We really need the update on the product as promised in the roadmap for november，like VPN alpha,new wallet.
Apologies frankkkkkk but the November alpha is closed. We are hard at work to maintain our December target for an open beta. In fact, we already have a new wallet, so that item was met ahead of schedule!
" We plan to offer a novel in-wallet
approach to VPNs whereby peers can offer their own internet connections as encrypted tunnels for interested parties.
VPN providers will receive Intense Coin (ITNS) in exchange for their services, and be able to specify rates for their service.
Bitcoin and related implementations have suffered from criticism that the blockchain allows payments to be inexorably traced
and linked, creating a traceable trail of activity and offering a false sense of anonymity. To address this, ITNS utilizes the CryptoNote
protocol which eliminates chain tracing of payments and offers true anonymity."
Just stumble upon this project, read the header and this tread. On first glance i do not understand one thing - if there is someone offering the vpn service, does it mean that the person who is providing the VPN will actually be responsible for their customers actions?
Also will the customer could be triced back from service provider?
approach to VPNs whereby peers can offer their own internet connections as encrypted tunnels for interested parties.
VPN providers will receive Intense Coin (ITNS) in exchange for their services, and be able to specify rates for their service.
Bitcoin and related implementations have suffered from criticism that the blockchain allows payments to be inexorably traced
and linked, creating a traceable trail of activity and offering a false sense of anonymity. To address this, ITNS utilizes the CryptoNote
protocol which eliminates chain tracing of payments and offers true anonymity."
Just stumble upon this project, read the header and this tread. On first glance i do not understand one thing - if there is someone offering the vpn service, does it mean that the person who is providing the VPN will actually be responsible for their customers actions?
Also will the customer could be triced back from service provider?
A community member has answered this already but I'll reiterate - hosting an exit node is indeed inherently risky. You certainly would be responsible for their traffic, since it's occurring through your network. If that risk is not acceptable to you, consider using a VPS.
beware this coin
look fake road to map
u can see image and description page one just copy thread monero,
just another coin PND ,
look fake road to map
u can see image and description page one just copy thread monero,
just another coin PND ,
What? Monero has VPN features?! I had no idea!
so after all this time the wallet is still buggy, really not a good thing for intense
Whats wrong with the wallet? It's one of the best: good looking, informative with block explorer etc. Even miming is possible.
dude, please, i sent 10000 coins to test, transfer never happened, stays on 0 confirmations, coins have disappeared though. half the coins are locked again, it has never worked since day one.
The answer from the dev is also not satisfactory, apparently the wallet is perfect, all you need to do is send coins in smaller transactions, do you realize how long it will take to send 200k coins if you can only send 750 at a time??
As mentioned, the actual fix for transaction issues was to upgrade block sizes for the network. This is not a switch that can be immediately flipped, it takes time as we need to allow people to upgrade their clients. That will happen at block 50k, which will be in less than a week at this point. Your coins are not 'disappearing', you have never lost anything, they are still in your wallet. I have replied to your DMs on slack within hours of receiving them, explaining the issue and how to rectify. I never said the 'wallet is perfect' either. Please don't spread FUD. It is just bad for the community.
Again - either wait a week, or send coins in smaller batches, and/or with 0-1 mixins.
so after all this time the wallet is still buggy, really not a good thing for intense
Whats wrong with the wallet? It's one of the best: good looking, informative with block explorer etc. Even miming is possible.
For example
A week ago I canceled the incorrect transactions. But after restarting the wallet - no coins. (>100k) After pressing the button - remove the pending tx - are not sent coins. And there's something else..
Sorry for the wallet issues folks, we have stayed on top of them as best as we can, and as mentioned after block 50k transaction sizes will not be an issue. At this time the only issue with the wallet is sending large transactions.
RomanV - I have handled your issues with you via DM in Slack from the moment you had them, but I'll explain your issues here so others are aware. The reason your transactions did not remain canceled was: you re-opened the wallet which refreshed the transactions from the pool. Your transactions did actually disappear from the pool, but because you didn't close the wallet with the transactions as CANCELED, when you reopened the wallet it just pushed them to the network again. You were also the first person to have this issue, which prompted the release of a new wallet. Nobody had tried to send large transactions like that before. As soon as we were aware of the issue, we fixed it - unfortunately your transactions had to (and did) expire from the network transaction pool first, which took a week. But at this point they are again absent from the pool so you should be good, as long as you canceled the TXs!
