Topic: [ANN] Potential Markets de-listed from Bittrex - page 4. (Read 63915 times)

With a warning notice like that over the trading box I am not surprised there is a "lack of user interest".Well my coins will sit on Bittrex because I don't have a link to a working wallet.I have messaged the devs and got no response so unless a working link to a fully compiled wallet is made available then Bittrex can look after my coins.I bought my coins there from the IPO.

Yes, after we met your volume limit please remove from your hit list.

Right, a lot of people have been insist, looks good.

Seeing that SolarCoin has easily met your challenge of 0.1 average daily volume for a week, how's about you take us off the hit list for longer than two weeks???   

Boycott Bittrex.

They are just contributing to the collapse of the scene and are actively inviting government regulation and the downfall of the entire cryptosphere by willfully failing to police themselves.

Don't be tempted to buy the "Spotlight Coin of the Week." (aka "paid advertisement placing")

Its all pay-for-play "payola": hidden, reciprocal financial arrangements between Bittrex and crapcoin devs to get their coins listed.

Bittrex will be the death of their own selves before too long. Just don't let it be your BTC that disappears when it happens.

Just a heads-up: Quebecoin is waking up, both volume-wise and price-wise:

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-QBC

Kind-of incongruous to see "This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest" on the top of the list page when the 24h vol. has ranged more-or-less between 0.3 and 0.4 BTC for the last couple of days.

The point: Exchanges must devise some regulations for Coin Developers, to protect their primary customers, and people that want to use said coins, from scams.
If they do not, then it won't be long before their customers (read: People holding accounts at exchanges) will realize the coin devs are the main customers and that would seal the fate of the Alt Coin market.

"This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest."

Digital commerce is live on Bittrex

I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said The issue is within this game people don't want there to be regulations and they don't want to be accountable its the guise of(anonymity and the lack of consequences that has been the way things have been operated thus far in all things crypto); that being said they're trying to hide behind new pseudonyms and scam coins. If these exchanges had any care for due diligence they may be able to catch some of the scams but at the same time there is no real way to tell whether a coin is going to be a scam or not because i could make the most legit looking coin and not have a crazy high market cap for it and then just poof vanish. There would need to be some kind of regulations put in place that would hold people accountable and those types of regulations are what will push people away from crypto as it would take the level of anonymity out of it. Now with what you said when those things come about crypto will be more stable and trustworthy but much less anonymous hopefully theres not too much of a mess before the dust settles.

That's so much like the early Internet. True fact: Lord Black - Conrad M. Black - was given the opportunity to buy a venture capitalist sized stake of Netscape. He was actually approached by the Netscape team, perhaps by Marc Andreessen himself. (I can't remember if that last bit was so.) His stake would have bee pre-IPO, so he had right in front of his hands the chance to pre-participate in arguably the hottest NASDAQ IPO of 1995. I think he had his opportunity to buy a stake in 1994.

Conrad Black, then still Mr. Black, turned them down flat.

You know why? For a reason that's both quaint and, in its way, common-sensical. He didn't believe a company that gave away its flagship product would ever turn a profit!

True Trivia, from the early days of the Internet... 

having thought about this a bit more:
It comes down to this. Coin users can be anonymous. Mining / Maintaining of the Block chain can be distributed. 

For a coin to have / gain lasting value, The Developer Team, meaning the people involved, must be known and well known at that. In short, the buck has to have a tangible stopping point rather than a community of some sort.
The teams that wins likely won't be the best, but will most certainly make very fewest mistakes along the way.
One could argue that the best way to look at alt coins is as small companies. That may not go over well for some, but that is the reality I see evolving.

The industry has a huge challenge in front of it. At the root, it is called desirability. You can talk about the features and benefits of one coin vs. the other, but.... hey, it is all open source. Which I take to mean: 'Anything you do another can too' 
Ultimately the difference is the commitment of the people, not the community, behind it. Now this makes the devs start sounding like a management team with a product that is virtually given away for free.
The winner won't be the best Dev team, it will be the Dev team with that surround themselves with the best marketing team.

BTW, I have no idea who it will be
Still like the idea of Cryptsy merging with Bittrex... if anyone is listening...

Best

We have a sophisticated and very capable semantic web representation as a foundation:

https://github.com/DOACC

But ... in the situation you outline, the difficulty is that those who have the problem aren't those who own the solution. It's a societal issue, not a technical one -- but the technology will be asked to play a part at some point, we think.

Cheers

Graham

Boycott Bittrex!

@Bittrex-Bill,
what is up with KTK market:


Any more details, when the trading resumes?

@Bittrex-Bill
Proof of Dev? Seriously, you mean all I need is a cool online name, a few BTC, and I can get my coin listed? No wonder the industry has a trust problem....

Think SRO (Self Regulatory Organization), like a stock exchange. People have faith in the stocks because they are on the exchanges. Exchanges have customers because they do their homework before listing a stock. They are not perfect, but the fact they look into companies first deters the unscrupulous.

As an exchange, It is all about trading volume, and that means trading the hottest coins. But paid listings are worrisome.
It begs the question, Who are your most important customers? Those with coins to list? Or, the people that trust you with their coins (Read: Money)? (No good or bad here, it is just a business model thing. But being a customer I prefer the latter)

Why? Because more and more alts have Market Caps approaching the 10's of millions range or higher. This is Real Money. The Mt.Gox collapse was the wake up call. Hey, Real $$! Then Poloniex suffered a loss at their own fault. Now say what you want, but Poloniex recovered and made everyone whole. Like the exchange or not, they have earned a measure of respect. As a result, there is a growing faith that each exchange is not a fraud, but soon they will demand a measure of protection from / by the exchange from coin fraud.

Now with the recent rash of new scam coins should drive this next evolutionary phase. Due Diligence. Some sort of due diligence is needed and or will soon be demanded by traders and investors. Bryce Weiner (think what you want) he has his coins. Will they work? IDK, but when I buy/invest in one, I have some knowledge of what I am getting into and reason to believe it isn't a scam. That doesn't mean it will work, but it seems like the guy is trying.

A clearly defined 'industry standard' set of criteria needs to be (read: will eventually be) developed. Something much more significant than measuring the shouting on social media. It is like a random pat down for people waiting at the gate of a sporting event. Will it keep bad people out, NO. But the simple tactic is enough to make casual evildoer step out of line.

The future of the industry is straight forward. Exchanges that continue listing anything for anyone will lose respect, volume, and desirability.
Exchanges that are serious have no choice than to start regulating themselves. If they don't, the alt industry will suffer significantly. Bottom line, Integrity and Intent count.  (It is also expensive!)

And that sets up the next stage.
Ultimately fragmented industries consolidate. It simple economics; things like economies of scale and shared resources are powerful at the bottom line.

So, anyone hear of any merger talk lately? Uncomfortable with that idea? It doesn't matter. The mergers are coming. And as fast as this industry evolves... I think the first one happens soon, like in the next 3 - 9 months.

You can make it happen,
You can watch it happen,  or
You can sit there and wonder WTF Just happened....  (Capt. Phil Harris)

My complete guess (based on Geography) >> Bittrex & Cryptsy.
Trex has a bit more volume which should go well with Cryptsy's newly (Licensed) Dollar markets. Every US Dollar Cryptsy adds to their accounts increases their desirability. 
Then the US Alt Trading Powerhouse will be ready to go international (read: MintPal) but that bring a lot of expensive legal requirements.
I see Polo gathering up the best of the rest while the high-school project sites fold due to lack of interest. Being in 3rd place (US) maybe Polo should try and get the ball rolling first.

Exactly! Project is --> http://coomercia.com
New shops coming for Pesetacoin with lots of products like electronics and many many more!

They're going to accept some cryptos as payment method but PTC is the most special one 

Please, don't delete PTC

Something amazing is still to come !!!

You will see on Tuesday. Just wait until Tuesday and check it by yourselves. You won't regret  

As well, great volume and movements on the order book this days!
Shops and news coming... PTC is a coin with a great future.

PLEASE Don't delist PTC