Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN]🚀 OPTHERIUM🚀 Synergy of Blockchain solutions - page 27. (Read 77258 times)

copper member
Activity: 485
Merit: 2

From 2017 the  BTC Dominance is about 50%. Now  BTC Dominance is 59%. There are 2300 cryptocurrencies on coinmarketcap, but  BTC Dominance is 59%. So you see how much the price of altcoin dependent from the price of Bitcoin.
What you are writing about is just a BTC share in the cryptocurrency market. Since crypto projects do not bring profit, they as a speculative tools depend on the price of Bitcoin. Much can change when there will be many self-sufficient projects.
yes but it is unpredictable, and most projects depend on the bitcoin market, and it is common for many projects including optherium projects, you should do your own analysis if you want to benefit
full member
Activity: 700
Merit: 110
The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.
A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

Many users of cryptocurrencies in favour of anonymity and the lack of state control.

Unfortunately, the anonymity in cryptocurrency becomes less and less. The KYC procedures should be held everywhere - during ICO, IEO and verification on exchanges.

And the problem from the clients's side, we don't know who owns those exchanges. We are required to submit KYC docs before accessing some levels but we are blindly obliged to do that even if we don't know them, if we badly want to use their platform.

No one knows how the exchanges will use the information they received from investors during the KYC procedures.

Cryptocurrency exchanges control money of investors and traders. But who will control the exchanges?
member
Activity: 309
Merit: 10
The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.
A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

Many users of cryptocurrencies in favour of anonymity and the lack of state control.

Unfortunately, the anonymity in cryptocurrency becomes less and less. The KYC procedures should be held everywhere - during ICO, IEO and verification on exchanges.

And the problem from the clients's side, we don't know who owns those exchanges. We are required to submit KYC docs before accessing some levels but we are blindly obliged to do that even if we don't know them, if we badly want to use their platform.

No one knows how the exchanges will use the information they received from investors during the KYC procedures.
full member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 138
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.
A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

Many users of cryptocurrencies in favour of anonymity and the lack of state control.

Unfortunately, the anonymity in cryptocurrency becomes less and less. The KYC procedures should be held everywhere - during ICO, IEO and verification on exchanges.

And the problem from the clients's side, we don't know who owns those exchanges. We are required to submit KYC docs before accessing some levels but we are blindly obliged to do that even if we don't know them, if we badly want to use their platform.
jr. member
Activity: 86
Merit: 1
The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.
A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

Many users of cryptocurrencies in favour of anonymity and the lack of state control.

Unfortunately, the anonymity in cryptocurrency becomes less and less. The KYC procedures should be held everywhere - during ICO, IEO and verification on exchanges.
copper member
Activity: 322
Merit: 0
The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.
A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

Many users of cryptocurrencies in favour of anonymity and the lack of state control.
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.
A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 286
●Social Crypto Trading●
The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.
copper member
Activity: 187
Merit: 0
If in 2019 cryptocurrencies will grow and traders will be able to earn a lot of money on trading in 2020 again, state control will be tightened.
member
Activity: 286
Merit: 10

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.
I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.

KYC is necessary for the state authorities to monitor the incomes of traders, for this person regulation is necessary.
jr. member
Activity: 57
Merit: 1

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.
I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.
The state always wants to control monetary movements, only KYC on the cryptocurrency market looks meaningless at the moment.

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

State authorities wanted traders to pay taxes on all their income they received from the growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
full member
Activity: 700
Merit: 110

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.
I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.
The state always wants to control monetary movements, only KYC on the cryptocurrency market looks meaningless at the moment.

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.
I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.
The state always wants to control monetary movements, only KYC on the cryptocurrency market looks meaningless at the moment.
newbie
Activity: 62
Merit: 0

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.
I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.
It is not surprising how different the attitude to this procedure is for some KYC is inconvenient and ineffective.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 286
●Social Crypto Trading●
Sometimes it is very difficult to stick to the roadmap, as not everything depends on the developers, for example, market conditions.
I think the market conditions are now very favorable.
full member
Activity: 700
Merit: 110
The experience of 2018 and a huge number of scams proved to people that it is necessary to check everything, ICO, IEO, exchanges, mixers before transferring money to them.
copper member
Activity: 145
Merit: 0
[cut out]

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.
Most cryptocurrencies are not anonymous. You can find a user by transactions that connected to a crypto exchange or exchange for material values. Therefore, there are mixers for BTC. In addition, it is difficult to prove the fact of scam.

That is why many people do not use exchanges with KYC procedures and use mixers to mix up transactions. Bitcoin mixers are rather popular.

Now the authorities of various goverment autorities tighten the control over cryptocurrencies and mixers also began to check. Anonymity decreases.

You have to be very cautious if you want to stay anonymous when using Bitcoin and I don't know how safe mixers actually are.

Therefore, it is necessary to work only with the proven exchangers, which you trust and proven mixers.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 251
[cut out]

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.
Most cryptocurrencies are not anonymous. You can find a user by transactions that connected to a crypto exchange or exchange for material values. Therefore, there are mixers for BTC. In addition, it is difficult to prove the fact of scam.

That is why many people do not use exchanges with KYC procedures and use mixers to mix up transactions. Bitcoin mixers are rather popular.

Now the authorities of various goverment autorities tighten the control over cryptocurrencies and mixers also began to check. Anonymity decreases.

You have to be very cautious if you want to stay anonymous when using Bitcoin and I don't know how safe mixers actually are.
jr. member
Activity: 68
Merit: 1
[cut out]

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.
Most cryptocurrencies are not anonymous. You can find a user by transactions that connected to a crypto exchange or exchange for material values. Therefore, there are mixers for BTC. In addition, it is difficult to prove the fact of scam.

That is why many people do not use exchanges with KYC procedures and use mixers to mix up transactions. Bitcoin mixers are rather popular.

Now the authorities of various goverment autorities tighten the control over cryptocurrencies and mixers also began to check. Anonymity decreases.
copper member
Activity: 322
Merit: 0
[cut out]

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.
Most cryptocurrencies are not anonymous. You can find a user by transactions that connected to a crypto exchange or exchange for material values. Therefore, there are mixers for BTC. In addition, it is difficult to prove the fact of scam.

That is why many people do not use exchanges with KYC procedures and use mixers to mix up transactions. Bitcoin mixers are rather popular.
Pages:
Jump to: