Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [ICO is complete!] Market.space - Decentralized Host Aggregator - page 24. (Read 6886 times)

sr. member
Activity: 568
Merit: 255
Hello
whats about KYC? is it obligatory?
Mostly KYC is needed for large contributions.

Well, if we omit KYC for small contributions, it would be a violation of the law regulations we stick to, don't you agree?
sr. member
Activity: 568
Merit: 255
Hi devs! When are u going to distribute bounty rewards?

Within 2 weeks after the ICO ends - we need some time to calculate all the stakes and send the rewards
sr. member
Activity: 568
Merit: 255
Do you have russian topic?

No. We don't target the Russian market, so there's no need to allocate resources for that
sr. member
Activity: 568
Merit: 255

I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis Wink They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't.

The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about.

Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings

As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers.
I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn.
But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done.
The final mark comes from the market anyway )

They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out.

We won't unless someone enrolled an independent expert tells the world Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 568
Merit: 255
Hello
whats about KYC? is it obligatory?

Yes, there's no other way to define whether you factually don't belong to the prohibited or restricted areas
sr. member
Activity: 568
Merit: 255
I had a look at your team on the website. They are experienced, but im not sure only few people could deliver these project... Do u have any plans to hire more devs after ICO?

Well, whatever questions you have as to our technical team, you're free to put them here. If you mean that not every developer currently working with us was heavily involved namely in blockchain and dApps previously, this means they've got a solid technical background allowing them to work on this project.

Yep, we'll be hiring more tech guys after the token sale. If you're the one who can contribute, you're welcome to enrol! Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 568
Merit: 255
Hi guys! How are you doing? Smiley How about bonuses? Will I have any bonuses if I buy tokens during the first week of sales?
Hello!
It's all fine, thank you!

Yes, sure we have special offers during the ICO include the following:
— 25% bonus for tokens bought within the first 24 hours
— 15% bonus for tokens bought within 10 days starting from the 2nd day of the ICO
— 10% bonus for tokens bought within 14 days starting from 12th day of the ICO

How can u ensure investors that bought tokens with 25% discount not to sell tokens immidiately after the excahnge listing?

I'm also worried that these users will dump all their tokens immidiately after listing. any plans how to stop this??

Hi. No way, there's a 6 months freeze for the Team. We follow the same scenario as most other projects do in this way. We'll include it in FAQ soon
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 254

I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis Wink They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't.

The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about.

Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings

As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers.
I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn.
But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done.
The final mark comes from the market anyway )

They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out.
newbie
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
Hi guys! How are you doing? Smiley How about bonuses? Will I have any bonuses if I buy tokens during the first week of sales?
Hello!
It's all fine, thank you!

Yes, sure we have special offers during the ICO include the following:
— 25% bonus for tokens bought within the first 24 hours
— 15% bonus for tokens bought within 10 days starting from the 2nd day of the ICO
— 10% bonus for tokens bought within 14 days starting from 12th day of the ICO

How can u ensure investors that bought tokens with 25% discount not to sell tokens immidiately after the excahnge listing?

I'm also worried that these users will dump all their tokens immidiately after listing. any plans how to stop this??
It depends if you're long-term or short-term investor.
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
Quite a lot of countries mentioned here. Others are just asking to confirm you are not from China or the USA. Quite a bothering trend - to know that all these countries reject ICOs and crypto or stigmatize them as "illegal"

The rumour has it that 80% of ICOs are scamful, that's why they are prohibiting. I even came across such a "study" recently.

Another thing is that no one wants to analyze the projects and put some efforts to getting the details. It's much easier to blame the project you invested in that acknowledge that it is actually you who bears all the responsibility for investing.

Sorry for digressing in this thread, it's just a very painful topic for me
Yeah, i read this article too. They picked the ICOs that had a minimum market cap of $50M and were expected to go into active trading and categorized them into six different groups: Scam, Failed, Gone Dead, Dwindling, Promising, and Successful.The study results reveal that of the whole pie, a whopping 81 percent of the ICOs turned out to be scams. Another 6 percent fell into the Failed category, and 5 percent had Gone Dead, taking the total for “Failure to List” group to 92 percent.
And despite all these negative and depressing statistics we're still participating in ICOs, 'couse we trully believe in these 8% Smiley Grin

Sorry to intrude, but how to spot a great ICO and avoid scam?
Unfortunately where there is money, there will be scams.
member
Activity: 145
Merit: 10
Quite a lot of countries mentioned here. Others are just asking to confirm you are not from China or the USA. Quite a bothering trend - to know that all these countries reject ICOs and crypto or stigmatize them as "illegal"

The rumour has it that 80% of ICOs are scamful, that's why they are prohibiting. I even came across such a "study" recently.

Another thing is that no one wants to analyze the projects and put some efforts to getting the details. It's much easier to blame the project you invested in that acknowledge that it is actually you who bears all the responsibility for investing.

Sorry for digressing in this thread, it's just a very painful topic for me
Yeah, i read this article too. They picked the ICOs that had a minimum market cap of $50M and were expected to go into active trading and categorized them into six different groups: Scam, Failed, Gone Dead, Dwindling, Promising, and Successful.The study results reveal that of the whole pie, a whopping 81 percent of the ICOs turned out to be scams. Another 6 percent fell into the Failed category, and 5 percent had Gone Dead, taking the total for “Failure to List” group to 92 percent.
And despite all these negative and depressing statistics we're still participating in ICOs, 'couse we trully believe in these 8% Smiley Grin

Sorry to intrude, but how to spot a great ICO and avoid scam?

There are sooooo many articles and threads about this man
choose any
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
Hi devs! When are u going to distribute bounty rewards?
sr. member
Activity: 668
Merit: 257
Quote

I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis Wink They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't.

All the ratings are sooo biased... if you just delve into the info about the project and shape your own opinion, and then go to check all these rates assigned by the "independent" experts, you'll that it's all not worth looking at

I would not trust these shitty ratings either... for instance, Mark Space have 4.1 on ICOBench, but they're scammers, and everyone knows that. So which on earth  "expert" ratings are we talking about  Huh

At least Ico Bench have quite a right rate for Filecoin, so it's not as hopeless as I thought

Filecoin? Oh, I'm starting to smell a rat  Grin Grin  The last update dated by the 1st of January, and no presence in networks like Medium or else, only blog

Come off that... I quite like that project and idea, you know. Not every project shows off a lot in the media... Although I agree that keeping people informed and not losing touch is very very important

I don't want to enter a discussion, as it would be off topic in this thread, and quite time taking. I'd only say that it's rather naive to think that not having a MVP + making very rare updates can result in delivered promises. Again, it's all my humble opinion

I like the recent development in the ICO space that it is not so easy anymore to raise a fortune with just a white paper and mediocre communication. It becomes more selective step by step, which is a good thing.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
saw you in the STORJ thread. I wonder why don't you stick to one token
Here is the explanation of their CEO, if interested
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ico-updates-sia-storj-alexander-rakhmanov/
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Quite a lot of countries mentioned here. Others are just asking to confirm you are not from China or the USA. Quite a bothering trend - to know that all these countries reject ICOs and crypto or stigmatize them as "illegal"

The rumour has it that 80% of ICOs are scamful, that's why they are prohibiting. I even came across such a "study" recently.

Another thing is that no one wants to analyze the projects and put some efforts to getting the details. It's much easier to blame the project you invested in that acknowledge that it is actually you who bears all the responsibility for investing.

Sorry for digressing in this thread, it's just a very painful topic for me
Yeah, i read this article too. They picked the ICOs that had a minimum market cap of $50M and were expected to go into active trading and categorized them into six different groups: Scam, Failed, Gone Dead, Dwindling, Promising, and Successful.The study results reveal that of the whole pie, a whopping 81 percent of the ICOs turned out to be scams. Another 6 percent fell into the Failed category, and 5 percent had Gone Dead, taking the total for “Failure to List” group to 92 percent.
And despite all these negative and depressing statistics we're still participating in ICOs, 'couse we trully believe in these 8% Smiley Grin

Sorry to intrude, but how to spot a great ICO and avoid scam?

I think one of the most obvious red flags is the lack of detail on how the technology works. So check the WP
And don't worry you need not be a technical geek in order to distinguish real from fake one. You just need to be attentive

Agree!
From my pt of view, reading, not skimming, the white paper of the ICO is the most effective and easy way to check out whether it's a scam. Be patient if you don't want to be cheated.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Quite a lot of countries mentioned here. Others are just asking to confirm you are not from China or the USA. Quite a bothering trend - to know that all these countries reject ICOs and crypto or stigmatize them as "illegal"

The rumour has it that 80% of ICOs are scamful, that's why they are prohibiting. I even came across such a "study" recently.

Another thing is that no one wants to analyze the projects and put some efforts to getting the details. It's much easier to blame the project you invested in that acknowledge that it is actually you who bears all the responsibility for investing.

Sorry for digressing in this thread, it's just a very painful topic for me
Yeah, i read this article too. They picked the ICOs that had a minimum market cap of $50M and were expected to go into active trading and categorized them into six different groups: Scam, Failed, Gone Dead, Dwindling, Promising, and Successful.The study results reveal that of the whole pie, a whopping 81 percent of the ICOs turned out to be scams. Another 6 percent fell into the Failed category, and 5 percent had Gone Dead, taking the total for “Failure to List” group to 92 percent.
And despite all these negative and depressing statistics we're still participating in ICOs, 'couse we trully believe in these 8% Smiley Grin

Sorry to intrude, but how to spot a great ICO and avoid scam?

Invest wisely and just invest in some amount you can afford to lose. This is a gambling world, your plane can either go to the moon or hit the ground hard, that's it.
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
Quite a lot of countries mentioned here. Others are just asking to confirm you are not from China or the USA. Quite a bothering trend - to know that all these countries reject ICOs and crypto or stigmatize them as "illegal"

The rumour has it that 80% of ICOs are scamful, that's why they are prohibiting. I even came across such a "study" recently.

Another thing is that no one wants to analyze the projects and put some efforts to getting the details. It's much easier to blame the project you invested in that acknowledge that it is actually you who bears all the responsibility for investing.

Sorry for digressing in this thread, it's just a very painful topic for me
Yeah, i read this article too. They picked the ICOs that had a minimum market cap of $50M and were expected to go into active trading and categorized them into six different groups: Scam, Failed, Gone Dead, Dwindling, Promising, and Successful.The study results reveal that of the whole pie, a whopping 81 percent of the ICOs turned out to be scams. Another 6 percent fell into the Failed category, and 5 percent had Gone Dead, taking the total for “Failure to List” group to 92 percent.
And despite all these negative and depressing statistics we're still participating in ICOs, 'couse we trully believe in these 8% Smiley Grin

Sorry to intrude, but how to spot a great ICO and avoid scam?

I think one of the most obvious red flags is the lack of detail on how the technology works. So check the WP
And don't worry you need not be a technical geek in order to distinguish real from fake one. You just need to be attentive
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Quite a lot of countries mentioned here. Others are just asking to confirm you are not from China or the USA. Quite a bothering trend - to know that all these countries reject ICOs and crypto or stigmatize them as "illegal"

The rumour has it that 80% of ICOs are scamful, that's why they are prohibiting. I even came across such a "study" recently.

Another thing is that no one wants to analyze the projects and put some efforts to getting the details. It's much easier to blame the project you invested in that acknowledge that it is actually you who bears all the responsibility for investing.

Sorry for digressing in this thread, it's just a very painful topic for me
Yeah, i read this article too. They picked the ICOs that had a minimum market cap of $50M and were expected to go into active trading and categorized them into six different groups: Scam, Failed, Gone Dead, Dwindling, Promising, and Successful.The study results reveal that of the whole pie, a whopping 81 percent of the ICOs turned out to be scams. Another 6 percent fell into the Failed category, and 5 percent had Gone Dead, taking the total for “Failure to List” group to 92 percent.
And despite all these negative and depressing statistics we're still participating in ICOs, 'couse we trully believe in these 8% Smiley Grin

Sorry to intrude, but how to spot a great ICO and avoid scam?
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Quite a lot of countries mentioned here. Others are just asking to confirm you are not from China or the USA. Quite a bothering trend - to know that all these countries reject ICOs and crypto or stigmatize them as "illegal"

The rumour has it that 80% of ICOs are scamful, that's why they are prohibiting. I even came across such a "study" recently.

Another thing is that no one wants to analyze the projects and put some efforts to getting the details. It's much easier to blame the project you invested in that acknowledge that it is actually you who bears all the responsibility for investing.

Sorry for digressing in this thread, it's just a very painful topic for me
Yeah, i read this article too. They picked the ICOs that had a minimum market cap of $50M and were expected to go into active trading and categorized them into six different groups: Scam, Failed, Gone Dead, Dwindling, Promising, and Successful.The study results reveal that of the whole pie, a whopping 81 percent of the ICOs turned out to be scams. Another 6 percent fell into the Failed category, and 5 percent had Gone Dead, taking the total for “Failure to List” group to 92 percent.
And despite all these negative and depressing statistics we're still participating in ICOs, 'couse we trully believe in these 8% Smiley Grin
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Quite a lot of countries mentioned here. Others are just asking to confirm you are not from China or the USA. Quite a bothering trend - to know that all these countries reject ICOs and crypto or stigmatize them as "illegal"

The rumour has it that 80% of ICOs are scamful, that's why they are prohibiting. I even came across such a "study" recently.

Another thing is that no one wants to analyze the projects and put some efforts to getting the details. It's much easier to blame the project you invested in that acknowledge that it is actually you who bears all the responsibility for investing.

Sorry for digressing in this thread, it's just a very painful topic for me
Yeah, i read this article too. They picked the ICOs that had a minimum market cap of $50M and were expected to go into active trading and categorized them into six different groups: Scam, Failed, Gone Dead, Dwindling, Promising, and Successful.The study results reveal that of the whole pie, a whopping 81 percent of the ICOs turned out to be scams. Another 6 percent fell into the Failed category, and 5 percent had Gone Dead, taking the total for “Failure to List” group to 92 percent.
Pages:
Jump to: