Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!! - page 605. (Read 2085654 times)
is there any chance to make a 'lite' version wallet for NAV without the exchange ticker?? or just remove it altogether, it just seems like it's not a very useful feature(for me atleast, i only have it open for staking and never really have the need to look at it) I think the ticker is what causes the slowness of the wallet, I noticed on version 2.0.6 wallet it was running a little slow with only cryptsy ticker working, but on this 2.0.7 version both cryptsy and bittrex ticker is working and it's a huge difference, much slower... slow just like the previous wallet before the fork (those previous wallets also had bittrex and cryptsy ticker working and it was tremendously slow just like now 2.0.7),
Damn, i thought we had narrowed it down to 32bit machines. We will continue to investigate.
Hold tight.
Hold tight.
yeap this is exactly my issue on windows 64bit.
I want to get to my PC tonight to see if a fresh install will do the same as above.
Last night I just downloaded the new wallet and extracted the wallet straight into NavajoCoin folder and ran it - it synced few blocks - then I unlocked for staking- started staking fine.
Went to send ninjaboon his 1000 NAV via new anon and copied hi address in and put tick in tick box - then 1000 NAV and then hit send 3 times no responce.
I can get screenshots of the whole thing - but there is no real error messages - but when i move around the wallet its smooth and fast - i can backup wallet - lock -unlock etc
I want to get to my PC tonight to see if a fresh install will do the same as above.
Last night I just downloaded the new wallet and extracted the wallet straight into NavajoCoin folder and ran it - it synced few blocks - then I unlocked for staking- started staking fine.
Went to send ninjaboon his 1000 NAV via new anon and copied hi address in and put tick in tick box - then 1000 NAV and then hit send 3 times no responce.
I can get screenshots of the whole thing - but there is no real error messages - but when i move around the wallet its smooth and fast - i can backup wallet - lock -unlock etc
You can always install a Virtual machine with windows 64bit.
That way you save time.
yeap this is exactly my issue on windows 64bit.
I want to get to my PC tonight to see if a fresh install will do the same as above.
Last night I just downloaded the new wallet and extracted the wallet straight into NavajoCoin folder and ran it - it synced few blocks - then I unlocked for staking- started staking fine.
Went to send ninjaboon his 1000 NAV via new anon and copied his address in and put tick in the anon tick box - then entered 1000 NAV in the field and then hit send 3 times no responce.
I can get screenshots of the whole thing - but there is no real error messages - but when i move around the wallet its smooth and fast - i can backup wallet - lock -unlock etc
I want to get to my PC tonight to see if a fresh install will do the same as above.
Last night I just downloaded the new wallet and extracted the wallet straight into NavajoCoin folder and ran it - it synced few blocks - then I unlocked for staking- started staking fine.
Went to send ninjaboon his 1000 NAV via new anon and copied his address in and put tick in the anon tick box - then entered 1000 NAV in the field and then hit send 3 times no responce.
I can get screenshots of the whole thing - but there is no real error messages - but when i move around the wallet its smooth and fast - i can backup wallet - lock -unlock etc
@soopy452000 / dev team,
I still have issues on the linux box, Ubuntu 14.10, getting this errors:
UPDATE: downloaded the NAV blockchain , boostrapped and it's loading fine now.
looks like I've solved my own question. lol.
I still have issues on the linux box, Ubuntu 14.10, getting this errors:
Quote
Opened LevelDB successfully
CBlock(hash=5629906e5a5da0dc780da47a5e4c4089ba06b39dc354ca89ce90247ca58349b3, ver=1, hashPrevBlock=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, hashMerkleRoot=bb1ffda520d0a993faf519fb2dc4e1a4766388add97d41092095fa0dd7eb827e, nTime=1401734150, nBits=1e0fffff, nNonce=552236, vtx=1, vchBlockSig=)
Coinbase(hash=bb1ffda520, nTime=1401734150, ver=2, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0, strTxComment=text:NavajoCoin genesis block)
CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000, 4294967295), coinbase 00012a0e47616d652069732061666f6f7421)
CTxOut(empty)
vMerkleTree: bb1ffda520
block.GetHash() == 5629906e5a5da0dc780da47a5e4c4089ba06b39dc354ca89ce90247ca58349b3
block.hashMerkleRoot == bb1ffda520d0a993faf519fb2dc4e1a4766388add97d41092095fa0dd7eb827e
block.nTime = 1401734150
block.nNonce = 552236
CBlock(hash=5629906e5a5da0dc780da47a5e4c4089ba06b39dc354ca89ce90247ca58349b3, ver=1, hashPrevBlock=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, hashMerkleRoot=bb1ffda520d0a993faf519fb2dc4e1a4766388add97d41092095fa0dd7eb827e, nTime=1401734150, nBits=1e0fffff, nNonce=552236, vtx=1, vchBlockSig=)
Coinbase(hash=bb1ffda520, nTime=1401734150, ver=2, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0, strTxComment=text:NavajoCoin genesis block)
CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000, 4294967295), coinbase 00012a0e47616d652069732061666f6f7421)
CTxOut(empty)
vMerkleTree: bb1ffda520
block.GetHash() == 5629906e5a5da0dc780da47a5e4c4089ba06b39dc354ca89ce90247ca58349b3
block.hashMerkleRoot == bb1ffda520d0a993faf519fb2dc4e1a4766388add97d41092095fa0dd7eb827e
block.nTime = 1401734150
block.nNonce = 552236
UPDATE: downloaded the NAV blockchain , boostrapped and it's loading fine now.
looks like I've solved my own question. lol.
Hello everyone,
From all reports so far, the new wallet with Anon transactions is operating perfectly for the majority of users.
There are some people on the thread who comment that the Anon is not working for them.
From our investigation so far, it looks like the wallet is having a small issue running SSL on 32Bit Windows.
On 32Bit Windows, you will tick the box, click send and the wallet will hang for some seconds, then the transaction will not send. Normal, non anonymous transactions are fine.
As said, 64Bit Windows is operating perfectly for everyone who is trying it.
We are currently investigating the issue and will attempt to resolve it as soon as possible.
For now, if you have the choice, opt for a 64Bit operating system to run the wallet on!
If you don't have a 64 bit operating system to work with, then hold tight for the patch which will be out ASAP.
Cheers,
Pakage
From all reports so far, the new wallet with Anon transactions is operating perfectly for the majority of users.
There are some people on the thread who comment that the Anon is not working for them.
From our investigation so far, it looks like the wallet is having a small issue running SSL on 32Bit Windows.
On 32Bit Windows, you will tick the box, click send and the wallet will hang for some seconds, then the transaction will not send. Normal, non anonymous transactions are fine.
As said, 64Bit Windows is operating perfectly for everyone who is trying it.
We are currently investigating the issue and will attempt to resolve it as soon as possible.
For now, if you have the choice, opt for a 64Bit operating system to run the wallet on!
If you don't have a 64 bit operating system to work with, then hold tight for the patch which will be out ASAP.
Cheers,
Pakage
THanks pakage.... now that you brought this 64/32bit OS up, I have a feeling that is the same issue with the slow wallet that's keep not responding. I'm running win7 32bit and once the wallet is open and staking it would be very slow to click different tabs inside the wallet because it would feeze for about a minute and back to normal for few seconds and cycles again. but staking is fine if i dont touch the wallet. I will try to move my wallet to a 64bit tomorrow to see if that issue is resolve.
Hello everyone,
From all reports so far, the new wallet with Anon transactions is operating perfectly for the majority of users.
There are some people on the thread who comment that the Anon is not working for them.
From our investigation so far, it looks like the wallet is having a small issue running SSL on 32Bit Windows.
On 32Bit Windows, you will tick the box, click send and the wallet will hang for some seconds, then the transaction will not send. Normal, non anonymous transactions are fine.
As said, 64Bit Windows is operating perfectly for everyone who is trying it.
We are currently investigating the issue and will attempt to resolve it as soon as possible.
For now, if you have the choice, opt for a 64Bit operating system to run the wallet on!
If you don't have a 64 bit operating system to work with, then hold tight for the patch which will be out ASAP.
Cheers,
Pakage
From all reports so far, the new wallet with Anon transactions is operating perfectly for the majority of users.
There are some people on the thread who comment that the Anon is not working for them.
From our investigation so far, it looks like the wallet is having a small issue running SSL on 32Bit Windows.
On 32Bit Windows, you will tick the box, click send and the wallet will hang for some seconds, then the transaction will not send. Normal, non anonymous transactions are fine.
As said, 64Bit Windows is operating perfectly for everyone who is trying it.
We are currently investigating the issue and will attempt to resolve it as soon as possible.
For now, if you have the choice, opt for a 64Bit operating system to run the wallet on!
If you don't have a 64 bit operating system to work with, then hold tight for the patch which will be out ASAP.
Cheers,
Pakage
Thumbs up! Thank you for quick investigation
Hello everyone,
From all reports so far, the new wallet with Anon transactions is operating perfectly for the majority of users.
There are some people on the thread who comment that the Anon is not working for them.
From our investigation so far, it looks like the wallet is having a small issue running SSL on 32Bit Windows.
On 32Bit Windows, you will tick the box, click send and the wallet will hang for some seconds, then the transaction will not send. Normal, non anonymous transactions are fine.
As said, 64Bit Windows is operating perfectly for everyone who is trying it.
We are currently investigating the issue and will attempt to resolve it as soon as possible.
For now, if you have the choice, opt for a 64Bit operating system to run the wallet on!
If you don't have a 64 bit operating system to work with, then hold tight for the patch which will be out ASAP.
Cheers,
Pakage
From all reports so far, the new wallet with Anon transactions is operating perfectly for the majority of users.
There are some people on the thread who comment that the Anon is not working for them.
From our investigation so far, it looks like the wallet is having a small issue running SSL on 32Bit Windows.
On 32Bit Windows, you will tick the box, click send and the wallet will hang for some seconds, then the transaction will not send. Normal, non anonymous transactions are fine.
As said, 64Bit Windows is operating perfectly for everyone who is trying it.
We are currently investigating the issue and will attempt to resolve it as soon as possible.
For now, if you have the choice, opt for a 64Bit operating system to run the wallet on!
If you don't have a 64 bit operating system to work with, then hold tight for the patch which will be out ASAP.
Cheers,
Pakage
@Pakage - thanks for the update. looks like the dev team is working hard on this.
Hello everyone,
From all reports so far, the new wallet with Anon transactions is operating perfectly for the majority of users.
There are some people on the thread who comment that the Anon is not working for them.
From our investigation so far, it looks like the wallet is having a small issue running SSL on 32Bit Windows.
On 32Bit Windows, you will tick the box, click send and the wallet will hang for some seconds, then the transaction will not send. Normal, non anonymous transactions are fine.
As said, 64Bit Windows is operating perfectly for everyone who is trying it.
We are currently investigating the issue and will attempt to resolve it as soon as possible.
For now, if you have the choice, opt for a 64Bit operating system to run the wallet on!
If you don't have a 64 bit operating system to work with, then hold tight for the patch which will be out ASAP.
Cheers,
Pakage
From all reports so far, the new wallet with Anon transactions is operating perfectly for the majority of users.
There are some people on the thread who comment that the Anon is not working for them.
From our investigation so far, it looks like the wallet is having a small issue running SSL on 32Bit Windows.
On 32Bit Windows, you will tick the box, click send and the wallet will hang for some seconds, then the transaction will not send. Normal, non anonymous transactions are fine.
As said, 64Bit Windows is operating perfectly for everyone who is trying it.
We are currently investigating the issue and will attempt to resolve it as soon as possible.
For now, if you have the choice, opt for a 64Bit operating system to run the wallet on!
If you don't have a 64 bit operating system to work with, then hold tight for the patch which will be out ASAP.
Cheers,
Pakage
If there is fudster still fud now most probably they are not here for the coin. They are here because of popularity of this thread and try to advertise something.
Look back history you can tell who disappear and they are quiet because they got their pot filled
Look back history you can tell who disappear and they are quiet because they got their pot filled
Navajo is dinosaur just gonna disappear.
Very soon!!! Super fool community of navajo...... There aint even one developer who can read between the lines!!! fools ... seriously fools!
Very soon!!! Super fool community of navajo......
There aint even one developer who can read between the lines!!! fools ... seriously fools!just like vior? hahahaha
Navajo is dinosaur just gonna disappear.
Very soon!!! Super fool community of navajo...... There aint even one developer who can read between the lines!!! fools ... seriously fools!
Very soon!!! Super fool community of navajo......
There aint even one developer who can read between the lines!!! fools ... seriously fools! it would be a better job if the solid supporters here doesnt put buy orders at a lower price and wait for a dump to accumulate coins and instead
eat the sell orders.
)
i admit. i dont have much btc unlike you guys. i dont even own at 100k navs as i was able to buy at 3k+ but i always buy at asking price to push the price up.
you guys say i have x amount of btc and i will use it to buy nav.
yeah you bought some navs. but you made the price go down.
i support nav and it will go to the moon! if that is so then eat the sell wall
dont put buy orders and wait for a dump
i know that is not a good move trading wise. but if you believe that this coin should be priced at higher price. then there is no problem buying at a sell wall
you may be at loss for a meantime but it will go up if you guys are right that this coin should be atleast 100k sat
geez.
just sharing my opinion.
eat the sell orders.
)i admit. i dont have much btc unlike you guys. i dont even own at 100k navs as i was able to buy at 3k+ but i always buy at asking price to push the price up.
you guys say i have x amount of btc and i will use it to buy nav.
yeah you bought some navs. but you made the price go down.
i support nav and it will go to the moon! if that is so then eat the sell wall
dont put buy orders and wait for a dump
i know that is not a good move trading wise. but if you believe that this coin should be priced at higher price. then there is no problem buying at a sell wall
you may be at loss for a meantime but it will go up if you guys are right that this coin should be atleast 100k sat
geez.
just sharing my opinion.
And if everyone did that...there would be no buy support thus less confidence in trading. Also sellers would have nothing to sell to, a market has to have both to maintain its price and push forward.
im NOT saying everyone. let there be buy support. buy support is impossible to be gone because there are many traders who are interested in nav. there will always be a buy support. newcomers,traders,average investors etc etc. they will always be there. you cant eliminate them especially day traders. but if you are one of the big supporters like for example dev team,pr team and cheerleaders if you will. Please buy at sell wall
let us say hashforce [I DONT KNOW HOW HASHFORCE ACCUMULATES COIN JUST AN EXAMPLE]
he is a solid supporter of this coin. if he gonna buy at least worth 3btc then buy at the asking price instead of putting buy orders at a lower price.
Well said Vince, we'll both send postcards from the moon stating were now heading for mars! Patience is a virtue 
Great job ninjaboon 
thanks. please spread the love around and collect good merits.
it would be a better job if the solid supporters here doesnt put buy orders at a lower price and wait for a dump to accumulate coins and instead
eat the sell orders.)
i admit. i dont have much btc unlike you guys. i dont even own at 100k navs as i was able to buy at 3k+ but i always buy at asking price to push the price up.
you guys say i have x amount of btc and i will use it to buy nav.
yeah you bought some navs. but you made the price go down.
i support nav and it will go to the moon! if that is so then eat the sell wall
dont put buy orders and wait for a dump
i know that is not a good move trading wise. but if you believe that this coin should be priced at higher price. then there is no problem buying at a sell wall
you may be at loss for a meantime but it will go up if you guys are right that this coin should be atleast 100k sat
geez.
just sharing my opinion.
eat the sell orders.
)i admit. i dont have much btc unlike you guys. i dont even own at 100k navs as i was able to buy at 3k+ but i always buy at asking price to push the price up.
you guys say i have x amount of btc and i will use it to buy nav.
yeah you bought some navs. but you made the price go down.
i support nav and it will go to the moon! if that is so then eat the sell wall
dont put buy orders and wait for a dump
i know that is not a good move trading wise. but if you believe that this coin should be priced at higher price. then there is no problem buying at a sell wall
you may be at loss for a meantime but it will go up if you guys are right that this coin should be atleast 100k sat
geez.
just sharing my opinion.
And if everyone did that...there would be no buy support thus less confidence in trading. Also sellers would have nothing to sell to, a market has to have both to maintain its price and push forward.
it would be a better job if the solid supporters here doesnt put buy orders at a lower price and wait for a dump to accumulate coins and instead
eat the sell orders.)
i admit. i dont have much btc unlike you guys. i dont even own at 100k navs as i was able to buy at 3k+ but i always buy at asking price to push the price up.
you guys say i have x amount of btc and i will use it to buy nav.
yeah you bought some navs. but you made the price go down.
i support nav and it will go to the moon! if that is so then eat the sell wall
dont put buy orders and wait for a dump
i know that is not a good move trading wise. but if you believe that this coin should be priced at higher price. then there is no problem buying at a sell wall
you may be at loss for a meantime but it will go up if you guys are right that this coin should be atleast 100k sat
geez.
just sharing my opinion.
eat the sell orders.
)i admit. i dont have much btc unlike you guys. i dont even own at 100k navs as i was able to buy at 3k+ but i always buy at asking price to push the price up.
you guys say i have x amount of btc and i will use it to buy nav.
yeah you bought some navs. but you made the price go down.
i support nav and it will go to the moon! if that is so then eat the sell wall
dont put buy orders and wait for a dump
i know that is not a good move trading wise. but if you believe that this coin should be priced at higher price. then there is no problem buying at a sell wall
you may be at loss for a meantime but it will go up if you guys are right that this coin should be atleast 100k sat
geez.
just sharing my opinion.
Great job ninjaboon
Even Pakistan is on the map (1.44%) A third world country with a first world military.. I salute you! to all the Pakistani's reading this.. fill up your Bittrex accounts!
THE NAVAJO COIN NETWORK
A third world country with a first world military.. I salute you! to all the Pakistani's reading this.. fill up your Bittrex accounts!THE NAVAJO COIN NETWORK
must be from my network. told the guys back 2 weeks ago about NAV.
Even Pakistan is on the map (1.44%) A third world country with a first world military.. I salute you! to all the Pakistani's reading this.. fill up your Bittrex accounts!
THE NAVAJO COIN NETWORK
A third world country with a first world military.. I salute you! to all the Pakistani's reading this.. fill up your Bittrex accounts!THE NAVAJO COIN NETWORK
Jump to: