Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] MemoryCoin - page 3. (Read 100341 times)

newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
November 28, 2013, 07:52:19 PM
where to download the wallet ?

The link in the begining of the thread seams to be broken ...
hero member
Activity: 695
Merit: 500
November 28, 2013, 01:43:34 PM
Do we have to keep the wallet.dat for the new release?

Yes!

I seem to remember you posted your MEG address on this thread - so maybe you can find it here.

LOL, your memory is way better then mine, I totally forgot Tongue

After I searched all my posts in my post history I found my address and its on the list Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
November 28, 2013, 12:51:51 PM
seems like your reviving this ? good your supporting the guys you abandoned but i'd rather see this coin die..
this was the most clever system i have seen in the whole alt coin scene (notice i avoided using the word scamcoin lol)

i could illustrate how this was the smartest system ever made and i can prove it too
you can SAY your intentions are good but the fact of the matter is you released a coin and raked in massive coins
you really couldn't get closer to a scamcoin if you tried..

and you can self moderate your topics all you want deleting what i and other have said but we will still be heard
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1030
November 28, 2013, 12:17:04 PM
Do we have to keep the wallet.dat for the new release?

Yes!

I seem to remember you posted your MEG address on this thread - so maybe you can find it here.
hero member
Activity: 695
Merit: 500
November 28, 2013, 11:12:26 AM
Wow, what great news! Free Trade, you are the best Smiley
I have a question though, I still have my MEG wallet saved but I am not sure how to check if my address is on the list (because I can't open the MemoryCoin client anymore, it will just not open), I know it should be on there as I supporter the MemoryCoin foundation all the way, from beginning to the end, but I would like to check if it rely is....is there any way to retrieve the address from the wallet.dat without the client?
Do we have to keep the wallet.dat for the new release?
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131
November 28, 2013, 09:48:13 AM
That is all saved-up coins will be destroyed? ? ? It somehow not so to those who began mining coins at the beginning? ? ? ? ? ?Can not do then restart and to leave this version? ? ? ?

If MemoryCoin is restarted, everything you have will be lost but look at it an other way : today your Coin are worthless.
If this time the community and devs are good enough then MemoryCoin will be worthy.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1030
November 28, 2013, 01:44:42 AM
fresh nodes? can't sinc

Use those nodes :


Oh no! You're still trying to keep this dead blockchain alive. This is like Weekend At Bernies.

Everyone, please be careful about trading on the old fork - coins there won't show up on the relaunch.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1030
November 28, 2013, 01:42:09 AM
is there a bounty for an mec block explorer?

Yes - I think if you can guarantee to provide a service at launch for MemoryCoin, I'll add some MEG for you in the genesis block - same offer goes for anyone else too. Priv message me with the details of what kind of block explorer etc.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1030
November 28, 2013, 01:40:16 AM
Note that if we only take de number of votes as the parameter to determine the awarded address the voting system can also be cheated. Just by distributing the coins over diferent addresses the 'big holder' could emulate serveral users. The point of my proposal is to make the voting system probabilistic: a grant address has more probability of being awarded as more coins (or votes, or a combination of both) support it, so, in the long run, all the grant addresses are awarded proportional to the support they receive. All the nodes in the network should use the same pseudo-random number generator or whatever algorithm to choose the 'winner' address.

Yes, any attempt to enforce a 'number of votes' rather than the 'size of votes' will lead to the gaming the voting.

On the other point - I think have a winner whose likelihood is based on the size of the vote is probably technically possible, but I think it would certainly lead to everyone immediately voting for themselves in the hope of winning.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1030
November 28, 2013, 01:36:22 AM
FreeTrade!
Do You have an aproximate release date?

Stas

Within a week I would hope.
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 251
November 27, 2013, 01:01:21 PM
fresh nodes? can't sinc

Use those nodes :

31.25.188.173
192.241.241.209
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
November 27, 2013, 12:27:03 PM
is there a bounty for an mec block explorer?
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
November 27, 2013, 12:23:23 PM
Note that if we only take de number of votes as the parameter to determine the awarded address the voting system can also be cheated. Just by distributing the coins over diferent addresses the 'big holder' could emulate serveral users. The point of my proposal is to make the voting system probabilistic: a grant address has more probability of being awarded as more coins (or votes, or a combination of both) support it, so, in the long run, all the grant addresses are awarded proportional to the support they receive. All the nodes in the network should use the same pseudo-random number generator or whatever algorithm to choose the 'winner' address.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131
November 27, 2013, 10:47:07 AM
just my proposal: totally agree to reduce the number of voted grants, but greed is greed and if someone becomes a big holder (by mining or buying) there would exist the possibility for her/him to 'hijack' the grant. A possibility to prevent this could be to choose the awarded address non-deterministically: the most voted address has the biggest probability to be rewarded but it is not ensured (I don't know if this is technicaly possible).

Yes the number of vote should matter a bit more than the quantity of coin.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
November 27, 2013, 10:42:39 AM
just my proposal: totally agree to reduce the number of voted grants, but greed is greed and if someone becomes a big holder (by mining or buying) there would exist the possibility for her/him to 'hijack' the grant. A possibility to prevent this could be to choose the awarded address non-deterministically: the most voted address has the biggest probability to be rewarded but it is not ensured (I don't know if this is technicaly possible).

good idea.
It could be determined by number of votes, but not by the biggest amount of coin at one purse.
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
November 27, 2013, 10:39:15 AM
just my proposal: totally agree to reduce the number of voted grants, but greed is greed and if someone becomes a big holder (by mining or buying) there would exist the possibility for her/him to 'hijack' the grant. A possibility to prevent this could be to choose the awarded address non-deterministically: the most voted address has the biggest probability to be rewarded but it is not ensured (I don't know if this is technicaly possible).
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
November 27, 2013, 10:12:32 AM
FreeTrade!
Do You have an aproximate release date?

Stas
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
November 27, 2013, 08:21:27 AM
First of all I am glad that you are gone keep the voting system. Smiley
Yes the easier it is the better.

You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?

Stas

Well I think what happened last time was the voting got corrupted over time because there were 5 grants . . . so people thought they could subvert 1 or 2 grants, and the other grants would keep things going. But what happened was that once there was a little corruption, it grew until it was over 50% and the whole system failed. Changing the culture after that was established wasn't possible. This time I'm hoping corruption won't have a chance to grow - there will either be none, or it will be total . . but it won't have a chance to grow gradually. And we're seeding it with miners and investors who understand the voting and the ideals, so we'll have a better chance to put down a better culture. That's my hope anyway.


Sounds good.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1030
November 27, 2013, 08:18:43 AM
First of all I am glad that you are gone keep the voting system. Smiley
Yes the easier it is the better.

You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?

Stas

Well I think what happened last time was the voting got corrupted over time because there were 5 grants . . . so people thought they could subvert 1 or 2 grants, and the other grants would keep things going. But what happened was that once there was a little corruption, it grew until it was over 50% and the whole system failed. Changing the culture after that was established wasn't possible. This time I'm hoping corruption won't have a chance to grow - there will either be none, or it will be total . . but it won't have a chance to grow gradually. And we're seeding it with miners and investors who understand the voting and the ideals, so we'll have a better chance to put down a better culture. That's my hope anyway.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
November 27, 2013, 08:09:24 AM
First of all I am glad that you are gone keep the voting system. Smiley
Yes the easier it is the better.

You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?

Stas
Pages:
Jump to: