You cannot ignore the importance of exchanges in the world of cryptocurrencies.
Unfortunately, LEOxChange has been deemed the "Official" exchange of LEOCoin. Considering the well-known issues--horrendous delays, no fractions less than 0.0001 BTC with trades, fee schemes to artificially boost the price, etc etc--LEOCoin is destined to continue its decline.
No, I beg to differ. The point that some issues could have been handled differently, we can take. And if we would have known about these in advance, we would have. But the decline you see, is just the last dip, before we turn around. As you perhaps know, we think this will be once PoS is starting and any botnetvirus mined LEOcoins cannot any longer be mined and dumped at no matter what price.
We also have good things going on in other area's (development, listing, exchanges) and will show a few of these in the coming weeks. Also the LEOxChange plans for the US market are still in the pipe-line, but coming nevertheless.
Clearly not being overly thrilled myself with current low prices, I am still happy that LEOcoin is nevertheless amongst the top 20 of digital currencies and I would be thrilled if we in a few months would go even higher again.
With regard to repeating statements about LEOcoin being dead or in a decline, I again wish to quote Mark Twain: "The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated." At the end of 2016, we will see again and know much more.
Leo knew about all the "issues" from the get go, people were sending their support tickets, as you know, so stop lying,
"And if we would have known about these in advance, we would have" couse there are steps you can and do take to make sure crpyto market is fast, among other things, and for the things you didnt "prepare in advance" you could solve em as they were coming in, but as LEO does, no attention was ever paid to the problems of the people.
I am still happy that LEOcoin is nevertheless amongst the top 20 of digital currencies really? Couse
https://coinmarketcap.com/ doesnt put you there. and you saying it is, does not make it true, no mater what math formula you use
At the end of 2016, we will see again and know much more First it was 2014, then 2015, now end of 2016.....you sure its not 2017?