Author

Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 286. (Read 473124 times)

newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
Where have you announced this as already there is invested $500.000 in it?
Seems a bit fishy to me
looks like a ripoff fan of ICONOMI, who took the name and ran to the shop to get another ICO with the same name  Cheesy i would suggest you to provide further details regarding the staked wallets and the team behind ION

Nope! another useless post... uggg

Domain Name: ionomy.com
Registry Domain ID: 2000867723_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Creation Date: 2016-02-07T10:47:47Z

Domain Name: iconomi.net
Registry Domain ID: 2015934505_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Creation Date: 2016-03-26T11:51:20Z
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
Where have you announced this as already there is invested $500.000 in it?
Seems a bit fishy to me
looks like a ripoff fan of ICONOMI, who took the name and ran to the shop to get another ICO with the same name  Cheesy i would suggest you to provide further details regarding the staked wallets and the team behind ION


Really, If your going to chime in atleast sound like you half know what your talking about ehh. Ionomy started months before this iconomi shit. So one could say that maybe it was the other way around imho. I would say the team is not worried about proving anything to anybody here otherwise they would come here and answer questions dont ya think? Do you think the only way a business succeeds in this space is by getting bitcointalk approval? Please, seems to me most of the good businesses in this space do not even take the time of day to come here.

If they are not worried about proving anything to anyone on this forum, why did they start a thread then? And since ION took the time of day to post here, that makes them a bad business, according to this logic. Speaking of businesses, Ionomy registered in Singapore yet? If not and Iconomi is a registered business, you can't say that Ionomy came first. No paper trail to prove that.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Where have you announced this as already there is invested $500.000 in it?
Seems a bit fishy to me
looks like a ripoff fan of ICONOMI, who took the name and ran to the shop to get another ICO with the same name  Cheesy i would suggest you to provide further details regarding the staked wallets and the team behind ION


Really, If your going to chime in atleast sound like you half know what your talking about ehh. Ionomy started months before this iconomi shit. So one could say that maybe it was the other way around imho. I would say the team is not worried about proving anything to anybody here otherwise they would come here and answer questions dont ya think? Do you think the only way a business succeeds in this space is by getting bitcointalk approval? Please, seems to me most of the good businesses in this space do not even take the time of day to come here.

You do realize that what you described is equally applicable to some random arrogant scammer? "I don't have anything to prove" is indistinguishable from "I can't say anything that wouldn't incriminate me so I'm gonna pretend I'm deaf". Transparency is the best cure for this so good luck trying to make it sound as if a legit entity would have any meaningful reason to play these charades.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1009
korvas: you outlined your view on scams and did not agree that scrypt.cc would fit that bill because crypto is the wild west (the only hardline you drew were coins with no blockchain). that was at a point when they still paid out a tad more than dust. it was obviously a ponzi hence the discussion at that specific place. you wanted to protect scrypt.cc by voicing your concerns and saying it should continue to stay in public view -- that it would still revitalize itself due to peoples greed + the site owner would never kill his cash cow

it sounds like you were optimizing the last stage of your exit. sad thing is that it came from the pockets of new victims. its nothing new here at bct. we have craploads of people saying any evidence of ponzis should be suppressed because the "investors" already know the nature of their investment (ponzi & gamble). of course, it makes no sense and is untrue



and how it connects to ion...:
there is nothing that will change your antics if its making any returns for you, at least publicly. scrypt.cc was provably a scam before you had your discussion. even at the most optimal setting owning all unknown miners, their hashrate would have been about 5% of what they said + "downtime of mining" not effecting hashrate. "small things" like ionomy and xpy pte. ltd not being real corporations are damn sand grains in that kind of thinking

reminds me of these 2 classic heroes of the biggest scam in 2014/15 -- mrcoins and badbitcoin



bit earlier




same shit again but less articulate main shills. cough shark cough...

Quote
XPY.IO
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE
Last Updated June 9th, 2015
This User Agreement ("Agreement") is a contract between you (“you”, “your” or “user”)
and Team Paycoin, (“Team Paycoin”, “xpy.io”, “we”, “us” or “our”) and applies to your

Export Controls & Sanctions. The supply of Paycoin and Team Paycoin Services through Team Paycoin Site is subject to Singapore and international export controls

ref: https://web.archive.org/web/20150813011755/http://www.xpy.io/terms.pdf
Quote
TERMS OF SERVICE
Last Updated: 03.25.2016
This User Agreement ("Agreement") is a contract between you (“you”, “your” or “user”) and Ionomy PTE, (“Ionomy PTE”, “Ionomy.com”, “we”, “us” or “our”) and applies to your

Export Controls & Sanctions. The supply of Virtual Currency and Ionomy PTE Services through Ionomy PTE Site is subject to Singapore and international export controls
ref: http://archive.is/IxsVs


ref: the government of singapore. acra.gov.sg



obviously its just one of many things wrong with this "operation". no wonder matlack and garza were friends in the past, they learned a lot together  Grin
matlacks favorite pdf was https://www.scribd.com/document/261925962/GAW-engagement-offshore and he learned its a lot easier to run a non-entity

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Where have you announced this as already there is invested $500.000 in it?
Seems a bit fishy to me
looks like a ripoff fan of ICONOMI, who took the name and ran to the shop to get another ICO with the same name  Cheesy i would suggest you to provide further details regarding the staked wallets and the team behind ION


Really, If your going to chime in atleast sound like you half know what your talking about ehh. Ionomy started months before this iconomi shit. So one could say that maybe it was the other way around imho. I would say the team is not worried about proving anything to anybody here otherwise they would come here and answer questions dont ya think? Do you think the only way a business succeeds in this space is by getting bitcointalk approval? Please, seems to me most of the good businesses in this space do not even take the time of day to come here.
hero member
Activity: 724
Merit: 500
Whats the ICO price today?

I'm sorry to say you've missed the ICO.

ION is currently $.15 on ionomy and $.17 on Yobit. If you interested then checkout https://ionomy.com/

The ICO price was $0.20 - $0.25, so the coin is currently 25%+ lower than ICO. Make sure you tell the whole story.

It went even down to 30% below.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The Ionomy maintained staking wallets and Masternodes used to pay for the boosting by Electrons have addresses on the block chain...

Please do share those addresses.

They are company private as stated many times...

Right, so we're supposed to just take your word for it. Sounds 100% legit, you should get WSJ bloggers to write a shill piece about it.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode.

In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!!

Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind....

Not this shit again  Roll Eyes

Hashlets were not POW... or PO (proof of) anything at all, except Garza's ability to coerce someone into drawing those PNGs.

It was a fucking ponzi scheme as the SEC explains quite eloquently in its lawsuit. And it was based on marketing tricks like that.

Fast forward to 2016, you got ION stakers from some mysterious unknown source being sold for BTC, as a promotion for... what exactly? Or is it yet another round of crowdsourcing? Weren't you shills just recently trying to say that ionomy has been using its ICO funds slowly and wisely and doesn't need any more investments?

Obviously Garza's model has been improved here, you get payouts in ION, which the team has a free supply of.

Edit: if it's not immediately obvious - ionomy stakers are also not POS or proof of anything, you can't lie your way out of this one (although you'll try for sure).

Ionomy makes coins from staking (you refer to these as free coins) the invested coin and from coins (refer by you as free) made from masternodes to cover the staker if it is boosting with Electrons... The rate you receive is variable depending on the current ION block reward rate... Using a Ionomy staker requires no additional resources from the investor and locks the rate of daily earning for 90 days... The investment coin is returned to the investor at completion of the staking contract..

This technique has been in use for a 1 1/2 years with payouts being made daily without any problems noted from the SEC or BCT trolls...


The coins that Ionomy stakes, where did they get them from? Did they pay for them like everyone else? If not, every coin they stake is indeed a free coin. Please explain how they are not free.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
so now they are hitting people up for money, under the guise of a garza like holiday promo, before the first game is 100% released? are they that unaware of how bad this looks? will there be holiday themed skins for these "stakers?" it's like the legendary hashlet/stakers crap all over again. why would they even dare...is this hubris, or are they trolling the "trolls," with all this retread garza shite?

This has got nothing to do with Garza it's a Halloween promotion.... you know you'll see a few thousand other companies doing the same thing this weekend.

Is this hubris errr no it's a promotion

The only person retreading garza shite is you and anyway if you no like you no buy  Grin

it is almost identical to the "legendary" hashlet sales (limited quantity only, except not really) that also coincided with various promotions including the infamous 911 scam. no kidding, companies use holiday's to promote, the comparison is not apropos. the point is, why do the exact same crap as the garza d-bag? not accepting ion for these promos is straight out of his playbook too, or at least similar enough to raise eyebrows. they shouldn't need any BTC (conveniently going up in price) at this point, and don't deserve anymore funding until they at least dust off the retread of "joust".

they should really save the promotions for when they have a fully functioning service to provide, doing so now during a time of missed deadlines, disorganization, legitimate controversies etc is suspicious at the very least. all they are essentially doing is further bilking money from current investors as new investors have no real proof of concept or service to entice them. short term you are giving them more BTC, and also locking your ion into stakers. if this is their idea of a "reward," then you have to be very confident in their long-term success.






^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This...............is legitimate criticism

I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode.

In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!!

Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind....

That is called further centralizing the coin. Why does the team want all of the coins in their possession?
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
Whats the ICO price today?

I'm sorry to say you've missed the ICO.

ION is currently $.15 on ionomy and $.17 on Yobit. If you interested then checkout https://ionomy.com/

The ICO price was $0.20 - $0.25, so the coin is currently 25%+ lower than ICO. Make sure you tell the whole story.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Where have you announced this as already there is invested $500.000 in it?
Seems a bit fishy to me
looks like a ripoff fan of ICONOMI, who took the name and ran to the shop to get another ICO with the same name  Cheesy i would suggest you to provide further details regarding the staked wallets and the team behind ION
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
i would rather not share your nick from the paycoin days because i respect your privacy. do you deny your weird support of scrypt.cc?
you dont really have anything to hide but theres few things like age, location, etc that can be deduced if someone knows your old nick. its the internet so rather err on the side of caution

if you say its ok to share your nick then il post the scrypt.cc stuff

If you'd rather not share then don't.

So to answer my question you need to reveal personal details or information that would lead to personnal information being made public

Do whatever your moral compass dictates......your choice

I just want to know what you mean by my wierd support of script.cc........ why call me a script.cc shrill ? I don't understand
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
The Ionomy maintained staking wallets and Masternodes used to pay for the boosting by Electrons have addresses on the block chain...

Please do share those addresses.

They are company private as stated many times...
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The Ionomy maintained staking wallets and Masternodes used to pay for the boosting by Electrons have addresses on the block chain...

Please do share those addresses.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
Ionomy makes coins from staking (you refer to these as free coins) the invested coin and from coins (refer by you as free) made from masternodes to cover the staker if it is boosting with Electrons... The rate you receive is variable depending on the current ION block reward rate... Using a Ionomy staker requires no additional resources from the investor and locks the rate of daily earning for 90 days... The investment coin is returned to the investor at completion of the staking contract..

This technique has been in use for a 1 1/2 years with payouts being made daily without any problems noted from the SEC or BCT trolls...

Does your staker have an address on the blockchain?

Better yet - since ION code is open source - show us where the block reward is linked in any way to the staker rates.



The Ionomy maintained staking wallets and Masternodes used to pay for the boosting by Electrons have addresses on the block chain...
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Ionomy makes coins from staking (you refer to these as free coins) the invested coin and from coins (refer by you as free) made from masternodes to cover the staker if it is boosting with Electrons... The rate you receive is variable depending on the current ION block reward rate... Using a Ionomy staker requires no additional resources from the investor and locks the rate of daily earning for 90 days... The investment coin is returned to the investor at completion of the staking contract..

This technique has been in use for a 1 1/2 years with payouts being made daily without any problems noted from the SEC or BCT trolls...

Does your staker have an address on the blockchain?

Better yet - since ION code is open source - show us where the block reward is linked in any way to the staker rates.

hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode.

In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!!

Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind....

Not this shit again  Roll Eyes

Hashlets were not POW... or PO (proof of) anything at all, except Garza's ability to coerce someone into drawing those PNGs.

It was a fucking ponzi scheme as the SEC explains quite eloquently in its lawsuit. And it was based on marketing tricks like that.

Fast forward to 2016, you got ION stakers from some mysterious unknown source being sold for BTC, as a promotion for... what exactly? Or is it yet another round of crowdsourcing? Weren't you shills just recently trying to say that ionomy has been using its ICO funds slowly and wisely and doesn't need any more investments?

Obviously Garza's model has been improved here, you get payouts in ION, which the team has a free supply of.

Edit: if it's not immediately obvious - ionomy stakers are also not POS or proof of anything, you can't lie your way out of this one (although you'll try for sure).

Ionomy makes coins from staking (you refer to these as free coins) the invested coin and from coins (refer by you as free) made from masternodes to cover the staker if it is boosting with Electrons... The rate you receive is variable depending on the current ION block reward rate... Using a Ionomy staker requires no additional resources from the investor and locks the rate of daily earning for 90 days... The investment coin is returned to the investor at completion of the staking contract..

This technique has been in use for a 1 1/2 years with payouts being made daily without any problems noted from the SEC or BCT trolls...
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1009
i would rather not share your nick from the paycoin days because i respect your privacy. do you deny your weird support of scrypt.cc?
you dont really have anything to hide but theres few things like age, location, etc that can be deduced if someone knows your old nick. its the internet so rather err on the side of caution

if you say its ok to share your nick then il post the scrypt.cc stuff
hero member
Activity: 1248
Merit: 583
i guess you missed the /s which means sarcasm. obviously its most likely reckless incompetence. rubbish? thats the thing matlack ran till last xmas or january. location singapore and company graval. next thing he was associated with was bitlend.io that xpy.io tried to promote btw. it was "located" in dubai but was never found in gov registry. its either matlacks or his inner circles modus operandi

and no its not a threat its a statement that they should have their things in order before someone asks every agency there to check this "entity" that supposedly operated from their country for years without proper documentation. they should respect their host country and follow their rules, dont you agree? or are these texans above all laws?
its very simple if you cant get answers from them then you have to request them from the government

theres a chance they are getting screwed by their local contact but we cant know because its "company confidential" and ionomy doesnt care Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes its also possible adam matlack outright lied and graval has nothing to do with anything (like he lied numerous times during paycoin fiasco so nothing new. blind trust is a dangerous thing)


but of course a scrypt.cc shill would not care about these things... if you didnt care back then why start now! oh right: "its crypto" !
 Roll Eyes

I missed the /s so it was sarcastic crap that's okay then  Grin

Script.cc shill what are you talking about ?? again you mention it.... how about you speak with some facts and justify that comment
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I don't think this promotional campaign is anything close to Hashlets which were POW (which required computation power purchased by GAW) and Lifetime contract with the ability to trade the resource. The Ionomy staker that being offered is a Proof of Stake (POS) contract that requires Ionomy to stake the resource and provide a daily earnings at a fixed rate. This staking contract expires in 90 days and the initial investment coin is returned to the investor. The Ionomy business is offering a higher rate of return to compete with the high earnings investors have been making using Masternode.

In simple terms, Ionomy is proving a better earnings (for a short period of time) to sway investors into the well established Ionomy staker program... this is what is called competitive business for the ION investor's money!!!

Get on the train and leave your GAW problems behind....

Not this shit again  Roll Eyes

Hashlets were not POW... or PO (proof of) anything at all, except Garza's ability to coerce someone into drawing those PNGs.

It was a fucking ponzi scheme as the SEC explains quite eloquently in its lawsuit. And it was based on marketing tricks like that.

Fast forward to 2016, you got ION stakers from some mysterious unknown source being sold for BTC, as a promotion for... what exactly? Or is it yet another round of crowdsourcing? Weren't you shills just recently trying to say that ionomy has been using its ICO funds slowly and wisely and doesn't need any more investments?

Obviously Garza's model has been improved here, you get payouts in ION, which the team has a free supply of.

Edit: if it's not immediately obvious - ionomy stakers are also not POS or proof of anything, you can't lie your way out of this one (although you'll try for sure).
Jump to: