http://imgur.com/a/rLe23
What am i doing wrong i followed the fuide to the letter.pls help!!
Topic: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - V3 Hardfork on block 210000 - page 373. (Read 990744 times)
October 12, 2016, 10:28:35 AM
October 12, 2016, 09:39:23 AM
So if I understand that correctly, it is not possible to run this wallet on Linux, and Windows people are struggling with suspicious binaries? Is there a way to get notified when the Linux version is ready so I don't have to follow this thread ? 
Because for me it seems pretty useless right now.
What's the thing about coins/accounts? Is "account" just another token that gets generated from the mining process, like a second coin? Why is it called account?
Because for me it seems pretty useless right now.What's the thing about coins/accounts? Is "account" just another token that gets generated from the mining process, like a second coin? Why is it called account?
One reason why there are multiple accounts given when you hit a block is so that there is a community of people using the coins. You can give away an account to someone you want to so that they can become a user of the currency.
October 12, 2016, 09:20:12 AM
So if I understand that correctly, it is not possible to run this wallet on Linux, and Windows people are struggling with suspicious binaries? Is there a way to get notified when the Linux version is ready so I don't have to follow this thread ? Because for me it seems pretty useless right now.
What's the thing about coins/accounts? Is "account" just another token that gets generated from the mining process, like a second coin? Why is it called account?
Because for me it seems pretty useless right now.What's the thing about coins/accounts? Is "account" just another token that gets generated from the mining process, like a second coin? Why is it called account?
October 12, 2016, 08:59:50 AM
Lol for anyone wondering, the results are calculated based on the shares, so the first few rounds can create numbers way higher (or lower) than the actual card's performance. Put it this way: 'x' shares per minute is 'y' speed. By luck, your miner finds 'x' shares in 10 seconds by chance, and that's the only data the miner has to go off of, so it thinks you are performing at 6y until it gets another data point
It isn't actually measuring the number of hashes done, but rather the expected number of hashes required to produce the number of shares you've produced.Also for people wondering about negative hashrates: this miner is quite the hackjob, and the timing function with a granularity of ms that I built basically only uses the current hour, minute, second, and millisecond to produce a number. So when you wrap around from hour 23 to hour 0, the miner thinks you went back in time, and through the magic of negative time thinks you also did negative work.
Thanks for the explanation. Much appreciated.
October 12, 2016, 08:48:02 AM
Lol for anyone wondering, the results are calculated based on the shares, so the first few rounds can create numbers way higher (or lower) than the actual card's performance. Put it this way: 'x' shares per minute is 'y' speed. By luck, your miner finds 'x' shares in 10 seconds by chance, and that's the only data the miner has to go off of, so it thinks you are performing at 6y until it gets another data point
It isn't actually measuring the number of hashes done, but rather the expected number of hashes required to produce the number of shares you've produced.Also for people wondering about negative hashrates: this miner is quite the hackjob, and the timing function with a granularity of ms that I built basically only uses the current hour, minute, second, and millisecond to produce a number. So when you wrap around from hour 23 to hour 0, the miner thinks you went back in time, and through the magic of negative time thinks you also did negative work.
October 12, 2016, 08:44:12 AM
1 GTX 1070?
Yea just 1 card.
wow! mind to share ur miner n settings?
Just using the V4 miner and whatever default settings are. Just a good card I guess.
Lol. That's just the 1st share. Its always high and settles down after. I've gotten over 2k before.
No this from from a share when I got a block. I likely just got lucky and it found it really quickly.
October 12, 2016, 08:38:42 AM
Seems like there is a new big miner, COINMINER
October 12, 2016, 07:38:23 AM
1 GTX 1070?
Yea just 1 card.
wow! mind to share ur miner n settings?
Just using the V4 miner and whatever default settings are. Just a good card I guess.
Lol. That's just the 1st share. Its always high and settles down after. I've gotten over 2k before.
October 12, 2016, 02:32:51 AM
1 GTX 1070?
Yea just 1 card.
wow! mind to share ur miner n settings?
Just using the V4 miner and whatever default settings are. Just a good card I guess.
October 12, 2016, 02:01:28 AM
1 GTX 1070?
Yea just 1 card.
wow! mind to share ur miner n settings?
October 12, 2016, 01:41:31 AM
1 GTX 1070?
Yea just 1 card.
October 12, 2016, 01:21:21 AM
1 GTX 1070?
October 12, 2016, 01:12:06 AM
So after 8 years the blockchain for this coin will be 913mb? That's not bad.
October 12, 2016, 01:02:53 AM
October 11, 2016, 11:21:52 PM
No pool? I can mine only with wallet?
October 11, 2016, 11:02:21 PM
Too many grammatical errors.
I've not wrote, its a quote. Its not mine errors. And, where you're seeing grammatical errors?
All over, just like your reply.
October 11, 2016, 10:44:20 PM
NO amd miner yet? anyone?
October 11, 2016, 09:16:52 PM
so is it easier to mine with multiple GPUs now or still need to run separate instances/users?
October 11, 2016, 09:14:12 PM
Is it really that hard for an exchange operator to handle this code?
It is currently, because the code doesn't yet support linux, and there is no RPC for coins, so you can't tell the wallet over a network "send x coins to y" or "have you received any coins on address z yet?" which are both features the dev is working on. Give the project some time--once the codebase matures, it'll be a lot easier for exchanges to work with.
on that same note... does the code allow for a pool?
October 11, 2016, 08:56:21 PM
Too many grammatical errors.
I've not wrote, its a quote. Its not mine errors. And, where you're seeing grammatical errors?
Jump to: