Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [MARKS] Incentivize Content Creators & Build a Reputation Value Framework - page 9. (Read 32316 times)

newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Bitmark is dead, price has already been 10k + and today is 350, will it recover?

There is activity in the GitHub repository of this project. If marking is not dead now is a good time to buy cheap.

And IF it is dead you would be throwing your money through the window  Wink

it would be good good news from the developer to brighten the day
member
Activity: 327
Merit: 16
Bitmark is dead, price has already been 10k + and today is 350, will it recover?

There is activity in the GitHub repository of this project. If marking is not dead now is a good time to buy cheap.

And IF it is dead you would be throwing your money through the window  Wink
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 2
Bitmark is dead, price has already been 10k + and today is 350, will it recover?

There is activity in the GitHub repository of this project. If marking is not dead now is a good time to buy cheap.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Bitmark is dead, price has already been 10k + and today is 350, will it recover?
full member
Activity: 483
Merit: 104
wanted some information from some developer on the exchanges, now that Poloniex will close, have some plan in progress to add in new exchanges, for example the cryptopia has some volume of purchase and sale, but in this new exchange Qtrade the purchase volume is 0.

I see some Bitmark buy orders on qTrade, but no sellers. It is a smaller exchange, and I have found it reliable.



newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
wanted some information from some developer on the exchanges, now that Poloniex will close, have some plan in progress to add in new exchanges, for example the cryptopia has some volume of purchase and sale, but in this new exchange Qtrade the purchase volume is 0.
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 14
In your opinion,  ¿what are the most important new features in the latest Bitcoin v0.16.3 code that we should adopt ?  I can think of the faster blockchain initial downloads for one.   Or perhaps we should "simply" transfer our features into the  BTC v0.16.3 base (our own genesis block, target block time, DGWv3, CEM, 8mPoW, etc.), and be completely up-to-date.

The only feature that I really care about is Segregated Witness because most Lightning Network software relies on it (though it is not strictly necessary for Lightning). The faster syncing and possible DoS/security fixes would be important too. Luckily the current vulnerability being patched for Bitcoin Core 0.14-0.16 (which allows for inflation) does not affect us.
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 2
I already have submitted my ticket requesting to keep Bitmark listed
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 2
We can try to open as many support tickets as we can (I mean one per user) to Poloniex support, asking to keep Bitmark listed or to list it again. If many Poloniex users show interest in this coin/project then it will help to be able to trade Bitmark on Poloniex again.

https://poloniex.freshdesk.com/support/tickets/new

If we act as a community it could help us all and this project.
full member
Activity: 483
Merit: 104
.... did a quick audit of the code starting at Mark Pfennig (Nathan Rixham)'s initial "global rename" commit and indeed it seems to be an exact copy of Bitcoin Core v0.9.2.1, other than renaming "Bitcoin" to "Bitmark". I also looked at his other commits before and didn't find anything dishonest. Thus, I am very convinced now that the code is honest and secure (up to the security of Bitcoin Core v0.9.2.1).  ...


In your opinion,  ¿what are the most important new features in the latest Bitcoin v0.16.3 code that we should adopt ?  I can think of the faster blockchain initial downloads for one.   Or perhaps we should "simply" transfer our features into the  BTC v0.16.3 base (our own genesis block, target block time, DGWv3, CEM, 8mPoW, etc.), and be completely up-to-date.
full member
Activity: 483
Merit: 104
Any update from Poloniex? Why they dislist? And Cryptopia We cannot deposit and withdraw?
Good News:  Cryptopia Deposits and Withdrawals are working normally again.

     Regarding Poloniex, it seems like Poloniex was acquired (bought) by a larger company, Circle. In these type of changes and transitions, verbal promises and shared history are often disregarded & overlooked. We are appealing the decision to de-list, because we had assurances that "as long as development continued, creating a stable environment for volunteers to create a rare fair coin, which never benefited from an ICO or premine, like most other coins" Poloniex would continue listing us.

     As everyone on this forum knows, development on Bitmark is active and ongoing. At this particular junction, when we have just transitioned to an 8mPoW algo system, and are starting to devote our energies and focus on Marking, it seems premature to de-list.

     Circle's criteria is, as I understand it, about Bitmark's comparatively lower volume on the exchange.   I believe we should at least be allowed some time, perhaps a year, to get the trade volume up to Circle's minimum average threshold, as now that the blockchain mechanics have been addressed, we are shifting our focus to Marking, our main reason for being or raison d'être. Marking has the potential to really drive interest in Bitmark and our blockchain, and multiply the trade volume.  

In fact, we have great shared history with Poloniex, as Polo implemented the first day-to-day use of Marking in their Troll Box. The Circle Company, IMO, should bring back this much-loved feature of the Poloniex Exchange, and with it, Marking, which tracked user's reputation on the Troll Box.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
how many confirmations are needed to confirm the deposit in cryptopia?
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 14
By the way I did a quick audit of the code starting at Mark Pfennig (Nathan Rixham)'s initial "global rename" commit and indeed it seems to be an exact copy of Bitcoin Core v0.9.2.1, other than renaming "Bitcoin" to "Bitmark". I also looked at his other commits before and didn't find anything dishonest. Thus, I am very convinced now that the code is honest and secure (up to the security of Bitcoin Core v0.9.2.1). Yes Nathan ran away with people's money (from what I heard), but he didn't (from my audits) code anything dishonest into the protocol. It is unlikely he would put something malicious into the git commits since anyone can view them publicly, but of course it is worth checking it some more.

newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
hy dev, happy to find your project. from the explanation about bitmark looks very convincing, if your project has been running from 2014. then how about your plan
full member
Activity: 483
Merit: 104
We're actively traded on Cryptopia.co.nz, and are also listed on a promising, new exchange, qTrade.io
It's an unwelcome announcement, but the Project is really just coming into its own, will survive and flourish.
...

Hope so  Smiley
But I should notice that 24h trading volume on cryptopia is 59$  Grin
I hope that all trading volume will be transfered from Poloniex (45k$) to cryptopia or anywhere else.

There's some buy orders on qTrade.io for Bitmarks at the moment.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Any update from Poloniex? Why they dislist? And Cryptopia We cannot deposit and withdraw?
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
I just tested the qtrade wallet and the deposits and withdrawals are working fine, the problem is very low volume, I hope that Bitmark can overcome all this.
hero member
Activity: 746
Merit: 500
OK, I just got the news that BTM is beeing delisted from POLO. Now, on this occasion,
I learned that a forked happened and the new coin name is MARKS....

But, Polo did not update the name.

SO, could you clarify what is the situation btw BTM and MARKS?

I also saw from Coinmarketcap, that ONLY cryptopia is listing the coin with the name MARKS.

WHERE can we move our BTM coins from POLO to?

Please, could I get an answer for my questions to help me understand
what is the situation btw BTM and MARKS?

thanks in advance

BTM and MARKS are the same, they (Bitmark team) needed a new ticker for BTM on Cryptopia, as BTM on Cryptopia means Bytom so they went for MARKS on Cryptopia. You can check this back in this thread earlier.

So BTMs you withdraw from Polo to Cryptopia for example become MARKS but it is still the same coin and blockchain.

HTH

thanks a lot for the clarification. Much appreciated.

Now all makes sense :-)
Pages:
Jump to: