where to download the wallet ?
The link in the begining of the thread seams to be broken ...
Topic: [ANN] MemoryCoin - page 3. (Read 100357 times)
Do we have to keep the wallet.dat for the new release?
Yes!
I seem to remember you posted your MEG address on this thread - so maybe you can find it here.
LOL, your memory is way better then mine, I totally forgot
After I searched all my posts in my post history I found my address and its on the list
seems like your reviving this ? good your supporting the guys you abandoned but i'd rather see this coin die..
this was the most clever system i have seen in the whole alt coin scene (notice i avoided using the word scamcoin lol)
i could illustrate how this was the smartest system ever made and i can prove it too
you can SAY your intentions are good but the fact of the matter is you released a coin and raked in massive coins
you really couldn't get closer to a scamcoin if you tried..
and you can self moderate your topics all you want deleting what i and other have said but we will still be heard
this was the most clever system i have seen in the whole alt coin scene (notice i avoided using the word scamcoin lol)
i could illustrate how this was the smartest system ever made and i can prove it too
you can SAY your intentions are good but the fact of the matter is you released a coin and raked in massive coins
you really couldn't get closer to a scamcoin if you tried..
and you can self moderate your topics all you want deleting what i and other have said but we will still be heard
Do we have to keep the wallet.dat for the new release?
Yes!
I seem to remember you posted your MEG address on this thread - so maybe you can find it here.
Wow, what great news! Free Trade, you are the best
I have a question though, I still have my MEG wallet saved but I am not sure how to check if my address is on the list (because I can't open the MemoryCoin client anymore, it will just not open), I know it should be on there as I supporter the MemoryCoin foundation all the way, from beginning to the end, but I would like to check if it rely is....is there any way to retrieve the address from the wallet.dat without the client?
Do we have to keep the wallet.dat for the new release?
I have a question though, I still have my MEG wallet saved but I am not sure how to check if my address is on the list (because I can't open the MemoryCoin client anymore, it will just not open), I know it should be on there as I supporter the MemoryCoin foundation all the way, from beginning to the end, but I would like to check if it rely is....is there any way to retrieve the address from the wallet.dat without the client?
Do we have to keep the wallet.dat for the new release?
That is all saved-up coins will be destroyed? ? ? It somehow not so to those who began mining coins at the beginning? ? ? ? ? ?Can not do then restart and to leave this version? ? ? ?
If MemoryCoin is restarted, everything you have will be lost but look at it an other way : today your Coin are worthless.
If this time the community and devs are good enough then MemoryCoin will be worthy.
Oh no! You're still trying to keep this dead blockchain alive. This is like Weekend At Bernies.
Everyone, please be careful about trading on the old fork - coins there won't show up on the relaunch.
is there a bounty for an mec block explorer?
Yes - I think if you can guarantee to provide a service at launch for MemoryCoin, I'll add some MEG for you in the genesis block - same offer goes for anyone else too. Priv message me with the details of what kind of block explorer etc.
Note that if we only take de number of votes as the parameter to determine the awarded address the voting system can also be cheated. Just by distributing the coins over diferent addresses the 'big holder' could emulate serveral users. The point of my proposal is to make the voting system probabilistic: a grant address has more probability of being awarded as more coins (or votes, or a combination of both) support it, so, in the long run, all the grant addresses are awarded proportional to the support they receive. All the nodes in the network should use the same pseudo-random number generator or whatever algorithm to choose the 'winner' address.
Yes, any attempt to enforce a 'number of votes' rather than the 'size of votes' will lead to the gaming the voting.
On the other point - I think have a winner whose likelihood is based on the size of the vote is probably technically possible, but I think it would certainly lead to everyone immediately voting for themselves in the hope of winning.
FreeTrade!
Do You have an aproximate release date?
Stas
Do You have an aproximate release date?
Stas
Within a week I would hope.
fresh nodes? can't sinc
Use those nodes :
31.25.188.173
192.241.241.209
is there a bounty for an mec block explorer?
Note that if we only take de number of votes as the parameter to determine the awarded address the voting system can also be cheated. Just by distributing the coins over diferent addresses the 'big holder' could emulate serveral users. The point of my proposal is to make the voting system probabilistic: a grant address has more probability of being awarded as more coins (or votes, or a combination of both) support it, so, in the long run, all the grant addresses are awarded proportional to the support they receive. All the nodes in the network should use the same pseudo-random number generator or whatever algorithm to choose the 'winner' address.
just my proposal: totally agree to reduce the number of voted grants, but greed is greed and if someone becomes a big holder (by mining or buying) there would exist the possibility for her/him to 'hijack' the grant. A possibility to prevent this could be to choose the awarded address non-deterministically: the most voted address has the biggest probability to be rewarded but it is not ensured (I don't know if this is technicaly possible).
Yes the number of vote should matter a bit more than the quantity of coin.
just my proposal: totally agree to reduce the number of voted grants, but greed is greed and if someone becomes a big holder (by mining or buying) there would exist the possibility for her/him to 'hijack' the grant. A possibility to prevent this could be to choose the awarded address non-deterministically: the most voted address has the biggest probability to be rewarded but it is not ensured (I don't know if this is technicaly possible).
good idea.
It could be determined by number of votes, but not by the biggest amount of coin at one purse.
just my proposal: totally agree to reduce the number of voted grants, but greed is greed and if someone becomes a big holder (by mining or buying) there would exist the possibility for her/him to 'hijack' the grant. A possibility to prevent this could be to choose the awarded address non-deterministically: the most voted address has the biggest probability to be rewarded but it is not ensured (I don't know if this is technicaly possible).
FreeTrade!
Do You have an aproximate release date?
Stas
Do You have an aproximate release date?
Stas
First of all I am glad that you are gone keep the voting system.
Yes the easier it is the better.
You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?
Stas
Yes the easier it is the better.
You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?
Stas
Well I think what happened last time was the voting got corrupted over time because there were 5 grants . . . so people thought they could subvert 1 or 2 grants, and the other grants would keep things going. But what happened was that once there was a little corruption, it grew until it was over 50% and the whole system failed. Changing the culture after that was established wasn't possible. This time I'm hoping corruption won't have a chance to grow - there will either be none, or it will be total . . but it won't have a chance to grow gradually. And we're seeding it with miners and investors who understand the voting and the ideals, so we'll have a better chance to put down a better culture. That's my hope anyway.
Sounds good.
First of all I am glad that you are gone keep the voting system.
Yes the easier it is the better.
You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?
Stas
Yes the easier it is the better.
You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?
Stas
Well I think what happened last time was the voting got corrupted over time because there were 5 grants . . . so people thought they could subvert 1 or 2 grants, and the other grants would keep things going. But what happened was that once there was a little corruption, it grew until it was over 50% and the whole system failed. Changing the culture after that was established wasn't possible. This time I'm hoping corruption won't have a chance to grow - there will either be none, or it will be total . . but it won't have a chance to grow gradually. And we're seeding it with miners and investors who understand the voting and the ideals, so we'll have a better chance to put down a better culture. That's my hope anyway.
First of all I am glad that you are gone keep the voting system.
Yes the easier it is the better.
You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?
Stas
Yes the easier it is the better.
You have stopped supporting it when majority of votes vent to the RP.
What is gone be different this time? how do you solve this?
Stas
Jump to: