Topic: [ANN] HydroMining | Green Mining, environmentally friendly and profitable - page 11. (Read 40905 times)

For any retards who missed it, the following was offered up as proof that coss.io was down when I expressed it was down ...

http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/coss.io


... else the above would've looked like the following which would've made my issue moot ...


That outta the way, I now wish to apologize to all the retards for being retards.

PS: Has anybody taken the time to calculate if 700 kW is morer smallerer, morer biggerer or the samer as 700 kW, the output of Hydro 2 and Hydro 3, respectively.

If only MD101 would return to address ANY of the recent accusations I've advanced, it'll be fun to read, but knowing him he'll probably resort to accusing me of fucking my dead mother, my dead father and the rest of my dead relatives.

Again, I'm tad rusty doin' maths since it's been years since I got a perfect 800 on the math section of the SAT back in 1978 where I took the test at Indiana University, but I'll give it a go nonetheless.

If S9 miners were purchased at U$1,295 each and HydroMiner purchased a U$1M worth which were just delivered, I calculated (please check my maths) by putting the morer smallerer number into the morer biggerer number, that equates to approximately 790 S9 miners were sent to HM's Vienna office.

Granted, the HM team is not stupid, thus morer than aware that it's prudent to deploy these advantageous miners ASAP either inside some free standing building or in a (singular; don't get ahead of me) sea container as close to a damn's turbine as possible (if for no other reason than to mask the noise produced by the miners and cooling units so not to disturb the damn facilities' rural neighbors or nesting, chirping birds).

My first question is in which power station site were these 790 miners deployed? The Hydro 1 where space was already an issue months ago, or Hydro 2 currently consisting of a single 20' sea container alongside the 700 kW producing dam?

A tougher question is how much kW will these 790 bitcoin miners consume plus the electricity needed to run the cooling units? Do these dams produce enough power to operate them?

Furthermore, HM is on record in stating that if for some reason the dams are unable to generate kW, they have diesel generators (the 3D silent models; think: disturbing the rural neighbors) in place to power their farm. Question: How many and how fuckin big are these magic diesel generators?

Unless the above is addressed, it'll be a given that them 790 bitcoin miners are mining away inside some secret location nowhere near a dam having water flowing through it or not. And guess who gets to keep all the initial coins generated from miners purchased with the Investards' investment. Hint: Not the Investards.

Sometimes I wish MD101 was still around replying to my replies in the exact same fashion as crypto's number serial liar, Leroy Fodor, especially ever since he by happenstance quoted Leroy quoting Joshua Zipkin in his lame attempt to discredit my scammy ass. HAHAHA (iconic Leroy Fodor laugh in case you're not versed)

Allow me to repost the following just in case RitzBitzz comes along and quotes MD101 on the subject in RB's attempt to calm the masses re nobody is, has or will get royally fucked by HM.

---

And here's how badly HydroMiner is fuckin the crypto community:

September 22, 2017: https://web.archive.org/web/20170922073038/https://www.hydrominer.org/wp-content/uploads/HydroMiner.pdf


Today: https://www.hydrominer.org/wp-content/uploads/HydroMiner.pdf


So that the retards are on the same page as us non-retards, the following are the facts presented by HydroMiner on their white paper:

Murau in Styria (Hydro 2): Maximum capacity of 700 kW.
Waidhofen an der Ybbs (Hydro 2): Maximum capacity of 700 kW.

Granted, my math prowess has become rusty since high school when I got a perfect 800 on the math section of the SAT (760 on the English/comprehension section), thus leaving it to others to conduct the calculations in seeing if 700 kW is morerer biggerer, morer smallerer or the samer as 700 kW (please show your work), the proof requested because ...

November 15, 2017: https://www.trendingtopics.at/hydrominer-ico-fragen-crypto-moining-h2o-token-sale/


Gulp! That explains everything. Murau was abandoned because its capacity was ONLY 700 kW, whereas the Waidhofen site has a much larger capacity, namely ... wait for it ... 700 kW.

Back to the proof I'm requesting, please include Q.E.D. at its end, for I wanna frame the work and hang it on my balls wall.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170922073038/https://www.hydrominer.org/wp-content/uploads/HydroMiner.pdf


https://www.trendingtopics.at/hydrominer-ico-fragen-crypto-moining-h2o-token-sale/


Prior to the ICO, the Marau site was rented, but after the ICO there was ONLY an option to rent there, abandoned due to its kW output being problematic, opting for a station with a larger, smaller or same (jury is still out) kW output.

I’m amaze with your shameless act.he’s no longer active?.blind or ignorance?
Should I quote his post?

Using the proceeds of the ICO, the HydroMiner team will equip more hydro power stations in the Alps.
HydroMiner has several options for power stations. In Styria for example, there is an option to place units
in containers at a facility with an output of up to 12,000 kW. Other smaller facilities are also available in
southern Germany, with a range from 500 kW to 4,500 kW.[/size][/quote]

Do they have 2 In the beginning?

https://www.hydrominer.org/status-next-steps/

These two stations generate enough power to meet our demands, and we don’t plan to add another station right away.

For those who truly enjoyed getting fucked up the ass sans lube, compare the following two articles by a person barely able to speak English who most likely doesn't even have a rudimentary handle on how it's penned ...

https://beat.10ztalk.com/2017/09/08/interview-with-christian-vogl-cto-of-hydrominer/

https://www.hydrominer.org/what-does-hydrominer-mine/

Hope you saw the pattern as your colon was gettin' stretched.

Very nice write-up: https://steemit.com/hydrominer/@cpufronz/hydrominer-a-post-ico-analysis

Surprisingly, Team HydroMiner addressed every question and concern, thus putting them in a better light, ergo I guess I'm done here with spreading FUD. Damn it!

Yes, HydroMIner is listed on Coss and EtherDelta. The team is in contact with other exchanges as well.

The project is under value at the moment , it have a very nice Community and the Dev Team is awesome too.Just give it time.the main thing that the team was a success and carried out their plans.

Heaven forbid that the rural neighbors would be pissed over the roar of air ventilation systems over the sound of fast moving water and ... wait for it ... huge motherfuckin turbines and birds chirping.


Okay, I'll give HM this one but ONLY if they're using 3D's quiet pumps.

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@karankj/hydrominer-eco-friendly-crypto-mining


I will record myself sucking a big, juicy dick if somebody can provide proof within all HM's vids depicting a single miner being cooled via 3M liquid cooling or the likes of such process. ALL I've seen to date are miners sitting on shelves cooled by fans (the ones plugged in, not the ones simply sitting on shelves acting as Christmas decorations).

The following hasn't changed on HM's white paper since the Hydro 2 was moved two hours away to its supposedly new location ...


Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't HM jacking off (or squirting) all over themselves each and every time they advanced that their farm is water cooled, negating what's depicted above (in red)?

https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/hydrominer/

And here's how badly HydroMiner is fuckin the crypto community:

September 22, 2017: https://web.archive.org/web/20170922073038/https://www.hydrominer.org/wp-content/uploads/HydroMiner.pdf


Today: https://www.hydrominer.org/wp-content/uploads/HydroMiner.pdf


So that the retards are on the same page as us non-retards, the following are the facts presented by HydroMiner on their white paper:

Murau in Styria (Hydro 2): Maximum capacity of 700 kW.
Waidhofen an der Ybbs (Hydro 2): Maximum capacity of 700 kW.

Granted, my math prowess has become rusty since high school when I got a perfect 800 on the math section of the SAT (760 on the English/comprehension section), thus leaving it to others to conduct the calculations in seeing if 700 kW is morerer biggerer, morer smallerer or the samer as 700 kW (please show your work), the proof requested because ...

November 15, 2017: https://www.trendingtopics.at/hydrominer-ico-fragen-crypto-moining-h2o-token-sale/


Gulp! That explains everything. Murau was abandoned because its capacity was ONLY 700 kW, whereas the Waidhofen site has a much larger capacity, namely ... wait for it ... 700 kW.

Back to the proof I'm requesting, please include Q.E.D. at its end, for I wanna frame the work and hang it on my balls wall.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170922073038/https://www.hydrominer.org/wp-content/uploads/HydroMiner.pdf


https://www.trendingtopics.at/hydrominer-ico-fragen-crypto-moining-h2o-token-sale/


Prior to the ICO, the Marau site was rented, but after the ICO there was ONLY an option to rent there, abandoned due to its kW output being problematic, opting for a station with a larger, smaller or same (jury is still out) kW output.

It was I who first brought such to light over a month ago, but HM opted to NOT take any action against the plagiarism. Makes one wonder if their team is also behind that ruse, eh? An honest entity would've shut down such a site once the act was brought to their attention, BUT NOT HM!!!

Hi Hydrominer team. Does SwissHydro have any connection to your project? Their whitepaper look very similar so I just wonder if there is any cooperation with you? Or is it just a coincidence? 

Great, so HydroMiner would have no problem depicting that they filed taxes in 2017 for profits they earned in 2016 which they're 100% on record in stating such to be the case prior to amassing start-up capital through their ICO, of which the above was part of the solicitation process directed toward potential investors.

You're a fuckin idiot if you (the reader) have no idea where I'm goin' with this.

https://www.hydrominer.org/faq/


https://www.hydrominer.org/status-next-steps/



Feel free to consider me unworthy to address the above, whereupon I WILL pen a scam accusation thread on HydroMiner.

TBC, I WILL NOT ACCEPT that you merely made a mistake akin to confusing 2014 with 2015 when Nadine started mining, AND confusing BTC with ETH with what she initially started to mine. There are way too many lies associated with HydroMiner that have been ignored, brushed under the rug, or not addressed because they consider those (like me) trolls when asking smart questions.

Already listed on exchange(s)? I didn't know that. I invested half a grand.

the price of a hydrominer has fallen by about half compared to the price of an ICO? Am I correct?