Not confidential because it's not "company coins", but of course you skipped that fact and went straight into ad hominem mode. Thank God for inventing logical fallacies otherwise you wouldn't have anything to say in this thread.
I don't understand what do you mean not 'company coins'..... infact I don't understand the paragraph please rephrase it you want a response
You said the information about wallets and masternodes is "company confidential". However the coins in those wallets or masternodes do not belong to the "company". The whitepaper doesn't designate them as such. And I don't think anybody is asking how much ION does huey own or anything like that. It's just reasonable questions as to where the dev bounty staking proceeds disappeared, or how the customer deposits are matching up with the masternodes supposedly funded with said deposits.
It's quite amazing how you "don't understand" but that didn't prevent you from denouncing the whole idea of someone possibly having a question on the topic.
And you seem to have contracted MrCoins' infection of drawing irrelevant parallels in an attempt to legitimize ION. The point is not whether Dash is a shitcoin or not, or what I think about it or any other coin. The point is it has nothing to do with ION other than some shared code. Completely irrelevant to the success or failure of ION.
You called DASH a shitcoin this is a point of reference. Calling DASH a shitcoin is just plain wrong. If you think DASH is crap kinda tells me that your due diligence results in flawed assessments.
Straw man much? It's all in your head. I did not call Dash a shitcoin nor does it mean anything even if I had done that. What I said is this - and that's an actual quote as opposed to your incessant attempts to put words in my mouth:
Again - a load of unrelated bullshit. Some other shitcoin doesn't make ION better or worse.
Simple as that. If substituting "Dash" for "shitcoin" helps you understand the concept better - fine, do that. You brought it up to begin with.
Once again you pull out Mr Coins why ? Mr Coins F**ked up bigtime but least Mr Coins had the guts to admit they were wrong. You on the other hand are in full on denial mode and use every opportunity to distance yourself from being a GAW customer.... so you got screwed over like many other people, so what, big deal, learn from it
Right, me screwed over by GAW
- what happened, ran out of fallacies so now in full-on make-shit-up mode?
Me doing due diligence and encouraging others to do the same is not a disaster. The fact is, you can see a lot of verifiable shadiness going on with ION (like the missing dev bounty staked coins), to which your only answer is - yeah but if you don't ignore that shit you'll be late. Late to what? Secret grand plan? Good luck with that.
You know nothing about market development do you... that's fine you can't be an expert in everything.
Not just with ION/Ionomy but with any new innovative business, infrastructure follows business NOT the other way round unless of course your a multinational but then that infrastructure just slows you down....... not good when your establishing a beachhead
I want answers too the difference is just not now. You want answers to your questions now and if you don't get them then you imply ill intent.
You're saying "innovative business" as if it's a fact however you failed to provide examples of actual innovation so far. Ok, secret plan it is. But again, none of that is actually relevant to whether we should ask questions or not. The fact that you don't want to doesn't mean nobody else should.
But on the other hand - thank you for the funnies. With Garza's trial still in slow motion this is the best we got.I aim to please
You do know that arrogance is a very dangerous trait to have. Unlike you I'm humble, I'm the humblest person you'll ever meet.
Yes, of course the best way to assert one's humbleness is to announce that on the intertubes. I hope we'll never meet.