized Block Reward Voting - the mining schedule and money supply are democratically decided (total supply is still bounded to 128M)
Oh great let the early investors decide to make coins even more rare. This will be a very good experiment to show why democracy is a power vacuum.
I Wouldn't worry too much about anonymint. He comes into every thread like some kind of genius savant, without actually being able to fix anything.
That doesn't mean some, if not all of his points are valid.
March 13, 2014, 11:03:10 AM
I didn't see anyone react on AnonyMint post (see quote below, original post on page 89), I'm not tech savvy enough in crypto to have a opinion on this, @keccak512 can we have the dev team point of view? Thanks.
Someone private messaged me to check out HeavyCoin.
Sorry I realize this post will make people angry at me. I am usually the messenger who brings technical reality which is usually bad news because most coin developers are not competent.
Insufficient technical details. From what I read about their claim of SIMD as an issue. I think they fail to understand the nature of the GPU advantage.
From the Github page:
Oh great let the early investors decide to make coins even more rare. This will be a very good experiment to show why democracy is a power vacuum.
Sorry I realize this post will make people angry at me. I am usually the messenger who brings technical reality which is usually bad news because most coin developers are not competent.
Innovations and contributions
- HEFTY1 - a cryptographic hash function for CPU-only proof-of-work with a small memory footprint
Insufficient technical details. From what I read about their claim of SIMD as an issue. I think they fail to understand the nature of the GPU advantage.
- Ultra-secure hashing - a secure strategy for using multiple cryptographic hash functions
From the Github page:
- Temporal Retargeting - multipool protection that goes beyond Kimoto Gravity Well
- Decentralized Block Reward Voting - the mining schedule and money supply are democratically decided (total supply is still bounded to 128M)
Oh great let the early investors decide to make coins even more rare. This will be a very good experiment to show why democracy is a power vacuum.
I Wouldn't worry too much about anonymint. He comes into every thread like some kind of genius savant, without actually being able to fix anything.
Jump to: