[ANN] Maieuticoin | 2014% PoS | 10k/MMXIV and BALLS/MMXIV Markets NOW OPEN - page 41.

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Creating a new chain and allowing a swap from MMXIV to the exclusive chain would be ok. All swapped MMXIV would be destroyed, obviously. That's an easy alternative. If I did it that way, I would do the swap first, figure out how many are being traded, then premine the exact amount and distribute. That way the swappers would control the supply, or lack of, not me

I'm not sure what the reason for a new chain would be other than exclusivity. If that's what you're looking for, just buy every MMXIV Wink

I don't need, or want, to run an ICO, though, in which anyone keeps any funds. Anything raised would need to be destroyed for me to even consider an idea

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

The easiest way would just be to offer a Snowball with a pre-compiled daemon and not post the source code. Otherwise people can just compile themselves. Building unique id's into the device to update the software only if purchased is easy, but trying to limit that in the blockchain I don't think is a good idea. Systems need to be built to scale from day one, not have roadblocks

You would only then be able to run the wallet through the webui initially, but people could just pass the daemon around and run it on desktops, too

I guess I understand the basics of what you're saying, but I think people will feel excluded and talk a lot of shit

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

So ive thought about this alot, and the bottom line is I cant control others actions. Too many idiots out there. BUT I can control the coin. So heres the deal. Those of you that want to dump at low prices will be dumping to me, and youll never see these coins again, because Im going to hold them. The good news with MMXIV is it has one of the lowest coin counts of any of the alt coins, and I am already a majority holder. So I will have a large buy wall up on both bittrex and polo 24/7. Ive already have 1 btc up on polo, and .6 btc so far on Bittrex. Ill also disrupt the buying process by always being the guy on top so the coins will always go to me, but we wont worry about that. No more of this bullshit trading .0001 mmxiv crap. Im born and raised in Vegas and we frown on that piddley crap. Bobby Knight is my idol, and I think he most famous pep talks might help explain it better for those of you that are trailing. Please take a moment of silence and close your eyes and play the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMVmhI1SUq0

coinking

legendary

Activity: 927

Merit: 1000

any interest in using my services? I'll cut ya a deal because I like this team, coin, and 2014% POS!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/increase-traffic-to-your-social-media-sites-authentic-and-guaranteed-daily-934236

ntsdm

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

POW ? SURE at heart we are all miners!
POS? HAS ALWAYS BEEN A "COMMUNITY" BASED INFLATION CONTROL INCENTIVE FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL COIN
even here..... there are many different solutions and algo's ... to many to mention!!!

POIH ?
PROOF OF INVESTMENT HOLDINGS
allowing only a small portion to be transferred out of the wallet in a given amount of time or the staking gets reset in the entire wallet. also obligating the preferential via of CooP to the other holders before allowing those coins to hit and shock the market.
using a unique algo only for this.
its a complexed beast and if actually feasible it will take ONE HELLA DEV WITH HARDCORE SKILLS and a marketing CREW for its success.

all of this requiring investment "coming from?:"
please remember real world possibilities;responsibilities,and human capabilities.
one only dev means when he goes on vacation to Angels island ......who will take care of the coin if "god,mohammed,buda,zeus, hell even his wife or girlfriend or both,,, if something would happen?

EDIT,
opps i forgot the Mistress,,, she is the selfish bitch that could care less about anything other then her sugar daddies constant payouts to her account!
i hope i didnt leave many other people out of the loop?

ntsdm

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 02:27:42 PM

Quote from: ntsdm on January 23, 2015, 02:18:47 PM

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 02:13:26 PM

Also with a software wallet it could have a unique unchangeable wallet id. Only spots would know who it belonged to, and would have to decide if he would allow for selling the wallet to another. I say no. Only the original walletholder can use the wallet. This keeps the wallet in the right hands, and dev spots would control inflation by # of wallets he hands out.

Vegas

the silk road trial shows how easy it is to kack a computer without being detected and copy out the wallet....... thus if hardware coded to the specific machine it would be useless because the software wallet would not work without the allowed machine to run it

If your suggesting hardware coded to a machine like product activation. Thats a bad idea for guys like me that upgrade their pc every month. But maybe a hardware AND a software wallet that have to match, regardless of machine hardware. This would certainly protect the fund, and allow for backups. I would like to see the dev include an emergency function were we could email dev spots and have him issue us a temporary software code in case our hardware fails. The other problem with hardware staking is what if someone breaks into your home and steals your pc, and hardware device? Or there is a fire? Software backups are no good. No wallet yet has 2FA. This is the most secure method, and dev may need to sub some work and collaborate on adding 2 factor authentication. This makes the wallet secure, and you can back it up and your not screwed if the hardware fails, and if someone does hack in, its next to impossible to beat 2FA. Maybe start an ICO on Bittrex with a min buy in, maybe atleast 1 btc to weed out the wannabees. The fact that the dev is spots will automatically bring confidence to the ICO. Let the people vote on weather its a good idea with their btc.

I know dev is watching, I just wonder what he thinks of all of this Huh

Ya I read what you said about this idea , "most people dont like me", well I dont like you either and still invested a shitload with you..right? Wink

Vegas

or another idea could be..... a developer held database with the function inside the wallet to allow and disallow staking or mining. only those issued a key could stake or mine the coin ? retrievable and repeatable on any hardware.....customer code referenced, that way everyone can hold the coin and trade them but only a few can generate them and control the amount in circulation.? there are and would be a tremendous amount of different solutions and ways to go about it but there is still one problem...... pushing a developer to do this...... he also must be married to the coin and truly devoted or its a fail in the very same idea of creation!
if software based only the developer muust rely on the kindness of his selected community to assure his well being....
if he devolves the required hardware also"hardware + software solution" then he will have a supplemented income with less pressure on the community for survival. and more incentive to further development and growth.

Mortimer452

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Just posted an update on Fred: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10239731

He is so damn happy right now Cool

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote from: ntsdm on January 23, 2015, 02:18:47 PM

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 02:13:26 PM

Also with a software wallet it could have a unique unchangeable wallet id. Only spots would know who it belonged to, and would have to decide if he would allow for selling the wallet to another. I say no. Only the original walletholder can use the wallet. This keeps the wallet in the right hands, and dev spots would control inflation by # of wallets he hands out.

Vegas

the silk road trial shows how easy it is to kack a computer without being detected and copy out the wallet....... thus if hardware coded to the specific machine it would be useless because the software wallet would not work without the allowed machine to run it

If your suggesting hardware coded to a machine like product activation. Thats a bad idea for guys like me that upgrade their pc every month. But maybe a hardware AND a software wallet that have to match, regardless of machine hardware. This would certainly protect the fund, and allow for backups. I would like to see the dev include an emergency function were we could email dev spots and have him issue us a temporary software code in case our hardware fails. The other problem with hardware staking is what if someone breaks into your home and steals your pc, and hardware device? Or there is a fire? Software backups are no good. No wallet yet has 2FA. This is the most secure method, and dev may need to sub some work and collaborate on adding 2 factor authentication. This makes the wallet secure, and you can back it up and your not screwed if the hardware fails, and if someone does hack in, its next to impossible to beat 2FA. Maybe start an ICO on Bittrex with a min buy in, maybe atleast 1 btc to weed out the wannabees. The fact that the dev is spots will automatically bring confidence to the ICO. Let the people vote on weather its a good idea with their btc.

I know dev is watching, I just wonder what he thinks of all of this Huh

Ya I read what you said about this idea , "most people dont like me", well I dont like you either and still invested a shitload with you..right? Wink

Vegas

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote from: Phosphorous on January 23, 2015, 02:18:02 PM

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 02:08:52 PM

Things that ARE exclusive , and unique for the most part and very valuable. The value would be determined by the demand, and unique supply. It is worth what people are willing to pay for it, and I think that if they knew it was very limited and hard to get into, and NOt public,this in itself would cause value, and bring together a like minded fund at the same time.

Vegas

There would be no demand because no one can own it outside of the club. And if I'm in the club, I can only sell to other club members which also limits demand.

I said earlier , the coin CAN and SHOULD be on the exchanges, and traded. The unique part is the wallet, that would generate the high pos rewards. The right people WOULD be accepted, and I believe that there would be massive demand because everyone wants something that is unique, that few people have. You would only get the hedgecoins by owning enough MMXIV. There would be a minimum buy in from dev spots. This would filter out the wrong people as the price would be too high for them.

Vegas

ntsdm

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 02:13:26 PM

Also with a software wallet it could have a unique unchangeable wallet id. Only spots would know who it belonged to, and would have to decide if he would allow for selling the wallet to another. I say no. Only the original walletholder can use the wallet. This keeps the wallet in the right hands, and dev spots would control inflation by # of wallets he hands out.

Vegas

the silk road trial shows how easy it is to kack a computer without being detected and copy out the wallet....... thus if hardware coded to the specific machine it would be useless because the software wallet would not work without the allowed machine to run it

Phosphorous

hero member

Activity: 556

Merit: 500

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 02:08:52 PM

Things that ARE exclusive , and unique for the most part and very valuable. The value would be determined by the demand, and unique supply. It is worth what people are willing to pay for it, and I think that if they knew it was very limited and hard to get into, and NOt public,this in itself would cause value, and bring together a like minded fund at the same time.

Vegas

There would be no demand because no one can own it outside of the club. And if I'm in the club, I can only sell to other club members which also limits demand.

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Also with a software wallet it could have a unique unchangeable wallet id. Only spots would know who it belonged to, and would have to decide if he would allow for selling the wallet to another. I say no. Only the original walletholder can use the wallet. This keeps the wallet in the right hands, and dev spots would control inflation by # of wallets he hands out.

Vegas

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote from: Phosphorous on January 23, 2015, 02:04:22 PM

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 01:56:28 PM

Guys if this sounds exciting to you , and you understand and agree or disagree with me, please chime in. I think if dev sees enough support for this, he might just do it. I think people will be breaking down the door to be a part of this unique coin.

Vegas

What is the point? I could make 10 "Exclusive Coin" and hand them out to 9 friends and keep one. And we can tell ourselves they are each worth $1M but we all promise not to sell. I guess we can call ourselves millionaires but if none of my friends will give me $1M for my coin and the public isn't allowed to, all I have is a worthless physical of digital coin and a group of delusional friends.

Things that ARE exclusive , and unique for the most part and very valuable. The value would be determined by the demand, and unique supply. It is worth what people are willing to pay for it, and I think that if they knew it was very limited and hard to get into, and NOt public,this in itself would cause value, and bring together a like minded fund at the same time.

Vegas

ThePeePs

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

https://cryptassist.io

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 01:52:34 PM

The only problem with a hardware wallet is hardware fails, and WHEN it does you lose everything. Im liking a software wallet still. Atleast I can make a backup of it, and have it on a few computers.

This why it is suggested that you always keep paper copies of your private keys (even if not using The Snowball). This way in the event of a hardware/software failure, you still have your keys, and your coins

I do this for every coin I hold.

ntsdm

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 01:59:16 PM

Quote

The only problem is hardware fails, and WHEN it does you lose everything. Im liking a software wallet still. Atleast I can make a backup of it.

Quote

loololololololol
please dont get me wrong but software fail safes for hardware failure is actually very common.
look at how much apple has made by that simple fact.....
hp line of hardware specific servers still carry hardware coed to allow access
and the list goes on for days...... that is the lease of a problem
as for registration they send their keys to a protected database held by the dev could even be a crude solution

I think simple software with unique hardcoded wallet id is best. I dont want a hardware device to fail and have no backup.

hardware coding keys designated from the Yeti is a channeling method for control of who is actually allowed in the community.

Phosphorous

hero member

Activity: 556

Merit: 500

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 01:56:28 PM

Guys if this sounds exciting to you , and you understand and agree or disagree with me, please chime in. I think if dev sees enough support for this, he might just do it. I think people will be breaking down the door to be a part of this unique coin.

Vegas

What is the point? I could make 10 "Exclusive Coin" and hand them out to 9 friends and keep one. And we can tell ourselves they are each worth $1M but we all promise not to sell. I guess we can call ourselves millionaires but if none of my friends will give me $1M for my coin and the public isn't allowed to, all I have is a worthless physical of digital coin and a group of delusional friends.

ntsdm

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 01:56:28 PM

Guys if this sounds exciting to you , and you understand and agree or disagree with me, please chime in. I think if dev sees enough support for this, he might just do it. I think people will be breaking down the door to be a part of this unique coin.

Vegas

in making an actual "BRANDED" and Exclusive Crypto coin ..... there are many aspects that go way beyond simple community support and this would require true dedication and total devotion for its survival.
remember that MMXIV today has its value made from the open community , restricting this changes the entire ballgame.

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote

The only problem is hardware fails, and WHEN it does you lose everything. Im liking a software wallet still. Atleast I can make a backup of it.

Quote

loololololololol
please dont get me wrong but software fail safes for hardware failure is actually very common.
look at how much apple has made by that simple fact.....
hp line of hardware specific servers still carry hardware coed to allow access
and the list goes on for days...... that is the lease of a problem
as for registration they send their keys to a protected database held by the dev could even be a crude solution

I think simple software with unique hardcoded wallet id is best. I dont want a hardware device to fail and have no backup.

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Guys if this sounds exciting to you , and you understand and agree or disagree with me, please chime in. I think if dev sees enough support for this, he might just do it. I think people will be breaking down the door to be a part of this unique coin.

Vegas

ntsdm

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: ntsdm on January 23, 2015, 01:39:30 PM

Quote from: vegasguy on January 23, 2015, 01:21:59 PM

Yes, its true a few amateur traders that need the money do screw it up for the people trying to do big things with the coin. I thought about the idea a posted a bit ago, and wanted to add to it. So to add to my idea, a good name is "hedgefund coin". I looked it up, and there never has been one. Im not sure if HFC ticker is taken or not. Here are more ideas. The wallet id would be hardcoded or locked. In other words dev igotspots would email a wallet with a premade wallet id, and that wallet cannot create new ids. This would prevent people from giving a copy of the wallet to their friends. Maybe it could only be bought initially only with MMXIV from dev spots at a 2 mmxiv for 1 hedgefundcoin and a min of say 100 MMXIV to buy, and approved invitation based on performance history with MMXIV. POS would be very high @ around 2000%. The wallets would be the key, and control inflation as only a few chosen ppl would have them, but at the same time the coin can be traded by anyone on the exchanges. This would be so exclusive that serious hardcore investors would buy loads of MMXIV coin thus raising the price of MMXIV. So I agree with earlier statements that there are those out there that would sell at a lower price knowing full well it hurts others. They are the same people wondering why they are always broke. How is THAT style of thinking working for you? When brilliant like minded people come together, big big things just happen, it always has.

@Igotspots, I wondered what you thought of this? This would be a VERY unique coin, where nothing else like it has been done before. Investors would be chosen, and handpicked. Tier 1 filter would be you choosing who you want in the fund, and tier 2 filter would be the price starting at 2 MMXIV for 1 hedge. Only a select few would have the wallet that creates very high pos with a very high priced coin. Perhaps a public ann here, and a private forum/website, and a user id and password would come with the wallet. This would keep inflation WAY down, and prices way up on MMXIV and Hedge.

Vegas

i would say this is actually a very simple job to do...... make a special line of the Yeti and use a hardware key code for access that way everything can be opensource but still protected and regulated.

The only problem is hardware fails, and WHEN it does you lose everything. Im liking a software wallet still. Atleast I can make a backup of it.

loololololololol
please dont get me wrong but software fail safes for hardware failure is actually very common.
look at how much apple has made by that simple fact.....
hp line of hardware specific servers still carry hardware coed to allow access
and the list goes on for days...... that is the lease of a problem
as for registration they send their keys to a protected database held by the dev could even be a crude solution

Topic: [ANN] Maieuticoin | 2014% PoS | 10k/MMXIV and BALLS/MMXIV Markets NOW OPEN - page 41. (Read 283114 times)