Guys I am getting worried that this is a scam. I reached SebastianJU for refund and he says he did not received escrow.
I am sent 2 emails to dev he is not responding.
What are you speaking about? I did not receive escrow? I do not know what you mean. I also sent an email to everyone I was told invested and I told everyone also that I only react on bitcointalk pm's, not on emails.
I think he even is not an investor.How can he invested without reading op and just below it your post
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17162879 I don't know if he is posting that to all ico or just to discredit CGC Project but addressing this issue in a timely manner by the escrower itself will render this post as useless,I don't think he invested at all .
Dont judge people by appearance. shiver might be the voice of reason speaking godly truth openly and without agenda. If he says he has reached out to sebastian guy, I dont see any reason to doubt his words.
If anyone need info about a refund he can get in touch with us, we may be able to help you. But please remember the FIRST THING you have to do is contact SebastianJu, because he is the escrow and he has full control over the money. BTC you invested are deposited on his BTC address, not on our. That was clear since the very first day.
I have send you a PM with the details the same message I sent SebastianJu. It should NOT be too difficult to refund as you only got a few investors. Check your email as well for my earlier communication otherwise I will post the email thread here for all to see.
SEBASTIAN PLEASE REFUND SHIVER (he is the guy of the double transaction, with a few satoshi on the second one).
SEBASTIAN PLEASE REFUND CESPOWEB, HE EVEN SENT YOU SCREENSHOTS OF COINBASE TRANSACTIONS (and he want to invest in the new ICO so we are basically waiting for him, our best investor).
I'am very sorry guys, I have no clue why refunds take so much. I have absolutely no control over the funds so it's about time we all start spamming SebastianJu mailbox asking for a refund. He also have an "escrow thread" we could spam a little in case he delays refund again and again..
We have had just 8 investors, refund process should be very easy (and profitable for Sebastian), since 2 are not eligible for refund as they invested only 0.01, (sebastian minimum fee). He has to refund 6 persons.
What the fuck do you write here?
Spamming me? I sent every investor an email when I started. You did not send me the list of the investor names on bitcointalk when I asked you on the 25th about it, nor did you answer my second question.
I made a post here about refund. Some investors contacted me, some, for some reason became loud in the thread because they did not receive a refund... well they did not contact me. Then two contacted me and I started a conversation of course. I explicitly explained to answer me by clicking on "reply to all" or "quote" instead on "reply" because all previous conversation is killed otherwise. Which makes it practically impossible on this forum to follow a lot of conversations that I have at the same time. Which takes time again.
Then of course the usual things happen. People did not read about the rules that were clear from the start. I have to explain every possible solution. And I do despite the time it takes.
I'm not sure what you blame me now when investors did not contact me nor you followed what was negotiated, I hope I do not need to explain what I mean. Besides those that behaved normally already received their refund. Screenshots are no real proof, a waiting time of at least 2 weeks are bound to it. But at the minimum I need investors to work with me. Some investors did not even contact me yet. And I can't contact them besides what I already did with the email.
I am responsible to the real investors. That is by default the person that brings in proof. Not a person who claims a tx. I could have claimed all the transactions from this ICO if a tx would be sufficient. It is no proof at all. I simply can't refund to a random user just because he pushes or spams me nor because one of the parties involved tells me that this is the user who invested. It is about proof in some form. Which would potentially mean funds being stolen from the real investor when I would follow that route.
This could have gone way more smooth when working together. I'm not happy about this post.
Edit: And yes... you should have sent them to me simply. It's not your task to push or blame me, you need to help me with infos you have to contact the users. So that they can provide proof to me then.
Edit 2: Also, am I right that 0.04b are missing because of the way you collected coins? Can you tell me where they went? It doesn't look like it was used as transaction fee.