Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] NoirShares UPDATE REQUIRED Advanced Features✔, Unique PoW✔ - page 28. (Read 69978 times)

legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
is any one find block payout larger then 2.2222 i have found 10 of them and nothing more Sad

How many cores are you using?

i got one 222.22 and a lot of 2.222
hero member
Activity: 599
Merit: 500
is any one find block payout larger then 2.2222 i have found 10 of them and nothing more Sad
hero member
Activity: 599
Merit: 500
can we please keep this private or on IRC , we don't need to qoute every huge post  and flood the fourm

seam like alot of work went into creating that post , i think your hard work would of been better spent trying to help the community other then destroying it

every one that invested knew the risk ,,,, you are talking about a missing 4 BTC  or less ,,, who really give a shit

legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Your math gives total shares, but like i pointed out,  It was a declaration on my part that 10000 NRS == 1 BTC == 1 Share, but that was not the price on the market was it? So we cannot assume that there is investment worth 50 BTC. The investment total was worth

29 BTC + 157 k NRB and 167k NRS +447 PTS (corrected)

Which at market price then was 29 BTC + 1.8 BTC + ~ 8 BTC and 4 BTC.

The SHARES are 50 but the VALUE is much less that your proposed 49 BTC

So what you are trying to tell me is that 29+1.8+8+4= 42.8 BTC is much less than 49.81 BTC, with your perceived value. Still even if I would take this into account 42.8 BTC is still a lot more than the around 32, maybe 33 BTC that was payed for the 5 miners!

Let's put the sarcasm aside a little and look at the facts. The shares are nearly 50 and their value, if you wish is 43 BTC (rounder numbers for ease)
 
Immediately remove the cost of the miners 33 BTC customs and taxes 7 BTC and the first two months electricity and the entire investment is gone.

Please confirm or reject with a reason.

Explain taxes

the miners were sent to me, as a result on their arrival i had to pay import taxes or "customs duty" as it is called in other countries. As you know, no country accepts BTC for such payments, meaning i had to pay it in fiat, if you are lucky enough to not live in a country with such regulation lucky  you. :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff if you were asking what it is exactly .

So taxes are paid in BTC nowadays? How much in dollars (exact) was it. Could you upload a copy of the customs duty bill (you can leave out the private information)?
Another question popping up: How much you say the mining operation has made (without extracting the costs)?

The mining operation has been a failure,  and i said it before. mined under my control is maybe 17 BTC. Before we jump to that part, let's stay on track with the firt part of accounting so that we can clear it first then move on to other issues.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Your math gives total shares, but like i pointed out,  It was a declaration on my part that 10000 NRS == 1 BTC == 1 Share, but that was not the price on the market was it? So we cannot assume that there is investment worth 50 BTC. The investment total was worth

29 BTC + 157 k NRB and 167k NRS +447 PTS (corrected)

Which at market price then was 29 BTC + 1.8 BTC + ~ 8 BTC and 4 BTC.

The SHARES are 50 but the VALUE is much less that your proposed 49 BTC

So what you are trying to tell me is that 29+1.8+8+4= 42.8 BTC is much less than 49.81 BTC, with your perceived value. Still even if I would take this into account 42.8 BTC is still a lot more than the around 32, maybe 33 BTC that was payed for the 5 miners!

Let's put the sarcasm aside a little and look at the facts. The shares are nearly 50 and their value, if you wish is 43 BTC (rounder numbers for ease)
 
Immediately remove the cost of the miners 33 BTC customs and taxes 7 BTC and the first two months electricity and the entire investment is gone.

Please confirm or reject with a reason.

Explain taxes

the miners were sent to me, as a result on their arrival i had to pay import taxes or "customs duty" as it is called in other countries. As you know, no country accepts BTC for such payments, meaning i had to pay it in fiat, if you are lucky enough to not live in a country with such regulation lucky  you. :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff if you were asking what it is exactly .

So taxes are paid in BTC nowadays? How much in dollars (exact) was it. Could you upload a copy of the customs duty bill (you can leave out the private information)?
Another question popping up: How much you say the mining operation has made (without extracting the costs)?

Quote
So taxes are paid in BTC nowadays?


Quote
meaning i had to pay it in fiat

If you are not going to least read, it becomes a moot conversation since you will keep dismissing what i say. Later today i will upload a redacted scanned copy .
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
Your math gives total shares, but like i pointed out,  It was a declaration on my part that 10000 NRS == 1 BTC == 1 Share, but that was not the price on the market was it? So we cannot assume that there is investment worth 50 BTC. The investment total was worth

29 BTC + 157 k NRB and 167k NRS +447 PTS (corrected)

Which at market price then was 29 BTC + 1.8 BTC + ~ 8 BTC and 4 BTC.

The SHARES are 50 but the VALUE is much less that your proposed 49 BTC

So what you are trying to tell me is that 29+1.8+8+4= 42.8 BTC is much less than 49.81 BTC, with your perceived value. Still even if I would take this into account 42.8 BTC is still a lot more than the around 32, maybe 33 BTC that was payed for the 5 miners!

Let's put the sarcasm aside a little and look at the facts. The shares are nearly 50 and their value, if you wish is 43 BTC (rounder numbers for ease)
 
Immediately remove the cost of the miners 33 BTC customs and taxes 7 BTC and the first two months electricity and the entire investment is gone.

Please confirm or reject with a reason.

Explain taxes

the miners were sent to me, as a result on their arrival i had to pay import taxes or "customs duty" as it is called in other countries. As you know, no country accepts BTC for such payments, meaning i had to pay it in fiat, if you are lucky enough to not live in a country with such regulation lucky  you. :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff if you were asking what it is exactly .

So taxes are paid in BTC nowadays? How much in dollars (exact) was it. Could you upload a copy of the customs duty bill (you can leave out the private information)?
Another question popping up: How much you say the mining operation has made (without extracting the costs)?
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Your math gives total shares, but like i pointed out,  It was a declaration on my part that 10000 NRS == 1 BTC == 1 Share, but that was not the price on the market was it? So we cannot assume that there is investment worth 50 BTC. The investment total was worth

29 BTC + 157 k NRB and 167k NRS +447 PTS (corrected)

Which at market price then was 29 BTC + 1.8 BTC + ~ 8 BTC and 4 BTC.

The SHARES are 50 but the VALUE is much less that your proposed 49 BTC

So what you are trying to tell me is that 29+1.8+8+4= 42.8 BTC is much less than 49.81 BTC, with your perceived value. Still even if I would take this into account 42.8 BTC is still a lot more than the around 32, maybe 33 BTC that was payed for the 5 miners!

Let's put the sarcasm aside a little and look at the facts. The shares are nearly 50 and their value, if you wish is 43 BTC (rounder numbers for ease)
 
Immediately remove the cost of the miners 33 BTC customs and taxes 7 BTC and the first two months electricity and the entire investment is gone.

Please confirm or reject with a reason.

Explain taxes

the miners were sent to me, as a result on their arrival i had to pay import taxes or "customs duty" as it is called in other countries. As you know, no country accepts BTC for such payments, meaning i had to pay it in fiat, if you are lucky enough to not live in a country with such regulation lucky  you. :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff if you were asking what it is exactly .
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
Your math gives total shares, but like i pointed out,  It was a declaration on my part that 10000 NRS == 1 BTC == 1 Share, but that was not the price on the market was it? So we cannot assume that there is investment worth 50 BTC. The investment total was worth

29 BTC + 157 k NRB and 167k NRS +447 PTS (corrected)

Which at market price then was 29 BTC + 1.8 BTC + ~ 8 BTC and 4 BTC.

The SHARES are 50 but the VALUE is much less that your proposed 49 BTC

So what you are trying to tell me is that 29+1.8+8+4= 42.8 BTC is much less than 49.81 BTC, with your perceived value. Still even if I would take this into account 42.8 BTC is still a lot more than the around 32, maybe 33 BTC that was payed for the 5 miners!
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000

So, if we look at the total investment of

Quote
A total of 28.95 BTC invested
A total of 157k NRB  invested
A total of 165k NRS invested

There is a BTC short fall of 4.0155 BTC

So since the BTC is not enough, we add the NRB

Which was valued at 1.831395349 BTC

leaving us with a short fall of 2.1842 BTC


Took me some time to read the accounting through, but one thing I can say: The accounting of 28.95 BTC totally invested is wrong. I have been looking at the Excelsheet, and see this sum: =SUM(H4:H42). In colum H only 0.15 BTC is stated for my account. But in column L you see I gave another 0.11 BTC on April 11th. That one was not counted in the total in colum H and you are referring to cell H47 for the total, but that is not the total total of BTC that has been given. My guess is that cell I47 to O47 also must be counted. Likewise I guess for PTS, NRS and NRB.
So there was more than you say there was.

You are right, it gives us a total of 29.05000255 BTC , sorry the NRB and NRS remain unchanged. And i forgot about the PTS.

So that means i need to add an additional 0.2 BTC and 3.67 BTC (for the PTS ) to what i have to account for.

I'll add that now.



I did this =SUM(E47:AH47) that gave me 49.81 BTC invested (total value of PTS, BTC, NRS and NRB that were donated)
If I am wrong, tell me what I did wrong, but for me you got 49.81 BTC!!!!

Your math gives total shares, but like i pointed out,  It was a declaration on my part that 10000 NRS == 1 BTC == 1 Share, but that was not the price on the market was it? So we cannot assume that there is investment worth 50 BTC. The investment total was worth

29 BTC + 157 k NRB and 167k NRS +447 PTS (corrected)

Which at market price then was 29 BTC + 1.8 BTC + ~ 8 BTC and 4 BTC.

The SHARES are 50 but the VALUE is much less that your proposed 49 BTC
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250

So, if we look at the total investment of

Quote
A total of 28.95 BTC invested
A total of 157k NRB  invested
A total of 165k NRS invested

There is a BTC short fall of 4.0155 BTC

So since the BTC is not enough, we add the NRB

Which was valued at 1.831395349 BTC

leaving us with a short fall of 2.1842 BTC


Took me some time to read the accounting through, but one thing I can say: The accounting of 28.95 BTC totally invested is wrong. I have been looking at the Excelsheet, and see this sum: =SUM(H4:H42). In colum H only 0.15 BTC is stated for my account. But in column L you see I gave another 0.11 BTC on April 11th. That one was not counted in the total in colum H and you are referring to cell H47 for the total, but that is not the total total of BTC that has been given. My guess is that cell I47 to O47 also must be counted. Likewise I guess for PTS, NRS and NRB.
So there was more than you say there was.

You are right, it gives us a total of 29.05000255 BTC , sorry the NRB and NRS remain unchanged. And i forgot about the PTS.

So that means i need to add an additional 0.2 BTC and 3.67 BTC (for the PTS ) to what i have to account for.

I'll add that now.



I did this =SUM(E47:AH47) that gave me 49.81 BTC invested (total value of PTS, BTC, NRS and NRB that were donated)
If I am wrong, tell me what I did wrong, but for me you got 49.81 BTC!!!!
Oh wait, that was exactly the amount Chocobo was referring to!
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1000
ORB has a good chance to grow.
it sounds correct what barwizi said. I look accourate later 
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
I think the simple thing has been making be complicate.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 568
Received the PM.
I'm also curious what's going on?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1000
ORB has a good chance to grow.
thank you very much chocobo, was not easy. this is bad news!

I'm curious what he says !?
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
I have finished reviewing the finances of NG. Logan, the current CFO of NG, has been missing for quite some time now and I finally decided to just do his job for him. I only wish I had done it sooner. Simply put there is a lot of money missing.

First, let me share with you all of the accounting documents I received from the group as well as the NG officer board Skype chat.


[4/28/2014 4:34:47 PM] Pocket: The General Fund is currently sitting on a small stack of BTC and a relatively large stack of NRS. A vote will be passed around to help determine our next plan of action with group funds.


I believe that investors were told the same in a newsletter. Barwizi stated to me earlier that all of the GF went to the miners. Obviously this wasn't true.


[9/11/2014 9:02:03 PM] Chocobo: also who is root_1?
[9/11/2014 9:02:41 PM] Noir X: root tends to pop up when i need him
[9/11/2014 9:03:03 PM] Noir X: i will ask if he finally got a new BCT account
[9/11/2014 9:03:21 PM] Chocobo: he have an old one?
[9/11/2014 9:05:31 PM] Noir X: i'll ask
[9/11/2014 9:06:59 PM] Noir X: i found him on stackexchange when i asked for c++ help
[9/11/2014 9:07:21 PM] Chocobo: what did you pay 79k NRS to him for?
[9/11/2014 9:07:40 PM] Noir X: hold
[9/11/2014 9:07:43 PM] Noir X: on
[9/11/2014 9:09:20 PM] Noir X: i was getting weird seg faults when compiling on linux, he helped me fix that, he also helped me modify the internal miner to correctly find blocks for NRS
[9/11/2014 9:09:56 PM] Noir X: his actual was meant to be ~50k
[9/11/2014 9:10:09 PM] Noir X: right at the start
[9/11/2014 9:11:04 PM] Chocobo: so was supposed to get 50k in feb
[9/11/2014 9:11:21 PM] Chocobo: but got 79k in march
[9/11/2014 9:11:50 PM] Noir X: yeah, the rest was to try keep him around for his talents
[9/11/2014 9:12:00 PM] Noir X: it would have been nice
[9/11/2014 9:12:42 PM] Noir X: like having a proffesional coder
[9/11/2014 9:12:56 PM] Chocobo: have his stack exchange?


He has not located root_1 yet, or found his stack exchange account. He says this information was on a hard drive that needs to be recovered. The amount root_1 was paid is suspiciously close to the 80k barwizi paid himself. The 79.2k NRS root_1 was paid was worth about 10.488 BTC on the dates of his payments and corresponds heavily to a dump on poloniex around that time. root_1 was paid a ridiculous amount for the work he did.

Another gaping hole in barwizi's accounting is a period around the launch of NRS that he sold premine NRS for .00085-.001 BTC per NRS. Here is proof that it occurred:


[3:45:03 PM] Chocobo: the other thing you need to find is do u remember when you were selling NRS for .00085-.001 BTC per from the premine?
[3:45:07 PM] Noir X: we even made a different implementation that may end up as part of any new poject that comes up
[3:45:16 PM] Noir X: yes
[3:45:52 PM] Chocobo: it looks like you sold around 43861.58 NRS
[3:46:01 PM] Noir X: yes
[3:46:02 PM] Chocobo: thats a lot of BTC
[3:46:05 PM] Noir X: i think
[3:46:19 PM] Noir X: but not all of it was at that price
[3:46:24 PM] Noir X: i think
[3:46:25 PM] Chocobo: you were entitled to 30-43 BTC in that way?
[3:46:31 PM] Chocobo: from the company fund
[3:46:38 PM] Noir X: that was long before there was any noir group
[3:46:50 PM] Noir X: that was when it was , Barwizi + new coin
[3:46:58 PM] Chocobo: there was NG
[3:47:05 PM] Chocobo: i have the thread
[3:47:23 PM] Noir X: yeah and who was i working with at that time?
[3:47:32 PM] Chocobo: omg dude how much BTC did NRS that you didnt own make you
[3:47:39 PM] Noir X: actually, lets stay on course
[3:47:47 PM] Noir X: so you wish to know what happened to the BTC ?
[3:48:04 PM] Chocobo: what BTC?
[3:48:52 PM] Noir X: i traded for any alt , then traded to BTC
[3:49:03 PM] Chocobo: yeah
[3:49:06 PM] Chocobo: still BTC
[3:49:11 PM] Noir X: you just mentioned the NRS i sold in the beginning
[3:49:26 PM] Noir X: well, most of it is undocumented


This really bothered me. He didn't even try to deny that he made that much BTC selling parts of the premine. He also claimed NG wasn't around yet. It was, and there are about 4 threads that document it. Makes me think he sold more than 43k NRS.

Later on he tells Logan this:

Quote
[7:57:59 AM] Barwizi: when none was forthcoming, i went as far as selling NRS at a discounted rate, all of this is documented in the firts ANN i made for NRS on both forums

Discounted? More like far above the all time high.

Next up is the accounting of the mining operation. Here are the only addresses I found that were mined to:


Quote


The total BTC mined to these addresses is 10.42958901. Far below the estimated 32.9448 BTC they should have mined. How much of this BTC have investors received? The total NRS payed out to investors as a whole was 7851.104578454333 NRS, which likely cost around 1.3 BTC to acquire around the time of the payouts. Barwizi made a document that attempted to explain where this BTC went. The document is at the top of this post, it is the one titled 'BTC accounting.xslx'. This document is riddled with flaws and inconsistencies. The first being the cost of the multipool. It really cost 3 BTC, not 3.5 BTC. Here are the transactions to the company NG hired:


Quote
753a5e7e5f828c447079b5efb0178731e562317f108602e95ea6448273791c9e
8d29d09e48c7b8aa5b811db7156c016df8df2867704b475ad0286bddfceab874


As you can see barwizi reimbursed himself in two payments here. The first being 3 BTC for the duty on the miners. Interestingly enough this is the third time he is reimbursed for duty. The first being when he decided the remaining 17.86287885850416 BTC worth of assets in the GF were his (about 3x the 6.5 BTC cost of duty, even though that price of the duty has not been proven). The second being a 0.57 BTC share added to his name on the registry noted 'Customs'. The third being the massive amount of BTC he made off of the premine. Then there is the row 'Partial re-inbursment of Costs' where he pays himself 2 BTC more for whatever reason.

On the launch of Cure Coin barwizi switched the miners to a pool that was mining curecoin. He claims to have left the coins on there instead of doing an auto-payout (rookie mistake...too rookie) and before he went to withdrawal the pool owners ran with the coin.


Quote
[9/3/2014 3:07:41 PM] Barwizi: yeah Sad
[9/3/2014 3:08:02 PM] Barwizi: if they hadnt held our curecoin that would have been +20 BTC


To get 20 BTC worth of curecoin the miners would have had to been running for quite sometime. During this time he wouldn't even ask an officer to withdraw these coins or at least keep an eye on the operation? It is very hard to believe. Especially when you see officers asking for control of the miners several times in the board chat. This stubbornness to keep the operation in his own hands after having the miners down 2/3rd's of the time only reinforces the idea that he was using the miners for himself. It is either that or gross mismanagement after receiving our near 50 BTC in investments.

Here is the pastebin of me confronting barwizi over all this missing money:


Quote


Quote
[1:31:44 PM] Chocobo: ok well the GF should have a shitload more in it
[1:32:09 PM] Noir X: from where?
[1:32:35 PM] Chocobo: 157500 NRB, 474.99 PTS, 167112.76 NRS
[1:32:41 PM] Chocobo: from the shares
[1:32:47 PM] Noir X: ALL of that is mine
[1:32:56 PM] Chocobo: there was enough BTC to pay for the miners
[1:33:06 PM] Chocobo: the rest belongs to the GF
[1:33:14 PM] Noir X: No there was not
[1:34:05 PM] Noir X: Entire GF investment went into miners
[1:34:11 PM] Chocobo: no lol
[1:34:35 PM] Chocobo: how much BTC was in the GF shares on your accounting of it
[1:35:21 PM] Noir X: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhCtiOzdwvPydEdVS21zTlptWjVGZkgxeDhxMUlzY3c&usp=drive_web
[1:35:35 PM] Noir X: that is the original doc
[1:35:52 PM] Chocobo: thats out of date
[1:35:59 PM] Chocobo: there are 50ish shares
[1:36:07 PM] Chocobo: and even by that account
[1:36:12 PM] Chocobo: there was 27 BTC
[1:36:33 PM] Chocobo: you dont get the rest of it as a tip for ordering


Quote
[3:31:50 PM] Chocobo: why didnt you record the 80k in the premine accounting document?
[3:32:27 PM] Noir X: because it ceased to be part of the premine when i took it
[3:32:40 PM] Chocobo: um no it didnt
[3:32:48 PM] Chocobo: thats not how it works
[3:32:56 PM] Chocobo: 80k went to you
[3:32:59 PM] Chocobo: record it


Quote
[3:45:03 PM] Chocobo: the other thing you need to find is do u remember when you were selling NRS for .00085-.001 BTC per from the premine?
[3:45:07 PM] Noir X: we even made a different implementation that may end up as part of any new poject that comes up
[3:45:16 PM] Noir X: yes
[3:45:52 PM] Chocobo: it looks like you sold around 43861.58 NRS
[3:46:01 PM] Noir X: yes
[3:46:02 PM] Chocobo: thats a lot of BTC
[3:46:05 PM] Noir X: i think
[3:46:19 PM] Noir X: but not all of it was at that price
[3:46:24 PM] Noir X: i think
[3:46:25 PM] Chocobo: you were entitled to 30-43 BTC in that way?
[3:46:31 PM] Chocobo: from the company fund
[3:46:38 PM] Noir X: that was long before there was any noir group
[3:46:50 PM] Noir X: that was when it was , Barwizi + new coin
[3:46:58 PM] Chocobo: there was NG
[3:47:05 PM] Chocobo: i have the thread
[3:47:23 PM] Noir X: yeah and who was i working with at that time?
[3:47:32 PM] Chocobo: omg dude how much BTC did NRS that you didnt own make you
[3:47:39 PM] Noir X: actually, lets stay on course
[3:47:47 PM] Noir X: so you wish to know what happened to the BTC ?
[3:48:04 PM] Chocobo: what BTC?
[3:48:52 PM] Noir X: i traded for any alt , then traded to BTC
[3:49:03 PM] Chocobo: yeah
[3:49:06 PM] Chocobo: still BTC
[3:49:11 PM] Noir X: you just mentioned the NRS i sold in the beginning
[3:49:26 PM] Noir X: well, most of it is undocumented


Quote
[3:53:09 PM] Noir X: do you know that we maintain a paid Github account? Or that we have had servers (two expired , we have 2 left) for the greater part of the year ?
[3:53:52 PM] Noir X: We had at a point 6 permanent nodes to kep the network up, which were paid for using BTC i got from selling PTS i got from the LTB guy
[3:54:30 PM] Noir X: even now, where do you think the server that did the snapshots came from?
[3:55:17 PM] Noir X: We got a lot of publicity in the beginning which was not free, but none of those costs were mentined
[3:55:49 PM] Noir X: even now i can give you access to one of the servers that has the beginnings of an exchange
[3:55:53 PM] Chocobo: what did you pay for publicity and through who?
[3:56:38 PM] Noir X: hell if i know, i can look through the pms and on the other forums
[3:56:48 PM] Noir X: you know that we had a forum ?
[3:57:06 PM] Noir X: dont you wonder where all that infrastructure came from ?
[3:57:31 PM] Chocobo: yeah noirbitstalk?


A few things about this last quote. A github paid account is $7 a month. We didn't even have one the whole time. The servers were not for a greater part of the year, as NG hasn't been around for a year. As for the servers and the forum, they are inexpensive and I know one of them is paid for by an officer. This 'justification' should make you sick. Barwizi likely ended up with AT LEAST 50-100 BTC that should of belonged to the GF. With the NRS price after a month the GF would have been very well off and able to fund actual projects.

This conversation was had before I finished my accounting, so some of the numbers were not figured out. The numbers I posted here are more accurate.


Barwizi has had months to prove expenses, and try and justify all of this. The fact of the matter is than even if there were 20 BTC of legit expenses that I didn't find he still took a TON of BTC from us. I don't even feel like looking at what these funds were worth when NRS held a 30k sats price. He lied to us as investors. A 'ground-breaking' feature was always two weeks away. While we bought in anticipation he dumped on us. You may have seen my disappointment in the quality of work done by our officers. Now that I reviewed all of this I realized that he contributed to their failure by keeping the funds away from them and in the dark as far as development goes. The officers failed, no doubt, but they tried.

I will be stepping down from COO. Don't worry, I was never paid and will never accept payment. I really didn't start working until a month ago, and most of my time was spent working up a redesign/relaunch for NRB and NRS as well as a full marketing plan. My work was ruined when barwizi decided to announce a merge without so much as asking me. He did this because he wasn't capable of developing a feature we planned for NRB. It is a shame this didn't work, I was very excited to work on a decentralized company, and my next order of business was to COMPLETELY re-brand NRS. I was going to make it simple. I also had my brother help barwizi program for free, and was going to bring on a second programmer/web designer. These two are good, they could have done the code barwizi couldn't.

If you are not aware barwizi launched a side project today:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/notice-project-x-come-join-the-movement-791338

He launches this while Noirshares is in between a blockchain swap and in shambles. You can't even trade the new NRB/NRS because the markets are on the old chain. His new project really pissed me off today. Here is what he had to say:

Quote
it's irritating to say the least that you think i am in some way tied to NG, i chose to stick with it and do NRS 2.90 as well as colored coins (project X), Antimatter aka XUC is in no way a part of NG. and you want to complain yet it is already in the list of coins participating.

With the amount of BTC he took I sure hope he feels some obligation to deliver on his promises to us.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
GF members please check your emails
Any GF member, Barwizi: was this important?

Not all of us have given email addresses.
hero member
Activity: 599
Merit: 500
sorry but when is the new DAC coming , in the old NRS thread is said "coming very soon"

i dont understand why NRS was stop POW , and made only POS  => then  merge with NRB ( that shit was dead and fail) => no POW  with CPU only. * which wont take long until is GPU again)
honestly  we should of left it alone ,,, let the miner mine .... the trader trade ...... and build up
Not stop and tare every thing apart.


can you  please update the web site , or turn it off , as all the information is wrong from the old NRS , wallet , info ,


sorry , but this all seam like where in shamble and don't know what going on
hero member
Activity: 599
Merit: 500
sorry i dont understand why we  are now mining , is this coin POW or POS

can we use the same PTS/NRS nan miner to solo ?


that miner will not work, modified to make it CPU only again , with internal miner.

that mean it going to be raped buy AWS whales ?  

so it still POS , i cant see in the OP that is POS  or interest rate , but i see that the wallet has "stakecoin"

also i am still getting " Connecting to IRC" is this a on going problem and need to be fix , or am i doing some thing wrong
hero member
Activity: 599
Merit: 500
sorry i dont understand why we  are now mining , is this coin POW or POS

can we use the same PTS/NRS nan miner to solo ?


that miner will not work, modified to make it CPU only again , with internal miner.

that mean it going to be raped buy AWS whales ? 
Pages:
Jump to: