Topic: [ANN] NoirShares UPDATE REQUIRED Advanced Features✔, Unique PoW✔ - page 27. (Read 69978 times)

LOL , its out of date by two or three entries, and it has a simple lay out that details who invested what , EVERYONE THAT INVESTED KNOWS THAT IS THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT SO STOP MISDIRECTING

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxCtiOzdwvPya2ZZY1RzeUlzWlk/edit?usp=sharing

has a few small changes to it but it's lay out is complicated, don't try to use that as a way of getting your point across.

Use blockchain info and do the math


NO don't try to misdirect the issue, in this document :- https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxCtiOzdwvPya2ZZY1RzeUlzWlk/edit?usp=sharing there is a page specifically tracking the prices. So dont throw your arbitrary numbers lets use the facts!


Estimate right?
 


All the documents are linked here so stop just saying things, i am using facts and figures not ideas and supposition.


I am providing documented proof, using the same documents as you. yet you choose to go outside that and make guesstimates, Use facts.

You are using an outdated GF ledger.

I have already listed that account. I also figured out that only 1.2BTCish worth of NRS was paid to the WHOLE group. 7k NRS...thats the total payout.

I don't think you read my post if you think only 4 BTC is missing.

Yes you are right, I believe that the CDO (current dev of SSD) could have done MUCH more. As well as any officer still around.


I think you put too many transactions up. In the six that you linked there is much more than 33 BTC. If you bought your own miner please separate it from that group.


This is way off. First of all that document is out of date. Use Logans. Logan had a page that tracked the price of NRS for each purchase on poloniex. Do the math, the average price at the time was more around .00008 BTC. The NRS was worth 11.9205333703 BTC, there is no getting around that. Check poloniex guys. Barwizi just guessed at .00004 NRS.



You estimate that duty and taxes were 6.5 BTC in your own accounting. You repaid yourself several times. Get the receipts.




I recall you bragging about free electricity. Once again, get receipts.


You repaid yourself from the miners according to your own document. The cost of hosting was paid by two of the miners, not paid out of your pocket.




It cost 3.0 BTC.




The PTS were worth 4.7749 BTC. Guys he is just guessing at the value of the coins. Check the charts and Logans document.


At the end of the day, even if we use barwizi's inflated figures he ended up with way too much of our BTC. We aren't even at the premine/missing mining op BTC yet.

edited: We came to 42.8 bitcoin. means still 10 bitcoin to account for, of which he says 7 btc is paid in taxes. I am tended to believe that (living in a country where that happens also if you order from a foreign country, but he also has to do accounting with exact figures, not with just about figures. If this is a Distributed Autonomous Company the accounting for the figures must be exact.
And in my country, if I had a company, I would be able to deduct the 7 BTC from my later to be paid taxes again, so I would actually not pay the taxes. So it is still to be seen if the 7 bitcoin might be deducted from the total value or not.
So then still 10 or 3 bitcoin to account for.

mh I have no connections, which wallet do you use?

barwizi is right

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0ENIPCOaLvNdXZvbHA5OFpTQlk/edit?usp=sharing

I had an updated slated for today , but the earlier heated conversation has me tired, i have decided to roll up today's updates with tomorrows.  Once i release the next update, there will be no risk of losing coins mined up to the release and balances from the previous chain as i will place new checkpoints. 

It would be my recommendation as a bystander that you don't mint with your wallet during the Alpha code phase.

Instead, if you want to participate in mining new coins (and minting them), you do it will an empty wallet, that has no passphrase and is not locked.

I own NRS in the snapshot myself, and I haven't imported my keys until the code is at least beta and more stable.

Right now I have new wallet (with no passphrase) that has less than 10 newly mined NRS in it, and that's what I'm using for the time being.

The decision was not made by me, i was told to do the change by the other officers, as they thought it would be profitable.
 Yes it could have been a group decision.  I'll get the login details.

My client is synced at block 1707 so far. Since there is no block explorer, I'm assuming this is the correct chain?

I'm getting some 2.2222 but when when I was on a bad chain fork before, I did see 22.2222 a couple times.

Reading Chocobo's post you said you could have earned 20 BTC in curecoin, but that the pool has taken (stolen) our curecoins.
Could you please provide us with the name of the pool our curecoins were supposed to be mined?
Apart from that do you agree that the decision to mine something else than BTC should have been made by the whole GF, not only by you?

using 4670k ( 4 core ) been running about 12 hours

I have spoken about that many times, here and in skype.

Please do, there is indeed another address that was mined to , give me a sec to find it


edit:- found https://blockchain.info/address/1PfS1BM8radJj3b2mR6bCEzJ26uZkJU3NK

That account is controlled by our recently returned CFO.

There was a point where we mined BTC and bought NRS for distribution to the group, for that part, Koontas and NRSLogan will have to speak.

As for the rest, i kept buying NRS which i still hold, and it will be distributed to GF member once we leave alpha NRS 2.0.

Yes we do, in your interest also that all is solved
and BTW what about if it was your 4 BTC that was lost?
We don't know how much was lost we are trying to find out. It is not a private matter, it concerns more than 25 GF fund members.

Well, I like to tackle all at once so:
These are the addresses that was mined to:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Nf7PswAM87DWXfRLWxVVTjb8BYK3qfQuS
https://blockchain.info/address/1J3hLEGDTLHvXgLzJUNggZCr2AWeA8wywi

You say that in the first address there was 8.86 BTC mined and to the second address 3.84 which totals 12.70 BTC.
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nf7PswAM87DWXfRLWxVVTjb8BYK3qfQuS
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1J3hLEGDTLHvXgLzJUNggZCr2AWeA8wywi

If there was only mined to the addresses there would be 12.70 according to your information right?

If you look in the blockchain you can see that the first address had 29.29 BTC and the second 5.13 which totals 34.42. I have been looking at the mining part of those addresses and left out all the round figures and big figures (which I think are not mined) and indeed I think around between 12 and 14 BTC was mined to those addresses. So for that the accounting must be right (considered you used only those addresses to mine).
Still you did not inform us about the mining operation not going well, so you have not been doing a good job at it while we trusted you with it.
I will do some research if there is a possibility there was mined into other addresses we don't know about.
How do you account for the periods:
april 2014-22/5
24/7-17/8
23/6-23/7

unless someone actively modifies the old NRS miner and a pool, t's likely going to remain solo mineable. I actually like it that way, pools cause centralization and when there is a fork, they tend to cause massive losses.

I am now pushing the last GUI  changes and will test them shortly. Friday should be beta and by then the exchanges will be on the new chain.

I found a couple 222.222, some 22.222 and plenty of 2.222. So far no 2222.2222 but I'm hoping for at least one while we can solo.