Dev - when you refer to "we will look into this"... who is that? Are there more than one developer on this project? Who is your support base/team? Because up to this moment the whole community thinks you are the only developer and if there are more people involved then we are wrong to place all the blame of inaction solely on you.
Two days ago, you came back into this forum and said you would be back doing updates and things that evening. Two days have passed, nothing done. The forum is slammed with spam, the OP has not been updated, and no progress has been made in any direction. There are a ton of people (skilled and knowledgeable) in this community who can step up and help. But since you hold the premine pursestrings, it MUST be you who asks for help and delegates projects.
If you think I'm being harsh, you completely misunderstand the situation. I'm trying to bring some reality to the discussion. This coin is dead unless you are more active or delegate the activity. And if we have to WAIT on you to make a decision about something that is good for the coin and the community, both will die. The crypto world moves at light speed, and if you don't have the time, energy, dedication, and commitment... then the crypto world will pass by this coin.
There are people in this community that can throw considerable amounts of hashing power towards the coin (just ask some of the pool operators what they see).
There are people in the community that are good with promotions and marketing.
There are people in this community that are good with community support.
There are people in this community that are good with code.
But you are personally sitting on the premine and not using it to promote, support, and expand the coin.
Here's an example in case people think I'm simply attacking the dev. (Which I'm not, I'm fighting for the success of the coin.) When a coin finally makes it to a popular exchange, it then becomes the target of the multipools and groups that have MASSIVE hashing power. So much power that they can essentially harvest all the coins and leave the "community" with low coin income and super high difficulty. Many coins already have had to PAY the multipools and groups to STAY AWAY from their coin while it was in the process of growing and in order to give those coin developers the time to update and modify the source code in order to survive the onslaught of these large hashing power groups. Does anyone think the Dev, in his current commitment to the coin, can quickly turn on a dime, address the code modifications needed, push out updates, get on the phone with multipool owners, and negotiate and settlement deal to make sure the coin survives? Anyone? This is something that I fear for the coin if a structure for managing the coin isn't put into place. I could care less if the current Dev is still in charge or not. He has shown he needs help. But if he's not willing to go down that road to find help, I don't think there's anything else we can do.
I've got tons of other examples of brilliant developers who needed to relinquish partial control over a project in order for the project to succeed... but I've written long enough on this post. You can contact me if you want the other stories.