Why doesnt the development team explain the clear difference between nav and other annon coins?
I read an article by the developer that was in response to a man who stated nav was not decentralized because of servers and that nav's rich list takes away any possible annon.
Developer came back with some sound respones but stated he was a developer and did not care what nav was worth day to day, and just wanted to create a sound product. Well part of your product Is price point and value, no body is going to adopt nav if it stays at such a low price. That is the world we live in, maybe a few journalist involved in a SJW movment in a 3rd world country might use it. But no one else. Just amazes me that a developer who has worked there ass off would say that about their own product. You have developed a product. A good product should have an appropriate value attached to it. People don't develop engineering software only hoping to sell it for 5 bucks a disk.
Very few investors and traders understand code like software engineers and developers. 1 percent maybe? Espically the niche coding that is block chains.
A huge amount of investment is from laymen. Yet much of this huge investment oppurtunity is being missed because there has been no clear explanation why nav is different then other annon coins.
I know what DD so do many others. You don't need to understand complex pipeline logistics to invest in Naural gas futures, companies, or infrastructure. You just need proper DD.
But there is almost 0 information for the layman out there, which makes up a huge amount of potential investment in this asset.
Also where is nav coins PR team?
And why do people expect nav to jump just because of media? You can only hype media so long, eventually people need to see results.
Some good points and at least constructive.
I think we all need to get away from the how does it compare to other coins. As a 2+year investor in Nav I asked many of the same questions but have learned the following that sets Nav out from the rest.
1) No premine, no funding - ALL development has been funded by the devs with the occasional "chip in" for things like server costs etc, from the community.
2) Dedicated, long serving, trusted dev team - They are still here and still delivering what they promised.
3) List of implemented features that the community values, not just adding of the latest crypto buzzword.
4) An active dev team - they all post on here and DO answer questions.
You can buy pr, marketing if you have the capital - see above Nav has NO funding. Talent however is harder to buy. Try and hire someone as technically savvy as these guys with what they have achieved for ZERO salary? what they have achieved in the last few months alone is far greater than ANY coin. $3 million market cap from very little marketing with zero funding? Thats pretty good going in my eyes, just imagine if they had the pockets of one of the top 10 coins for marketing? Or the number of devs / backroom staff?
Judging a coin by your own standards is never a good thing. Not everyone is after a fast buck -
I have bought nav at 300 sats, 800 sats, 2000 sats, 4500 sats and more recently 10000 sats.
I used to moan about the lack of x or y (look back through my 2+ years of posts 99% are about Nav) but credit where it is due they have ALWAYS delivered more than they said they would with cherries on top. What they have achieved is nothing short of amazing and have the talent, tech and staying power for the long haul.
I will probably get flamed for being a Nav yes man as I am bigging up what they have done and continue to, but I am NOT part of the dev team. I am just an investor that found something interesting that had a certain something. Yes for me it has been very profitable, but I keep buying as I know this is still the infancy of something much much bigger.