I thought the ICO only brought in 12 BTC?
And how does this response have anything to do with the question asked above? You can't report on the wallet status?
Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 371. (Read 473177 times)
August 03, 2016, 01:43:20 PM
August 03, 2016, 01:32:03 PM
Total amount of BTC raised from ION ICO: 363.79 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,261,871 / 5,000,000 for Week 1 = 261,871 IONs @ $422.00 = 124.1094786729858 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,310,010 / 5,000,000 for week 2 = 48,139 IONs @ $452.7 = 22.33088137839629 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,565,127 / 5,000,000 for week 3 = 255,117 IONs @ $450.8 = 124.502528837622 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,621,139 / 5,000,000 for week 4 = 56,012 IONs @ $442.5 = 29.11358192090395 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,656,784 / 5,000,000 for week 5 = 35,645 IONs @ $450.9 = 18.97272122421823 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,738,599 / 5,000,000 for week 6 = 81,815 IONs @ $457 = 44.75656455142232 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,261,871 / 5,000,000 for Week 1 = 261,871 IONs @ $422.00 = 124.1094786729858 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,310,010 / 5,000,000 for week 2 = 48,139 IONs @ $452.7 = 22.33088137839629 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,565,127 / 5,000,000 for week 3 = 255,117 IONs @ $450.8 = 124.502528837622 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,621,139 / 5,000,000 for week 4 = 56,012 IONs @ $442.5 = 29.11358192090395 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,656,784 / 5,000,000 for week 5 = 35,645 IONs @ $450.9 = 18.97272122421823 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,738,599 / 5,000,000 for week 6 = 81,815 IONs @ $457 = 44.75656455142232 BTC
August 03, 2016, 11:51:29 AM
The answer is yes. They are still having wallet issues. Not syncing, no stakes, installation issues...the usual.
Well, while we wait we can play those three awesome monthly games and earn protons or some sh... oh wait...
August 03, 2016, 10:39:48 AM
Below is a quote from a current discussion on Ionomy Slack.
" Lots of opinions about what ionomy priorities should be:
1. freeze gravity code, release Gravity as is, and testing immediately
2. continue to build the code until ready for testing then let the whales bash on it — they’ve got the most to gain if ionomy succeeds
3. make the wallet work perfectly on every platform because “nothing else matters until that is fixed and works on every computer.
4. Prioritize hype and marketing because that’s the only thing that works in crypto
5. Create an electron market and add features to Atoms
As the email points out, the team's been addressing the bottom line concern: security. Hype and marketing or rushing something to market are not going to fix that. Isn’t that exactly why people were posting about the neucoin disaster? ceforce just reinforced that the plan is to let the whales hammer the alpha, which is a great way to tap into the community. From the email, and from #ionomy_github, the community’s also at work improving the wallets through code development and testnet.
I agree community is the greatest asset. Even all these different opinions in the community about priorities are great. But the team can’t do all of them first, right? That’s why they’re priorities! I like the ones they’ve chosen: Gravity alpha in the community and using the testnet to improve wallets and ION’s core code."
Grow the community and share your opions at
https://ionomy.slack.com/messages/general/details/
" Lots of opinions about what ionomy priorities should be:
1. freeze gravity code, release Gravity as is, and testing immediately
2. continue to build the code until ready for testing then let the whales bash on it — they’ve got the most to gain if ionomy succeeds
3. make the wallet work perfectly on every platform because “nothing else matters until that is fixed and works on every computer.
4. Prioritize hype and marketing because that’s the only thing that works in crypto
5. Create an electron market and add features to Atoms
As the email points out, the team's been addressing the bottom line concern: security. Hype and marketing or rushing something to market are not going to fix that. Isn’t that exactly why people were posting about the neucoin disaster? ceforce just reinforced that the plan is to let the whales hammer the alpha, which is a great way to tap into the community. From the email, and from #ionomy_github, the community’s also at work improving the wallets through code development and testnet.
I agree community is the greatest asset. Even all these different opinions in the community about priorities are great. But the team can’t do all of them first, right? That’s why they’re priorities! I like the ones they’ve chosen: Gravity alpha in the community and using the testnet to improve wallets and ION’s core code."
Grow the community and share your opions at
https://ionomy.slack.com/messages/general/details/
So ION doesn't even have working wallets yet, and the team has no clue how to proceed. Am I interpreting this correctly?
The answer is yes. They are still having wallet issues. Not syncing, no stakes, installation issues...the usual.
August 03, 2016, 10:36:44 AM
So ION doesn't even have working wallets yet, and the team has no clue how to proceed. Am I interpreting this correctly?
@Franz_Huber A detailed answer to this question is beyond the scope of me. This is a good question you can ask in Ionomy Slack. The latest status and support for the ION wallets are available there!
https://ionomy.slack.com/messages/general/details/
https://ionomy.slack.com/messages/help_and_support/details/
August 03, 2016, 01:37:58 AM
Below is a quote from a current discussion on Ionomy Slack.
" Lots of opinions about what ionomy priorities should be:
1. freeze gravity code, release Gravity as is, and testing immediately
2. continue to build the code until ready for testing then let the whales bash on it — they’ve got the most to gain if ionomy succeeds
3. make the wallet work perfectly on every platform because “nothing else matters until that is fixed and works on every computer.
4. Prioritize hype and marketing because that’s the only thing that works in crypto
5. Create an electron market and add features to Atoms
As the email points out, the team's been addressing the bottom line concern: security. Hype and marketing or rushing something to market are not going to fix that. Isn’t that exactly why people were posting about the neucoin disaster? ceforce just reinforced that the plan is to let the whales hammer the alpha, which is a great way to tap into the community. From the email, and from #ionomy_github, the community’s also at work improving the wallets through code development and testnet.
I agree community is the greatest asset. Even all these different opinions in the community about priorities are great. But the team can’t do all of them first, right? That’s why they’re priorities! I like the ones they’ve chosen: Gravity alpha in the community and using the testnet to improve wallets and ION’s core code."
Grow the community and share your opions at
https://ionomy.slack.com/messages/general/details/
" Lots of opinions about what ionomy priorities should be:
1. freeze gravity code, release Gravity as is, and testing immediately
2. continue to build the code until ready for testing then let the whales bash on it — they’ve got the most to gain if ionomy succeeds
3. make the wallet work perfectly on every platform because “nothing else matters until that is fixed and works on every computer.
4. Prioritize hype and marketing because that’s the only thing that works in crypto
5. Create an electron market and add features to Atoms
As the email points out, the team's been addressing the bottom line concern: security. Hype and marketing or rushing something to market are not going to fix that. Isn’t that exactly why people were posting about the neucoin disaster? ceforce just reinforced that the plan is to let the whales hammer the alpha, which is a great way to tap into the community. From the email, and from #ionomy_github, the community’s also at work improving the wallets through code development and testnet.
I agree community is the greatest asset. Even all these different opinions in the community about priorities are great. But the team can’t do all of them first, right? That’s why they’re priorities! I like the ones they’ve chosen: Gravity alpha in the community and using the testnet to improve wallets and ION’s core code."
Grow the community and share your opions at
https://ionomy.slack.com/messages/general/details/
So ION doesn't even have working wallets yet, and the team has no clue how to proceed. Am I interpreting this correctly?
August 02, 2016, 04:57:01 PM
Why is it when people want to discuss the topic at hand we get boki instead. Looks like my report stats move from 14 at 100% to 15 at 100% *sigh*
Anyway we had some speculation about 20 new masternodes. Is there any way to confirm if these have been created? Like can we check some stats on the network for number of masternodes or are they similar to Paycoins super staker addresses that dont do anything beyond grab a bigger reward?
Slack is a dead end as it (conveniently?) only keeps 10k messages. Makes me suspect yet again they dont keep a forum for a reason lol
Also it sounds like the game has been pushed back yet again?
Anyway we had some speculation about 20 new masternodes. Is there any way to confirm if these have been created? Like can we check some stats on the network for number of masternodes or are they similar to Paycoins super staker addresses that dont do anything beyond grab a bigger reward?
Slack is a dead end as it (conveniently?) only keeps 10k messages. Makes me suspect yet again they dont keep a forum for a reason lol
Also it sounds like the game has been pushed back yet again?
I definitely, 100% positive remember reading a slack user question how 20 new masternodes went online when there weren't than many coins publicly available to make the 20 nodes.
If the core team took the premine and made 20 nodes (pure speculation on my part here. Not accusing anything.) they are literally stealing from the ION community as the community members will now get less stakes.
Has the team posted the addresses of the premine coins?
Thanks for the discussion, doesn't get to happen often in this thread lately...
August 02, 2016, 04:23:46 PM
Clicks through the pages...
Yeah this is what I expected from the ION team.
Yeah this is what I expected from the ION team.
August 02, 2016, 03:03:45 PM
Why is it when people want to discuss the topic at hand we get boki instead. Looks like my report stats move from 14 at 100% to 15 at 100% *sigh*
Anyway we had some speculation about 20 new masternodes. Is there any way to confirm if these have been created? Like can we check some stats on the network for number of masternodes or are they similar to Paycoins super staker addresses that dont do anything beyond grab a bigger reward?
Slack is a dead end as it (conveniently?) only keeps 10k messages. Makes me suspect yet again they dont keep a forum for a reason lol
Also it sounds like the game has been pushed back yet again?
Anyway we had some speculation about 20 new masternodes. Is there any way to confirm if these have been created? Like can we check some stats on the network for number of masternodes or are they similar to Paycoins super staker addresses that dont do anything beyond grab a bigger reward?
Slack is a dead end as it (conveniently?) only keeps 10k messages. Makes me suspect yet again they dont keep a forum for a reason lol
Also it sounds like the game has been pushed back yet again?
Because some clowns do not discuss, they want everybody to follow their opinion and they think they can achive it by lame intimidation, bad executed and failed threats in public and non public, shitting around, spreading lies, .... And maybe the reason could be that if people commit crime, which Alexandra Morgan did with all the doxxing and so on, she was even shown Californian law paragraphs about identity theft and usage. Then we have some blind (because they dont want to see) mods who ignore it and twist to some crap.
Same users are only attacking and behaving like they call "Piece of shit".
I did not interfere any usefull discussion. I interfere if some trolls of this thread continue trolling and shitting around, mainly harrasing bitcointalk users. Dont ask me why moderation and administration allows it and more secret question is why do the want it, even bigger question: Why are they involved?, what do you think, is their goal to reduce their active customerbase (userbase)? I hope you know the answer, I dont.
Talk about ION, ask questions or just leave. Talking about Alexandra, Boris and some supporter from NY, no it is not about ION. You dont complain about giveaway of suchmoon in this thread? Do you know that giveaways without clear permission of thread starter (OP, Dev, whoever this double meaning should be). There was no permission, this fact was ignored, as well as the other fact that it was XPY giveaway in ION coin. If you are smartass like others, show me that XPY's blockchain is the same as ION's, it should not be hard I think if you are sure that ION is XPY. Actually most existing rules were broken, did you complain about them?
Do you think moderation does not know it or does not see it? Stupid or, of course they know and allow it with no explanation, probably some moderator gave his/her ok for this giveaway which clearly shouldnt have taken place in this thread. Now, did you complain about all this and what is going on? Why do you complain about me, just because I stopped this ugly gangabang orgy involving everbody, this party seems not to be that funny for party starters.
Back to you, if you dont want boki15 to post, why do you ask or comment on me? BTW, why do you complain about me, do you enjoy suchmoon and others calling piece of shit
? Not to forget involvement of another mod where they opened a thread in my name, spreading lies. How do you like, you love it or? Why? Just because you dont like my opinion. Now we are back at the point of intimidation, mass mobbing, .....
So please, if you want to discuss about ION, do it and dont forget to report correctly, not by double standards which became standard here. What a bunch of CryptoDolls, CryptoLols sounds nice too.
August 02, 2016, 01:38:40 PM
Below is a quote from a current discussion on Ionomy Slack.
" Lots of opinions about what ionomy priorities should be:
1. freeze gravity code, release Gravity as is, and testing immediately
2. continue to build the code until ready for testing then let the whales bash on it — they’ve got the most to gain if ionomy succeeds
3. make the wallet work perfectly on every platform because “nothing else matters until that is fixed and works on every computer.
4. Prioritize hype and marketing because that’s the only thing that works in crypto
5. Create an electron market and add features to Atoms
As the email points out, the team's been addressing the bottom line concern: security. Hype and marketing or rushing something to market are not going to fix that. Isn’t that exactly why people were posting about the neucoin disaster? ceforce just reinforced that the plan is to let the whales hammer the alpha, which is a great way to tap into the community. From the email, and from #ionomy_github, the community’s also at work improving the wallets through code development and testnet.
I agree community is the greatest asset. Even all these different opinions in the community about priorities are great. But the team can’t do all of them first, right? That’s why they’re priorities! I like the ones they’ve chosen: Gravity alpha in the community and using the testnet to improve wallets and ION’s core code."
Grow the community and share your opions at
https://ionomy.slack.com/messages/general/details/
" Lots of opinions about what ionomy priorities should be:
1. freeze gravity code, release Gravity as is, and testing immediately
2. continue to build the code until ready for testing then let the whales bash on it — they’ve got the most to gain if ionomy succeeds
3. make the wallet work perfectly on every platform because “nothing else matters until that is fixed and works on every computer.
4. Prioritize hype and marketing because that’s the only thing that works in crypto
5. Create an electron market and add features to Atoms
As the email points out, the team's been addressing the bottom line concern: security. Hype and marketing or rushing something to market are not going to fix that. Isn’t that exactly why people were posting about the neucoin disaster? ceforce just reinforced that the plan is to let the whales hammer the alpha, which is a great way to tap into the community. From the email, and from #ionomy_github, the community’s also at work improving the wallets through code development and testnet.
I agree community is the greatest asset. Even all these different opinions in the community about priorities are great. But the team can’t do all of them first, right? That’s why they’re priorities! I like the ones they’ve chosen: Gravity alpha in the community and using the testnet to improve wallets and ION’s core code."
Grow the community and share your opions at
https://ionomy.slack.com/messages/general/details/
August 02, 2016, 01:24:08 PM
Why is it when people want to discuss the topic at hand we get boki instead. Looks like my report stats move from 14 at 100% to 15 at 100% *sigh*
Anyway we had some speculation about 20 new masternodes. Is there any way to confirm if these have been created? Like can we check some stats on the network for number of masternodes or are they similar to Paycoins super staker addresses that dont do anything beyond grab a bigger reward?
Slack is a dead end as it (conveniently?) only keeps 10k messages. Makes me suspect yet again they dont keep a forum for a reason lol
Also it sounds like the game has been pushed back yet again?
Anyway we had some speculation about 20 new masternodes. Is there any way to confirm if these have been created? Like can we check some stats on the network for number of masternodes or are they similar to Paycoins super staker addresses that dont do anything beyond grab a bigger reward?
Slack is a dead end as it (conveniently?) only keeps 10k messages. Makes me suspect yet again they dont keep a forum for a reason lol
Also it sounds like the game has been pushed back yet again?
August 02, 2016, 05:27:39 AM
Here's one to chew on: A use in the slack channel pointed out 20 new masternodes were made in the past two weeks but there are not enough coins on the market(s) to fill 20 nodes. Where did those coins come from. Anyone care to speculate?
Care to eleborate with some more specific stats/info?
I would not like to jump to wrong conclusions of false intel.
Just what I read on the general slack channel posted by one of the ion enthusiasts. Feel free to search back through the slack logs for it, if they go store that much info. Whomever posted it can elaborate on the details.
I cannot find what you are talking about.
Could you have it mixed up with the "community masternodes project"? This has "only" 4-5 masternodes though and is fully transparent.
It was definitely not mixed with the community Masternode project. But does it really matter? The team has no plans of being transparent and the majority of the ION supporters are loving that aspect. I don't understand it but I don't need to I guess.
August 02, 2016, 02:42:53 AM
Here's one to chew on: A use in the slack channel pointed out 20 new masternodes were made in the past two weeks but there are not enough coins on the market(s) to fill 20 nodes. Where did those coins come from. Anyone care to speculate?
Care to eleborate with some more specific stats/info?
I would not like to jump to wrong conclusions of false intel.
Just what I read on the general slack channel posted by one of the ion enthusiasts. Feel free to search back through the slack logs for it, if they go store that much info. Whomever posted it can elaborate on the details.
I cannot find what you are talking about.
Could you have it mixed up with the "community masternodes project"? This has "only" 4-5 masternodes though and is fully transparent.
August 01, 2016, 01:52:33 PM
Here's one to chew on: A use in the slack channel pointed out 20 new masternodes were made in the past two weeks but there are not enough coins on the market(s) to fill 20 nodes. Where did those coins come from. Anyone care to speculate?
Care to eleborate with some more specific stats/info?
I would not like to jump to wrong conclusions of false intel.
Just what I read on the general slack channel posted by one of the ion enthusiasts. Feel free to search back through the slack logs for it, if they go store that much info. Whomever posted it can elaborate on the details.
Why should they keep any data? Why should they pay for every user?
Everybody is free to open slack channel, this would be another fabulous idea to open slack channel, pay for to be able to archive messages for trolls that want to go through it to look for some scandalous statement. Really fabulous! If you open it, I will be probably the first person who will join your channel, just make payed account of it because otherwise you will not be able to archive messages.
I miss some economic expert of this troll thread, who will explain why so much small and midsize companies of this world would pay for something that they do not need at all? They must be all retarded and scammers like the one that is accused all the time in this thread. Actually tendency is go to encrypted messaging which is not saved anywhere at all. What is it that you will complain about if encrypted unsaved messging enters popularity?
Can you explain me now why should they pay for you to be able to spread all the shit that is spreaded? Sometimes I ask myself what kind of judgement do some have here, kinda, lets shit around, no matter about what, just shit around, thats the motto.
I would also expect an kickass proof economic description of your accusation. Do you say now that ION is scamming because thex dont waste money for saving useless messages and because some people just dont get how slack is used or to be used? I bet you would preffer sharepoint account where you are the admin.
August 01, 2016, 09:23:36 AM
Here's one to chew on: A use in the slack channel pointed out 20 new masternodes were made in the past two weeks but there are not enough coins on the market(s) to fill 20 nodes. Where did those coins come from. Anyone care to speculate?
Care to eleborate with some more specific stats/info?
I would not like to jump to wrong conclusions of false intel.
Just what I read on the general slack channel posted by one of the ion enthusiasts. Feel free to search back through the slack logs for it, if they go store that much info. Whomever posted it can elaborate on the details.
August 01, 2016, 05:41:25 AM
Here's one to chew on: A use in the slack channel pointed out 20 new masternodes were made in the past two weeks but there are not enough coins on the market(s) to fill 20 nodes. Where did those coins come from. Anyone care to speculate?
Care to eleborate with some more specific stats/info?
I would not like to jump to wrong conclusions of false intel.
July 31, 2016, 03:26:07 PM
cool. so first they push the release date back one month and say beta is coming... now they push back the beta...
whats the end game. why do they impose such deadlines on them selfs
just be geniuses at work and say its coming soon (tm). fudders destroyed our game!!
whats the end game. why do they impose such deadlines on them selfs
just be geniuses at work and say its coming soon (tm). fudders destroyed our game!!
They will have one private alpha test per month!
July 31, 2016, 11:50:52 AM
cool. so first they push the release date back one month and say beta is coming... now they push back the beta...
whats the end game. why do they impose such deadlines on them selfs
just be geniuses at work and say its coming soon (tm). fudders destroyed our game!!
whats the end game. why do they impose such deadlines on them selfs
just be geniuses at work and say its coming soon (tm). fudders destroyed our game!!
July 31, 2016, 03:55:06 AM
is the game released yet.........................?
According to the latest update, the game is currently in private alpha testing. It's unclear how long this will be for. Rumours seem to suggest a vague period of 'days' and 'mid August' being touted for the game to enter private beta (presumably to the rabid tens of folks over on the ionomy slack only), though that was talked about a week or so ago and there hasn't been an 'official' update since.
Meanwhile there appears to be some sort of spat bubbling beneath the idyllic surface between ion ultra fan 'wild ion shark' and other members of the community about the community master nodes. I can't really be bothered to work out what it's actually about, but it's fairly amusing to read the snarky comments on slack and their unofficial forum anyway.
July 30, 2016, 09:34:25 PM
is the game released yet.........................?
Jump to: