(...)
Previous wallets will no longer function at that point. Even if an older wallet is coded with the new pchmessage, all blocks generated by it will be rejected and a small percentage of its sent transactions will actually be accepted (due to DER encoding).
(...)
I am still not sure what truely happens here. To everyone here: The old members do get more and more quiet, as there is heavy (and plausible) uncertainty, what will happen to existing funds (despite that ones of one person) in the future.
Shortly: Just why should ANYONE ELSE look at this inception as it would be an improvement?
I only am citing from the above:
Quote
"Previous wallets will no longer function at that point. Even if an older wallet is coded with the new pchmessage, all blocks generated by it will be rejected and a small percentage of its sent transactions will actually be accepted (due to DER encoding)."
Now: What is the implication that should be a benefit to NDL-Holders, is this a win-win case or another robbery?
So far there has not been a single positive argument for the less negative cases, so I still don't know what to think about it, - and because of that: Please everyone do your own dd.
Greez.
n.
PPS: By the way, my announcement of sending 30 Million NDL to someone who creates an up to date wallet for this coin is still alive. It only should be a benefit for everyone involved benefitely ... so, perhaps we will have two chains in near future.
The only difference is that if you are mining you have to mine with the new wallet. If you have funds in an old wallet they are safe.
If you want to CPU mine now instead of just dropping to the console and typing setgenerate true, you have to put in a conf file and run a CPU miner.
If you were mining with a video card nothing has changed.
-Dave
]