Topic: [ANN] Minereum - First Self Mining Smart Contract - page 395. (Read 438108 times)
If want this coin have a future ,Dev should show some plans ~and done with it .
You can go to vote, on the exchange
I think the developers made a good decision with the Airdrop but need to do more now, the project needs some exchange with decent volume also the project a solid roadmap on how to move the project forward
I have just voted for Minereum at mercatox.com
Also try to list in other exchanges.
Also try to list in other exchanges.
hi there Dev,
do you got any new to tell us ?
do you got any new to tell us ?
Not sure why more people are not voting. If we were to assume the theory of IP spoofing for sake of argument that 1 person owns 5 addresses that still leaves over 800 votes/persons that could vote. Let's try a 1 to 20 ratio that still leaves a little over 200 to vote. Not supporting any theories just thinking about the voting. 
have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
Simple explanation is people don't dare to deposit or make trade on any of those exchanges where you want them to go and after creating accounts. Taking it to any low volume exchange means destroying the coin better wait and make struggle for something big.have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
mercatox.com - exchange with a bad reputation. I therefore do not vote.
Update
New website: https://www.minereum.com
Note: DNS updates may take few more hours, the website may be inaccessible from time to time.
New website: https://www.minereum.com
Note: DNS updates may take few more hours, the website may be inaccessible from time to time.
Congratulations dev website is very profesional.
Very Nice Pro website, congratz Minereum !
I voted on the Mercatox exchange for adding a token, but I think that it is not worth adding a token, because there are almost no trades there. 
If people don't bother to go to Mercatex because is a crap exchange, then why didn't you say anything? we could all have a discussion and see the pros and cons, perhaps nobody would have gone voting, or all we have, you really should post your opinions, this is a community.
Yeah, it doesn't bother me that multiple IP's registered either.
I figure if the co-founder of Ethereum is bothering to follow Minerium on twitter then it must have something going for it.
I figure if the co-founder of Ethereum is bothering to follow Minerium on twitter then it must have something going for it.
Not sure why more people are not voting. If we were to assume the theory of IP spoofing for sake of argument that 1 person owns 5 addresses that still leaves over 800 votes/persons that could vote. Let's try a 1 to 20 ratio that still leaves a little over 200 to vote. Not supporting any theories just thinking about the voting.
have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
Simple explanation is people don't dare to deposit or make trade on any of those exchanges where you want them to go and after creating accounts. Taking it to any low volume exchange means destroying the coin better wait and make struggle for something big.have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
mercatox.com - exchange with a bad reputation. I therefore do not vote.
Gotcha. Well thats good to know then.
Well I don't mind people having registered multiple IP's. All small change really. I remember NEM's distribution where the project leader got caught having multiple stakes. And a lot of people did. Look where they are now.
Even with all the skulduggery going on NEM managed better distribution than NXT. And both managed better initial distribution than BTC.
Dev most probably has a stake in this whole operation. Or maybe he is the new BCNext or he (or she) is using this as a pilot for something else.
Either way it would suit Dev to come forward.
As to the lack of votes on Mercatox: I really can't be arsed to register on some crap exchange just to vote. I think most people can't.
Even with all the skulduggery going on NEM managed better distribution than NXT. And both managed better initial distribution than BTC.
Dev most probably has a stake in this whole operation. Or maybe he is the new BCNext or he (or she) is using this as a pilot for something else.
Either way it would suit Dev to come forward.
As to the lack of votes on Mercatox: I really can't be arsed to register on some crap exchange just to vote. I think most people can't.
Not sure why more people are not voting. If we were to assume the theory of IP spoofing for sake of argument that 1 person owns 5 addresses that still leaves over 800 votes/persons that could vote. Let's try a 1 to 20 ratio that still leaves a little over 200 to vote. Not supporting any theories just thinking about the voting.
have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
Simple explanation is people don't dare to deposit or make trade on any of those exchanges where you want them to go and after creating accounts. Taking it to any low volume exchange means destroying the coin better wait and make struggle for something big.have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
mercatox.com - exchange with a bad reputation. I therefore do not vote.
Not sure why more people are not voting. If we were to assume the theory of IP spoofing for sake of argument that 1 person owns 5 addresses that still leaves over 800 votes/persons that could vote. Let's try a 1 to 20 ratio that still leaves a little over 200 to vote. Not supporting any theories just thinking about the voting.
have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
Simple explanation is people don't dare to deposit or make trade on any of those exchanges where you want them to go and after creating accounts. Taking it to any low volume exchange means destroying the coin better wait and make struggle for something big. have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
Not sure why more people are not voting. If we were to assume the theory of IP spoofing for sake of argument that 1 person owns 5 addresses that still leaves over 800 votes/persons that could vote. Let's try a 1 to 20 ratio that still leaves a little over 200 to vote. Not supporting any theories just thinking about the voting.
have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
Dev holds most of the genesis addresses. It's obvious. have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
Not sure why more people are not voting. If we were to assume the theory of IP spoofing for sake of argument that 1 person owns 5 addresses that still leaves over 800 votes/persons that could vote. Let's try a 1 to 20 ratio that still leaves a little over 200 to vote. Not supporting any theories just thinking about the voting.
have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
have a good week everyone!
-crypt0r3x
hi dev i looking that when i send my coin :
what is this dev ?
coins cannot be sent to the Genesis address what is this dev ?
hi dev i looking that when i send my coin :
what is this dev ?
what is this dev ?
There is no way in hell that 4268 addresses were collected from the community. It's blatantly obvious that the majority of those addresses belong to the dev. The airdrop was a huge premine for the dev.
There is no way to please you people, you are blaming the developers for what, assuming he screened out some addresses you people will be the one crucifying him for doing so, to me the distribution is fair, 33000 token is huge provided the price hit the roof, even 0.00001BTC means 3.3BTC to every genesis address holder
There is no way in hell that 4268 addresses were collected from the community. It's blatantly obvious that the majority of those addresses belong to the dev. The airdrop was a huge premine for the dev.
There is no way to please you people, you are blaming the developers for what, assuming he screened out some addresses you people will be the one crucifying him for doing so, to me the distribution is fair, 33000 token is huge provided the price hit the roof, even 0.00001BTC means 3.3BTC to every genesis address holder
Agreed. They were given away for free. No one has anything to lose here.
Personally, I don't think the Dev has most of the addresses. I'm sure plenty of people registered multiple accounts through IP spoofing, but it is what it is. I registered and was able to collect just fine.
Jump to: