Topic: [ANN] Independant Miners Alliance Official Launch Notification (IMACredit coin) - page 4. (Read 22141 times)
September 15, 2014, 05:38:06 PM
Thank you!
September 15, 2014, 04:08:34 PM
can somebody share his/hers settings how to mine over pools,i try everything from cgminer to vertminer,i think i tried 150 miners,but cant put it on work,i have amd fx-6300 cpu and sapphire r9 280x toxic cards...anyone...Cassey....!?
ps..you can even put it like riddle,i think i would faster make it work then this:))...btw,windows 8.1 i have..thx
ps..you can even put it like riddle,i think i would faster make it work then this:))...btw,windows 8.1 i have..thx
I'm using the yescrypt miner and it's working so far... From GlobalBoost-Y (BSTY)
https://mega.co.nz/#!2Q9AyJbT!2fLnh_5JKzXp_gGGW9_6uoEDvAERYAoPe2npeCK4OZc
Copy and make bat file: minerd -a scrypt:131072 -o stratum+tcp://mpos.imacredit.org:10052 -u youruser.miner -p x
Win7 64 with i7 4770k ~ 0.25khash/s adding -t 4 I got ~ 0.15khash/s (Dunno Why)
Win7 64 with FX6300 ~ 0.09khash/s but adding -t 3 I got 0.26khash/s (Not stable, sometimes go down to 0.06khas/s)
Hope it Helps
September 15, 2014, 02:12:56 PM
ok,thx Cassey..i guess will continue mining with wallet,good luck finding something for windows ,if not we will Better Call Saul;)
But be shy about continuing your quest and posting success here! Surely somebody has a CPUminer compiled for Windows that came from the current github tree?
September 15, 2014, 02:09:20 PM
ok,thx Cassey..i guess will continue mining with wallet,good luck finding something for windows ,if not we will Better Call Saul;)
September 15, 2014, 02:03:08 PM
can somebody share his/hers settings how to mine over pools,i try everything from cgminer to vertminer,i think i tried 150 miners,but cant put it on work,i have amd fx-6300 cpu and sapphire r9 280x toxic cards...anyone...Cassey....!?
ps..you can even put it like riddle,i think i would faster make it work then this:))...btw,windows 8.1 i have..thx
ps..you can even put it like riddle,i think i would faster make it work then this:))...btw,windows 8.1 i have..thx
You are currently limited to mining with the wallet given your configuration.
Under windows, CUDA miner works, and under Linux both CUDA and Pooler's CPUminer (aka. minerd) work just fine. Alas, CUDA is only relevant if you have a NVidia GPU.
I'm continuing to try and find a Windows version of CPUminer that will accept the scrypt:n parameter, but have not found one yet. I'm trying to build on from the github repository, but building under windows is proving challenging.
Other miners like sgminer can not handle N=16 due, I believe, to their allocation of scratchpad space from the stack instead of the heap. They seem to break on any N > 14.
Cassey
September 15, 2014, 12:39:39 PM
can somebody share his/hers settings how to mine over pools,i try everything from cgminer to vertminer,i think i tried 150 miners,but cant put it on work,i have amd fx-6300 cpu and sapphire r9 280x toxic cards...anyone...Cassey....!?
ps..you can even put it like riddle,i think i would faster make it work then this:))...btw,windows 8.1 i have..thx
ps..you can even put it like riddle,i think i would faster make it work then this:))...btw,windows 8.1 i have..thx
September 15, 2014, 12:01:16 PM
A bit of good news: one of the developers modified http://mpos.imacredit.org to display in Hash instead of KHash. Now you can track what your miners are really doing...
Please do spread the load between pools if your not inclined to solo mine (preferred). The pool is up mostly so people can verify they are working, we are fine with temporary visitors.
Cassey
Please do spread the load between pools if your not inclined to solo mine (preferred). The pool is up mostly so people can verify they are working, we are fine with temporary visitors.
Cassey
September 15, 2014, 08:35:49 AM
{
"blocks" : 3690,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00078303,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 15318,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
"blocks" : 3690,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00078303,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 15318,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
Which looks quite heathly - about 3X the minimum hashrate to insure target block times.
September 15, 2014, 02:07:37 AM
{
"blocks" : 3690,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00078303,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 15318,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
"blocks" : 3690,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00078303,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 15318,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
September 14, 2014, 05:57:34 PM
yes pools maybe should display hash in h/s not kh/s 
September 14, 2014, 05:44:57 PM
Those rates seem right on. I have a number of machines that vary from 0.01kh to 0.08kh.
Having one of the dev's modifiy mpos.imacredit.org to report things in hash instead of k-hash. Will then start doing some testing around improving a motherboards performance by using dual memory instead of single, using a GPU instead of the onboard CPU based graphics (which shares memory with the CPU).
Will post when I get some results. Just thinking this might be the perfect excuse to buy some micro-ATX boards and hang them off my ASIC power supplies that are not using the motherboard power cables...
Cassey
Having one of the dev's modifiy mpos.imacredit.org to report things in hash instead of k-hash. Will then start doing some testing around improving a motherboards performance by using dual memory instead of single, using a GPU instead of the onboard CPU based graphics (which shares memory with the CPU).
Will post when I get some results. Just thinking this might be the perfect excuse to buy some micro-ATX boards and hang them off my ASIC power supplies that are not using the motherboard power cables...
Cassey
September 14, 2014, 04:48:15 PM
any pools yet?
I'm testing on my pool for a day. it works:http://coinspool.cu.cc/
You need the latest cpuminer:
Code:
minerd -a scrypt:131072 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3033 -u yourwalletaddress -p x
Doesn't look like your pool is finding any blocks though. Are those hash measurements correct?
Code:
[2014-09-14 23:41:35] thread 1: 3468 hashes, 0.06 khash/s
[2014-09-14 23:41:35] thread 2: 3480 hashes, 0.06 khash/s
[2014-09-14 23:41:40] thread 0: 3456 hashes, 0.06 khash/s
[2014-09-14 23:41:40] thread 3: 2484 hashes, 0.05 khash/s
September 14, 2014, 11:50:09 AM
Actually, that makes 3-4 pools.
There is also http://mpos.imacredit.org and http://www.multicoinpool.org. Stratum ports on the website (http://www.imacredit.org/coin-details.html)
FYI - most pool software really sucks are reporting low hashrates that are the nature of IMA Credit. One of the devs is going to try and get mpos.imacredit.org reporting in Hash instead of KHash later today. Wish him luck!
I believe HashHarder also spun up a pool, but don't know much about that one.
Cassey
There is also http://mpos.imacredit.org and http://www.multicoinpool.org. Stratum ports on the website (http://www.imacredit.org/coin-details.html)
FYI - most pool software really sucks are reporting low hashrates that are the nature of IMA Credit. One of the devs is going to try and get mpos.imacredit.org reporting in Hash instead of KHash later today. Wish him luck!
I believe HashHarder also spun up a pool, but don't know much about that one.
Cassey
September 14, 2014, 10:46:25 AM
any pools yet?
I'm testing on my pool for a day. it works:http://coinspool.cu.cc/
You need the latest cpuminer:
Code:
minerd -a scrypt:131072 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3033 -u yourwalletaddress -p x
Doesn't look like your pool is finding any blocks though. Are those hash measurements correct?
September 13, 2014, 05:08:49 PM
any pools yet?
I'm testing on my pool for a day. it works:http://coinspool.cu.cc/
You need the latest cpuminer:
Code:
minerd -a scrypt:131072 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3033 -u yourwalletaddress -p x
September 13, 2014, 04:47:27 PM
any pools yet?
September 13, 2014, 09:38:22 AM
Is there a way I can setup my Gridseed miner to mine this and use my computer's on-board RAM?
September 13, 2014, 06:19:19 AM
Quote
getinfo

{
"version" : 90102,
"protocolversion" : 80001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 2666,
"timeoffset" : -5,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1410484423,
"keypoolsize" : 103,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}

{
"version" : 90102,
"protocolversion" : 80001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 2666,
"timeoffset" : -5,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1410484423,
"keypoolsize" : 103,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
----------------------------
Quote
getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 2667,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 10,
"networkhashps" : 4895,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
{
"blocks" : 2667,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 10,
"networkhashps" : 4895,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
After 2 days, my balance is zero.
"hashespersec" : 10,
"timeoffset" : -5,
What should I do?
or
use GPU
September 12, 2014, 03:27:27 AM
Quote
getinfo

{
"version" : 90102,
"protocolversion" : 80001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 2666,
"timeoffset" : -5,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1410484423,
"keypoolsize" : 103,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}

{
"version" : 90102,
"protocolversion" : 80001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 2666,
"timeoffset" : -5,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1410484423,
"keypoolsize" : 103,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
----------------------------
Quote
getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 2667,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 10,
"networkhashps" : 4895,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
{
"blocks" : 2667,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 10,
"networkhashps" : 4895,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
After 2 days, my balance is zero.
"hashespersec" : 10,
"timeoffset" : -5,
What should I do?
September 11, 2014, 02:33:45 PM
[2014-09-11 17:13:39] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 0.26 khash/s (yay!!!)
Looks Hash is less than you GTX560
;)G1620 1 thread=10H/S
Well, good news and bad news.
Good news: Your GTX is doing fine.
Bad news: after an evening or three of testing, we can confirm that --algo=scrypt:131072 is required, although we have no idea why. That should be the parameter for a N-17 coin. If you use scrypt:65536 (which is what we expected) the miner will hash, but all blocks were rejected. This was previously reported and is now confirmed. Alas, that is what I was using with Cudaminer in my previous reports so my 560Ti numbers were double what they should have been.
Our best guess is that there is an additional 63 byte wrapper associated with the scratchpad space, meaning scrypt:65599 might work, if the code accepted that value, which it doesn't...
Here it the N expression:
https://github.com/IMAcredit/imacredit/blob/master/src/scrypt.cpp#L261
So nfactor is 16 -> n = 1 << (16 + 1) = 2 ^ 17 = 131072
Other values are not good.
Jump to: