Topic: [ANN] Potential Markets de-listed from Bittrex - page 3. (Read 63915 times)

I'm taking it one step further and not using Bittrex at all.

I'm also suggesting everyone here stop using them unless you want the culture of corruption, greed and bullshit to continue to flourish.

You don't need to use Bittrex. You can find 90% of that horseshit on other exchanges anyway. Its just where the pumps happen because there the coin devs work hand in hand with the exchange devs to rip off their customers. The other major exchanges have pretty much put a stop to this practice but Bittrex relishes in it. They must have tiny dicks.

But of course. But in the real world of business, profit is supposed to more-or-less dovetail with adding value for the people who supply the revenue. And if those sources be multiple, it's supposed to include taking up the challenge of performing a reasonable add-value balancing act between the sources.

From what I've read here, Bittrex's balancing act has become somewhat wobbly.

As for PROFIT, you yourself can withhold a teeny bit from them - all on your own - by using Bittrex only if you have to. Preferably, to buy, withdraw and HODL. And, if you can find another source or destination, to not use them at all.

It's not as hard as it sounds if you've got a well-trained "forget-ory."

For everyone asking "Why Bittrex Bill did you do this, this and this?"

The answer is always PROFIT. Whenever it seems like there's some shady shit happening at Bittrex and you can't put your finger quite on it, its because Bittrex is ripping you off just a little bit.

Why bother listing a coin only to turn around and delist the coin weeks later? You can't honestly tell me that it takes huge amounts of processing power or server space to keep a wallet up for coins.

Some coins are small but may have a vibrant or active community that is slowly growing as word of the coin spreads, but by putting this "delist threat" on the coin, I believe you completely deflate/defeat any chance of that coin's support growing. What new investor is going to want to buy in to a coin that has that warning on it, even if the coin is legitimate, with a dedicated core community and an active dev... Why would they? So from the start if they aren't meeting your volume expectations (meaning making you as much profit as possible), they are doomed. Who cares if the coin has potential or could continue to grow. They aren't making you immediate profit so you drop them. It's like Bittrex is fully promoting the PND coins, leeching as much profit as possible, while most traders get burnt, then dumping the coin entirely from the exchange.

It is beyond frustrating, and it seriously makes me wonder if Bittrex has been involved from the beginning with the ever growing number of scam/PND coins that disappear as quickly as they appear on the exchange.

And now you put a 50k satoshi minimum to buy or sell a coin?!? How are smaller coins ever expected to grow? I looked at my portfolio today, and this completely makes it impossible to buy/sell over half the coins in my wallet. Coins that I was easily trading a few days earlier, are now just stuck in limbo. I can't sell out what I have bought, and I can't buy more unless I meet your excessively high minimum order requirements (and I can't increase my coin amount by trading in the gap between buys/sells, which is really damned lame).

Bittrex seems to be making it harder and harder to want to do business with them, why should I bother? Because you add a new coin within days of it launching? Why would I buy it knowing as soon as it isn't making you money you will drop the coin. It's also now pointless, as unless I invest your specified amount, I can't get in to that coin. When I have extra 20k satoshi, I can't buy 100 of some random coin (that I might not buy otherwise) selling at 0.000002. Why not? Because it's not making Bittrex a profit.

I know this is a business and all, but come the hell on, all of those small transaction fees have to add up. Quit promoting PND shitcoins that magically disappear once they are no longer profitable to your exchange, or have fleeced half your users from their coin. Quit adding things like minimum buy and sell amounts that prevent your users from being able to freely trade coins in their wallet.

And most of all quit acting like this is about the user's experience, when we all know this all has to do with one thing. Bittrex increasing Bittrex's profits.

hi i forget withdraw my mycoin in time , now the coin can't be withdraw , so i didn't konw how to deal it , could you please help me withdraw my coin to address NAwzpjHo2ygxsktoRU1FhPTKggvW62Vy8s? [email protected]

Hi..yes I have been informed of KreativeKrypto's new twitter status plus many other details by someone who seems to be looking into what is going on here.They are currently linking their involvement with others coins also among other things but feel free to pm me anything relevant and I can pass it on to the right people.Thanks

BittrexBill,

Looks like MazaCoin was pulled from Bittrex without any notification... maybe an automated thing?  The dev team is expanding and there is new marketing and developments right around the corner that will stimulate interest in the MZC market and increase trading volume.  Maza means money, and the Mazacoin community doesn't want Bittrex to miss out on the opportunities that are coming up!  Admittedly its been stagnant for a while, but the team is working hard to revitalize the community and the community's interest.  Please re-list MZC as soon as possible!

Thanks!

You said it brother. I feel that Bittrex should also be involved in the return of the IPO to the investors, at least if they plan on delisting the coin. At least Bittrex could get in contact with KreativeKrypto, who apparently changed his twitter username to @Altcoin_SunTzu. (https://twitter.com/Altcoin_SunTzu/status/478565372187389952)

Wink wink.

mycoin auuuu where is my MYC

where is mycoin? i have 3000000 mycoin! plz give it to me . [email protected]

No kidding... SolarCoin is over 1 BTC right now and climbing, yet that stupid, threatening annoying message is still there. Pointless.  Why include "by August 1" if you aren't going to remove the warning? *shakes head* Strongly considering just going back to Allcrypt again for all my SLR trades. Volume is better there anyway when there aren't technical issues and there's no virtual gun being held to my head (aka the de-list warning) every time I look at the SLR market there.

it appears to me that the 'inactive market' warning is never updated no matter what the volume is.

Thanks CommanderVenus...the reality is that we should not have to be thinking about taking over this coin.IPO funds were raised for this coins development and to sustain its value.IPO funds cannot be missappropriated for other uses.The coin was represented in the OP for IPO purchasers with goals and plans and sold to buyers under this presentation.Any member of the "team" who has neglected/abandoned their responsibilities would be required by law to return those IPO funds to either the community or new development team.

It is NOT our responsibility as investors to takeover this coin.It is the responsibility of those who presented their plan to either execute it to an acceptable level of progressive sustainability or resign their position and return witheld funds less accountable approved spending to the entity.

This coins status has not been confirmed by the current "team" however their silence has caused considerable levels of distress among investors who have through such a lack of sufficient communication either sold their holdings at a "catastrophic" loss or still hold in negative equity and the responsibility for this situation lies solely with this "team" and their actions/inactions.

Wow, you went right off the deep end. Pretty original stuff, your comments (that you posted in 12 different threads I commented on -- who is the troll again?):


You physically threatened me over a coin that didn't even budge in price, despite your assertions that I was "costing you money." Anything someone says after you threaten them, you had it coming. These people don't care about our squabble btw.

Bittrex just adds coins with high interest by people for volume and delist ones that fall out of favor and have little or no volume. It's what they should do. Why keep dead weight?

 This is really funny coming from a TROLL   

I guess you don't mind it if I post the private messages you've been sending me then and then all can see what a troll you are.

I dont really know of any way to prove to you that its not tampered with, but this is the executable thats in my dcom folder. Hell if i knew anything about programming i would try to do a community takeover of it.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/bdus007am89p6o8/dCom-qt-1.02.exe

Well - if bittrex bill had done that with me - after taking over GraniteCoin a few days ago - he would have seen that Im a legitimate person with a legitimate reason as to why I could not do much at all in the 4 days I was given to 'increase trade volume' ...

Maybe then he would have given me more time? ... I think not! ...

As it stands - no matter what happens in the way of verification - its about MONEY ... if the market is not doing so well - an extension is given - then possibly another ... the coin is taken over by me and NO extension is given - even though the last few days showed that trade volume rose by more than 8 times to around .18btc (and not just .1btc that bittrex bill requested) ...

As much as I think its a great idea to to verify - it wont work with a strict and unforboding bunch of rules like that ...

Besides - Im not the dev - still looking for a good dev for the redevelopment of the coin ... I just took over ownership of GraniteCoin

crysx

+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

If they are too chicken shit to do a face to face then their coin should not be listed!!!!!!!!!!!

heres how to solve the scam problem.

chances are its the same scammers for the most part.

prior to listing a coin conduct a 15 meeting 'face to face' video confering session with the dev.

heck he doesnt even have to use his real name so his 'anonymity' can be maintained.

this means a person gets one chance to defraud the public and then no more.

ask pertinent questions about the coin that only the 'dev' would know.

scams are reduced by 90% immediately and your 'free market' is preserved.